Elahe Ganji1,2,3, C Savio Chan4, Christopher W Ward5, Megan L Killian2,3. 1. Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Delaware , Newark, DE, USA. 2. Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Delaware , Newark, DE, USA. 3. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Michigan Medicine , Ann Arbor, MI, USA. 4. Department of Physiology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University , Chicago, IL, USA. 5. Department of Orthopaedics, University of Maryland School of Medicine , Baltimore, MD, 21201, USA.
Abstract
Purpose: Optogenetics is an emerging alternative to traditional electrical stimulation to initiate action potentials in activatable cells both ex vivo and in vivo. Optogenetics has been commonly used in mammalian neurons and more recently, it has been adapted for activation of cardiomyocytes and skeletal muscle. Therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate the stimulation feasibility and sustain isometric muscle contraction and limit decay for an extended period of time (1s), using non-invasive transdermal light activation of skeletal muscle (triceps surae) in vivo. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We used inducible Cre recombination to target expression of Channelrhodopsin-2 (ChR2(H134R)-EYFP) in skeletal muscle (Acta1-Cre) in mice. Fluorescent imaging confirmed that ChR2 expression is localized in skeletal muscle and does not have specific expression in sciatic nerve branch, therefore, allowing for non-nerve mediated optical stimulation of skeletal muscle. We induced muscle contraction using transdermal exposure to blue light and selected 10 Hz stimulation after controlled optimization experiments to sustain prolonged muscle contraction. RESULTS: Increasing the stimulation frequency from 10 Hz to 40 Hz increased the muscle contraction decay during prolonged 1s stimulation, highlighting frequency dependency and importance of membrane repolarization for effective light activation. Finally, we showed that optimized pulsed optogenetic stimulation of 10 Hz resulted in comparable ankle torque and contractile functionality to that of electrical stimulation. CONCLUSIONS: Our results demonstrate the feasibility and repeatability of non-invasive optogenetic stimulation of muscle in vivo and highlight optogenetic stimulation as a powerful tool for non-invasive in vivo direct activation of skeletal muscle.
Purpose: Optogenetics is an emerging alternative to traditional electrical stimulation to initiate action potentials in activatable cells both ex vivo and in vivo. Optogenetics has been commonly used in mammalian neurons and more recently, it has been adapted for activation of cardiomyocytes and skeletal muscle. Therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate the stimulation feasibility and sustain isometric muscle contraction and limit decay for an extended period of time (1s), using non-invasive transdermal light activation of skeletal muscle (triceps surae) in vivo. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We used inducible Cre recombination to target expression of Channelrhodopsin-2 (ChR2(H134R)-EYFP) in skeletal muscle (Acta1-Cre) in mice. Fluorescent imaging confirmed that ChR2 expression is localized in skeletal muscle and does not have specific expression in sciatic nerve branch, therefore, allowing for non-nerve mediated optical stimulation of skeletal muscle. We induced muscle contraction using transdermal exposure to blue light and selected 10 Hz stimulation after controlled optimization experiments to sustain prolonged muscle contraction. RESULTS: Increasing the stimulation frequency from 10 Hz to 40 Hz increased the muscle contraction decay during prolonged 1s stimulation, highlighting frequency dependency and importance of membrane repolarization for effective light activation. Finally, we showed that optimized pulsed optogenetic stimulation of 10 Hz resulted in comparable ankle torque and contractile functionality to that of electrical stimulation. CONCLUSIONS: Our results demonstrate the feasibility and repeatability of non-invasive optogenetic stimulation of muscle in vivo and highlight optogenetic stimulation as a powerful tool for non-invasive in vivo direct activation of skeletal muscle.
Authors: Tobias Bruegmann; Daniela Malan; Michael Hesse; Thomas Beiert; Christopher J Fuegemann; Bernd K Fleischmann; Philipp Sasse Journal: Nat Methods Date: 2010-10-03 Impact factor: 28.547
Authors: Zhiheng Jia; Virginijus Valiunas; Zongju Lu; Harold Bien; Huilin Liu; Hong-Zhang Wang; Barbara Rosati; Peter R Brink; Ira S Cohen; Emilia Entcheva Journal: Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol Date: 2011-08-09
Authors: Georg Nagel; Tanjef Szellas; Wolfram Huhn; Suneel Kateriya; Nona Adeishvili; Peter Berthold; Doris Ollig; Peter Hegemann; Ernst Bamberg Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2003-11-13 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Thomas J Vajtay; Akhil Bandi; Aman Upadhyay; Mavis R Swerdel; Ronald P Hart; Christian R Lee; David J Margolis Journal: J Neurophysiol Date: 2019-02-20 Impact factor: 2.714
Authors: Patrick M Boyle; John C Williams; Christina M Ambrosi; Emilia Entcheva; Natalia A Trayanova Journal: Nat Commun Date: 2013 Impact factor: 14.919
Authors: Le Cai; Alex Burton; David A Gonzales; Kevin Albert Kasper; Amirhossein Azami; Roberto Peralta; Megan Johnson; Jakob A Bakall; Efren Barron Villalobos; Ethan C Ross; John A Szivek; David S Margolis; Philipp Gutruf Journal: Nat Commun Date: 2021-11-18 Impact factor: 14.919