Literature DB >> 32775457

Factors Associated with Brachial-Ankle Pulse Wave Velocity in an Apparently Healthy Chinese Population.

Liangmei Chen1,2, Xiaomin Liu1, Linpei Jia1, Zheyi Dong1, Qian Wang1, Yizhi Chen1, Yong Wang1, Ying Zheng1, Sasa Nie1, KangKang Song1, Delong Zhao1, Shuwei Duan1, Zuoxiang Li1, Zhe Feng1, Xuefeng Sun1, Guangyan Cai1, Weiguang Zhang1, Xiangmei Chen1,2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To investigate the factors influencing brachial-ankle pulse wave velocity (baPWV) in an apparently healthy Chinese population, especially the associations between baPWV and indices of blood pressure (BP).
METHODS: A total of 1123 participants with no history of hypertension were enrolled in this study, and the baPWV and BP of all four limbs were measured along with other covariates. Correlation analyses and multivariate linear regression models were used to identify factors associated with baPWV.
RESULTS: A total of 1123 participants (male 43.3%, mean age: 58.4 ± 13.9 years) were included. The average baPWV was 14.87 ± 3.21 m/s, and no difference was found between the sexes. Age was positively correlated with baPWV (r = 0.65, p < 0.01), especially in females (r = 0.71 versus 0.56 in males). The correlation coefficient between age and baPWV increased markedly after the age of 65 years. In addition, the resting heart rate (RHR), waist-hip ratio, glomerular filtration rate, and plasma glucose level were significantly correlated with baPWV (r = 0.25, 0.22, -0.43, and 0.25, respectively; p < 0.01). BP parameters were highly positively correlated with baPWV, especially systolic BP (SBP) and pulse pressure (PP). Multivariate regression revealed that age, BP parameters, and RHR were independently correlated with baPWV (p < 0.01) after adjusting for confounding factors. The standardized coefficients of SBP were greater than those of PP, followed by diastolic BP (DBP).
CONCLUSION: BaPWV increased with age, especially after 65 years. Age, BP, and RHR were independent factors associated with baPWV. The effect of SBP on baPWV was more prominent than that of PP.
Copyright © 2020 Liangmei Chen et al.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32775457      PMCID: PMC7396024          DOI: 10.1155/2020/9795240

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biomed Res Int            Impact factor:   3.411


1. Introduction

Arterial elasticity dysfunction is an important indicator of arteriosclerosis and is closely associated with cardiovascular diseases [1-3]. Increased arterial stiffness parallels structural changes in the medial layer of elastic arteries and is one of the pathological symptoms of vascular damage. Arterial stiffness is associated with future hypertension and cardiovascular events. Therefore, the prevention of arterial stiffness is of great importance [4]. Brachial-ankle pulse wave velocity (baPWV) is the most widely used measure of arterial stiffness in regular clinical and epidemiological settings due to its noninvasive and reproducible nature as well as the ease of follow-up and evaluation [5]. Higher baPWV was observed in patients with hypertension or other diseases, such as diabetes mellitus, dyslipidaemia, metabolic syndrome, chronic kidney disease, and ventricular hypertrophy [6-9]. baPWV was identified as an independent predictor of cardiovascular diseases, cardiovascular mortality, and all-cause mortality [1, 10]. Most studies on baPWV-associated factors have focused on patients with hypertension and the other diseases mentioned above [11-14], but arterial stiffness is not confined to patients with hypertension. In nonhypertensive individuals, it is not clear whether blood pressure (BP) has an effect on baPWV. The factors influencing baPWV have been widely studied, but this relationship is less well defined. Taking the resting heart rate (RHR) as an example, studies have shown a positive association with baPWV, no association, or even an inverse association [15]. However, numerous studies have demonstrated robust associations between baPWV and RHR, ageing, higher body mass index (BMI), and reduced glomerular filtration rate (GFR) [16-18]. These associations are not well studied in Chinese adults without hypertension. Furthermore, whether the increase in arterial stiffness with advancing age results from the age-associated increase in BP is unknown. The present study measured baPWV and BP, including bilateral ankle/brachial systolic BP, bilateral ankle/brachial diastolic BP, and bilateral ankle/brachial pulse pressure (PP), in a healthy northern Chinese population without hypertension or other atherosclerotic factors. We investigated the factors associated with baPWV and particularly studied whether BP was an independent factor influencing baPWV.

