Samantha J O Hardman1, Derren J Heyes1, Igor V Sazanovich2, Nigel S Scrutton1. 1. Manchester Institute of Biotechnology and Department of Chemistry, School of Natural Sciences, Faculty of Science and Engineering, The University of Manchester, 131 Princess Street, Manchester M1 7DN, U.K. 2. Central Laser Facility, Research Complex at Harwell, Science and Technology Facilities Council, Harwell Oxford, Didcot OX11 0QX, United Kingdom.
Abstract
Due to the recent advances in X-ray free electron laser techniques, bilin-containing cyanobacteriochrome photoreceptors have become prime targets for the ever-expanding field of time-resolved structural biology. However, to facilitate these challenging studies, it is essential that the time scales of any structural changes during the photocycles of cyanobacteriochromes be established. Here, we have used visible and infrared transient absorption spectroscopy to probe the photocycle of a model cyanobacteriochrome system, TePixJ. The kinetics span multiple orders of magnitude from picoseconds to seconds. Localized changes in the bilin binding pocket occur in picoseconds to nanoseconds, followed by more large-scale changes in protein structure, including formation and breakage of a second thioether linkage, in microseconds to milliseconds. The characterization of the entire photocycle will provide a vital frame of reference for future time-resolved structural studies of this model photoreceptor.
Due to the recent advances in X-ray free electron laser techniques, bilin-containing cyanobacteriochrome photoreceptors have become prime targets for the ever-expanding field of time-resolved structural biology. However, to facilitate these challenging studies, it is essential that the time scales of any structural changes during the photocycles of cyanobacteriochromes be established. Here, we have used visible and infrared transient absorption spectroscopy to probe the photocycle of a model cyanobacteriochrome system, TePixJ. The kinetics span multiple orders of magnitude from picoseconds to seconds. Localized changes in the bilin binding pocket occur in picoseconds to nanoseconds, followed by more large-scale changes in protein structure, including formation and breakage of a second thioether linkage, in microseconds to milliseconds. The characterization of the entire photocycle will provide a vital frame of reference for future time-resolved structural studies of this model photoreceptor.
Time-resolved structural studies
of biological systems are becoming ever more common and accessible.[1] Advances in synchrotrons and X-ray free electron
lasers (XFELs) have increased the sensitivity and time resolution
of time-resolved crystallography and X-ray scattering measurements.
This allows direct visualization of atomic bond formation and breakage,
and protein structural changes, during biological reactions.[2] In time-resolved measurements, reactions are
often triggered by a short laser pulse, and as a result, photoactivated
proteins have become popular targets for these studies.[3−6] The cyanobacteriochrome (CBCR) photoreceptors make up a highly promising
family of light-activated proteins for this purpose because of their
sensitivity to a range of wavelengths that span the ultraviolet (UV)–visible
spectrum and their, comparatively, small size. CBCRs contain a linear
bilin chromophore linked to the protein by one or more Cys residues
located within a light-sensing domain, known as a GAF domain. It is
well documented that the light signaling of CBCRs occurs by photoconversion
between two forms of the protein.[7] This
photoconversion is initiated by light, which causes an ultrafast (picoseconds)
photoisomerization across the C15–C16 bond of the bilin molecule
(Figure A,B). This,
in turn, triggers other localized motions, such as movements of nearby
side chains (nanoseconds to microseconds), which finally induce large-scale
protein conformational changes (milliseconds to seconds) and, ultimately,
the biological signaling response. It has been found that the wavelength
sensitivity of CBCRs can be affected by the exact conformation of
each of the rings within the bilin (e.g., the so-called trapped-twist
geometry), as well as factors such as protonation and hydration,[8] and even the orientation of the D ring of the
bilin cofactor, which changes the conjugation of the ring system.[9] On the basis of these recent advances in our
understanding of CBCR action, it has now even been suggested that
the prediction of photocycles of some CBCRs from sequence alone is
possible,[10] and a single CBCR has been
rationally redesigned to produce new photoconvertible variants.[11]
Figure 1
Structures of PVB in (A) Pb and (B) Pg, including labels
of significant
C atoms, ring labels, and locations of bound Cys residues in the TePixJ
CBCR. Atom coloring: blue for N, red for O, and dark blue (Pb) or
green (Pg) for C (H atoms are not shown). (C) Superposition of Pb
(PDB entry 2M7U) and Pg (PDB entry 2M7V) protein structures. (D) Superposition of the chromophore region
of structures shown in panel C. (E) Visible absorbance spectra of
the Pb and Pg states. (F) Calculated spectral contributions of Pb,
Pg, and nonreactive components derived from spectra shown in panel
E (shown in more detail in Figure S1).
