Literature DB >> 32780745

Yellow fever transmission in non-human primates, Bahia, Northeastern Brazil.

Jaqueline Goes de Jesus1,2, Tiago Gräf1, Marta Giovanetti3,4, Maria Angélica Mares-Guia3, Joilson Xavier4, Maricelia Lima Maia5,6, Vagner Fonseca4,7, Allison Fabri3, Roberto Fonseca Dos Santos8, Felicidade Mota Pereira8, Leandro Ferraz Oliveira Santos8, Luciana Reboredo de Oliveira da Silva8, Zuinara Pereira Gusmão Maia9, Jananci Xavier Gomes Cerqueira10, Julien Thèze11, Leandro Abade12, Mirza de Carvalho Santana Cordeiro6, Sintia Sacramento Cerqueira Torquato6, Eloisa Bahia Santana6, Neuza Santos de Jesus Silva6, Rosemary Sarmento Oitiçica Dourado6, Ademilson Brás Alves10, Adeilde do Socorro Guedes10, Pedro Macedo da Silva Filho10, Nuno Rodrigues Faria11, Carlos F Campelo de Albuquerque13, André Luiz de Abreu14, Alessandro Pecego Martins Romano15, Julio Croda16, Rodrigo Fabiano do Carmo Said15, Gabriel Muricy Cunha10, Jeane Magnavita da Fonseca Cerqueira10, Arabela Leal E Silva de Mello8, Ana Maria Bispo de Filippis3, Luiz Carlos Junior Alcantara3,4.   

Abstract

Yellow fever virus (YFV) causes a clinical syndrome of acute hemorrhagic hepatitis. YFV transmission involves non-human primates (NHP), mosquitoes and humans. By late 2016, Brazil experienced the largest YFV outbreak of the last 100 years, with 2050 human confirmed cases, with 681 cases ending in death and 764 confirmed epizootic cases in NHP. Among affected areas, Bahia state in Northeastern was the only region with no autochthonous human cases. By using next generation sequence approach, we investigated the molecular epidemiology of YFV in NHP in Bahia and discuss what factors might have prevented human cases. We investigated 47 YFV positive tissue samples from NHP cases to generate 8 novel YFV genomes. ML phylogenetic tree reconstructions and automated subtyping tools placed the newly generated genomes within the South American genotype I (SA I). Our analysis revealed that the YFV genomes from Bahia formed two distinct well-supported phylogenetic clusters that emerged most likely of an introduction from Minas Gerais and Espírito Santo states. Vegetation coverage analysis performed shows predominantly low to medium vegetation coverage in Bahia state. Together, our findings support the hypothesis of two independent YFV SA-I introductions. We also highlighted the effectiveness of the actions taken by epidemiological surveillance team of the state to prevented human cases.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32780745      PMCID: PMC7418952          DOI: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0008405

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PLoS Negl Trop Dis        ISSN: 1935-2727


