Literature DB >> 23873240

Surgical site infections in spine surgery: identification of microbiologic and surgical characteristics in 239 cases.

Amir Abdul-Jabbar1, Sigurd H Berven, Serena S Hu, Dean Chou, Praveen V Mummaneni, Steven Takemoto, Christopher Ames, Vedat Deviren, Bobby Tay, Phil Weinstein, Shane Burch, Catherine Liu.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: Retrospective analysis.
OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to describe the microbiology of surgical site infection (SSI) in spine surgery and relationship with surgical management characteristics. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: SSI is an important complication of spine surgery that results in significant morbidity. A comprehensive and contemporary understanding of the microbiology of postoperative spine infections is valuable to direct empiric antimicrobial treatment and prophylaxis and other infection prevention strategies.
METHODS: All cases of spinal surgery associated with SSI between July 2005 and November 2010 were identified by the hospital infection control surveillance program using Centers for Disease Control National Health Safety Network criteria. Surgical characteristics and microbiologic data for each case were gathered by direct medical record review.
RESULTS: Of 7529 operative spine cases performed between July 2005 and November 2010, 239 cases of SSI were identified. The most commonly isolated pathogen was Staphylococcus aureus (45.2%), followed by Staphylococcus epidermidis (31.4%). Methicillin-resistant organisms accounted for 34.3% of all SSIs and were more common in revision than in primary surgical procedures (47.4% vs. 28.0%, P = 0.003). Gram-negative organisms were identified in 30.5% of the cases. Spine surgical procedures involving the sacrum were significantly associated with gram-negative organisms (P < 0.001) and polymicrobial infections (P = 0.020). Infections due to gram-negative organisms (P = 0.002) and Enterococcus spp. (P = 0.038) were less common in surgical procedures involving the cervical spine. Cefazolin-resistant gram-negative organisms accounted for 61.6% of all gram-negative infections and 18.8% of all SSIs.
CONCLUSION: Although gram-positive organisms predominated, gram-negative organisms accounted for a sizeable portion of SSI, particularly among lower lumbar and sacral spine surgical procedures. Nearly half of infections in revision surgery were due to a methicillin-resistant organism. These findings may help guide choice of empiric antibiotics while awaiting culture data and antimicrobial prophylaxis strategies in specific spine surgical procedures. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23873240     DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3182a42a68

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  40 in total

1.  Surgical Loupes Worn by Orthopaedic Surgeons Are a Reservoir for Microorganisms.

Authors:  Jack G Graham; Antonia F Chen; Noreen J Hickok; Samantha Knott; Caroline Purtill; Dennis Martin; Pedro K Beredjiklian
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 2.  Complications of surgical intervention in adult lumbar scoliosis.

Authors:  Peter A Christiansen; Michael LaBagnara; Durga R Sure; Christopher I Shaffrey; Justin S Smith
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2016-09

Review 3.  [Management of postoperative wound infections following spine surgery : First results of a multicenter study].

Authors:  M Rickert; P Schleicher; C Fleege; M Arabmotlagh; M Rauschmann; F Geiger; K J Schnake
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 1.087

4.  Variables associated with remission in spinal surgical site infections.

Authors:  Julien Billières; Ilker Uçkay; Antonio Faundez; Jonathan Douissard; Paulina Kuczma; Domizio Suvà; Mathieu Zingg; Pierre Hoffmeyer; Dennis E Dominguez; Guillaume Racloz
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2016-06

5.  Titanium granules pre-treated with hydrogen peroxide inhibit growth of bacteria associated with post-operative infections in spine surgery.

Authors:  Acke Ohlin; Emma Mattsson; Matthias Mörgelin; Julia R Davies; Gunnel Svensäter; Stéphane Corvec; Pentti Tengvall; Kristian Riesbeck
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2018-05-07       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Sonication of removed implants improves microbiological diagnosis of postoperative spinal infections.

Authors:  Justus Bürger; Doruk Akgün; Patrick Strube; Michael Putzier; Matthias Pumberger
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2019-01-17       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  Surgical site infection in spinal surgery: a comparative study between 2-octyl-cyanoacrylate and staples for wound closure.

Authors:  Muneharu Ando; Tetsuya Tamaki; Munehito Yoshida; Shunji Sasaki; Yasushi Toge; Takuji Matsumoto; Kazuhiro Maio; Ryosuke Sakata; Daisuke Fukui; Seiji Kanno; Yukihiro Nakagawa; Hiroshi Yamada
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2014-02-01       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 8.  Imaging-Based Approach to Extradural Infections of the Spine.

Authors:  Jason F Talbott; Vinil N Shah; Alina Uzelac; Jared Narvid; Rebecca A Dumont; Cynthia T Chin; David M Wilson
Journal:  Semin Ultrasound CT MR       Date:  2018-09-26       Impact factor: 1.875

Review 9.  [Infections after reconstructive spinal interventions : How do I deal with them?]

Authors:  Burkhard Lehner; Michael Akbar; Nicholas A Beckmann
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 1.087

10.  Analysis of Postoperative Thoracolumbar Spine Infections in a Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial Using the Centers for Disease Control Surgical Site Infection Criteria.

Authors:  Shearwood McClelland; Richelle C Takemoto; Baron S Lonner; Tate M Andres; Justin J Park; Pedro A Ricart-Hoffiz; John A Bendo; Jeffrey A Goldstein; Jeffrey M Spivak; Thomas J Errico
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2016-04-21
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.