Literature DB >> 29796742

Nasal silicone splints and quilting sutures using a septum stitch device following septoplasty: a prospective comparative study.

Akihito Kuboki1, Shun Kikuchi2, Daiya Asaka2, Nobuto Onda2, Tsuguhisa Nakayama2, Hiromi Kojima2, Nobuyoshi Otori2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Although nasal splints and trans-septal sutures are preferred for septal closure following septoplasty, quilting sutures, also known as continuous mattress sutures, are technically challenging and thus time consuming. Recently, the utility of a novel stitch device was demonstrated for quilting sutures; however, whether it contributes to the technical solution and time management of septal sutures remains unclear. This study aims to quantify the time and cost of septal closure following septoplasty by comparing nasal splints with quilting sutures using the septum stitch device.
METHODS: We prospectively examined 23 patients who underwent septoplasty and assigned them to the following two groups: group 1, underwent the quilting suture for septal closure following septoplasty; group 2 underwent the nasal silicone splint method. We recorded the total operation time and surgical time for septal closure. Furthermore, we evaluated postoperative symptoms with Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) scores and compared the complication rate.
RESULTS: We observed no significant difference in the average of total operating time (P = 0.641) and the surgical time for septal closure (P = 0.886). Among postoperative symptoms, only nasal bleeding was significantly worse in group 1 on postoperative day 1 (P = 0.023). In addition, the occurrence of postoperative complications was insignificant between both groups.
CONCLUSIONS: The septum stitch facilitated safe and easy quilting suturing without significant increase of operation time.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Complications; Nasal splint; Operative time; Quilting suture; Septoplasty; Trans-septal suture

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29796742     DOI: 10.1007/s00405-018-4998-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol        ISSN: 0937-4477            Impact factor:   2.503


  25 in total

1.  A randomised prospective trial of trans-septal suturing using a novel device versus nasal packing for septoplasty.

Authors:  Arzu Y Korkut; Aysenur Meric Teker; Sabri B Eren; Orhan Gedikli; Omer Askiner
Journal:  Rhinology       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 3.681

2.  Simple suturing of the nasal septum using the Maniceps septum stitch device.

Authors:  A Kuboki; K Yanagi; T Nakayama; S Haruna
Journal:  J Laryngol Otol       Date:  2015-04-28       Impact factor: 1.469

3.  Hemostatic suture for septoplasty: how we do it.

Authors:  I N Lee; L Vukovic
Journal:  J Otolaryngol       Date:  1988-02

4.  The comparison of the quality of life and intranasal edema between the patients with or without nasal packing after septoplasty.

Authors:  B Kayahan; S Ozer; A E Suslu; O Ogretmenoglu; M Onerci
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2016-11-24       Impact factor: 2.503

5.  Membrane approximation by continuous mattress sutures following septoplasty.

Authors:  R B Sessions
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  1984-05       Impact factor: 3.325

6.  Nasal splinting using silicone plates without gauze packing following septoplasty combined with inferior turbinate surgery.

Authors:  Daiya Asaka; Mamoru Yoshikawa; Tetsushi Okushi; Tsuguhisa Nakayama; Yoshinori Matsuwaki; Nobuyoshi Otori; Hiroshi Moriyama
Journal:  Auris Nasus Larynx       Date:  2011-05-19       Impact factor: 1.863

7.  Changes in nasal resistance and quality of life after endoscopic microdebrider-assisted inferior turbinoplasty in patients with perennial allergic rhinitis.

Authors:  Tsung-Wei Huang; Po-Wen Cheng
Journal:  Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2006-09

8.  Comparison of totally occlusive nasal pack, internal nasal splint, and transseptal suture technique after septoplasty in terms of immediate respiratory distress related to anesthesia and surgical complications.

Authors:  Melih Cayonu; Aydın Acar; Eyup Horasanlı; Aytug Altundag; Murat Salihoglu
Journal:  Acta Otolaryngol       Date:  2014-02-11       Impact factor: 1.494

9.  Nasal packing after septoplasty: a randomized comparison of packing versus no packing in 88 patients.

Authors:  Mohammad Sohail Awan; Moghira Iqbal
Journal:  Ear Nose Throat J       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 1.697

10.  Retrospective analysis of 697 septoplasty surgery cases: packing versus trans-septal suturing method.

Authors:  I Cukurova; E A Cetinkaya; G C Mercan; E Demirhan; M Gumussoy
Journal:  Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 2.124

View more
  1 in total

1.  Is nasal septal suturing an alternative technique to nasal packing?: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Dandan Wang; Ting Liu; Chao Liao; Guangjun Tang; Tian Tian; Li Tian
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2020-12-11       Impact factor: 1.817

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.