Introduction

Yellow fever virus (YFV) is an enveloped, single-stranded RNA virus, with an approximately 11,000 base pair genome, belonging to the Flaviviridae family. It causes a clinical syndrome of acute hemorrhagic hepatitis, called Yellow Fever (YF) disease, that shows clinical features ranging from mild febrile illness to hemorrhage. The term "yellow" comes from jaundice observed in patients with severe liver disease [1-3]. In the Americas, YFV transmission occurs via two distinct cycles: sylvatic and urban. The sylvatic (or jungle) cycle involves transmission between non-human primates (NHP) and sylvatic mosquitoes; humans are infected through the bites of infected sylvatic mosquitoes while visiting or working in forested regions. The urban (or domestic) transmission cycle involves viremic humans who were infected by the virus in the forest regions or through the intermediate cycle, which then returns to an urban area. Those humans develop significant viremia to infect urban mosquitoes which can transmit the virus to other humans in urban settings [4-5]. The main vectors of sylvatic cycle are the Culicidae of genus Haemagogus and Sabethes, which are of strictly wild habits [6-7]. On the other hand, and are responsible for outbreaks in urban and peri-urban areas [8-9]. In Brazil, YFV has been reported beyond the limits of Amazon region, occurring throughout the country in cycles of 7 to 14 years [10]. Considering this, Brazilian health authorities adopted surveillance based on seasonality [11]. Between 2016 and 2018, Brazil witnessed the largest YFV outbreak since 1980, with 778 cases and 262 deaths during the 2016–2017 seasonal period and 1376 cases and 483 deaths during the 2017–2018 seasonal period [12]. The outbreak has brought national and international concern due to the dispersion of the epidemic in areas where vaccination coverage is limited [13], and due to its potential for international spread [14]. Genomic and epidemiological analysis of the first epidemic wave of the outbreak in Minas Gerais (2016–2017) revealed that human cases resulted from sylvatic transmission [7]. Yet, following the discovery of a pool of mosquitoes positive for yellow fever virus, the re-emergence of urban yellow fever has greatly concerned public health authorities [5, 11, 15]. Bahia is the largest state of the Brazilian northeast region, bordering the state of Minas Gerais, the epicentre of the 2016–2017 YFV outbreak in Brazil. Between July 2017 and June 2018, the epidemiological surveillance division reported 58 human YF suspected cases in Bahia, from which laboratory tests confirmed all cases were imported, with no autochthonous confirmed cases in the state. Regarding epizootic cases in NHPs, through June 2017, 624 NHP suspected cases were reported, of which 52 were confirmed by YFV RT-PCR. These cases were widely distributed throughout 28 municipalities in Bahia state, including the capital city, Salvador [16]. In the view of the recent YFV epizootic in Bahia and given the lack of vaccination in the state, it is surprising that no human cases have been reported so far. Considering the seasonality of the virus transmission in the country and the release of epidemiological data reports, from July 2017 to June 2018, 846 NHP epizootic cases were reported, and none was confirmed by laboratory tests. Also, in the period between July 2018 and June 2019, 268 NHP epizootic suspected cases have been reported in 61 municipalities in Bahia state, none was confirmed for YFV infection [16]. In this study, by using the genomic sequence approach, we investigate the molecular epidemiology of YFV in NHP in Bahia and discuss what factors might be acting to prevent virus transmissions to humans [16].

Materials and methods

Ethical statement for biological data

This study is part of the arboviral genomic surveillance efforts of the ZiBRA project (www.zibraproject.org) which is supported by the Pan American World Health Organization (PAHO) and the Brazilian Ministry of Health (MoH). Ethical approval for tested samples was obtained from Ethics Review Committee from PAHO under reference number 2016-08-0029. Samples were provided for research and surveillance purposes within the terms of Resolution 510/2016 of CONEP (National Ethical Committee for Research, Ministry of Health, Brazil).

Population of study

We conducted molecular diagnostics and genome sequencing on 47 YFV positive tissue samples from dead NHPs collected in 24 municipalities in the state of Bahia, Northeast Brazil. Samples were delivered to the Central Public Health Laboratory (LACEN/Bahia) to perform differential diagnosis of rabies and also for collection of viscera samples to investigate YFV infection. Sample data as NHP species, municipality of collection and collection date are summarized in Table 1.
Table 1

Epidemiological data associated with each isolate processed/sequenced in this study.