Structures of PVB in (A) Pb and (B) Pg, including labels
of significant
C atoms, ring labels, and locations of bound Cys residues in the TePixJ
CBCR. Atom coloring: blue for N, red for O, and dark blue (Pb) or
green (Pg) for C (H atoms are not shown). (C) Superposition of Pb
(PDB entry 2M7U) and Pg (PDB entry 2M7V) protein structures. (D) Superposition of the chromophore region
of structures shown in panel C. (E) Visible absorbance spectra of
the Pb and Pg states. (F) Calculated spectral contributions of Pb,
Pg, and nonreactive components derived from spectra shown in panel
E (shown in more detail in Figure S1).The thermophilic cyanobacterium Thermosynechococcus
elongatus BP-1 contains a number of putative CBCR photoreceptors,
one of which,
TePixJ, has become a model system for structural studies of this class
of protein. TePixJ contains a so-called DXCF motif in which a second
Cys residue can link to C10 of the bilin,[12,13] shortening the wavelength of absorbance and thus extending the wavelength
range of the phycoviolobilin (PVB) chromophore (Figure A,B). As a result, TePixJ converts between
blue and green light-absorbing states (known as Pb and Pg states,
respectively). The Pb state is the dark-adapted state in which the
bilin is in a 15Z conformation, with two Cys linkages;
the Pg state contains the bilin in a 15E conformation
with only one Cys linkage. The structures of TePixJ in the Pb and
Pg states have been determined using X-ray crystallography[14,15] and solution phase nuclear magnetic resonance.[16] Together, these studies suggest that photoconversion from
the Pb to Pg state involves an initial photoisomerization of the bilin
cofactor (15Z to 15E), which is
then proposed to trigger a chain of structural changes in the protein.
These include the breakage of the C10–Cys-494 thioether bond,
opposite rotations of the A and D pyrrole rings, sliding of the bilin
in the binding pocket, the appearance of an extended region of disorder
that includes Cys-494, and finally changes in the protein backbone
(Figure C,D).[16] Although direct detection of these processes
is still lacking, it has recently been shown that photoactive crystals
can now be produced, paving the way for future time-resolved crystallography
studies.[17] However, to facilitate such
measurements, it is important to understand the entire photoconversion
kinetics in detail to ascertain the time scales of any structural
changes in the protein. Here, we have performed, for the first time,
time-resolved spectroscopy in the visible and infrared regions on
TePixJ to study the kinetics of intermediate formation after photoexcitation.
Consequently, we report the photoreactions of both Pb and Pg forms
of the protein, which will provide a crucial frame of reference for
future time-resolved structural studies.TePixJ converts between
states with major visible absorption features
at 417 and 442 nm (Pb) and 534 nm (Pg) (Figure E,F and Figure S1), in agreement with previous studies.[12,18] In both states,
in addition to the spectral features that change upon illumination,
there is some contribution from a nonreactive species that absorbs
at 385 and 570 nm (Figure F and Figure S1). Previous work
on a related CBCR, Tlr1999, has identified a similar nonreactive component
as a configuration of PVB that is trapped in the 15Z isomer (as in the Pb state) with a nonligated Cys, perhaps due to
oxidation of the Cys residue.[19] However,
it is also known that TePixJ can contain a mixture of PVB and the
phycocyanobilin (PCB) from which it is autocatalytically isomerized,[12] in which case the nonreactive component is likely
to be a PCB configuration with limited photoreactivity,[20] and only one Cys linkage.[11] Whatever its identity, this nonreactive species will still
absorb light but does not appear to photoconvert between states, and
photoexcitation does not give rise to any long-lived states (Figure S2); therefore, it is not likely that
it will initiate any changes in protein structure. It has been found
that the Pg state of TePixJ shows little to no thermal reversion to
the Pb state over several months, so that should not affect any kinetics
measured here.[21]Initially, we studied
the kinetics of the forward photoconversion
of the Pb (15Z) state to the Pg (15E) state of TePixJ. After photoexcitation of the Pb state, changes
in absorption in the visible region were recorded covering time scales
from picoseconds to seconds (Figure A–C and Figures S3–S5) and in the infrared region covering time scales from 1 ps to 400
μs (Figure D
and Figure S6). In the visible region,
data up to 3.6 μs were collected on samples in both H2O and D2O buffer systems to provide a more direct comparison
with the infrared data set (collected in D2O buffer due
to strong infrared absorption of H2O). Data were analyzed
globally with a model of sequentially evolving components to yield
evolution-associated difference spectra (EADS) and lifetimes of conversion
between the EADS (Figure ). Data in the visible region display a strong bleach feature
of the Pb state (417 and 442 nm) and transient peaks resulting from
photoexcited states and subsequent reaction intermediates and products.
