| Literature DB >> 32781598 |
Vit Kosek1, Marie Heczkova2, Frantisek Novak3, Eva Meisnerova3, Olga Novákova4,5, Jaroslav Zelenka1, Kamila Bechynska1, Nikola Vrzacova1, Jiri Suttnar6, Alzbeta Hlavackova6, Helena Dankova2, Miriam Bratova2, Nikola Daskova2, Hana Malinska2, Olena Oliyarnyk2, Petr Wohl7, Hana Bastova7, Jana Hajslova1, Monika Cahova2.
Abstract
Omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids (ω-3PUFAs) are introduced into parenteral nutrition (PN) as hepatoprotective but may be susceptible to the lipid peroxidation while olive oil (OO) is declared more peroxidation resistant. We aimed to estimate how the lipid composition of PN mixture affects plasma and erythrocyte lipidome and the propensity of oxidative stress. A cross-sectional comparative study was performed in a cohort of adult patients who were long-term parenterally administered ω-3 PUFAs without (FO/-, n = 9) or with (FO/OO, n = 13) olive oil and healthy age- and sex-matched controls, (n = 30). Lipoperoxidation assessed as plasma and erythrocyte malondialdehyde content was increased in both FO/- and FO/OO groups but protein oxidative stress (protein carbonyls in plasma) and low redox status (GSH/GSSG in erythrocytes) was detected only in the FO/- subcohort. The lipidome of all subjects receiving ω-3 PUFAs was enriched with lipid species containing ω-3 PUFAs (FO/-˃FO/OO). Common characteristic of all PN-dependent patients was high content of fatty acyl-esters of hydroxy-fatty acids (FAHFAs) in plasma while acylcarnitines and ceramides were enriched in erythrocytes. Plasma and erythrocyte concentrations of plasmanyls and plasmalogens (endogenous antioxidants) were decreased in both patient groups with a significantly more pronounced effect in FO/-. We confirmed the protective effect of OO in PN mixtures containing ω-3 PUFAs.Entities:
Keywords: fish oil; home parenteral nutrition; hydroxy-fatty acids; intestinal failure; lipidomics; olive oil; oxidative stress; plasmalogens
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32781598 PMCID: PMC7468769 DOI: 10.3390/nu12082351
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nutrients ISSN: 2072-6643 Impact factor: 5.717
Cohort characteristics.
| Control | FO/– | FO/OO | |
|---|---|---|---|
| sex (F/M) | 20/10 | 7/2 | 10/3 |
| age (years) | 64 | 60 | 66 |
| BMI | 25.7 | 25 | 21 |
| time on PN (month) | N/A | 40 | 56 |
| CRP (mg/l) | 0.9 | 1.6 * | 1.1 * |
|
| |||
| SBS I | N/A | 7 | 3 |
| SBS II + III | N/A | 2 | 4 |
| other | N/A | 0 | 6 |
|
| |||
| i.v. energy (kcal/day) | N/A | 940 | 1144 |
| lipids (g/day) | N/A | 20 | 32.2 |
| soybean oil (g/day) | N/A | 8.0 | 9.7 |
| olive oil (g/day) | N/A | 0.0 | 8.1 ‡ |
| MCFA (g/day) | N/A | 10.0 | 9.7 |
| fish oil (g/day) | N/A | 2.0 | 4.6 |
| amino acids (g/day) | N/A | 50.0 | 53.6 |
| glucose (g/day) | N/A | 138 | 134 |
|
| |||
| TAG (mmol/L) | 1.5 | 1.6 | 1.2 |
| total cholesterol (mmol/L) | 5.3 | 3.3 | 3.8 |
| HDL cholesterol (mmol/L) | 2.2 | 1.1 | 1.2 |
| LDL cholesterol (mmol/L) | 2.0 | 1.6 * | 1.6 * |
|
| |||
| bilirubin (µmol/L) | 9.9 | 13.0 | 9.5 |
| AST (µkat/L) | 0.4 | 0.5 | 0.4 |
| ALT (µkat/L) | 0.6 | 0.8 | 0.4 |
| ALP (µkat/L) | 1.3 | 2.2 | 1.9 |
| GGT (µkat/L) | 0.4 | 0.7 | 0.6 |
| albumin (g/L) | 42 | 43 | 44 |
|
| |||
| blood count | 4.4 | 3.9 | 4.3 |
| uric acid | 253 | 268 | 236 |
| total protein content | 70 | 73 | 71 |
ALT, alanine aminotransferase; ALP, alkaline phosphatase; AST, aspartate aminotransferase; BMI, body mass index; CRP, C-reactive protein; F, female; GGT, gamma-glutamyl transferase; HDL, high density lipoprotein; LDL, low density lipoprotein; M, male; MCFA, medium chain fatty acids; PN, parenteral nutrition; TAG, triacylglycerol. Data are given as a median (min; max). * p ˂ 0.05 vs. control; ‡ p ˂ 0.05 vs. FO/–.