IDSample TypeHostMunicipalityCollection Date
RJ250LiverCallithrix genusSão Miguel das Matas12/03/2017
RJ251*LiverCallithrix genusCordeiros10/03/2017
RJ252LiverCallithrix genusSão Felipe10/03/2017
RJ253LiverCallithrix genusSalvador14/03/2017
RJ254LiverCallithrix genusFeira de Santana10/03/2017
RJ255LiverCallithrix genusCamaçari14/03/2017
RJ256LiverCallithrix genusAlagoinhas14/03/2017
RJ257LiverCallithrix genusCatu15/03/2017
RJ258*Liverno data availablePedrão15/03/2017
RJ259*LiverCallithrix genusSalvador15/03/2017
RJ260*LiverAlouatta genusSanta Rita de Cassia13/03/2017
RJ261*LiverCallithrix genusCamacari16/03/2017
RJ262LiverCallithrix genusCamacari16/03/2017
RJ263LiverCallithrix genusCamacari16/03/2017
RJ264LiverCallithrix genusCamacari16/03/2017
RJ265LiverCallithrix genusSalvador16/03/2017
RJ266LiverCallithrix genusItuberá14/03/2017
RJ267LiverCallithrix genusSalvador19/03/2017
RJ268LiverCallithrix genusFeira De Santana17/03/2017
RJ269*LiverAlouatta genusCordeiros17/03/2017
RJ270LiverCallithrix penicillataSaúde17/03/2017
RJ271LiverCallithrix jacchusEsplanada21/03/2017
RJ272LiverCallithrix jacchusBiritinga22/03/2017
RJ273LiverCallithrix penicillataBarrocas05/04/2017
RJ274*LiverCallithrix penicillataIchu05/04/2017
RJ275LiverCallithrix jacchusLauro de Freitas04/04/2017
RJ276LiverCallithrix jacchusPaulo Afonso05/04/2017
RJ277LiverCallithrix penicillataSalvador06/04/2017
RJ278LiverCallithrix penicillataCandeias06/04/2017
RJ279LiverCallithrix jacchusMata De São Joao06/04/2017
RJ280LiverCallithrix jacchusSalvador05/04/2017
RJ281LiverCallithrix jacchusSalvador05/04/2017
RJ282LiverCallithrix jacchusSalvador06/04/2017
RJ283LiverCallithrix penicillataSalvador06/04/2017
RJ284LiverCallithrix jacchusSalvador06/04/2017
RJ285LiverCallithrix jacchusSalvador06/04/2017
RJ286LiverCallithrix penicillataCamaçari07/04/2017
RJ287LiverCallithrix penicillataFeira de Santana06/04/2017
RJ288LiverCallithrix penicillataRiachão do Jacuipe07/04/2017
RJ289LiverCallithrix jacchusSão Goncalo dos Campos07/04/2017
RJ290LiverCallithrix jacchusSão Goncalo dos Campos07/04/2017
RJ291LiverCallithrix penicillataRiachao do Jacuipe07/04/2017
RJ292*LiverCallithrix penicillataFeira de Santana07/04/2017
RJ293LiverCallithrix penicillataFeira de Santana07/04/2017
RJ294LiverCallithrix jacchusSalvador09/04/2017
RJ295LiverCallithrix penicillataIrara07/04/2017
RJ296LiverCallithrix jacchusEntre Rios05/04/2017

ID = Project identifier; Sample Type = Sample type tested; Host = Host species; State: BA = Bahia; Municipality = municipality of sample collection. Collection Date = Date of sample collection. Complete genomes recovered are highlighted with an asterisk.

ID = Project identifier; Sample Type = Sample type tested; Host = Host species; State: BA = Bahia; Municipality = municipality of sample collection. Collection Date = Date of sample collection. Complete genomes recovered are highlighted with an asterisk.

Viral RNA isolation and sample processing

Viral RNA was isolated from liver tissue samples using Qiagen Viral RNA Minikit following manufacturer instructions and including additional steps to avoid contamination as previously described by Faria et al, 2018 [7]. The first step consisted of homogenization of liver tissue using TissueLyser LT equipment (Qiagen). A ~2 mm diameter of tissue was cut using a disposable scalpel and added to a 2 mL Eppendorf tube containing a 5 mm stainless steel bead (Qiagen). 560 μl AVL lysis buffer (Qiagen) was added to each tube and the sample was homogenised for 5 min at 50 Hz followed by a 10 min incubation at room temperature. Samples were centrifuged at 1,200g for 2 min to pellet cellular material, and 500 μL of supernatant was transferred to a new tube containing 500 μL of 100% EtOH. RNA extraction was subsequently completed using kit. To avoid contamination between samples due to the high number of virions, regular glove changes were conducted and parafilm was used to seal the gap between collection tubes and QIAamp Mini columns (Qiagen) during centrifugation.

Real-time quantitative PCR

YFV reverse transcription quantitative real-time PCR (RT-qPCR) was performed on 47 samples using the Superscript III Platinum One-Step RT-qPCR System (Invitrogen) on a StepOnePlus Real-Time PCR machine (Applied Biosystems). The conserved YFV 5’ non-coding region was targeted using the primers YFall15F (5’ to 3’: GCTAATTGAGGTGYATTGGTCTGC), YFall103R (5’ to 3’: CTGCTAATCGCTCAAMGAACG) and the probe YFall41 (5’ to 3’: FAM- ATCGAGTTGCTAGGCAATAAACAC-BHQ), based on the previously described Domingo’s assay [17]. Thermocycler conditions consisted of reverse transcription at 45ºC for 15 min, denaturation at 95°C for 5 min, followed by 40 cycles of denaturation at 95°C for 10s, and annealing and extension at 60°C for 40s. To check if RNA isolation was efficient, we used RNase P as an endogenous positive control. Assays for RNase P used the primers RNaseP-F (5’ to 3’: AGATTTGGACCTGCGAGCG), RNaseP-R (GAGCGGCTGTCTCCACAAGT), and a probe (FAM- TTCTGACCTGAAGGCTCTGCGCG-BHQ1).