2. Subjects and Methods

A total of 1368 participants were recruited among the residents of urban Beijing in 2014. All participants received an explanation of the purpose of this investigation and voluntarily provided their consent to participate in this study. All protocols were approved by the Ethics Committee of the Chinese PLA General Hospital. The exclusion criteria were as follows: (1) pregnant women; (2) individuals taking medication; (3) subjects with a medical history of peripheral vascular diseases; (4) subjects with hypertension (BP ≥ 140/90 mmHg) or diagnosed with chronic kidney disease, diabetes mellitus, or dyslipidaemia (total cholesterol ≥ 5.9 mmol/L, triglycerides ≥ 1.70 mmol/L); (5) subjects with a medical history of cardiovascular diseases, such as stroke and myocardial infarction; and (6) BMI ≥ 28.0 kg/m2 [17]. Data from 1123 participants were included in the final analysis (Figure 1).
Figure 1

Flowchart of participant screening.

Participants underwent a comprehensive assessment with an Artery Stiffness Detector (OMRON VP-1000), including measurements of bilateral baPWV and BP in all four limbs and electrocardiography. The examination was conducted after the participants rested in the supine position for at least 5 min, and all examinations were performed by the same senior physician at the Chinese PLA General Hospital. The average values of the bilateral baPWV and BP were used for the analysis. The sum-PP was the sum of the PPs in the four limbs. Physical measurements, including body height, weight, waist circumference, and hip circumference, were also taken. BMI was calculated as the weight (kg) divided by the height squared (m2). The waist-hip ratio (WHR) was calculated as the waist circumference divided by the hip circumference. Subjects were required to fast for 8-12 h before blood sample collection. The plasma alanine aminotransferase (ALT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), total protein (TP), albumin, total bilirubin (TB), plasma glucose (PG), urea, urea acid, creatinine, total cholesterol (TC), triglycerides (TG), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels were measured at the Biochemistry Laboratory of the Chinese PLA General Hospital. The GFR was calculated according to the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration creatinine (CKD-EPI) equation. Data are presented as the means ± standard deviations for continuous variables and as the percentages (%) for categorical variables. The population characteristics stratified by baPWV quartiles were compared using ANOVA (continuous normally distributed parameters), Kruskal-Wallis tests (continuous nonnormally distributed variables), or chi-square tests (categorical variables). Missing data was not imputed due to the small proportion (approximately 2%) of missing data. Correlation analyses were used to determine the relationships between baPWV and variables (BP parameters, age, height, weight, BMI, waist circumference, etc.). The Pearson correlation analysis was used to determine relationships between normally distributed variables, and the Spearman correlation analysis was used for nonnormally distributed variables. Multivariate linear regression was used to identify factors affecting baPWV with “stepwise” as the variable filtering method. To avoid multicollinearity, we included only one BP parameter at a time as an independent variable in the regression model, with age, WHR, PG, GFR, and RHR as covariates. Data analyses were performed using SPSS version 25.0 for Mac (SPSS, Chicago, IL, USA).

3. Results

In total, 1123 participants were eligible for inclusion in this study, including 486 males (43.3%) and 637 females (56.7%). The age ranges of the males and females were both 21 to 86 years, and the mean age of the population was 58.4 ± 13.9 years. The average baPWV was 14.87 ± 3.21 m/s, and there was no difference between the sexes (male: 15.02 ± 2.84 m/s, female: 14.75 ± 3.46 m/s; p = 0.170). According to baPWV quartiles, we stratified the study population into four groups: Q1 (baPWV < 12.66 m/s), Q2 (12.66 ≤ baPWV < 14.36 m/s), Q3 (14.36 ≤ baPWV < 16.46 m/s), and Q4 (baPWV ≥ 16.46 m/s). The mean values of baPWV for the Q1-Q4 groups were 11.41 ± 0.98 m/s, 13.48 ± 0.50 m/s, 15.33 ± 0.58 m/s, and 19.26 ± 2.51 m/s, respectively. There was a trend for gradually increasing age, GFR, RHR, and PG levels with increasing baPWV (p < 0.001) (Table 1). The highest age, GFR, and RHR were observed in individuals with the highest quartiles of baPWV. The mean value of the sum-PP was 246.6 ± 47.1 mmHg. All indices of BP increased significantly as baPWV increased.
Table 1

