Literature DB >> 27247324

Safety and efficacy of ruxolitinib in an open-label, multicenter, single-arm phase 3b expanded-access study in patients with myelofibrosis: a snapshot of 1144 patients in the JUMP trial.

Haifa Kathrin Al-Ali1, Martin Griesshammer2, Philipp le Coutre3, Cornelius F Waller4, Anna Marina Liberati5, Philippe Schafhausen6, Renato Tavares7, Pilar Giraldo8, Lynda Foltz9, Pia Raanani10, Vikas Gupta11, Bayane Tannir12, Julian Perez Ronco12, Jagannath Ghosh13, Bruno Martino14, Alessandro M Vannucchi15.   

Abstract

JUMP is a phase 3b expanded-access trial for patients without access to ruxolitinib outside of a clinical study; it is the largest clinical trial to date in patients with myelofibrosis who have been treated with ruxolitinib. Here, we present safety and efficacy findings from an analysis of 1144 patients with intermediate- or high-risk myelofibrosis, as well as a separate analysis of 163 patients with intermediate-1-risk myelofibrosis - a population of patients not included in the phase 3 COMFORT studies. Consistent with ruxolitinib's mechanism of action, the most common hematologic adverse events were anemia and thrombocytopenia, but these led to treatment discontinuation in only a few cases. The most common non-hematologic adverse events were primarily grade 1/2 and included diarrhea, pyrexia, fatigue, and asthenia. The rates of infections were low and primarily grade 1/2, and no new or unexpected infections were observed. The majority of patients achieved a ≥50% reduction from baseline in palpable spleen length. Improvements in symptoms were rapid, with approximately half of all patients experiencing clinically significant improvements, as assessed by various quality-of-life questionnaires. The safety and efficacy profile in intermediate-1-risk patients was consistent with that in the overall JUMP population and with that previously reported in intermediate-2- and high-risk patients. Overall, ruxolitinib provided clinically meaningful reductions in spleen length and symptoms in patients with myelofibrosis, including those with intermediate-1-risk disease, with a safety and efficacy profile consistent with that observed in the phase 3 COMFORT studies. This trial was registered as NCT01493414 at ClinicalTrials.gov. Copyright© Ferrata Storti Foundation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27247324      PMCID: PMC5060023          DOI: 10.3324/haematol.2016.143677

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Haematologica        ISSN: 0390-6078            Impact factor:   9.941


  18 in total

1.  Three-year efficacy, safety, and survival findings from COMFORT-II, a phase 3 study comparing ruxolitinib with best available therapy for myelofibrosis.

Authors:  Francisco Cervantes; Alessandro M Vannucchi; Jean-Jacques Kiladjian; Haifa Kathrin Al-Ali; Andres Sirulnik; Viktoriya Stalbovskaya; Mari McQuitty; Deborah S Hunter; Richard S Levy; Francesco Passamonti; Tiziano Barbui; Giovanni Barosi; Claire N Harrison; Laurent Knoops; Heinz Gisslinger
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2013-10-30       Impact factor: 22.113

2.  JAK inhibition with ruxolitinib versus best available therapy for myelofibrosis.

Authors:  Claire Harrison; Jean-Jacques Kiladjian; Haifa Kathrin Al-Ali; Heinz Gisslinger; Roger Waltzman; Viktoriya Stalbovskaya; Mari McQuitty; Deborah S Hunter; Richard Levy; Laurent Knoops; Francisco Cervantes; Alessandro M Vannucchi; Tiziano Barbui; Giovanni Barosi
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2012-03-01       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  The burden of fatigue and quality of life in myeloproliferative disorders (MPDs): an international Internet-based survey of 1179 MPD patients.

Authors:  Ruben A Mesa; Joyce Niblack; Martha Wadleigh; Srdan Verstovsek; John Camoriano; Sunni Barnes; Angelina D Tan; Pamela J Atherton; Jeff A Sloan; Ayalew Tefferi
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2007-01-01       Impact factor: 6.860

4.  New prognostic scoring system for primary myelofibrosis based on a study of the International Working Group for Myelofibrosis Research and Treatment.

Authors:  Francisco Cervantes; Brigitte Dupriez; Arturo Pereira; Francesco Passamonti; John T Reilly; Enrica Morra; Alessandro M Vannucchi; Ruben A Mesa; Jean-Loup Demory; Giovanni Barosi; Elisa Rumi; Ayalew Tefferi
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2008-11-06       Impact factor: 22.113

Review 5.  The 2008 revision of the World Health Organization (WHO) classification of myeloid neoplasms and acute leukemia: rationale and important changes.

Authors:  James W Vardiman; Jüergen Thiele; Daniel A Arber; Richard D Brunning; Michael J Borowitz; Anna Porwit; Nancy Lee Harris; Michelle M Le Beau; Eva Hellström-Lindberg; Ayalew Tefferi; Clara D Bloomfield
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2009-04-08       Impact factor: 22.113

6.  The Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy scale: development and validation of the general measure.

Authors:  D F Cella; D S Tulsky; G Gray; B Sarafian; E Linn; A Bonomi; M Silberman; S B Yellen; P Winicour; J Brannon
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1993-03       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 7.  Primary myelofibrosis: 2013 update on diagnosis, risk-stratification, and management.

Authors:  Ayalew Tefferi
Journal:  Am J Hematol       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 10.047

8.  Combining anchor and distribution-based methods to derive minimal clinically important differences on the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy (FACT) anemia and fatigue scales.

