Literature DB >> 32787708

The Fast-Mapping Abilities of Adults With Developmental Language Disorder.

Karla K McGregor1,2, Nichole Eden1, Timothy Arbisi-Kelm1, Jacob Oleson2.   

Abstract

Purpose The aim of the study was to determine the integrity of fast mapping among adults with developmental language disorder (DLD). Method Forty-eight adults with DLD or typical language development (TD) were presented with 24 novel words and photos of their unfamiliar referents from the semantic categories of mammal, bird, fruit, or insect in two conditions. In the fast-mapping condition, 12 of the 24 unfamiliar referents were presented, one at a time alongside a familiar referent (e.g., a dog) and a question (e.g., Is the tail of the torato up?). In the explicit-encoding condition, the other 12 unfamiliar referents were presented alone, one at a time, with a label (e.g., This is a spimer). Immediately after exposure (T1) and again after a 1-day interval (T2), memory for the word-to-exemplar link was measured with a three-alternative forced-choice test, requiring the participant to match a spoken word to one of three pictured referents from the training set. At T2, memory for semantic category information was measured with a four-alternative forced-choice test, requiring the participant to match a spoken word to one of four prototypical silhouettes representing each of the semantic categories. Results Performance on word-to-exemplar link recognition was stronger for words learned in the explicit-encoding than the fast-mapping condition and stronger for the TD group than the DLD group. Time was not a significant factor as both groups maintained posttraining levels of performance after a 1-day retention interval. Performance on semantic category recognition was stronger for words learned in the explicit-encoding than the fast-mapping condition and stronger for the TD group than the DLD group. The lower category recognition performance of the DLD group was related to their lower nonverbal IQ scores. Conclusion Contexts that allow for explicit encoding yield better learning of word-to-referent links than contexts that allow for fast mapping in both stronger and weaker learners. Adults with DLD have difficulty learning the link between words and referents, whether trained via fast mapping or explicit encoding and whether tested with exemplar or category referents. Retention is a relative strength for adults with DLD. Supplemental Material https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.12765551.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32787708      PMCID: PMC7890218          DOI: 10.1044/2020_JSLHR-19-00418

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res        ISSN: 1092-4388            Impact factor:   2.297


  37 in total

1.  Differences in the performance of children with specific language impairment and their typically developing peers on nonverbal cognitive tests: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Erica Gallinat; Tammie J Spaulding
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 2.297

2.  The mutual exclusivity bias in children's word learning.

Authors:  W E Merriman; L L Bowman
Journal:  Monogr Soc Res Child Dev       Date:  1989

3.  Lexical decay during online sentence processing in adults with specific language impairment.

Authors:  Gerard H Poll; Holly S Watkins; Carol A Miller
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 2.297

4.  Prevalence of psychiatric disorders in children with speech and language disorders.

Authors:  J H Beitchman; R Nair; M Clegg; B Ferguson; P G Patel
Journal:  J Am Acad Child Psychiatry       Date:  1986-07

5.  Individual Differences in Distributional Learning for Speech: What's Ideal for Ideal Observers?

Authors:  Rachel M Theodore; Nicholas R Monto; Stephen Graham
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2019-12-16       Impact factor: 2.297

6.  Identification of adults with developmental language impairments.

Authors:  Lesley J Fidler; Elena Plante; Rebecca Vance
Journal:  Am J Speech Lang Pathol       Date:  2010-08-25       Impact factor: 2.408

7.  Retrieval-Based Word Learning in Young Typically Developing Children and Children With Development Language Disorder II: A Comparison of Retrieval Schedules.

Authors:  Eileen Haebig; Laurence B Leonard; Patricia Deevy; Jeffrey Karpicke; Sharon L Christ; Evan Usler; Justin B Kueser; Sofía Souto; Windi Krok; Christine Weber
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2019-04-15       Impact factor: 2.297

8.  Procedural and declarative memory brain systems in developmental language disorder (DLD).

Authors:  Joanna C Lee; Peggy C Nopoulos; J Bruce Tomblin
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2020-03-30       Impact factor: 2.381

9.  Encoding Deficits Impede Word Learning and Memory in Adults With Developmental Language Disorders.

Authors:  Karla K McGregor; Katherine Gordon; Nichole Eden; Tim Arbisi-Kelm; Jacob Oleson
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2017-10-17       Impact factor: 2.297

10.  The declarative system in children with specific language impairment: a comparison of meaningful and meaningless auditory-visual paired associate learning.

Authors:  Dorothy V M Bishop; Hsinjen Julie Hsu
Journal:  BMC Psychol       Date:  2015-02-19
View more
  1 in total

1.  What Children with Developmental Language Disorder Teach Us About Cross-Situational Word Learning.

Authors:  Karla K McGregor; Erin Smolak; Michelle Jones; Jacob Oleson; Nichole Eden; Timothy Arbisi-Kelm; Ronald Pomper
Journal:  Cogn Sci       Date:  2022-02
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.