Demographic and clinical characteristics of the participants.

CharacteristicsTotal (N = 1123)baPWV quartiles (m/s) p value
Q1 (<12.66) (N = 281)Q2 (12.66-14.36) (N = 281)Q3 (14.36-16.46) (N = 281)Q4 (≥16.46) (N = 280)
Male, N (%)486 (43.3)98 (34.9)137 (48.8)132 (47.0)119 (42.5)0.004
Age (years)58.4 ± 13.946.4 ± 13.255.1 ± 10.861.6 ± 10.0&70.6 ± 8.4& #<0.001
Physical measurements
 Height (cm)164.8 ± 8.0165.4 ± 7.5165.8 ± 8.5165.5 ± 7.5162.6 ± 8.0& #<0.001
 Weight (kg)66.2 ± 11.564.5 ± 12.067.8 ± 11.967.7 ± 10.464.8 ± 11.1& #<0.001
 BMI (kg/m2)24.3 ± 3.323.5 ± 3.424.5 ± 3.124.7 ± 3.124.4 ± 3.3<0.001
 WC (cm)85.6 ± 10.481.3 ± 11.086.1 ± 10.087.5 ± 9.687.5 ± 9.9<0.001
 HC (cm)98.2 ± 6.896.8 ± 6.998.4 ± 6.699.0 ± 6.598.6 ± 7.30.001
 WHR0.87 ± 0.070.84 ± 0.070.87 ± 0.060.88 ± 0.080.89 ± 0.06<0.001
 RHR67.2 ± 10.165.1 ± 8.965.6 ± 8.967.7 ± 10.3&70.4 ± 11.2& #<0.001
 baPWV (m/s)14.87 ± 3.2111.41 ± 0.9813.48 ± 0.5015.33 ± 0.5819.26 ± 2.51<0.001
Biochemical examination
 ALT (U/L)20.6 ± 13.420.0 ± 16.321.8 ± 13.120.9 ± 13.219.7 ± 10.10.242
 AST (U/L)20.8 ± 8.419.3 ± 7.621.2 ± 8.321.4 ± 9.121.2 ± 8.20.007
 AST/ALT ratio1.13 ± 0.361.13 ± 0.361.09 ± 0.371.13 ± 0.371.18 ± 0.35&0.027
 TP (g/L)70.9 ± 3.870.7 ± 3.870.8 ± 4.071.3 ± 3.871.0 ± 3.70.190
 Albumin (g/L)45.1 ± 2.945.4 ± 2.445.1 ± 2.544.9 ± 3.544.9 ± 3.10.109
 TB (μmol/L)12.1 ± 5.112.0 ± 4.911.7 ± 4.212.1 ± 5.512.4 ± 5.60.419
 PG (mmol/L)5.4 ± 1.25.0 ± 0.95.3 ± 0.95.5 ± 1.2&5.9 ± 1.4& #<0.001
 Urea (mmol/L)5.1 ± 1.44.6 ± 1.35.1 ± 1.45.2 ± 1.45.4 ± 1.2&<0.001
 Creatinine (μmol/L)71.1 ± 16.566.8 ± 12.471.5 ± 21.772.8 ± 14.773.0 ± 15.1<0.001
 Uric acid (μmol/L)318.5 ± 79.1296.5 ± 83.6318.4 ± 74.8334.1 ± 75.5325.1 ± 77.6<0.001
 TC (mg/mL)4.6 ± 0.94.4 ± 0.84.6 ± 0.94.7 ± 1.04.6 ± 0.9#0.001
 TG (mg/mL)1.4 ± 0.91.2 ± 0.71.4 ± 0.91.5 ± 1.0&1.4 ± 0.9#<0.001
 HDL-C (mg/mL)1.4 ± 0.41.4 ± 0.41.3 ± 0.31.3 ± 0.41.4 ± 0.40.101
 TC/HDL ratio3.6 ± 1.13.4 ± 1.23.6 ± 1.13.7 ± 1.23.5 ± 1.0#0.003
LDL-C (mg/mL)2.8 ± 0.82.7 ± 0.82.9 ± 0.82.9 ± 0.82.8 ± 0.8<0.001
GFR (mL/min/1.73m2)92.7 ± 18.6103.7 ± 16.996.1 ± 18.488.9 ± 16.0&82.2 ± 15.7& #<0.001
Parameters of BP (mmHg)
 Sum-PP246.6 ± 47.1210.4 ± 29.6231.7 ± 34.3255.0 ± 38.2&289.6 ± 43.8& #<0.001
 Brachial SBP126.9 ± 14.9112.8 ± 12.3123.2 ± 10.0131.7 ± 11.0&140.1 ± 10.4& #<0.001
 Brachial DBP74.9 ± 9.367.8 ± 7.974.8 ± 8.578.2 ± 8.6&78.9 ± 7.8&<0.001
 Brachial PP52.1 ± 10.245.3 ± 6.748.4 ± 7.653.5 ± 8.7&61.1 ± 9.7& #<0.001
 Ankle SBP143.2 ± 20.8124.0 ± 15.6138.7 ± 15.6149.8 ± 15.7&160.1 ± 16.8& #<0.001
 Ankle DBP72.2 ± 9.464.8 ± 7.871.8 ± 7.975.9 ± 8.2&76.4 ± 8.6&<0.001
 Ankle PP71.0 ± 15.959.4 ± 10.666.9 ± 12.673.9 ± 13.1&83.7 ± 15.8& #<0.001