cDNA synthesis, library preparation and sequencing for MinION

cDNA was reverse transcribed from viral RNA using the Protoscript II First Strand Sequencing kit (NEB) with random hexamer priming. Multiplex PCR was conducted using Q5 High Fidelity Hot-Start DNA Polymerase (New England Biolabs) and the 500bp sequencing primer scheme as previously described [7]. All samples were subjected to 35 cycles of PCR using the thermocycling conditions and reaction conditions described in Faria et al, 2018 [7]. PCR products were purified using a 1x Ampure XP bead clean up and concentrations were measured using a Qubit dsDNA High Sensitivity kit on a Qubit 3.0 fluorimeter (ThermoFisher). Library preparation for the ONT MinION was conducted using Ligation Sequencing 1D (SQK-LSK108) and Native Barcoding kit (EXP-NBD103) according to the manufacturer’s instructions, but with the changes detailed in [18]. Amplified DNA and appropriate negative controls were sequenced in barcoded multiplexes of 6–12 samples per MinION run using FLO-MIN106 flow cells. Sequencing was performed without basecalling for 48 hours using MinKNOW. Consensus sequences for each barcoded sample were generated following previously published methods [18]. Raw files were basecalled using Albacore, demultiplexed and trimmed using Porechop, and then mapped with bwa to a reference genome (GenBank Accession No. JF912190). Nanopolish variant calling was applied to the assembly to detect single nucleotide variants to the reference genome. Consensus sequences were generated; non-overlapped primer binding sites, and sites for which coverage was <20X were replaced with ambiguity code N.

Phylogenetic analysis

YFV sequence dataset was created by adding the eight novel genomes generated in this study to a reference dataset compiled by Faria et al. (2018) [7] and publicly available at https://github.com/arbospread/YFV-monitoring. Sequences were aligned using MAFFT [19] and manually edited using AliView [20]. Maximum likelihood (ML) phylogenies were performed in IQ-TREE program under a GTR + Γ4 nucleotide substitution model. [21]. Prior to the tree reconstruction, ModelFinder application [22], as implemented in IQ-TREE, was used to select the best-fitted substitution model for the analysed dataset. Time-scaled phylogenetic trees were inferred with the sequences clustering in the current YFV outbreak clade. Temporal signal was assessed in TempEst [23] and the BEAST/BEAGLE package [24] was used for the Bayesian phylogenetic analysis. Trees were estimated under the SRD06 substitution model [25], the uncorrelated lognormal distributed relaxed molecular clock [26] and the nonparametric Bayesian Skygrid coalescent model [27]. Monte Carlo Markov chains (MCMC) were run for 100 million generations and the chain convergence and adequate effective sample size (ESS) were diagnosed in Tracer software [28]. Maximum clade credibility (MCC) trees were summarized using the TreeAnnotator tool and visualized in Figtree v1.4.4 (https://github.com/rambaut/figtree).

Results

Sample Collection, RT-qPCR screening and sequencing

We conducted molecular screening of YFV on liver fragments of non-human primates collected in 24 municipalities of the Bahia state, northeastern Brazil. Most of these municipalities are concentrated in the eastern region of the state, in the vicinity of the cities of Salvador and Feira de Santana (Fig 1). However, some samples were collected in more distant regions, especially those collected in the northwest of the state, in the city of Santa Rita de Cássia. Additionally, four samples are from the southern city of Vitória da Conquista. Among the tested samples, non-human primates from the Callitrichidae family (n = 44) predominated (Callithrix genus: Callithrix jacchus, n = 14; Callithrix penicillata n = 13), but we also included non-human primates from the Atelidae family (Alouatta genus n = 2) (Table 1). Due to the deteriorated conditions of the primates, 17 Callithrix could only be identified at the species level by the surveillance team. YFV RT-qPCR tests results, expressed as cycle threshold values (Ct), ranged from 7.59 to 36.81 (median = 31.31) (Table 1). The majority of samples had Ct > 30.0, all from Callithrix genus.
Fig 1

Geographical distribution of YFV NHP cases in Bahia state and vegetation coverage analysis.

Sampling locations of YFV genome sequences generated in this study are shown as red triangles. Main municipalities are represented as white circles. Yellow diamonds show all epizootic cases tested on the study. Green color gradient shows vegetation index of Bahia state.

Geographical distribution of YFV NHP cases in Bahia state and vegetation coverage analysis.