In the infrared region, a previous resonance Raman study of TePixJ
has assigned a feature at ∼1570 cm–1 as a
N–H in-plane bending mode, strong bands above 1600 cm–1 as C=C stretches of ring D, and A–B and C–D
methane bridges.[21]
Figure 2
Time-resolved changes
after photoexcitation of the Pb state. Visible
data sets in H2O-based buffer (A) from 0.47 ps to 3.9 μs,
(B) from 0.6 to 450 μs, and (C) from 0.9 to 994 ms and (D) an
infrared data set from 1 ps to 400 μs. Evolution-associated
difference spectra (EADS) normalized to the most intense feature,
and corresponding lifetimes, from global analysis of (E–G)
visible data sets and (H) the infrared data set, shown in more detail
in Figures S7–S10. For samples in
D2O, the visible data set extends to 3.9 μs and the
infrared data set to 400 μs, so lifetimes for steps beyond these
time scales were not determined (n.d.). The blank regions in panels
A and E centered at 420 nm are due to an excess of scattered pump
light on these time scales, which overwhelms any changes in absorption
from the sample.
Time-resolved changes
after photoexcitation of the Pb state. Visible
data sets in H2O-based buffer (A) from 0.47 ps to 3.9 μs,
(B) from 0.6 to 450 μs, and (C) from 0.9 to 994 ms and (D) an
infrared data set from 1 ps to 400 μs. Evolution-associated
difference spectra (EADS) normalized to the most intense feature,
and corresponding lifetimes, from global analysis of (E–G)
visible data sets and (H) the infrared data set, shown in more detail
in Figures S7–S10. For samples in
D2O, the visible data set extends to 3.9 μs and the
infrared data set to 400 μs, so lifetimes for steps beyond these
time scales were not determined (n.d.). The blank regions in panels
A and E centered at 420 nm are due to an excess of scattered pump
light on these time scales, which overwhelms any changes in absorption
from the sample.On the basis of these
data, it appears that there are a number
of distinct steps during the photoconversion of the Pb state to the
Pg state. The first transition from EADS1 to EADS2 in the infrared
region has a lifetime of 11.9 ps, and in addition to spectral contributions
from excited state relaxation processes, a new large positive feature
appears at 1654 cm–1 and a smaller positive feature
appears on the high-frequency side of the major ground state bleach
causing an apparent shift in this feature (Figure H). This transition is therefore likely to
correspond to the 15Z to 15E photoisomerization.
However, it appears that there is a lack of any definite absorption
features in the visible region associated with the photoisomerization
step. There are no positive features in the visible difference spectra
between 1 ns and 1 ms, and the only apparent feature is a bleach of
the Pb absorption feature (442 nm). There are two possible explanations
for this phenomenon. First, it may be that there is only a small shift
in absorbance upon isomerization, and that the new state has an extinction
coefficient that is much lower than that of the starting Pb state,
as in the case of related DXCF CBCR Tlr1999 where photoisomerization
shifts the absorbance maximum by only 2 nm.[19] The second option is that the absorption of the isomerized state
may have shifted out of the monitored range, to wavelengths shorter
than 400 nm, as in the case of CBCR Tlr0924, where isomerization shifts
the Pb peak absorbance from 450 to 390 nm.[22] This second hypothesis is supported by the changes in spectral shape
on the short-wavelength side of the bleach during subsequent transitions.