Authors:  David Cella; David T Eton; Jin-Shei Lai; Amy H Peterman; Douglas E Merkel
Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 3.612

9.  Proposed criteria for the diagnosis of post-polycythemia vera and post-essential thrombocythemia myelofibrosis: a consensus statement from the International Working Group for Myelofibrosis Research and Treatment.

Authors:  G Barosi; R A Mesa; J Thiele; F Cervantes; P J Campbell; S Verstovsek; B Dupriez; R L Levine; F Passamonti; J Gotlib; J T Reilly; A M Vannucchi; C A Hanson; L A Solberg; A Orazi; A Tefferi
Journal:  Leukemia       Date:  2007-08-30       Impact factor: 11.528

Review 10.  Primary myelofibrosis: update on definition, pathogenesis, and treatment.

Authors:  Omar I Abdel-Wahab; Ross L Levine
Journal:  Annu Rev Med       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 13.739

View more
  45 in total

Review 1.  The Rationale for Immunotherapy in Myeloproliferative Neoplasms.

Authors:  Lucia Masarova; Prithviraj Bose; Srdan Verstovsek
Journal:  Curr Hematol Malig Rep       Date:  2019-08       Impact factor: 3.952

2.  Ruxolitinib is effective and safe in Japanese patients with hydroxyurea-resistant or hydroxyurea-intolerant polycythemia vera with splenomegaly.

Authors:  Keita Kirito; Kenshi Suzuki; Koichi Miyamura; Masahiro Takeuchi; Hiroshi Handa; Shinichiro Okamoto; Brian Gadbaw; Kyosuke Yamauchi; Taro Amagasaki; Kazuo Ito; Masayuki Hino
Journal:  Int J Hematol       Date:  2017-09-27       Impact factor: 2.490

Review 3.  JAK2 inhibitors for myeloproliferative neoplasms: what is next?

Authors:  Prithviraj Bose; Srdan Verstovsek
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2017-05-12       Impact factor: 22.113

4.  Ruxolitinib for the management of myelofibrosis: Results of an international physician survey.

Authors:  Martin H Ellis; Maya Koren-Michowitz; Noa Lavi; Alessandro M Vannucchi; Ruben Mesa; Claire N Harrison
Journal:  Leuk Res       Date:  2017-08-10       Impact factor: 3.156

Review 5.  Philadelphia chromosome-negative classical myeloproliferative neoplasms: revised management recommendations from European LeukemiaNet.

Authors:  Tiziano Barbui; Ayalew Tefferi; Alessandro M Vannucchi; Francesco Passamonti; Richard T Silver; Ronald Hoffman; Srdan Verstovsek; Ruben Mesa; Jean-Jacques Kiladjian; Rȕdiger Hehlmann; Andreas Reiter; Francisco Cervantes; Claire Harrison; Mary Frances Mc Mullin; Hans Carl Hasselbalch; Steffen Koschmieder; Monia Marchetti; Andrea Bacigalupo; Guido Finazzi; Nicolaus Kroeger; Martin Griesshammer; Gunnar Birgegard; Giovanni Barosi
Journal:  Leukemia       Date:  2018-02-27       Impact factor: 11.528

6.  Second primary malignancies in ruxolitinib-treated myelofibrosis: real-world evidence from 219 consecutive patients.

Authors:  Margherita Maffioli; Toni Giorgino; Barbara Mora; Alessandra Iurlo; Elena Elli; Maria Chiara Finazzi; Marianna Caramella; Elisa Rumi; Maria Cristina Carraro; Nicola Polverelli; Mariella D'Adda; Simona Malato; Marianna Rossi; Alfredo Molteni; Alessandro Vismara; Cinzia Sissa; Francesco Spina; Michela Anghilieri; Daniele Cattaneo; Rossella Renso; Marta Bellini; Maria Luisa Pioltelli; Chiara Cavalloni; Daniela Barraco; Raffaella Accetta; Lorenza Bertù; Matteo Giovanni Della Porta; Francesco Passamonti
Journal:  Blood Adv       Date:  2019-11-12

7.  Guidance on changing therapy choice in myelofibrosis.

Authors:  Donal P McLornan; Claire N Harrison
Journal:  Blood Adv       Date:  2020-02-25

8.  Ruxolitinib and interferon-α2 combination therapy for patients with polycythemia vera or myelofibrosis: a phase II study.

Authors:  Anders Lindholm Sørensen; Stine Ulrik Mikkelsen; Trine Alma Knudsen; Mads Emil Bjørn; Christen Lykkegaard Andersen; Ole Weis Bjerrum; Nana Brochmann; Dustin Andersen Patel; Lise Mette Rahbek Gjerdrum; Daniel El Fassi; Torben A Kruse; Thomas Stauffer Larsen; Hans Torben Mourits-Andersen; Claus Henrik Nielsen; Christina Ellervik; Niels Pallisgaard; Mads Thomassen; Lasse Kjær; Vibe Skov; Hans Carl Hasselbalch
Journal:  Haematologica       Date:  2019-12-26       Impact factor: 9.941

Review 9.  JAK inhibitors in dermatology: The promise of a new drug class.

Authors:  William Damsky; Brett A King
Journal:  J Am Acad Dermatol       Date:  2017-01-28       Impact factor: 11.527

Review 10.  Novel Therapies in Myeloproliferative Neoplasms (MPN): Beyond JAK Inhibitors.

Authors:  Minas P Economides; Srdan Verstovsek; Naveen Pemmaraju
Journal:  Curr Hematol Malig Rep       Date:  2019-10       Impact factor: 3.952

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.