Sampling locations of YFV genome sequences generated in this study are shown as red triangles. Main municipalities are represented as white circles. Yellow diamonds show all epizootic cases tested on the study. Green color gradient shows vegetation index of Bahia state.

Genome sequencing and phylogenetic analysis

Genomes were generated using a previously validated MinION portable YFV sequencing protocol [7]. Briefly, positive samples were enriched by performing a multiplex PCR, using two sets of overlapping primers to amplify the YFV complete genome. Samples with amplicon yield from 4.0 ng/uL and above were sequenced. Due to high Ct values ​​and, consequently, low viral load, it was possible to recover eight complete genomes, with genome coverage (20x) similar for all samples (median = 99%; S1 Table). ML phylogenetic tree reconstructions and automated subtyping tools (Yellow Fever Virus Typingtool available at www.genomedetective.com/app/typingtool/yellowfevervirus/) [7] placed the newly generated genomes within the South American genotype I, among the sequences of the current Brazilian outbreak (Fig 1). Our Bayesian dated phylogenetic analysis revealed that the YFV genomes isolated from NHP infected in Bahia formed two distinct well-supported phylogenetic clusters. Cluster 1 is composed by sequences isolated from infected NHP found in the municipalities of Camaçari, Salvador, Feira de Santana and Ichu, which are separated of a maximum great-circle distance of 156 km. Cluster 1 is also composed of a sequence isolated in the city of Santa Rita de Cassia, which is at a minimal distance of 585 km (great-circle distance) apart from the other cities in the same cluster. A single sequence from the municipality of Pedrao is located basally to Cluster 1, however with small support to form a clade with those sequences. Within Cluster 1, was also observed a YFV genome isolated in Rio de Janeiro state and basally to the whole cluster, sequences from Espirito Santo state are located. This, suggests that Cluster 1 has emerged from an introduction from one of these two states, however, only future studies with higher sampling coverage from Bahia state could provide more information about the origins and transmission dynamics of YFV in northeast Brazil. In contrast, our phylogenetic analysis shows that Cluster 2 (pp = 1.00), composed by three sequences isolated from NHPs sampled in the city of Cordeiros, suggests that Minas Gerais state is the origin of this cluster. Cordeiros is located further south in the Bahia state and close to the Minas Gerais state borders. The time of the most recent common ancestor of both clusters (Fig 2) is late February 2017 (95% Bayesian credible interval: February to March 2017).
Fig 2

Bayesian and molecular phylogenetic of the YFV NHP cases in Bahia.

Bayesian dated phylogenetic analysis revealed that the YFV genomes isolated from NHP infected in Bahia formed two distinct well-supported phylogenetic clusters. Cluster 1 (red colored superior sequences; posterior probability, PP = 0.93) emerged most likely from an introduction from Minas Gerais state (red colored inferior sequences PP = 0.67), however an origin in Espírito Santo state is also possible. Cluster 2 (PP = 1.00) originated from an introduction from Minas Gerais (PP = 1.00) composed by three sequences isolated from NHPs sampled in the city of Cordeiros, located further south in the Bahia state and close to the Minas Gerais state borders. Violin plots showing estimated posterior distributions of the time of the most recent common ancestor (tMRCA). The time of the most recent common ancestor of both clusters is late February 2017 (95% Bayesian credible interval: February to March 2017).

Bayesian and molecular phylogenetic of the YFV NHP cases in Bahia.

Bayesian dated phylogenetic analysis revealed that the YFV genomes isolated from NHP infected in Bahia formed two distinct well-supported phylogenetic clusters. Cluster 1 (red colored superior sequences; posterior probability, PP = 0.93) emerged most likely from an introduction from Minas Gerais state (red colored inferior sequences PP = 0.67), however an origin in Espírito Santo state is also possible. Cluster 2 (PP = 1.00) originated from an introduction from Minas Gerais (PP = 1.00) composed by three sequences isolated from NHPs sampled in the city of Cordeiros, located further south in the Bahia state and close to the Minas Gerais state borders. Violin plots showing estimated posterior distributions of the time of the most recent common ancestor (tMRCA). The time of the most recent common ancestor of both clusters is late February 2017 (95% Bayesian credible interval: February to March 2017).