Because of the apparent lack of photoisomerized state absorbance in
the visible region, the observed EADS1 to EADS2 transition (Figure E) is likely to primarily
result from relaxation of the photoexcited state, and thus, the transition
has very similar lifetimes in H2O and D2O (6.4
and 5.9 ps, respectively). The shapes of the EADS for the measurements
in the D2O and H2O buffer systems are virtually
identical (Figure S7), implying that the
same chemistry occurs in both cases.In the visible and infrared
data sets, the EADS2 to EADS3 transition
(Figure E,H), with
a lifetime of several hundred picoseconds, corresponds to a loss of
signal intensity but no distinct spectral changes and is therefore
likely to correspond to excited state relaxation. This is followed
by a number of subtle spectral changes that occur on the microsecond
time scale, suggesting that these steps have a minimal effect on the
electronic properties of the bilin cofactor (Figure E,F). The visible data can be fitted with
two components (8.0 and 199 μs lifetimes), whereas the infrared
data could be fitted to only one (81.1 μs), which is likely
a convolution of the two steps observed in the visible data that cannot
be resolved due to the low signal-to-noise ratio. In the visible region,
there are minor changes to the shape of the ground state bleach, and
in the infrared region, there is a loss of some of the distinct features
that were previously apparent. These may correspond to localized structural
changes, perhaps the sliding of the bilin within the active site,
that have been observed in previous structural studies.[16] However, as these changes are likely to be spectroscopically
silent, it further emphasizes the importance of developing time-resolved
structural approaches to obtain a complete molecular description of
all steps in the photocycle of these proteins. There is only one further
notable spectral transition on slower time scales, the formation of
the final Pg state (Figure C,G), which occurs with a lifetime of 86.8 ms. This step in
the photoconversion, which represents the breakage of the second Cys
linkage, also involves any large-scale protein structural changes
that are likely to accompany the formation of the final Pg state.The time scales for the formation and decay of intermediates in
the reverse Pg (15E) to Pb (15Z)
photoconversion have also been measured. Changes in absorption after
photoexcitation of the Pg state of TePixJ in the visible region were
recorded over time scales from picoseconds to milliseconds (Figure A–C and Figures S11–S13) and in the infrared region
over time scales from 1 ps to 400 μs (Figure D and Figure S14). A number of steps can be identified for the Pg to Pb photoconversion
based on the EADS resulting from global analysis (Figure E–H), and this shows
that the conversion between the two states is not simply a reversal
of the steps in the Pb to Pg reaction. This situation is similar to
the photoreactions of other CBCRs,[22,23] and the related
phytochrome photoreceptors,[24] which often
have more identifiable steps in one direction than the other. Unlike
the 15Z to 15E isomerization step
that resulted in no apparent new visible spectral features, in the
15E to 15Z isomerization a new feature
is formed at ∼561 nm (first apparent in EADS4). This is similar
to the absorption of the nonreactive species present in the samples,
consistent with those species being 15Z isomers trapped
in a Pg-like protein environment. The EADS3 to EADS4 transition in
which this feature appears in the visible region correlates with changes
in the infrared region on similar time scales of several hundred picoseconds.
Hence, this is likely to correspond to the isomerization step. There
are no new distinct features formed in the infrared region, but it
may be that, as with other CBCRs, the isomerization results in a broadening,
rather than clear shift, of features.[25] In addition to the isomerization, there is significant loss of signal
intensity for peaks present in EADS1 and EADS2, so the isomerization
will occur concurrently with excited state relaxation, as seen in
the forward reaction. The E to Z isomerization occurs more slowly than the Z to E isomerization, and differences in photoisomerization rates
of the forward and reverse reaction have been observed in bilin-containing
photoreceptors,[23,26−28] because the
interactions of the bilin with the surrounding environment will be
different due to structural differences between starting states (e.g., Figure ) and the activation
energy of isomerization will be different in each case. The transitions
preceding the isomerization, with lifetimes of around 2 and 20 ps,
are therefore likely to derive from excited state relaxation, which
correlates with the first observed transition in the infrared (EADS2
to EADS3) that displays no significant change in spectra, only a change
in intensity. The excited state lifetimes of other bilin-containing
photoreceptors are often reported as multiexponential, which can be
explained either as ground state heterogeneity[26] or as the initial excited state affecting the surrounding
protein environment.[29]
Figure 3
Time-resolved changes
after photoexcitation of the Pg state. Visible
data sets in H2O-based buffer (A) from 0.36 ps to 3.6 μs,
(B) from 1 to 450 μs, and (C) from 0.1 to 45 ms and (D) infrared
data set from 1 ps to 400 μs. Evolution-associated difference
spectra (EADS) normalized to the most intense feature, and corresponding
lifetimes, from global analysis of (E–G) visible data sets
and (H) an infrared data set, shown in more detail in Figures S15–S18. For samples in D2O, the visible data set extends to 3.6 μs and the infrared
data set to 400 μs, so lifetimes for steps beyond these time
scales were not determined (n.d.). The blank region in panel A centered
at 530 nm is due to an excess of scattered pump light on these time
scales, which overwhelms any changes in absorption from the sample.
