Literature DB >> 30545653

Use of Closed Incisional Negative Pressure Wound Therapy After Revision Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasty in Patients at High Risk for Infection: A Prospective, Randomized Clinical Trial.

Jared M Newman1, Marcelo B P Siqueira2, Alison K Klika2, Robert M Molloy2, Wael K Barsoum3, Carlos A Higuera3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Continuous wound drainage after arthroplasty can lead to the development of a periprosthetic joint infection. Closed incisional negative pressure wound therapy (ciNPWT) has been reported to help alleviate drainage and other wound complications. The purpose of this prospective randomized controlled trial is to compare the use of ciNPWT with our standard of care dressing in revision arthroplasty patients who were at high risk to develop wound complications.
METHODS: A total of 160 patients undergoing elective revision arthroplasty were prospectively randomized to receive either ciNPWT or a silver-impregnated occlusive dressing after surgery in a single institution. Patients were included if they had at least 1 risk factor for developing wound complication(s): wound complication, readmission, and reoperation rates were collected at 2, 4, and 12 weeks postoperatively.
RESULTS: The postoperative wound complication rate was significantly higher in the control cohort compared to the ciNPWT cohort (19 [23.8%] vs 8 [10.1%], P = .022). There was no significant difference between the control and ciNPWT cohorts in terms of readmissions (19 [23.8%] vs 16 [20.3%], P = .595). Reoperation rate was higher in controls compared to ciNPWT patients (10 [12.5%] vs 2 [2.5%], P = .017). After adjusting for the history of a prior periprosthetic joint infection and inflammatory arthritis, the ciNPWT cohort had a significantly decreased wound complication rate (odds ratio 0.28, 95% confidence interval 0.11-0.68).
CONCLUSION: ciNPWT may decrease the rate of postoperative wound complications in patients who are at an increased risk of such wound issues after revision arthroplasty.
Copyright © 2019 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  arthroplasty; complications; infection; negative pressure wound therapy; revision; wound healing

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30545653     DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2018.11.017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Arthroplasty        ISSN: 0883-5403            Impact factor:   4.757


  19 in total

1.  Are high-risk patient and revision arthroplasty effective indications for closed-incisional negative-pressure wound therapy after total hip or knee arthroplasty? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jun-Ho Kim; Dae-Hee Lee
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2020-05-13       Impact factor: 3.315

2.  Comparison of silver-embedded occlusive dressings and negative pressure wound therapy following total joint arthroplasty in high BMI patients: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Katherine A Lygrisse; Greg Teo; Vivek Singh; Nishanth Muthusamy; Ran Schwarzkopf; Long William
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2022-07-02       Impact factor: 2.928

3.  Patients Who Undergo Early Aseptic Revision TKA Within 90 Days of Surgery Have a High Risk of Re-revision and Infection at 2 Years: A Large-database Study.

Authors:  Tony S Shen; Alex Gu; Patawut Bovonratwet; Nathaniel T Ondeck; Peter K Sculco; Edwin P Su
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2022-03-01       Impact factor: 4.755

4.  Inflammatory prognostic scoring systems are risk factors for surgical site infection following wide local excision of soft tissue sarcoma.

Authors:  Omer M Farhan-Alanie; Taegyeong Tina Ha; James Doonan; Ashish Mahendra; Sanjay Gupta
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2021-10-09

Review 5.  Negative pressure wound therapy for surgical wounds healing by primary closure.

Authors:  Gill Norman; Chunhu Shi; En Lin Goh; Elizabeth Ma Murphy; Adam Reid; Laura Chiverton; Monica Stankiewicz; Jo C Dumville
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2022-04-26

6.  What's New in Musculoskeletal Infection.

Authors:  Thomas K Fehring; Keith A Fehring; Angela Hewlett; Carlos A Higuera; Jesse E Otero; Aaron J Tande
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2020-07-15       Impact factor: 6.558

7.  Negative pressure wound therapy for surgical wounds healing by primary closure.

Authors:  Gill Norman; En Lin Goh; Jo C Dumville; Chunhu Shi; Zhenmi Liu; Laura Chiverton; Monica Stankiewicz; Adam Reid
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2020-05-01

8.  The use of negative-pressure wound therapy after total knee arthroplasty is effective for reducing complications and the need for reintervention.

Authors:  Camilo Partezani Helito; Marcel Faraco Sobrado; Pedro Nogueira Giglio; Marcelo Batista Bonadio; José Ricardo Pécora; Marco Kawamura Demange; Riccardo Gomes Gobbi
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2020-07-25       Impact factor: 2.362

9.  Negative pressure wound therapy for surgical wounds healing by primary closure.

Authors:  Gill Norman; En Lin Goh; Jo C Dumville; Chunhu Shi; Zhenmi Liu; Laura Chiverton; Monica Stankiewicz; Adam Reid
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2020-06-15

10.  2021 Young Investigator Award Winner: Anatomic Gradients in the Microbiology of Spinal Fusion Surgical Site Infection and Resistance to Surgical Antimicrobial Prophylaxis.

Authors:  Dustin R Long; Chloe Bryson-Cahn; Ronald Pergamit; Celeste Tavolaro; Rajiv Saigal; Jeannie D Chan; John B Lynch
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2021-02-01       Impact factor: 3.468

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.