Literature DB >> 28275487

Experiences in the management of anastomotic leakages and analysis of the factors affecting leakage healing in patients with esophagogastric junction cancer.

Ningning Ding1, Yousheng Mao1, Jie He1, Shugeng Gao1, Yue Zhao1, Ding Yang1, Kelin Sun1, Guiyu Cheng1, Juwei Mu1, Qi Xue1, Dali Wang1, Jun Zhao1, Yushun Gao1, Xiangyang Liu1, Dekang Fang1, Jian Li1, Yonggang Wang1, Jinfeng Huang1, Bing Wang1, Liangze Zhang1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: It was reported in the literatures that the incidence of anastomotic leakage in patients with esophagogastric junction cancer decreased due to application of staplers and closure devices as well as gastric conduit technique in recent years, however, it increased slightly at our center since widely using the above devices and gastric conduit techniques from 2009. The objective of this study was to summarize our experiences in the management of anastomotic leakages and analyze the factors affecting leakage healing in the patients with esophagogastric junction cancer after surgical resection in recent 6 years.
METHODS: All patients who received surgical resections for esophagogastric junction cancer and diagnosed anastomotic leak at our center between January 2009 and December 2014 were retrospectively analyzed, we also enrolled the patients who had a longer hospital stay (>30 days) as they may develop anastomotic leak. The binary logistic regression in SPSS 16.0 was applied to analyze the factors that may affect leakage healing.
RESULTS: Of the 1,815 surgically treated esophagogastric junction cancer patients, 91 cases were diagnosed anastomotic leakage postoperatively. The patients were divided into two groups based on the median leakage healing time (40 days) in this series: fast healing group (37 cases) and slowly healing group (54 cases). All factors that may affect the leakage healing were put into analysis by using binary logistic regression. The results of the analysis showed that leakage size (OR =1.073, P=0.004), thoracic drainage (OR =12.937, P=0.037) and smoking index ≤400 (OR =1.001, P=0.04) significantly affected the healing time, while drinking history (P=0.177), duration of fever after anastomotic leak developed (P=0.084), and hypoproteinemia after leak (P=0.169) also apparently but not significantly affect the healing time.
CONCLUSIONS: Though many factors may affect leakage healing in the esophagogastric junction carcinoma patients, leakage size, thoracic drainage and smoking index (≤400) are the most important factors affecting the leakage healing. Placement of a chest tube beside the anastomosis area during operation for early identification and control of an anastomotic leak to minimize contamination of the mediastinum is the most important way to promote leakage healing. A chest tube placing into the purulent cavities after the patients experienced leaks is also important for the cure of leakage. More attention should be paid perioperatively to the patients who had a smoking index (≥400) and the patients who suffered fever or hypoproteinemia.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Esophagogastric junction cancer; anastomotic leakage; chest drainage

Year:  2017        PMID: 28275487      PMCID: PMC5334072          DOI: 10.21037/jtd.2017.02.34

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Thorac Dis        ISSN: 2072-1439            Impact factor:   2.895


  21 in total

1.  Comparison between esophagography and chest computed tomography for evaluation of leaks after esophagectomy and gastric pull-through.

Authors:  Joshua E Lantos; Marc S Levine; Stephen E Rubesin; Charles T Lau; Drew A Torigian
Journal:  J Thorac Imaging       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 3.000

2.  Personalized management of anastomotic leak after surgery for esophageal carcinoma.

Authors:  Hong-Yu Ye; Wei-Zhao Huang; Yin-Meng Wu; Yi Liang; Jun-Meng Zheng; Hai-Ming Jiang
Journal:  Chin Med Sci J       Date:  2012-03

3.  Protection of intrathoracic esophageal anastomoses by omentum.

Authors:  H S Goldsmith; A A Kiely; H T Randall
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  1968-03       Impact factor: 3.982

4.  Intrathoracic anastomotic leakage and mortality after esophageal cancer resection: a population-based study.

Authors:  Martin Rutegård; Pernilla Lagergren; Ioannis Rouvelas; Jesper Lagergren
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2011-07-19       Impact factor: 5.344

5.  Diagnosis and management of anastomotic leaks after esophagectomy.

Authors:  Donald E Low
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2011-05-10       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 6.  Anastomotic complications after esophagectomy.

Authors:  T Lerut; W Coosemans; G Decker; P De Leyn; P Nafteux; D van Raemdonck
Journal:  Dig Surg       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 2.588

7.  Prevalence and risk factors for ischemia, leak, and stricture of esophageal anastomosis: gastric pull-up versus colon interposition.

Authors:  John W Briel; Anand P Tamhankar; Jeffrey A Hagen; Steven R DeMeester; Jan Johansson; Emmanouel Choustoulakis; Jeffrey H Peters; Cedric G Bremner; Tom R DeMeester
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 6.113

8.  Systematic approach of postoperative gastric conduit complications after esophageal resection.

Authors:  J J G Scheepers; D L van der Peet; A A F A Veenhof; B Heijnen; M A Cuesta
Journal:  Dis Esophagus       Date:  2009-04-15       Impact factor: 3.429

9.  Transthoracic esophagectomy: a safe approach to carcinoma of the esophagus.

Authors:  D J Mathisen; H C Grillo; E W Wilkins; A C Moncure; A D Hilgenberg
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  1988-02       Impact factor: 4.330

10.  Choice of therapeutic strategies in intrathoracic anastomotic leak following esophagectomy.

Authors:  Juntang Guo; Xiangyang Chu; Yang Liu; Naikang Zhou; Yongfu Ma; Chaoyang Liang
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2014-12-29       Impact factor: 2.754

View more
  3 in total

1.  Risk factors for anastomotic leakage after surgical resections for esophageal cancer.

Authors:  Jonas Herzberg; Tim Strate; Salman Yousuf Guraya; Human Honarpisheh
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2021-05-15       Impact factor: 3.445

2.  Predictors of Unplanned Reoperation for Ovarian Cancer Patients From the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Database.

Authors:  Michael D Toboni; Haller J Smith; Sejong Bae; J Michael Straughn; Charles A Leath
Journal:  Int J Gynecol Cancer       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 3.437

3.  Safety and Efficacy of Non-Steroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs (NSAIDs) Used for Analgesia After Bariatric Surgery: A Retrospective Case-Control Study.

Authors:  Hicham Abou Zeid; Rita Kallab; Marie Antoinette Najm; Hisham Jabbour; Roger Noun; Fadi Sleilati; Salim Chucri; Christine Dagher; Ghassan Sleilaty; Nicole Naccache
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2019-03       Impact factor: 4.129

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.