Discussion

In the last two decades, YFV transmissions have been recorded beyond the limits of the considered endemic area (Amazon region). Human cases and/or NHP epizootic cases occurring in Bahia, Minas Gerais, São Paulo, Paraná and Rio Grande do Sul characterize a recurrent expansion of the viral circulation area in the eastern and south directions of the country, where the virus had not been registered for decades [29]. One of the most significant events in the history of YF was recorded in the 2017/2018 period: the spread of the virus reached the Brazilian east coast, in the region of the Atlantic Forest biome, which houses a wide diversity of non-human primates and potential wild vectors [7, 13, 15]. This recent YFV outbreak has been favored by changes in environmental, eco-social and human behavior [30]. Although Bahia state did not report autochthonous human cases, a large number of epizootic cases in NHP have been reported in that state [16]. Here we reported the generation of novel YFV sequences recovered from NHP from the northeast region of Brazil not covered before by other studies. Our phylogenetic analysis has shown the simultaneous introduction of YFV into two distinct sites in the Bahia state. Considering the distance between the locations, these introductions are consistent with the hypothesis that animals may have been transported by humans as some events of primate’s traffic by human activity has already been reported by surveillance teams within Bahia state (data not published). Possas and colleagues [31] discussed that NHPs are not responsible for the rapid spread of YFV observed in the last outbreak in Brazil, once the migration habits of NHP species in Brazilian Southeastern forests show evidences that they do not use the ground and deforested areas to migrate. According to our vegetation coverage analysis, Bahia state shows predominantly low to medium vegetation coverage (Fig 1). In addition to our knowledge about mosquitoes’ speed mobility and the time between the two introductions we suggest that the occurrence of cases in distant areas was not caused by NHP natural migration nor by mosquitoes spread from an initial point [7]. Factors like (i) high density of vectors and primary hosts, (ii) the presence of susceptible individuals and (iii) low vaccine coverage areas play an important role in the emergence of a YFV outbreak. Over the last decades YF cases have been controlled in Brazil through the efforts of the epidemiological surveillance teams that acts in a preventive way, through investigation and deployment of vector barriers in places considered at risk of transmission, avoiding the spread of the virus to other regions and also the re-establishment of urban transmission [16]. Upon the resurgence of YF in southeastern, Bahia state has intensified the vaccine campaign and it was widely distributed to population in municipalities bordering states with YFV circulation or where there was NHP YFV detection. According to the vaccination recommendation area, the municipalities covered by intensification of campaign in 2018 were Camaçari, Candeias, Itaparica, Lauro de Freitas, Mata de São João, Salvador, São Francisco do Conde and Vera Cruz. Still according to Brazilian surveillance epidemiological reports, between July 2017 and June 2018, the state reported 378 cases of NHP YFV, still lower than the Southeastern states of Sao Paulo (2,119 reported cases), Minas Gerais (n = 1,600) and Rio de Janeiro (n = 622). [32]. The 2016–2018 YFV outbreak in Brazil has shown human cases with deaths in the south-eastern states, especially Minas Gerais, where the outbreak began and has expanded. Considering the proximity between the state of Minas Gerais and the state of Bahia, together with the wide circulation of the vector, the occurrence of NHP infected by the YFV and low vaccine coverage in Bahia state, we wondered why Bahia did not present the occurrence of human cases. The best hypothesis to explain this fact lies in two main aspects: the first is related to the type of NHP infected by the virus, predominantly Callithrichidae family primates, which, as described by other studies, have a lower viral replication ability, reducing its transmission through the sylvatic cycle [5, 33–34]. The goal of monitoring epizootic cases among NHP is to provide an early warning of risk of YFV transmission to humans, the second fact is based on the actions of epidemiological surveillance teams (municipal and of the state) that together carried out several activities to reduce virus transmission. Beyond vaccination campaign, vector blockade with insecticide (heavy and costly ultra-low volume application) which is already part of the strategies used by the epidemiological surveillance service in Brazil and was intensified in the state of Bahia. The use of agrochemicals in public health is standardized by the WHO as a complementary tool for vector control and it was adopted by the Health Surveillance Secretariat of the Ministry of Health in Brazil [35]. In addition, the investigation of suspicious cases in a timely manner was crucial to the prevention of urban yellow fever favored by Ae. Aegypti vector. The integrated actions promoted a blockade in the transmission chain of 28 municipalities with laboratory proven NHP YFV circulation, so that there would be no record of a human case with autochthonous transmission in Bahia between December/2016 and June/2019. During the monitoring period (July/2018 to June/2019), 216 NHP cases were reported in 61 municipalities. Considering this post-outbreak epidemiological data, when compared with the previous monitoring period (July/2017 to June/2018), with a record of 846 cases, a reduction of 291% compared to the current period. Thus, the coordinated actions of epidemiological surveillance team in Bahia state were the main factor for preventing human cases during the YFV epidemics which affected other states in Brazil. Vector surveillance and control are essential for the prevention and control of vector borne diseases and, in YF epidemics, the identification of Ae. aegypti and other Ae. species helps to inform authorities the level of risk of an urban outbreak [35]. In Bahia state, epidemiological surveillance actions such as the use of vaccine blocking strategies and vector control possibly contributed to the success in preventing autochthonous human YFV cases during the 2016–2018 epidemics in Brazil and should be taken as an example of coordinated management for future vector borne diseases outbreaks.