Oxidative stress markers in erythrocytes and plasma.
| Control | FO/– | FO/OO | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||
|
| MDA (nmol·g Hb−1) | 7.4 | 14.3 *** | 13.8 *** |
| protein carbonyls | 0.4 | 0.7 | 0.4 | |
|
| ||||
| antioxidant capacity | 16.0 | 15.6 | 15.6 | |
| GSH | 1430 | 1187 | 1736 | |
| GSSG | 57.5 | 64.3 | 74.1 | |
|
| ||||
| GSH/GSSG | 25.3 † | 17.7 * | 24.8 † | |
|
| ||||
|
| MDA (µM) | 1.4 | 2.3 *** | 2.1 *** |
| protein carbonyls | 1.8 † | 2.9 * | 1.3 † | |
|
| ||||
| antioxidant capacity | 59.6 | 55.2 | 47.2 | |
|
| ||||
| SOD (U/ml) | 1.8 | 1.5 | 2.0 | |
| GSH-Px | 330 | 375 | 370 | |
MDA, malondialdehyde; Hb, hemoglobin; GSH, glutathione; GSSG, glutathione disulfide; SOD, superoxide dismutase; GSH-Px, glutathione peroxidase; NADPH, nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate; SO, soybean oil; OO, olive oil; FO, fish oil. Data are given as a median (min;max). * p ˂ 0.05, *** p ˂ 0.001 vs. control; † p ˂ 0.05 vs. FO/–.
Figure 1Plasma lipidome. (A): Principal Component Analysis (PCA) score plot based on all confirmed plasma lipids (n = 102) showing two separated clusters of control samples as green points and patient samples as black points. (B): Hierarchical clustering analysis of individual control and patient plasma samples according to all lipids with VIP score ˃1.0 (n = 30). The most distant clusters are a group consisting of controls and three FO/OO subjects on one side and all FO/– patients plus ten FO/OO patients on the other side. Within the later cluster, no special clustering according to the presence/absence of OO was seen. PCA principal component analysis; OO, olive oil; FO, fish oil.
Figure 2Radar chart showing distribution pattern of VIP lipids (score ˃1.0) in plasma. Data are expressed as log(2)FC over control. Only lipids surviving t-test and OPLS-DA selection (n = 30) were included into this analysis. Individual lipid species are grouped according to the lipid classes. For statistical significance calculated by ANOVA with Fisher´s post hoc test, see Supplementary Table S2. FC, fold change; OO, olive oil; FO, fish oil; PUFA, polyunsaturated fatty acids; FAHFAs, fatty acyl-esters of hydroxy-fatty acids.
Figure 3Erythrocyte lipidome. (A): Principal Component Analysis (PCA) score plot based on all confirmed erythrocyte lipids (n = 195) showing two separated clusters of control samples as green points and patient samples as black points. The exceptions are four samples from FO/OO group, which cluster with controls. (B): Hierarchical clustering analysis of individual patient erythrocyte samples according to all lipids with VIP score ˃1.0 (n = 59). There are two main clusters, i.e., patients on one side and controls together with four subjects from the FO/OO group on the other side. In the patient cluster, there is no particular tendency to the separation of FO/– and FO/OO groups. PCA, principal component analysis; OO, olive oil; FO, fish oil.
Figure 4Radar chart showing distribution pattern of VIP lipids (score ˃1.0) in erythrocytes. Data are expressed as log(2)FC over controls. Only lipids surviving t-test, OPLS-DA selection and ANOVA test (n = 58) were included into this analysis. Individual lipid species are grouped according to the lipid classes. For statistical significance calculated by ANOVA with Fisher´s post hoc test, see Supplementary Table S3. FC fold change. OO, olive oil; FO, fish oil.
Figure 5Correlation between MDA concentration and VIP lipids in plasma (A) and erythrocytes (B). The correlation was calculated as Spearman coefficient; only statistically significant values are shown. Blue color indicates negative and red color positive correlation. MDA, malondialdehyde; PUFA, polyunsaturated fatty acids; FAHFAs, fatty acyl-esters of hydroxy-fatty acids.