Literature DB >> 26077641

Characteristics and behaviour of screen-detected ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast: comparison with symptomatic patients.

Valerie Cui Yun Koh1, Jeffrey Chun Tatt Lim, Aye Aye Thike, Poh Yian Cheok, Minn Minn Myint Thu, Veronique Kiak Mien Tan, Benita Kiat Tee Tan, Kong Wee Ong, Gay Hui Ho, Wai Jin Tan, Yongcheng Tan, Ahmed Syed Salahuddin, Inny Busmanis, Angela Pek Yoon Chong, Jabed Iqbal, Shyamala Thilagaratnam, Jill Su Lin Wong, Puay Hoon Tan.   

Abstract

Breast cancer is the most common malignancy in Singapore women. Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) is the putative, non-obligate precursor of the majority of invasive breast cancers. The efficacy of the Singapore breast-screening pilot project in detecting early stage breast cancer led to the launch of a national breast-screening programme, BreastScreen Singapore (BSS), in January 2002. In this study, we compared clinicopathological and immunohistochemical characteristics, as well as clinical outcomes, between screen-detected and symptomatic DCIS. The study cohort comprised 1202 cases of DCIS diagnosed at Singapore General Hospital from 1994 to 2010. Comparison of clinicopathological parameters, immunohistochemical results of ER, PR, HER2, CK14, EGFR, and 34βE12, and clinical outcomes was carried out between the 2 groups. Amongst 1202 cases, 610 (50.7%) were screen-detected and 592 (49.3%) were symptomatic DCIS. Screen-detected cases were smaller in size (P < 0.001), of lower nuclear grade (P = 0.004), and more frequently expressed ER (P < 0.001). Luminal A phenotype was more frequently observed in screen-detected DCIS, while triple-negative and HER2 phenotypes were more common in symptomatic DCIS (P < 0.001). The basal-like phenotype was also more frequent in symptomatic DCIS (P = 0.041). Mean and median follow-up was 99.7 and 97.8 months, respectively, with a maximum follow-up of 246.0 months. More symptomatic patients developed invasive recurrences compared to screen-detected patients (P = 0.001). A trend for better disease-free survival was observed in screen-detected patients (P = 0.076). Patients who were screen-detected experienced better overall survival than those with symptomatic DCIS (P = 0.007). Our data indicate a more favourable outcome of screen-detected DCIS patients confirming the role of BSS in early identification of this curable disease.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26077641     DOI: 10.1007/s10549-015-3472-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat        ISSN: 0167-6806            Impact factor:   4.872


  6 in total

1.  Triple-negative and HER2 positive ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast: characteristics, behavior, and biomarker profile.

Authors:  Satoshi Takahashi; Aye Aye Thike; Valerie Cui Yun Koh; Hironobu Sasano; Puay Hoon Tan
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2018-07-23       Impact factor: 4.064

2.  Prognostic Score-Based Stratification Analysis Reveals Universal Benefits of Radiotherapy on Lowering the Risk of Ipsilateral Breast Event for Ductal Carcinoma In Situ Patients with Different Risk Levels.

Authors:  Libo Yang; Dongli Lu; Yutian Lai; Mengjia Shen; Qiuxiao Yu; Ting Lei; Tianjie Pu; Hong Bu
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2020-08-13       Impact factor: 5.344

3.  Breast ductal Carcinoma in situ associated with microinvasion induces immunological response and predicts ipsilateral invasive recurrence.

Authors:  Xiao-Yang Chen; Aye Aye Thike; Valerie Cui Yun Koh; Nur Diyana Md Nasir; Boon Huat Bay; Puay Hoon Tan
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2020-11-02       Impact factor: 4.064

4.  The method of detection of ductal carcinoma in situ has no therapeutic implications: results of a population-based cohort study.

Authors:  Lotte E Elshof; Michael Schaapveld; Emiel J Rutgers; Marjanka K Schmidt; Linda de Munck; Flora E van Leeuwen; Jelle Wesseling
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2017-03-09       Impact factor: 6.466

5.  Comparison of patients with small (≤2 cm) breast cancer according to adherence to breast screening program.

Authors:  Jung Min Park; Soong Jun Bae; Changik Yoon; Hye Sun Lee; Hak Woo Lee; Sung Gwe Ahn; Seung Ah Lee; Joon Jeong
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-11-02       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Differences in breast cancer-risk factors between screen-detected and non-screen-detected cases (MCC-Spain study).

Authors:  Marta Hernández-García; Ana Molina-Barceló; Mercedes Vanaclocha-Espi; Óscar Zurriaga; Beatriz Pérez-Gómez; Nuria Aragonés; Pilar Amiano; Jone M Altzibar; Gemma Castaño-Vinyals; María Sala; María Ederra; Vicente Martín; Inés Gómez-Acebo; Carmen Vidal; Adonina Tardón; Rafael Marcos-Gragera; Marina Pollán; Manolis Kogevinas; Dolores Salas
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2021-11-24       Impact factor: 2.506

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.