Literature DB >> 24183638

Executive summary of the 2013 International Society for Clinical Densitometry Position Development Conference on bone densitometry.

John T Schousboe1, John A Shepherd, John P Bilezikian, Sanford Baim.   

Abstract

The International Society for Clinical Densitometry (ISCD) convenes a Position Development Conference (PDC) every 2-3 yr to make recommendations for guidelines and standards in the field of musculoskeletal measurement and assessment. The recommendations pertain to clinically relevant issues regarding the acquisition, quality control, interpretation, and reporting of various aspects of musculoskeletal health metrics. Topics for consideration are developed by the ISCD Board of Directors and the Scientific Advisory Committee. For the 2013 PDC, body composition analysis was a central topic area for the first time and considered timely because of the scientific advances in measurement of fat and lean body mass by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). Indications for DXA and vertebral fracture assessment and use of reference data to calculate bone mineral density T-scores were also updated. Task Forces for each of these areas were assigned questions of relevance to a clinical audience and asked to conduct comprehensive literature reviews. Reports with proposed Position Statements were then presented to an international panel of experts. The Expert Panel included representatives of the International Osteoporosis Foundation, the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research, the National Osteoporosis Foundation, Osteoporosis Canada, and the North American Menopause Society. The PDC was held in Tampa, FL, contemporaneously with the Annual Meeting of the ISCD, March 21 through March 23, 2013. This report describes the methodology of the 2013 ISCD PDC and summarizes the results of the 2013 ISCD PDC for vertebral fracture assessment/DXA and National Health and Nutrition Survey (NHANES) Reference Database Task Forces. A separate article in this issue will summarize the results of the Body Composition Analysis Task Forces.
Copyright © 2013. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry; Official Positions; guidelines; standards; vertebral fracture

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24183638     DOI: 10.1016/j.jocd.2013.08.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Densitom        ISSN: 1094-6950            Impact factor:   2.617


  157 in total

1.  Development of an Automated Bone Mineral Density Software Application: Facilitation Radiologic Reporting and Improvement of Accuracy.

Authors:  I-Ta Tsai; Meng-Yuan Tsai; Ming-Ting Wu; Clement Kuen-Huang Chen
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 4.056

2.  Incidence and Predictors of Repeat Bone Mineral Densitometry: A Longitudinal Cohort Study.

Authors:  Emily C White VanGompel; Peter Franks; John A Robbins; Joshua J Fenton
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2017-06-20       Impact factor: 5.128

3.  Reduced bone mass and preserved marrow adipose tissue in patients with inflammatory bowel diseases in long-term remission.

Authors:  C M Bastos; I M Araújo; M H Nogueira-Barbosa; C E G Salmon; F J A de Paula; L E A Troncon
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2017-04-12       Impact factor: 4.507

4.  Short-term precision assessment of trabecular bone score and bone mineral density using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry with different scan modes: an in vivo study.

Authors:  Michele Bandirali; Alessandro Poloni; Luca Maria Sconfienza; Carmelo Messina; Giacomo Davide Edoardo Papini; Marcello Petrini; Fabio Massimo Ulivieri; Giovanni Di Leo; Francesco Sardanelli
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2015-02-08       Impact factor: 5.315

5.  Validity of height loss as a predictor for prevalent vertebral fractures, low bone mineral density, and vitamin D deficiency.

Authors:  A L Mikula; S J Hetzel; N Binkley; P A Anderson
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2017-02-03       Impact factor: 4.507

6.  FRAX calculated without BMD does not correctly identify Caucasian men with densitometric evidence of osteoporosis.

Authors:  R C Hamdy; E Seier; K Whalen; W A Clark; K Hicks; T B Piggee
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2018-02-03       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 7.  Quantitative imaging techniques for the assessment of osteoporosis and sarcopenia.

Authors:  Sara Guerri; Daniele Mercatelli; Maria Pilar Aparisi Gómez; Alessandro Napoli; Giuseppe Battista; Giuseppe Guglielmi; Alberto Bazzocchi
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2018-02

8.  High bone marrow fat in patients with Cushing's syndrome and vertebral fractures.

Authors:  Francesco Ferraù; Salvatore Giovinazzo; Erika Messina; Agostino Tessitore; Sergio Vinci; Gherardo Mazziotti; Andrea Lania; Francesca Granata; Salvatore Cannavò
Journal:  Endocrine       Date:  2019-08-02       Impact factor: 3.633

9.  Trabecular bone scores and lumbar spine bone mineral density of US adults: comparison of relationships with demographic and body size variables.

Authors:  A C Looker; N Sarafrazi Isfahani; B Fan; J A Shepherd
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2016-03-07       Impact factor: 4.507

10.  The added value of trabecular bone score to FRAX® to predict major osteoporotic fractures for clinical use in Chinese older people: the Mr. OS and Ms. OS cohort study in Hong Kong.

Authors:  Y Su; J Leung; D Hans; O Lamy; T Kwok
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2016-08-26       Impact factor: 4.507

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.