Literature DB >> 32777067

RAS/CBL mutations predict resistance to JAK inhibitors in myelofibrosis and are associated with poor prognostic features.

Giacomo Coltro1,2, Giada Rotunno1,2, Lara Mannelli1,2,3, Carmela Mannarelli1,2, Sara Fiaccabrino1,2, Simone Romagnoli1,2,4, Niccolò Bartalucci1,2, Enrica Ravenda1,2, Eleonora Gelli2,5, Emanuela Sant'Antonio1,2, Mrinal M Patnaik6, Ayalew Tefferi6, Alessandro M Vannucchi1,2, Paola Guglielmelli1,2.   

Abstract

The dysregulation of the JAK/STAT pathway drives the pathogenesis of myelofibrosis (MF). Recently, several JAK inhibitors (JAKis) have been developed for treating MF. Select mutations (MTs) have been associated with impaired outcomes and are currently incorporated in molecularly annotated prognostic models. Mutations of RAS/MAPK pathway genes are frequently reported in cancer and at low frequencies in MF. In this study, we investigated the phenotypic, prognostic, and therapeutic implications of NRASMTs, KRASMTs, and CBLMTs (RAS/CBLMTs) in 464 consecutive MF patients. A total of 59 (12.7%) patients had RAS/CBLMTs: NRASMTs, n = 25 (5.4%); KRASMTs, n = 13 (2.8%); and CBLMTs, n = 26 (5.6%). Patients with RAS/CBLMTs were more likely to present with high-risk clinical and molecular features. RAS/CBLMTs were associated with inferior overall survival compared with patients without MTs and retained significance in a multivariate model, including the Mutation-Enhanced International Prognostic Score System (MIPSS70) risk factors and cytogenetics; however, inclusion of RAS/CBLMTs in molecularly annotated prognostic models did not improve the predictive power of the latter. The 5-year cumulative incidence of leukemic transformation was notably higher in the RAS/CBLMT cohort. Among 61 patients treated with JAKis and observed for a median time of 30 months, the rate of symptoms and spleen response at 6 months was significantly lower in the RAS/CBLMT cohort. Logistic regression analysis disclosed a significant inverse correlation between RAS/CBLMTs and the probability of achieving a symptom or spleen response that was retained in multivariate analysis. In summary, our study showed that RAS/CBLMTs are associated with adverse phenotypic features and survival outcomes and, more important, may predict reduced response to JAKis.
© 2020 by The American Society of Hematology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32777067      PMCID: PMC7422130          DOI: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2020002175

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Blood Adv        ISSN: 2473-9529


  44 in total

1.  A pooled analysis of overall survival in COMFORT-I and COMFORT-II, 2 randomized phase III trials of ruxolitinib for the treatment of myelofibrosis.

Authors:  Alessandro M Vannucchi; Hagop M Kantarjian; Jean-Jacques Kiladjian; Jason Gotlib; Francisco Cervantes; Ruben A Mesa; Nicholas J Sarlis; Wei Peng; Victor Sandor; Prashanth Gopalakrishna; Abdel Hmissi; Viktoriya Stalbovskaya; Vikas Gupta; Claire Harrison; Srdan Verstovsek
Journal:  Haematologica       Date:  2015-06-11       Impact factor: 9.941

2.  JAK inhibition with ruxolitinib versus best available therapy for myelofibrosis.

Authors:  Claire Harrison; Jean-Jacques Kiladjian; Haifa Kathrin Al-Ali; Heinz Gisslinger; Roger Waltzman; Viktoriya Stalbovskaya; Mari McQuitty; Deborah S Hunter; Richard Levy; Laurent Knoops; Francisco Cervantes; Alessandro M Vannucchi; Tiziano Barbui; Giovanni Barosi
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2012-03-01       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  Safety and efficacy of ruxolitinib in an open-label, multicenter, single-arm phase 3b expanded-access study in patients with myelofibrosis: a snapshot of 1144 patients in the JUMP trial.