Time-resolved changes
after photoexcitation of the Pg state. Visible
data sets in H2O-based buffer (A) from 0.36 ps to 3.6 μs,
(B) from 1 to 450 μs, and (C) from 0.1 to 45 ms and (D) infrared
data set from 1 ps to 400 μs. Evolution-associated difference
spectra (EADS) normalized to the most intense feature, and corresponding
lifetimes, from global analysis of (E–G) visible data sets
and (H) an infrared data set, shown in more detail in Figures S15–S18. For samples in D2O, the visible data set extends to 3.6 μs and the infrared
data set to 400 μs, so lifetimes for steps beyond these time
scales were not determined (n.d.). The blank region in panel A centered
at 530 nm is due to an excess of scattered pump light on these time
scales, which overwhelms any changes in absorption from the sample.Over the subsequent nanoseconds and hundreds of
microseconds, the
infrared data show no signs of significant structural changes occurring,
and in the visible region, there are subtle changes in the apparent
position and shape of the positive absorption feature of the reaction
intermediate; therefore, we assign these changes to subtle changes
in the conformation of the bilin within the binding pocket. As with
the Pb photoreaction, it appears that the one lifetime resolved from
the infrared data (26.5 μs) is a combination of the two steps
resolved in the visible data (11.4 ns and 186 μs). The differences
between H2O and D2O buffer solutions are, as
with the Pb photoreaction, purely in the kinetics, not in the chemistry
occurring (Figure S15). In the photoconversions
of many CBCR and phytochrome proteins, the reactions include deprotonation
and the subsequent reprotonation of the bilin chromophore.[24,25,30,31] It has also been hypothesized that deprotonation of the bilin is
required to promote the interaction with the neutral thiol group during
the formation of the second Cys linkage.[32] The transition from EADS4 to EADS5 displays a moderate kinetic isotope
effect (KIE, lifetimes of 18.7 ns in D2O and 11.4 ns in
H2O), making this a plausible proton transfer step. However,
such a step should have a distinct infrared spectral signature,[25] and blue-shifted absorbance maxima,[14,33] neither of which are observed here, so the observed KIE may be due
to only changed dynamics due to exchangeable protons making the protein
“heavier” and transitions slower.[24] In a manner similar to that of the Pb photoreaction, there
are only minor spectral changes on the nanosecond to microsecond time
scales, suggesting that they represent localized structural changes
with no significant impact on the bilin environment. The formation
of the final Pb state, which involves the formation of the second
linkage at position C10 of the bilin chromophore to the Cys residue,
occurs with a lifetime of 4.9 ms. As with other CBCRs, it appears
as though formation of the Cys linkage occurs more rapidly than the
breakage of this bond during the reverse step.[23]In summary, we have used visible and infrared transient
absorption
measurements to identify the time scales of intermediate formation
in the photoconversions of the CBCR TePixJ (Figure ). It is clear that a number of localized
and more large-scale structural changes take place over a wide range
of time scales from picoseconds to milliseconds. While it would be
expected that large-scale motions would be restricted in a crystalline
form, the production of photoconvertible TePixJ crystals[17] implies that any restrictions do not block the
overall reaction, and a study of a phytochrome showed overall agreement
between crystal and solution phase structural data.[34] Previous X-ray solution scattering studies of phytochrome
proteins[24,34,35] found a number
of very slow (milliseconds to seconds) large-scale structural changes
took place after the final visible spectral transition had occurred;
similar large-scale structural changes may take place in TePixJ, although
TePixJ contains only a GAF domain, not the PAS-GAF-PHY structure of
phytochromes, so large-scale structural changes are likely to be less
extensive. Further time-resolved studies to probe millisecond to second
changes using vibrational (infrared or Raman) spectroscopy or circular
dichroism would provide valuable elucidation of any later reaction
steps. The time scales associated with intermediate formation presented
here will be crucial to inform any future time-resolved structural
studies of this CBCR and other related CBCRs.