∗ p < 0.05 compared with Q1. &p < 0.05 compared with Q2. #p < 0.05 compared with Q3. baPWV: brachial-ankle pulse wave velocity; BMI: body mass index; WC: waist circumference; HC: hip circumference; WHR: waist-hip ratio; ALT: alanine aminotransferase; AST: aspartate aminotransferase; TP: total protein; TB: total bilirubin; PG: plasma glucose; TC: total cholesterol; TG: triglycerides; HDL-C: high-density lipoprotein cholesterol; LDL-C: low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; GFR: glomerular filtration rate; RHR: resting heart rate; BP: blood pressure; SBP: systolic BP; DBP: diastolic BP; PP: pulse pressure.

The Pearson correlation coefficients between baPWV and other clinical variables are listed stratified by sex in Table 2. Age was positively correlated with baPWV (r = 0.65, p < 0.01), especially in females (r = 0.71 versus 0.56 in males). The correlation between age and baPWV became stronger after age 65, as shown in Figure 2. The GFR was negatively correlated with baPWV (r = −0.43, p < 0.01), especially in females (r = −0.48, p < 0.01). The WHR, RHR, and level of plasma glucose (PG) were significantly but weakly correlated with baPWV in the whole population (all 0.2 < r < 0.3, p < 0.01). In addition, height, WC, and the urea acid level were only weakly correlated with baPWV in females (all 0.2 < r ≤ 0.3, p < 0.01) (Table 2).
Table 2

Correlation analysis of brachial-ankle pulse wave velocity stratified by sex.