Authors:  Haifa Kathrin Al-Ali; Martin Griesshammer; Philipp le Coutre; Cornelius F Waller; Anna Marina Liberati; Philippe Schafhausen; Renato Tavares; Pilar Giraldo; Lynda Foltz; Pia Raanani; Vikas Gupta; Bayane Tannir; Julian Perez Ronco; Jagannath Ghosh; Bruno Martino; Alessandro M Vannucchi
Journal:  Haematologica       Date:  2016-05-31       Impact factor: 9.941

4.  Correlation of mutation profile and response in patients with myelofibrosis treated with ruxolitinib.

Authors:  Keyur P Patel; Kate J Newberry; Rajyalakshmi Luthra; Elias Jabbour; Sherry Pierce; Jorge Cortes; Rajesh Singh; Meenakshi Mehrotra; Mark J Routbort; Madan Luthra; Taghi Manshouri; Fabio P Santos; Hagop Kantarjian; Srdan Verstovsek
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2015-06-29       Impact factor: 22.113

5.  Long-term survival and blast transformation in molecularly annotated essential thrombocythemia, polycythemia vera, and myelofibrosis.

Authors:  Ayalew Tefferi; Paola Guglielmelli; Dirk R Larson; Christy Finke; Emnet A Wassie; Lisa Pieri; Naseema Gangat; Rajmonda Fjerza; Alem A Belachew; Terra L Lasho; Rhett P Ketterling; Curtis A Hanson; Alessandro Rambaldi; Guido Finazzi; Juergen Thiele; Tiziano Barbui; Animesh Pardanani; Alessandro M Vannucchi
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2014-07-18       Impact factor: 22.113

6.  Proposed criteria for the diagnosis of post-polycythemia vera and post-essential thrombocythemia myelofibrosis: a consensus statement from the International Working Group for Myelofibrosis Research and Treatment.

Authors:  G Barosi; R A Mesa; J Thiele; F Cervantes; P J Campbell; S Verstovsek; B Dupriez; R L Levine; F Passamonti; J Gotlib; J T Reilly; A M Vannucchi; C A Hanson; L A Solberg; A Orazi; A Tefferi
Journal:  Leukemia       Date:  2007-08-30       Impact factor: 11.528

Review 7.  Contributions of the Raf/MEK/ERK, PI3K/PTEN/Akt/mTOR and Jak/STAT pathways to leukemia.

Authors:  L S Steelman; S L Abrams; J Whelan; F E Bertrand; D E Ludwig; J Bäsecke; M Libra; F Stivala; M Milella; A Tafuri; P Lunghi; A Bonati; A M Martelli; J A McCubrey
Journal:  Leukemia       Date:  2008-03-13       Impact factor: 11.528

Review 8.  Mechanisms of Resistance to JAK2 Inhibitors in Myeloproliferative Neoplasms.

Authors:  Sara C Meyer
Journal:  Hematol Oncol Clin North Am       Date:  2017-05-13       Impact factor: 3.722

9.  U2AF1 mutation types in primary myelofibrosis: phenotypic and prognostic distinctions.

Authors:  Ayalew Tefferi; Christy M Finke; Terra L Lasho; Curtis A Hanson; Rhett P Ketterling; Naseema Gangat; Animesh Pardanani
Journal:  Leukemia       Date:  2018-02-27       Impact factor: 11.528

10.  The KRASG12C Inhibitor MRTX849 Provides Insight toward Therapeutic Susceptibility of KRAS-Mutant Cancers in Mouse Models and Patients.

