Literature DB >> 3278125

Hemostatic suture for septoplasty: how we do it.

I N Lee1, L Vukovic.   

Abstract

One of the disadvantages of the septoplasty procedure is patient discomfort, mainly from nasal packing, usually necessitating hospital stay. In an attempt to overcome some of this problem, a method was sought to replace the purpose of packing; namely hemostasis, prevention of hematoma and displacement of the retained cartilage. A continuous septal suturing technique was conceived some years ago by one of the authors (LV) and since then used extensively and perfected by both. Using this method in more than 800 cases (both septoplasties and septorhinoplasties) has proved to considerably reduce patient discomfort by eliminating nasal packs, and allowed the septoplasty procedure to be carried out in most cases on a day-surgery basis, also reducing the hospital stay of the septorhinoplasties. The final postoperative appearance of the septum also seems better than previously. We conclude that the use of the continuous hemostatic-stabilizing septal suturing technique is a useful modification of the standard procedure, with only minor increase in operating time.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3278125

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Otolaryngol        ISSN: 0381-6605


  13 in total

1.  Effectiveness of Nasal Packing in Trans-septal Suturing Technique in Septoplasty: A Randomized Comparative Study.

Authors:  Kanak Yadav; Tarun Ojha; Saurabh Gakhar; Abhishek Sharma; Amit Singhal; Vaishali Kataria
Journal:  Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2017-03-31

2.  Nasal silicone splints and quilting sutures using a septum stitch device following septoplasty: a prospective comparative study.

Authors:  Akihito Kuboki; Shun Kikuchi; Daiya Asaka; Nobuto Onda; Tsuguhisa Nakayama; Hiromi Kojima; Nobuyoshi Otori
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2018-05-23       Impact factor: 2.503

Review 3.  Comparison on effectiveness of trans-septal suturing versus nasal packing after septoplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Wei-Wei Wang; Bao-Cheng Dong
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2017-09-15       Impact factor: 2.503

4.  A comparison of the effects of packing or transseptal suture on polysomnographic parameters in septoplasty.

Authors:  Murat Turhan; Aslı Bostancı; Mehmet Akdag; Oktay Dinc
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2012-10-05       Impact factor: 2.503

5.  Nasal packing and transseptal suturing techniques: surgical and anaesthetic perspectives.

Authors:  Rıza Önder Günaydın; Erdinc Aygenc; Selma Karakullukcu; Fatih Fidan; Serdar Celikkanat
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2011-03-02       Impact factor: 2.503

6.  Comparison of septoplasty with and without nasal packing and review of literature.

Authors:  Rajashri S Mane; Balasaheb Patil; Anjana Mohite
Journal:  Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2013-02-08

7.  Effect of nasal packing and haemostatic septal suture on mucociliary activity after septoplasty: an assessment by rhinoscintigraphy.

Authors:  Mustafa Kula; Imdat Yuce; Yasar Unlu; Ahmet Tutus; Sedat Cagli; Ibrahim Ketenci
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2009-10-13       Impact factor: 2.503

8.  Septal stapler use during septum surgery.

Authors:  Güven Yildirim; Cemal Cingi; Ercan Kaya
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2012-08-28       Impact factor: 2.503

9.  Influence of surface properties of Merocel® (polyvinyl acetal) and silicone nasal splints on biofilm formation.

Authors:  Ilknur Dag; Mustafa Acar; Oner Sakallioglu; Tolgahan Catli; Turhan San; Cemal Cingi
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2013-09-25       Impact factor: 2.503

10.  Restorative procedures in disturbed function of the upper airways - nasal breathing.

Authors:  Gunter Mlynski
Journal:  GMS Curr Top Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2005-10-17
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.