ParametersTotal (n = 1123)Male (n = 486)Female (n = 637)
Age (years)0.650.560.71
Physical measurements
 Height (cm)-0.14-0.20-0.28#
 Weight, kg-0.03-0.12-0.01
 BMI (kg/m2)0.07-0.040.12
 WC (cm)0.180.060.24#
 HC (cm)0.07-0.040.12
 WHR0.22#0.150.27#
 RHR0.25#0.28#0.24#
Biochemical examination
 ALT (U/L)-0.03-0.110.03
 AST (U/L)0.07-0.030.12
 AST/ALT ratio0.080.160.05
 TP (g/L)0.030.050.03
 Albumin (g/L)-0.09-0.11-0.09
 TB (μmol/L)0.020.07-0.03
 PG (mmol/L)0.25#0.22#0.28#
 Urea (mmol/L)0.190.010.30
 Creatinine (μmol/L)0.140.180.12
 Uric acid (μmol/L)0.130.010.21#
 TC (mg/mL)0.050.060.05
 TG (mg/mL)0.100.080.11
 HDL-C (mg/mL)-0.010.03-0.02
 TC/HDL ratio0.030.020.03
 LDL-C (mg/mL)0.040.040.04
 GFR (mL/min/1.73m2)-0.43-0.39-0.48
 Sum-PP0.630.530.69
 Brachial SBP0.660.620.68
 Brachial DBP0.410.400.43
 Brachial PP0.580.500.66
 Ankle SBP0.620.570.66
 Ankle DBP0.420.440.41
 Ankle PP0.570.470.63

∗ r > 0.3, p < 0.01; #r > 0.2, p < 0.01. baPWV: brachial-ankle pulse wave velocity; BMI: body mass index; WC: waist circumference; HC: hip circumference; WHR: waist-hip ratio; ALT: alanine aminotransferase; AST: aspartate aminotransferase; TP: total protein; TB: total bilirubin; PG: plasma glucose; TC: total cholesterol; TG: triglycerides; HDL-C: high-density lipoprotein cholesterol; LDL-C: low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; GFR: glomerular filtration rate; RHR: resting heart rate; BP: blood pressure; SBP: systolic BP; DBP: diastolic BP; PP: pulse pressure.

Figure 2

The scatter diagram between age and brachial-ankle pulse wave velocity in different age groups. Blue circles represent people aged ≤45 years, orange circles represent people aged between 46 and 65 years, and grey circles represent elderly people (>65 years).

baPWV was positively correlated with all parameters of BP, especially SBP and sum-PP. The correlation coefficient of SBP (r ≥ 0.57) was greater than that of sum-PP (r = 0.53) in males, followed by PP (r ≤ 0.50) and DBP (r ≤ 0.44). Except for left brachial SBP (r = 0.70), the correlation coefficients of SBP (r ≤ 0.68) were smaller than those of sum-PP (r = 0.69) in females, followed by PP (r ≤ 0.66) and DBP (r ≤ 0.44) (Table 2). To analyse the relationships between baPWV and the BP indices, stepwise multivariate linear regression analysis was performed; the results are shown in Table 3. After adjusting for confounding factors (including WHR, PG, GFR, age, and RHR), the parameters of BP (sum-PP, SBP, DBP, and PP) were stable and significant determinants of baPWV. The standardized coefficient of SBP was greater than that of sum-PP in males, but the opposite was true in females, both followed by PP and DBP. In addition to the BP parameters, age and the RHR were also independent factors influencing baPWV.
Table 3

Coefficients of variables in multivariate linear regression analyses.

BP indices as independent variablesUnstandardized coefficients (95% confidence interval)Standardized coefficients
AgeBP indicesRHRAgeBP indicesRHR
TotalSum-PP9.8 (8.8, 10.8)2.8 (2.5, 3.1)8.2 (7.0, 9.4)0.420.410.26
Brachial SBP10.2 (9.2, 11.1)9.7 (8.7, 10.6)5.6 (4.4, 6.8)0.450.420.18
Brachial DBP13.9 (13.0, 14.9)8.7 (7.3, 10.2)5.6 (4.2, 6.9)0.600.250.17
Brachial PP11.2 (9.8, 12.6)11.5 (10.1, 12.9)8.3 (7.0, 9.5)0.480.360.26
Ankle SBP10.7 (9.8, 11.7)6.3 (5.7, 6.9)7.5 (6.4, 8.7)0.460.410.24
Ankle DBP13.8 (12.9, 14.7)9.5 (8.1, 10.9)6.4 (5.2, 7.7)0.600.280.20
Ankle PP10.9 (9.8, 11.9)7.1 (6.2, 7.9)8.2 (6.9, 9.4)0.470.350.26