Authors:  Jill Hallin; Lars D Engstrom; Lauren Hargis; Andrew Calinisan; Ruth Aranda; David M Briere; Niranjan Sudhakar; Vickie Bowcut; Brian R Baer; Joshua A Ballard; Michael R Burkard; Jay B Fell; John P Fischer; Guy P Vigers; Yaohua Xue; Sole Gatto; Julio Fernandez-Banet; Adam Pavlicek; Karen Velastagui; Richard C Chao; Jeremy Barton; Mariaelena Pierobon; Elisa Baldelli; Emanuel F Patricoin; Douglas P Cassidy; Matthew A Marx; Igor I Rybkin; Melissa L Johnson; Sai-Hong Ignatius Ou; Piro Lito; Kyriakos P Papadopoulos; Pasi A Jänne; Peter Olson; James G Christensen
Journal:  Cancer Discov       Date:  2019-10-28       Impact factor: 38.272

View more
  8 in total

Review 1.  Novel therapies vs hematopoietic cell transplantation in myelofibrosis: who, when, how?

Authors:  James England; Vikas Gupta
Journal:  Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program       Date:  2021-12-10

2.  Clinical and molecular correlates of JAK-inhibitor therapy failure in myelofibrosis: long-term data from a molecularly annotated cohort.

Authors:  James T England; Caroline J McNamara; James A Kennedy; Jose-Mario Capo-Chichi; Jingyue Huang; Andrea Arruda; Taylor Nye; Verna Cheung; Jaime O Claudio; Dawn Maze; Hassan Sibai; Anne Tierens; Hubert Tsui; Aniket Bankar; Wei Xu; Tracy Stockley; Vikas Gupta
Journal:  Leukemia       Date:  2022-03-26       Impact factor: 12.883

Review 3.  The Genetic Basis of Primary Myelofibrosis and Its Clinical Relevance.

Authors:  Elisa Rumi; Chiara Trotti; Daniele Vanni; Ilaria Carola Casetti; Daniela Pietra; Emanuela Sant'Antonio
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2020-11-24       Impact factor: 5.923

4.  [Genetic characteristics and prognostic values of RAS mutations in patients with myelofibrosis].

Authors:  J Y Wu; B Li; Y J Jia; P H Zhang; Z F Xu; T J Qin; S Q Qu; L J Pan; J Q Liu; X Yan; Y D Zhang; J Chen; J Y Gong; Z J Xiao
Journal:  Zhonghua Xue Ye Xue Za Zhi       Date:  2020-12-14

Review 5.  Towards a Personalized Definition of Prognosis in Philadelphia-Negative Myeloproliferative Neoplasms.

Authors:  Barbara Mora; Francesco Passamonti
Journal:  Curr Hematol Malig Rep       Date:  2022-09-01       Impact factor: 4.213

Review 6.  Molecular pathogenesis of the myeloproliferative neoplasms.

Authors:  Graeme Greenfield; Mary Frances McMullin; Ken Mills
Journal:  J Hematol Oncol       Date:  2021-06-30       Impact factor: 17.388

7.  A Humanized Animal Model Predicts Clonal Evolution and Therapeutic Vulnerabilities in Myeloproliferative Neoplasms.

Authors:  Hamza Celik; Ethan Krug; Christine R Zhang; Wentao Han; Nancy Issa; Won Kyun Koh; Hassan Bjeije; Ostap Kukhar; Maggie Allen; Tiandao Li; Daniel A C Fisher; Jared S Fowles; Terrence N Wong; Matthew C Stubbs; Holly K Koblish; Stephen T Oh; Grant A Challen
Journal:  Cancer Discov       Date:  2021-12-01       Impact factor: 38.272

8.  Reduced intensity hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for accelerated-phase myelofibrosis.

Authors:  Nico Gagelmann; Christine Wolschke; Rachel B Salit; Thomas Schroeder; Markus Ditschkowski; Victoria Panagiota; Bruno Cassinat; Felicitas Thol; Anita Badbaran; Marie Robin; Hans Christian Reinhardt; Francis Ayuk; Michael Heuser; Bart L Scott; Nicolaus Kröger
Journal:  Blood Adv       Date:  2022-02-22
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.