Conclusion

Together, our findings support the hypothesis of two independent YFV SA-I introductions and highlighted the possible contribution of the actions taken by epidemiological surveillance team of the state of Bahia on prevention of human cases.

Statistics for the YFV sequences generated in this study.

Sequences were mapped against FJ912190 reference genome. Numbers correspond quantity of reads mapped on reference genome. Ct = RT-qPCR Cycle threshold value. Accession number correspond to Genbank database accession number. (DOCX) Click here for additional data file.
  25 in total

1.  Posterior Summarization in Bayesian Phylogenetics Using Tracer 1.7.

Authors:  Andrew Rambaut; Alexei J Drummond; Dong Xie; Guy Baele; Marc A Suchard
Journal:  Syst Biol       Date:  2018-09-01       Impact factor: 15.683

2.  Yellow fever virus in Haemagogus leucocelaenus and Aedes serratus mosquitoes, southern Brazil, 2008.

Authors:  Jader da C Cardoso; Marco A B de Almeida; Edmilson dos Santos; Daltro F da Fonseca; Maria A M Sallum; Carlos A Noll; Hamilton A de O Monteiro; Ana C R Cruz; Valeria L Carvalho; Eliana V Pinto; Francisco C Castro; Joaquim P Nunes Neto; Maria N O Segura; Pedro F C Vasconcelos
Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 6.883

3.  Relaxed phylogenetics and dating with confidence.

Authors:  Alexei J Drummond; Simon Y W Ho; Matthew J Phillips; Andrew Rambaut
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2006-03-14       Impact factor: 8.029

4.  Mutagenesis analysis of T380R mutation in the envelope protein of yellow fever virus.

Authors:  Yan-Jang S Huang; John T Nuckols; Kate M Horne; Dana Vanlandingham; Mario Lobigs; Stephen Higgs
Journal:  Virol J       Date:  2014-03-29       Impact factor: 4.099

5.  AliView: a fast and lightweight alignment viewer and editor for large datasets.

Authors:  Anders Larsson
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2014-08-05       Impact factor: 6.937

6.  Urgent call for action: avoiding spread and re-urbanisation of yellow fever in Brazil.

Authors:  Cristina Possas; Reinaldo Menezes Martins; Ricardo Lourenço de Oliveira; Akira Homma
Journal:  Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 2.743

7.  Bayesian phylogenetic and phylodynamic data integration using BEAST 1.10.

Authors:  Marc A Suchard; Philippe Lemey; Guy Baele; Daniel L Ayres; Alexei J Drummond; Andrew Rambaut
Journal:  Virus Evol       Date:  2018-06-08

8.  Yellow fever epizootics in non-human primates, Southeast and Northeast Brazil (2017 and 2018).

Authors:  Maria Angélica Monteiro de Mello Mares-Guia; Marco A Horta; Alessandro Romano; Cíntia D S Rodrigues; Marcos C L Mendonça; Carolina C Dos Santos; Maria C Torres; Eliane S M Araujo; Allison Fabri; Everton R de Souza; Roberta O R Ribeiro; Fabiana P Lucena; Luiz C A Junior; Rivaldo V da Cunha; Rita M R Nogueira; Patricia C Sequeira; Ana M Bispo de Filippis
Journal:  Parasit Vectors       Date:  2020-02-19       Impact factor: 3.876

9.  Phylogenomic analysis unravels evolution of yellow fever virus within hosts.

Authors:  Chen Chen; Dong Jiang; Ming Ni; Jing Li; Zhihai Chen; Jingyuan Liu; Hanhui Ye; Gary Wong; Wei Li; Yuanyuan Zhang; Beibei Wang; Yuhai Bi; Danying Chen; Ping Zhang; Xuesen Zhao; Yaxian Kong; Weifeng Shi; Pengcheng Du; Gengfu Xiao; Juncai Ma; George F Gao; Jie Cui; Fujie Zhang; Wenjun Liu; Xiaochen Bo; Ang Li; Hui Zeng; Di Liu
Journal:  PLoS Negl Trop Dis       Date:  2018-09-06