MaleSum-PP8.6 (7.2, 10.0)2.5 (2.1, 3.0)9.1 (7.4, 10.8)0.420.400.34
Brachial SBP8.9 (7.6, 10.1)9.8 (8.5, 11.2)5.6 (4.1, 7.3)0.430.450.21
Brachial DBP11.3 (10.0, 12.7)9.7 (7.4, 11.9)5.1 (3.2, 7.0)0.550.300.19
Brachial PP8.9 (7.5, 10.3)11.2 (9.1, 13.3)9.1 (7.4, 10.8)0.440.360.33
Ankle SBP8.8 (7.5, 10.1)6.0 (5.1, 6.9)7.9 (6.3, 9.5)0.430.420.29
Ankle DBP11.2 (9.9, 12.4)11.0 (9.0, 13.0)6.1 (4.4, 7.9)0.540.360.23
Ankle PP9.2 (7.8, 10.6)6.0 (4.8, 7.3)9.0 (7.3, 10.8)0.450.330.33

FemaleSum-PP10.9 (9.5, 12.4)3.0 (2.6, 3.4)8.3 (6.6, 9.9)0.440.420.23
Brachial SBP12.1 (10.6, 13.5)9.2 (7.9, 10.6)5.7 (4.0, 7.4)0.510.390.16
Brachial DBP16.1 (14.8,17.4)7.4 (5.2, 9.5)5.8 (3.9, 7.7)0.650.190.16
Brachial PP13.6 (11.7, 15.5)12.0 (10.0, 13.9)8.0 (6.3, 9.7)0.550.370.22
Ankle SBP12.9 (11.5, 14.3)6.3 (5.4, 7.3)7.2 (5.6, 8.9)0.520.390.20
Ankle DBP16.6 (15.2, 18.0)8.2 (6.1, 10.2)6.5 (4.6, 8.3)0.670.210.18
Ankle PP12.6 (11.2, 14.0)7.6 (6.4, 8.8)8.2 (6.5, 9.9)0.510.350.23

RHR: resting heart rate; BP: blood pressure; SBP: systolic BP; DBP: diastolic BP; PP: pulse pressure.

