Dustin R Long1, Chloe Bryson-Cahn2, Ronald Pergamit3, Celeste Tavolaro4, Rajiv Saigal5, Jeannie D Chan2,6, John B Lynch2. 1. Division of Critical Care Medicine, Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA. 2. Division of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA. 3. Quality Improvement Program, Harborview Medical Center, Seattle, WA. 4. Department of Orthopaedics and Sports Medicine, Harborview Medical Center, Seattle, WA. 5. Department of Neurosurgery, Harborview Medical Center, Seattle, WA. 6. Department of Pharmacy, Harborview Medical Center, School of Pharmacy, University of Washington, Seattle, WA.
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective hospital-registry study. OBJECTIVE: To characterize the microbial epidemiology of surgical site infection (SSI) in spinal fusion surgery and the burden of resistance to standard surgical antibiotic prophylaxis. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: SSI persists as a leading complication of spinal fusion surgery despite the growth of enhanced recovery programs and improvements in other measures of surgical quality. Improved understandings of SSI microbiology and common mechanisms of failure for current prevention strategies are required to inform the development of novel approaches to prevention relevant to modern surgical practice. METHODS: Spinal fusion cases performed at a single referral center between January 2011 and June 2019 were reviewed and SSI cases meeting National Healthcare Safety Network criteria were identified. Using microbiologic and procedural data from each case, we analyzed the anatomic distribution of pathogens, their differential time to presentation, and correlation with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus screening results. Susceptibility of isolates cultured from each infection were compared with the spectrum of surgical antibiotic prophylaxis administered during the index procedure on a per-case basis. Susceptibility to alternate prophylactic agents was also modeled. RESULTS: Among 6727 cases, 351 infections occurred within 90 days. An anatomic gradient in the microbiology of SSI was observed across the length of the back, transitioning from cutaneous (gram-positive) flora in the cervical spine to enteric (gram-negative/anaerobic) flora in the lumbosacral region (correlation coefficient 0.94, P < 0.001). The majority (57.5%) of infections were resistant to the prophylaxis administered during the procedure. Cephalosporin-resistant gram-negative infection was common at lumbosacral levels and undetected methicillin-resistance was common at cervical levels. CONCLUSION: Individualized infection prevention strategies tailored to operative level are needed in spine surgery. Endogenous wound contamination with enteric flora may be a common mechanism of infection in lumbosacral fusion. Novel approaches to prophylaxis and prevention should be prioritized in this population.Level of Evidence: 3.
STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective hospital-registry study. OBJECTIVE: To characterize the microbial epidemiology of surgical site infection (SSI) in spinal fusion surgery and the burden of resistance to standard surgical antibiotic prophylaxis. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: SSI persists as a leading complication of spinal fusion surgery despite the growth of enhanced recovery programs and improvements in other measures of surgical quality. Improved understandings of SSI microbiology and common mechanisms of failure for current prevention strategies are required to inform the development of novel approaches to prevention relevant to modern surgical practice. METHODS: Spinal fusion cases performed at a single referral center between January 2011 and June 2019 were reviewed and SSI cases meeting National Healthcare Safety Network criteria were identified. Using microbiologic and procedural data from each case, we analyzed the anatomic distribution of pathogens, their differential time to presentation, and correlation with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus screening results. Susceptibility of isolates cultured from each infection were compared with the spectrum of surgical antibiotic prophylaxis administered during the index procedure on a per-case basis. Susceptibility to alternate prophylactic agents was also modeled. RESULTS: Among 6727 cases, 351 infections occurred within 90 days. An anatomic gradient in the microbiology of SSI was observed across the length of the back, transitioning from cutaneous (gram-positive) flora in the cervical spine to enteric (gram-negative/anaerobic) flora in the lumbosacral region (correlation coefficient 0.94, P < 0.001). The majority (57.5%) of infections were resistant to the prophylaxis administered during the procedure. Cephalosporin-resistant gram-negative infection was common at lumbosacral levels and undetected methicillin-resistance was common at cervical levels. CONCLUSION: Individualized infection prevention strategies tailored to operative level are needed in spine surgery. Endogenous wound contamination with enteric flora may be a common mechanism of infection in lumbosacral fusion. Novel approaches to prophylaxis and prevention should be prioritized in this population.Level of Evidence: 3.
Authors: Patrick B Murphy; Sarah Knowles; Sami A Chadi; Kelly Vogt; Muriel Brackstone; Julie Ann Van Koughnett; Michael C Ott Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2019-07 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: Kyle J Popovich; Alla Aroutcheva; Bala Hota; Kathleen G Beavis; Mary K Hayden; Robert A Weinstein Journal: Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol Date: 2014-07-25 Impact factor: 3.254
Authors: Ammar A Javed; Jonathan Teinor; Michael Wright; Ding Ding; Richard A Burkhart; John Hundt; John L Cameron; Martin A Makary; Jin He; Frederic E Eckhauser; Christopher L Wolfgang; Matthew J Weiss Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2019-06 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: Jared M Newman; Marcelo B P Siqueira; Alison K Klika; Robert M Molloy; Wael K Barsoum; Carlos A Higuera Journal: J Arthroplasty Date: 2018-11-17 Impact factor: 4.757
Authors: P D Sponseller; D M LaPorte; M W Hungerford; K Eck; K H Bridwell; L G Lenke Journal: Spine (Phila Pa 1976) Date: 2000-10-01 Impact factor: 3.468
Authors: Amir Abdul-Jabbar; Sigurd H Berven; Serena S Hu; Dean Chou; Praveen V Mummaneni; Steven Takemoto; Christopher Ames; Vedat Deviren; Bobby Tay; Phil Weinstein; Shane Burch; Catherine Liu Journal: Spine (Phila Pa 1976) Date: 2013-10-15 Impact factor: 3.468
Authors: Deana J Hussamy; Alison C Wortman; Donald D McIntire; Kenneth J Leveno; Brian M Casey; Scott W Roberts Journal: Obstet Gynecol Date: 2019-10 Impact factor: 7.661
Authors: Margaret A Olsen; Jennie Mayfield; Carl Lauryssen; Louis B Polish; Marilyn Jones; Joshua Vest; Victoria J Fraser Journal: J Neurosurg Date: 2003-03 Impact factor: 5.115
Authors: Jeffrey Hyun-Kyu Choi; Huy Alex Duong; Sean Williams; Joshua Lee; Michael Oh; Charles Rosen; Yu-Po Lee; Nitin Bhatia Journal: N Am Spine Soc J Date: 2021-12-06