Figure 4
Summary of the lifetimes
fitted for the photoconversion of TePixJ.
Values from visible transient absorption are colored purple, and those
from IR measurements red. Highlighting around the arrows denotes the
lifetime of the excited state.
Summary of the lifetimes
fitted for the photoconversion of TePixJ.
Values from visible transient absorption are colored purple, and those
from IR measurements red. Highlighting around the arrows denotes the
lifetime of the excited state.
Authors: Chavdar Slavov; Tobias Fischer; Avishai Barnoy; Heewhan Shin; Aditya G Rao; Christian Wiebeler; Xiaoli Zeng; Yafang Sun; Qianzhao Xu; Alexander Gutt; Kai-Hong Zhao; Wolfgang Gärtner; Xiaojing Yang; Igor Schapiro; Josef Wachtveitl Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2020-06-26 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Peter W Kim; Lucy H Freer; Nathan C Rockwell; Shelley S Martin; J Clark Lagarias; Delmar S Larsen Journal: Biochemistry Date: 2012-01-03 Impact factor: 3.162
Authors: Claudia C Cornilescu; Gabriel Cornilescu; E Sethe Burgie; John L Markley; Andrew T Ulijasz; Richard D Vierstra Journal: J Biol Chem Date: 2013-12-11 Impact factor: 5.157
Authors: Nicolas Coquelle; Michel Sliwa; Joyce Woodhouse; Giorgio Schirò; Virgile Adam; Andrew Aquila; Thomas R M Barends; Sébastien Boutet; Martin Byrdin; Sergio Carbajo; Eugenio De la Mora; R Bruce Doak; Mikolaj Feliks; Franck Fieschi; Lutz Foucar; Virginia Guillon; Mario Hilpert; Mark S Hunter; Stefan Jakobs; Jason E Koglin; Gabriela Kovacsova; Thomas J Lane; Bernard Lévy; Mengning Liang; Karol Nass; Jacqueline Ridard; Joseph S Robinson; Christopher M Roome; Cyril Ruckebusch; Matthew Seaberg; Michel Thepaut; Marco Cammarata; Isabelle Demachy; Martin Field; Robert L Shoeman; Dominique Bourgeois; Jacques-Philippe Colletier; Ilme Schlichting; Martin Weik Journal: Nat Chem Date: 2017-09-11 Impact factor: 24.427
Authors: Christopher Kupitz; Shibom Basu; Ingo Grotjohann; Raimund Fromme; Nadia A Zatsepin; Kimberly N Rendek; Mark S Hunter; Robert L Shoeman; Thomas A White; Dingjie Wang; Daniel James; Jay-How Yang; Danielle E Cobb; Brenda Reeder; Raymond G Sierra; Haiguang Liu; Anton Barty; Andrew L Aquila; Daniel Deponte; Richard A Kirian; Sadia Bari; Jesse J Bergkamp; Kenneth R Beyerlein; Michael J Bogan; Carl Caleman; Tzu-Chiao Chao; Chelsie E Conrad; Katherine M Davis; Holger Fleckenstein; Lorenzo Galli; Stefan P Hau-Riege; Stephan Kassemeyer; Hartawan Laksmono; Mengning Liang; Lukas Lomb; Stefano Marchesini; Andrew V Martin; Marc Messerschmidt; Despina Milathianaki; Karol Nass; Alexandra Ros; Shatabdi Roy-Chowdhury; Kevin Schmidt; Marvin Seibert; Jan Steinbrener; Francesco Stellato; Lifen Yan; Chunhong Yoon; Thomas A Moore; Ana L Moore; Yulia Pushkar; Garth J Williams; Sébastien Boutet; R Bruce Doak; Uwe Weierstall; Matthias Frank; Henry N Chapman; John C H Spence; Petra Fromme Journal: Nature Date: 2014-07-09 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: Berthold Borucki; David von Stetten; Sven Seibeck; Tilman Lamparter; Norbert Michael; Maria Andrea Mroginski; Harald Otto; Daniel H Murgida; Maarten P Heyn; Peter Hildebrandt Journal: J Biol Chem Date: 2005-07-31 Impact factor: 5.157
Authors: Anna F E Hauck; Samantha J O Hardman; Roger J Kutta; Gregory M Greetham; Derren J Heyes; Nigel S Scrutton Journal: J Biol Chem Date: 2014-05-09 Impact factor: 5.157