Literature DB >> 22926990

Septal stapler use during septum surgery.

Güven Yildirim1, Cemal Cingi, Ercan Kaya.   

Abstract

Although discussions regarding nasal packing are still ongoing, to eliminate any possible complications, surgeons have used nasal packing for many years. Septoplasty is one of the most frequently performed operations by head and neck surgeons. Any methods to diminish the surgical time or bring comfort to the surgeon will be well appreciated. In this study, we attempted to demonstrate the usefulness of the stapler method by comparing preoperative and postoperative results from the visual analog scale (VAS), nasal obstruction symptom evaluation (NOSE), rhinosinusitis quality of life questionnaire (RQLQ), and acoustic rhinomanometry values. In addition, we evaluated pain scores, postoperative complications, and breathing after nasal packing, stapling, and trans-septal suturing techniques. Patients were divided into three groups. In the first group, deviated cartilage was removed or repositioned and mucoperichondrial flaps were closed with a bioresorbable stapler after septoplasty. Four or five staples were placed on the septum. In the second group, the septum was sutured continuously with 4/0 Pegelak (Doğsan TR). In the third group, Merocel packs were used without any sutures and were kept for 48 h. Nasal packing leads to patient discomfort after septal surgery; however, there is no difference in patient comfort between closing the mucoperichondrial flaps by suturing the septum or using a stapler. After surgery, there were no differences between the groups in terms of successful breathing. This situation was assessed by endoscopic examination and acoustic rhinomanometry. Thus, there was no objective or subjective difference. Stapling increases the doctor's comfort level and surgical time is optimized. Although experienced surgeons can easily suture the septum, less experienced ones have some difficulty; therefore, stapling may provide more benefit to the latter. Further, four staples are sufficient to close the septum.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22926990     DOI: 10.1007/s00405-012-2165-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol        ISSN: 0937-4477            Impact factor:   2.503


  28 in total

1.  Nasal septal clamp.

Authors:  R Raman; M B Dahalil
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 3.497

2.  Surgery of the difficult septum.

Authors:  S SALINGER; B M COHEN
Journal:  AMA Arch Otolaryngol       Date:  1955-04

3.  The use of intra-nasal splints: a consultant survey.

Authors:  M B Pringle
Journal:  Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci       Date:  1992-12

4.  A clinical evaluation of bioresorbable staples for mucoperichondrial flap coaptation in septoplasty.

Authors:  Thomas A Tami; Ronald B Kuppersmith; James Atkins
Journal:  Am J Rhinol Allergy       Date:  2010 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.467

5.  Surgery of the nasal septum.

Authors:  Gunter Mlynski
Journal:  Facial Plast Surg       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 1.446

6.  Quilting sutures for nasal septum.

Authors:  C Hari; C Marnane; P J Wormald
Journal:  J Laryngol Otol       Date:  2007-10-12       Impact factor: 1.469

7.  An evaluation of post-operative packing in nasal septal surgery.

Authors:  D A Nunez; F W Martin
Journal:  Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci       Date:  1991-12

8.  [Fibrin glue for operative correction of septal deviations].

Authors:  M Boenisch; G J Nolst Trenité
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 1.284

9.  Nasal septal clips: an alternative to nasal packing after septal surgery?

Authors:  Anand Veluswamy; Sachin Handa; Santosh Shivaswamy
Journal:  Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2011-11-30

10.  Use of nasal packs and intranasal septal splints following septoplasty.

Authors:  M M Ardehali; S Bastaninejad
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2009-07-04       Impact factor: 2.789

View more
  3 in total

1.  Nasal silicone splints and quilting sutures using a septum stitch device following septoplasty: a prospective comparative study.

Authors:  Akihito Kuboki; Shun Kikuchi; Daiya Asaka; Nobuto Onda; Tsuguhisa Nakayama; Hiromi Kojima; Nobuyoshi Otori
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2018-05-23       Impact factor: 2.503

2.  Effect of Suture Type and Suture Distance on Holding Strength in Nasal Septal Laceration Model.

Authors:  Alper Köycü; Evren Hızal; Ozan Erol; Adnan Fuat Büyüklü
Journal:  Turk Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2021-03-26

3.  The Effect of Nasal Packing Removal on Patients Anxiety.

Authors:  Caner Sahin; Hatice Imer Aras
Journal:  Med Arch       Date:  2015-12
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.