10.  Yellow fever cases in French Guiana, evidence of an active circulation in the Guiana Shield, 2017 and 2018.

Authors:  Alice Sanna; Audrey Andrieu; Luisiane Carvalho; Claire Mayence; Philippe Tabard; Marina Hachouf; Claire-Marie Cazaux; Antoine Enfissi; Dominique Rousset; Hatem Kallel
Journal:  Euro Surveill       Date:  2018-09
View more
  4 in total

1.  Mapping environmental suitability of Haemagogus and Sabethes spp. mosquitoes to understand sylvatic transmission risk of yellow fever virus in Brazil.

Authors:  Sabrina L Li; André L Acosta; Sarah C Hill; Oliver J Brady; Marco A B de Almeida; Jader da C Cardoso; Arran Hamlet; Luis F Mucci; Juliana Telles de Deus; Felipe C M Iani; Neil S Alexander; G R William Wint; Oliver G Pybus; Moritz U G Kraemer; Nuno R Faria; Jane P Messina
Journal:  PLoS Negl Trop Dis       Date:  2022-01-07

2.  Retrospective Investigation in Horses with Encephalitis Reveals Unnoticed Circulation of West Nile Virus in Brazil.

Authors:  Hegger Fritsch; Felicidade Mota Pereira; Erica Azevedo Costa; Vagner Fonseca; Stephane Tosta; Joilson Xavier; Flavia Levy; Carla de Oliveira; Gabriela Menezes; Jaqueline Lima; Lenisa Santos; Luciana Silva; Vanessa Nardy; Marcela Kelly Gómez Astete; Beatriz Senra Álvares da Silva Santos; Nágila Rocha Aguiar; Maria Isabel Maldonado Coelho Guedes; Guilherme Canhestro de Faria; Ronaldo Furtini; Safira Rachel Milanez Drumond; Gabriel Muricy Cunha; Marcia São Pedro Leal Souza; Ronaldo de Jesus; Sara A Franco Guimarães; Italo Coelho Nuno; Ian Carlos Brito de Santana; José Eduardo Ungar de Sá; George Roma Santos; Willadesmon Santos Silva; Thiago Ferreira Guedes; Emerson Luiz Lima Araújo; Rodrigo Fabiano do Carmo Said; Carlos Frederico Campelo de Albuquerque; Cassio Roberto Leonel Peterka; Alessandro Pecego Martins Romano; Rivaldo Venâncio da Cunha; Ana Maria Bispo de Filippis; Arabela Leal E Silva de Mello; Marta Giovanetti; Luiz Carlos Junior Alcantara
Journal:  Viruses       Date:  2022-07-14       Impact factor: 5.818

3.  Phylogeographic patterns of the yellow fever virus around the metropolitan region of São Paulo, Brazil, 2016-2019.

Authors:  Marielton Dos Passos Cunha; Amaro Nunes Duarte-Neto; Shahab Zaki Pour; Bárbara Brito de Souza Pereira; Yeh-Li Ho; Beatriz Perondi; Jaques Sztajnbok; Venancio Avancini Ferreira Alves; Luiz Fernando Ferraz da Silva; Marisa Dolhnikoff; Paulo Hilário Nascimento Saldiva; Paolo Marinho de Andrade Zanotto
Journal:  PLoS Negl Trop Dis       Date:  2022-09-23

4.  Real-Time Genomic Surveillance during the 2021 Re-Emergence of the Yellow Fever Virus in Rio Grande do Sul State, Brazil.

Authors:  Miguel de S Andrade; Fabrício S Campos; Aline A S Campos; Filipe V S Abreu; Fernando L Melo; Anaiá da P Sevá; Jader da C Cardoso; Edmilson Dos Santos; Lucas C Born; Cláudia M D da Silva; Nicolas F D Müller; Cirilo H de Oliveira; Alex J J da Silva; Danilo Simonini-Teixeira; Sofía Bernal-Valle; Maria A M M Mares-Guia; George R Albuquerque; Alessandro P M Romano; Ana C Franco; Bergmann M Ribeiro; Paulo M Roehe; Marco A B de Almeida
Journal:  Viruses       Date:  2021-10-01       Impact factor: 5.048

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.