Literature DB >> 30193399

Performance of multitarget stool DNA testing in African American patients.

Gregory S Cooper1,2, Sanford D Markowitz2,3, Zhengyi Chen4, Missy Tuck5, Joseph E Willis2,6, Barry M Berger7, Dean E Brenner5, Li Li2,4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Multitarget stool DNA (mt-sDNA) is an approved method for colon cancer screening that is especially relevant for patients who cannot undergo colonoscopy. Although the test performance has been evaluated in a large clinical trial, it was limited to a predominantly white population. Given differences in the epidemiology and biology of colon cancer in African American individuals, the authors sought to compare the performance of mt-sDNA between racial groups.
METHODS: The authors prospectively identified patients aged ≥40 years who were referred for colonoscopy at an academic medical center and 2 satellite facilities. Prior to the colonoscopy, the authors collected stool for mt-sDNA and fecal immunochemical testing (FIT). They compared the sensitivity, specificity, and receiver operating characteristic curve between African American and white patients for the detection of advanced lesions or any adenoma.
RESULTS: A total of 760 patients were included, 34.9% of whom were African American. The prevalence of any adenoma (38.9% for African American patients and 33.9% for white patients) and that for advanced lesions (6.8% and 6.7%, respectively) were similar between groups. The overall sensitivities of mt-sDNA for the detection of advanced lesions and any adenoma were 43% and 19%, respectively, and the specificities were 91% and 93%, respectively. In general, mt-sDNA was more sensitive and less specific than FIT. When stratified by race, the sensitivity, specificity, and receiver operating characteristic curve area were similar between African American and white patients for both mt-sDNA and FIT.
CONCLUSIONS: Test performance characteristics of mt-sDNA were comparable in African American and white patients. Given the lower uptake of colonoscopy in African American individuals, mt-sDNA may offer a promising screening alternative in this patient population.
© 2018 American Cancer Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  African Americans; DNA analysis; colon polyps/diagnosis; colonoscopy; colorectal neoplasms/diagnosis; early detection of cancer

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30193399      PMCID: PMC6226346          DOI: 10.1002/cncr.31660

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer        ISSN: 0008-543X            Impact factor:   6.860


  12 in total

1.  Racial disparities in stage-specific colorectal cancer mortality: 1960-2005.

Authors:  Samir Soneji; Shally Shalini Iyer; Katrina Armstrong; David A Asch
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2010-08-19       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies.

Authors:  Erik von Elm; Douglas G Altman; Matthias Egger; Stuart J Pocock; Peter C Gøtzsche; Jan P Vandenbroucke
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2007-10-16       Impact factor: 25.391

3.  Early Adoption of a Multitarget Stool DNA Test for Colorectal Cancer Screening.

Authors:  Lila J Finney Rutten; Robert M Jacobson; Patrick M Wilson; Debra J Jacobson; Chun Fan; John B Kisiel; Seth Sweetser; Sidna M Tulledge-Scheitel; Jennifer L St Sauver
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 7.616

4.  Colorectal Cancer Screening: Recommendations for Physicians and Patients From the U.S. Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer.

Authors:  Douglas K Rex; C Richard Boland; Jason A Dominitz; Francis M Giardiello; David A Johnson; Tonya Kaltenbach; Theodore R Levin; David Lieberman; Douglas J Robertson
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2017-06-09       Impact factor: 22.682

Review 5.  Screening for colorectal cancer in African Americans: determinants and rationale for an earlier age to commence screening.

Authors:  John M Carethers
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2014-12-25       Impact factor: 3.199

6.  Cancer screening in the United States, 2017: A review of current American Cancer Society guidelines and current issues in cancer screening.

Authors:  Robert A Smith; Kimberly S Andrews; Durado Brooks; Stacey A Fedewa; Deana Manassaram-Baptiste; Debbie Saslow; Otis W Brawley; Richard C Wender
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2017-02-07       Impact factor: 508.702

7.  Cancer statistics for African Americans, 2013.

Authors:  Carol DeSantis; Deepa Naishadham; Ahmedin Jemal
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2013-02-05       Impact factor: 508.702

8.  Colorectal cancer in African Americans.

Authors:  Sangeeta Agrawal; Anand Bhupinderjit; Manoop S Bhutani; Lisa Boardman; Cuong Nguyen; Yvonne Romero; Radhika Srinivasan; Radhika Srinvasan; Colmar Figueroa-Moseley
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 10.864

9.  Stool DNA Testing for Screening Detection of Colorectal Neoplasia in Alaska Native People.

Authors:  Diana G Redwood; Elvin D Asay; Ian D Blake; Pamela E Sacco; Claudia M Christensen; Frank D Sacco; James J Tiesinga; Mary E Devens; Steven R Alberts; Douglas W Mahoney; Tracy C Yab; Patrick H Foote; Thomas C Smyrk; Ellen M Provost; David A Ahlquist
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  2015-10-28       Impact factor: 7.616

10.  Multitarget stool DNA testing for colorectal-cancer screening.

Authors:  Thomas F Imperiale; David F Ransohoff; Steven H Itzkowitz; Theodore R Levin; Philip Lavin; Graham P Lidgard; David A Ahlquist; Barry M Berger
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2014-03-19       Impact factor: 91.245

View more
  6 in total

1.  Diagnostic Performance of Multitarget Stool DNA and CT Colonography for Noninvasive Colorectal Cancer Screening.

Authors:  Perry J Pickhardt; Peter M Graffy; Benjamin Weigman; Nimrod Deiss-Yehiely; Cesare Hassan; Jennifer M Weiss
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2020-08-11       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 2.  Epigenetic Alterations in the Gastrointestinal Tract: Current and Emerging Use for Biomarkers of Cancer.

Authors:  William M Grady; Ming Yu; Sanford D Markowitz
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2020-12-03       Impact factor: 22.682

3.  Early Screening of African Americans (45-50 Years Old) in a Fecal Immunochemical Test-Based Colorectal Cancer Screening Program.

Authors:  Theodore R Levin; Christopher D Jensen; Neetu M Chawla; Lori C Sakoda; Jeffrey K Lee; Wei K Zhao; Molly A Landau; Ariel Herm; Eryn Eby; Charles P Quesenberry; Douglas A Corley
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2020-07-20       Impact factor: 22.682

4.  Using Comorbidity Pattern Analysis to Detect Reliable Methylated Genes in Colorectal Cancer Verified by Stool DNA Test.

Authors:  Yi-Chiao Cheng; Po-Hsien Wu; Yen-Ju Chen; Cing-Han Yang; Jhen-Li Huang; Yu-Ching Chou; Pi-Kai Chang; Chia-Cheng Wen; Shu-Wen Jao; Hsin-Hui Huang; Yi-Hsuan Tsai; Tun-Wen Pai
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2021-09-28       Impact factor: 4.096

5.  Reusing a prepaid health plan's fecal immunochemical tests for microbiome associations with colorectal adenoma.

Authors:  James J Goedert; Zhenyi Wu; Cyndee H Yonehara; Timothy B Frankland; Rashmi Sinha; Gieira S Jones; Yunhu Wan; Jacques Ravel; Ni Zhao; Stacey A Honda
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-08-31       Impact factor: 4.996

Review 6.  Black and White Differences in Colorectal Cancer Screening and Screening Outcomes: A Narrative Review.

Authors:  Carolyn M Rutter; Amy B Knudsen; Jennifer S Lin; Kathryn E Bouskill
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2020-11-03       Impact factor: 4.090

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.