4. Discussion

The present cross-sectional study of an apparently healthy northern Chinese population showed that baPWV increases with age and that the rate of increase accelerates after 65 years of age. People with higher RHRs or BP levels tend to have higher baPWV. The significantly positive correlation of BP with baPWV indicates that a higher BP is still a contributing factor to arterial stiffness, even when it is within the normal range. The effect of SBP on baPWV was more prominent than that of PP. BaPWV is widely used to evaluate arterial stiffness, which reflects alterations in the structural and functional properties of the central and peripheral arteries. Carotid-femoral PWV (cfPWV) is the most validated technique and is regarded as the gold standard for PWV measurement [19]. However, because of its methodological difficulties and limited availability, cfPWV is not generally implemented in China. In contrast, the measurement of baPWV is easy and reproducible, as it simply involves using BP cuffs on the four extremities. baPWV is elevated in patients with diabetes mellitus, hypertension, metabolic syndrome, chronic kidney disease, and sleep apnoea syndrome; and ageing, tachycardia, and the postmenopause period also result in increases in baPWV [19-22]. baPWV is an independent risk factor for cardiovascular events in patients with hypertension, but the optical cut-off values of baPWV for predicting cardiovascular disease are still controversial. For example, Ohkuma et al. proposed 18.3 m/s [23], while Kawai et al. suggested 17.5 m/s [24, 25]. In the general Chinese population, Lu et al. reported that a baPWV of 16.7 m/s is the optimal threshold for cardiovascular risk stratification [26]. With the increasing use of baPWV to measure arterial stiffness and predict the risks of arteriosclerosis and cardiovascular death, the amount of research on the factors associated with baPWV in various populations has increased. Many studies have reported that baPWV increases substantially with increasing age [27-29], and our results are consistent with these well-established findings. A study including 3215 Japanese adolescents claimed that the effect of ageing was more prominent in males than in females [29]. However, the sex difference seems to be the opposite in adults, which has also been validated in our study (r = 0.56 in male versus r = 0.71 in female, p < 0.001) and other studies [17, 28]. The level of plasma oestrogen or androgen during menopause may explain the augmented increase in baPWV with ageing in females [17, 30]. Furthermore, our study illustrated a linear relationship between age and the value of baPWV, and a relatively closer correlation was observed in elderly people. A study reported that the age-related progression of arterial stiffness could be explained by a growth curve rather than a straight line [16]. Our study demonstrated that a higher BP is a contributing factor to arterial stiffness, even when it is within the normal range, and the effect of SBP on baPWV was more prominent than that of PP. The association between BP and arterial stiffness has been debated in various studies [11, 13, 26, 27, 31, 32]. Longitudinal studies have shown that a large PP in childhood plays a role in the development of subclinical vascular damage in adulthood, and the early prevention of a large PP can reduce the future risk of cardiovascular disease [14]. Some BP-derived indicators, such as long-term BP variability and sum-PP [5, 33], were also reported to be significantly associated with baPWV. This relationship between BP and arterial stiffness may be bidirectional because arterial stiffness contributes to the increase in BP, and arterial stiffening is accelerated in patients with hypertension [34]. They behave reciprocally as cause and effect, interacting in a vicious cycle [35]. However, a statement from the American Heart Association said that arterial stiffness represents a cause rather than a consequence of hypertension [15]. Monitoring BP may be useful for the identification of vascular impairment [36], and baPWV can be used to predict the progression of BP and incident hypertension and determine the individual response to antihypertensive treatment [37-40]. Whether baPWV could be a useful screening tool to identify apparently healthy subjects who should be targeted for inventions aimed at preventing incident hypertension requires further study. The effects of the RHR on PWV are still controversial, with conflicting results being observed. Some researchers in the Corinthia study suggested that the influence of the RHR on PWV is mediated by BP [41], and the product of the RHR times the BP was reported to be associated with baPWV [42]. However, approximately half of the existing epidemiological studies have reported a significant BP-independent association between the RHR and PWV [43]. Our study demonstrated that an increased RHR is independently associated with a higher baPWV, regardless of other confounders in apparently healthy individuals. Regarding the mechanism, an increased RHR can change the viscoelasticity of the arterial wall, thus increasing arterial stiffness [43]. A study including 912 females showed that the urea acid level and baPWV had a positive nonlinear correlation [44], but our study showed that the level of urea acid was significantly linearly correlated with baPWV in females but not in males. In the previous literature, total homocysteine levels, BMI, low creatinine clearance, proteinuria, urine albumin, and salt intake were also reported to be associated with baPWV [22, 38, 45]. The results of this study should be interpreted in light of potential limitations. Although the study participants included people without hypertension or other cardiovascular diseases, the BP measurements were only obtained on a single occasion and the medical history was not reliable enough. Our study is cross-sectional; therefore, we could not determine the temporality of the associated factors, and we could not identify a causal relationship between baPWV and BP. These problems should be addressed in future longitudinal studies with larger populations.

5. Conclusions

In summary, the subjects included in our study were apparently healthy and without cardiovascular risk factors, and we verified the factors affecting baPWV and the association between BP and baPWV. The results showed that in addition to age and the RHR, BP was independently associated with baPWV. The development of arterial stiffness accelerates in elderly people. The standardized coefficients of SBP were greater than those of PP, followed by DBP. These findings underscore the importance of early monitoring of higher SBP to protect vascular elasticity.
  45 in total

1.  Increased pulse wave velocity is associated with low creatinine clearance and proteinuria in a screened cohort.

Authors:  Yusuke Ohya; Kunitoshi Iseki; Chiho Iseki; Takako Miyagi; Kozen Kinjo; Shuichi Takishita
Journal:  Am J Kidney Dis       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 8.860

2.  Influences of age and gender on results of noninvasive brachial-ankle pulse wave velocity measurement--a survey of 12517 subjects.

