Literature DB >> 25747692

Survey of organizational research climates in three research intensive, doctoral granting universities.

James A Wells1, Carol R Thrush2, Brian C Martinson3, Terry A May4, Michelle Stickler5, Eileen C Callahan6, Karen L Klomparens4.   

Abstract

The Survey of Organizational Research Climate (SOuRCe) is a new instrument that assesses dimensions of research integrity climate, including ethical leadership, socialization and communication processes, and policies, procedures, structures, and processes to address risks to research integrity. We present a descriptive analysis to characterize differences on the SOuRCe scales across departments, fields of study, and status categories (faculty, postdoctoral scholars, and graduate students) for 11,455 respondents from three research-intensive universities. Among the seven SOuRCe scales, variance explained by status and fields of study ranged from 7.6% (Advisor-Advisee Relations) to 16.2% (Integrity Norms). Department accounted for greater than 50% of the variance explained for each of the SOuRCe scales, ranging from 52.6% (Regulatory Quality) to 80.3% (Integrity Inhibitors). It is feasible to implement this instrument in large university settings across a broad range of fields, department types, and individual roles within academic units. Published baseline results provide initial data for institutions using the SOuRCe who wish to compare their own research integrity climates.
© The Author(s) 2014.

Keywords:  institutional assessment; organizational climate; research integrity; survey research

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25747692     DOI: 10.1177/1556264614552798

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics        ISSN: 1556-2646            Impact factor:   1.742


  8 in total

1.  Main outcomes of an RCT to pilot test reporting and feedback to foster research integrity climates in the VA.

Authors:  Brian C Martinson; David C Mohr; Martin P Charns; David Nelson; Emily Hagel-Campbell; Ann Bangerter; Hanna E Bloomfield; Richard Owen; Carol R Thrush
Journal:  AJOB Empir Bioeth       Date:  2017-08-07

2.  The Role of Culture and Acculturation in Researchers' Perceptions of Rules in Science.

Authors:  Alison L Antes; Tammy English; Kari A Baldwin; James M DuBois
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2017-03-20       Impact factor: 3.525

3.  Reverse mentoring to enhance research integrity climate.

Authors:  Daniel Pizzolato; Kris Dierickx
Journal:  BMC Res Notes       Date:  2022-06-17

4.  Perceptions of Research Integrity Climate in Hungarian Universities: Results from A Survey among Academic Researchers.

Authors:  Anna Catharina Vieira Armond; Péter Kakuk
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2022-06-30       Impact factor: 3.777

5.  Assessing the climate for research ethics in labs: Development and validation of a brief measure.

Authors:  Erin D Solomon; Tammy English; Matthew Wroblewski; James M DuBois; Alison L Antes
Journal:  Account Res       Date:  2021-02-04       Impact factor: 2.622

6.  Initial Results from the Survey of Organizational Research Climates (SOuRCe) in the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs Healthcare System.

Authors:  Brian C Martinson; David Nelson; Emily Hagel-Campbell; David Mohr; Martin P Charns; Ann Bangerter; Carol R Thrush; Joseph R Ghilardi; Hanna Bloomfield; Richard Owen; James A Wells
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-03-11       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Perceptions of research integrity climate differ between academic ranks and disciplinary fields: Results from a survey among academic researchers in Amsterdam.

Authors:  Tamarinde L Haven; Joeri K Tijdink; Brian C Martinson; Lex M Bouter
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-01-18       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Researchers' Perceptions of a Responsible Research Climate: A Multi Focus Group Study.

Authors:  Tamarinde Haven; H Roeline Pasman; Guy Widdershoven; Lex Bouter; Joeri Tijdink
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2020-08-10       Impact factor: 3.525

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.