Authors:  Hirofumi Tomiyama; Akira Yamashina; Tomio Arai; Kenichi Hirose; Yutaka Koji; Taishiro Chikamori; Saburoh Hori; Yoshio Yamamoto; Nobutaka Doba; Shigeaki Hinohara
Journal:  Atherosclerosis       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 5.162

Review 3.  Brachial-Ankle Pulse Wave Velocity: Myths, Misconceptions, and Realities.

Authors:  Jun Sugawara; Hirofumi Tanaka
Journal:  Pulse (Basel)       Date:  2015-06-04

Review 4.  Effect of Heart Rate on Arterial Stiffness as Assessed by Pulse Wave Velocity.

Authors:  Isabella Tan; Mark Butlin; Bart Spronck; Hanguang Xiao; Alberto Avolio
Journal:  Curr Hypertens Rev       Date:  2018

5.  Pulse wave velocity, blood pressure and adipocytokines in young adults: the Rio de Janeiro study.

Authors:  Oswaldo Luiz Pizzi; Andréa Araujo Brandão; Roberto Pozzan; Maria Eliane Campos Magalhães; Erika Maria Gonçalves Campana; Flavia Lopes Fonseca; Elizabete Viana de Freitas; Ayrton Pires Brandão
Journal:  Arq Bras Cardiol       Date:  2012-12-11       Impact factor: 2.000

6.  Comparative effects of aging in men and women on the properties of the arterial tree.

Authors:  H Smulyan; R G Asmar; A Rudnicki; G M London; M E Safar
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 24.094

7.  Brachial-ankle pulse wave velocity is an independent predictor of incident hypertension in Japanese normotensive male subjects.

Authors:  Hiroki Satoh; Yasuaki Saijo; Reiko Kishi; Hiroyuki Tsutsui
Journal:  Environ Health Prev Med       Date:  2010-12-02       Impact factor: 3.674

8.  Association of long-term blood pressure variability and brachial-ankle pulse wave velocity: a retrospective study from the APAC cohort.

Authors:  Yang Wang; Yuling Yang; Anxin Wang; Shasha An; Zhifang Li; Wenyan Zhang; Xuemei Liu; Chunyu Ruan; Xiaoxue Liu; Xiuhua Guo; Xingquan Zhao; Shouling Wu
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-02-19       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Reference values of brachial-ankle pulse wave velocity according to age and blood pressure in a central Asia population.

Authors:  Gulinuer Yiming; Xianhui Zhou; Wenkui Lv; Yi Peng; Wenhui Zhang; Xinchun Cheng; Yaodong Li; Qiang Xing; Jianghua Zhang; Qina Zhou; Ling Zhang; Yanmei Lu; Hongli Wang; Baopeng Tang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-04-12       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Associations between Blood Pressure Indices and Brachial-ankle Pulse Wave Velocity in Treated Hypertensive Adults: results from the China Stroke Primary Prevention Trial (CSPPT).

Authors:  Lihua Hu; Yuanyuan Zhang; Xiao Huang; Yun Song; Xianhui Qin; Binyan Wang; Yan Zhang; Genfu Tang; Jianping Li; Ping Li; Huihui Bao; Yong Huo; Xiaoshu Cheng
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-06-03       Impact factor: 4.379

View more
  2 in total

1.  Cross-sectional association between body fat percentage and arteriosclerosis assessed by Cardio-Ankle Vascular Index in a Chinese population: a retrospective observational study.

Authors:  Linfeng He; Lijuan Bai; Lihua Liu; Yun Liu; Ruiyun Wang; Yaoling Wang; Man Liao; Yizhou Wan; Benling Qi
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2022-01-07       Impact factor: 2.692

2.  Relationship between physical fitness and arterial stiffness in Korean older adults.

Authors:  Tae Kyung Yoo; Hye Chang Rhim; Soo Hyun Park; Saejong Park; Jong-Young Lee
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2022-09-23       Impact factor: 1.817

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.