Literature DB >> 32770242

Comparison of data analytics strategies in computer vision systems to predict pig body composition traits from 3D images.

Arthur F A Fernandes1, João R R Dórea1, Bruno Dourado Valente2, Robert Fitzgerald2, William Herring2, Guilherme J M Rosa1.   

Abstract

Computer vision systems (CVS) have been shown to be a powerful tool for the measurement of live pig body weight (BW) with no animal stress. With advances in precision farming, it is now possible to evaluate the growth performance of individual pigs more accurately. However, important traits such as muscle and fat deposition can still be evaluated only via ultrasound, computed tomography, or dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry. Therefore, the objectives of this study were: 1) to develop a CVS for prediction of live BW, muscle depth (MD), and back fat (BF) from top view 3D images of finishing pigs and 2) to compare the predictive ability of different approaches, such as traditional multiple linear regression, partial least squares, and machine learning techniques, including elastic networks, artificial neural networks, and deep learning (DL). A dataset containing over 12,000 images from 557 finishing pigs (average BW of 120 ± 12 kg) was split into training and testing sets using a 5-fold cross-validation (CV) technique so that 80% and 20% of the dataset were used for training and testing in each fold. Several image features, such as volume, area, length, widths, heights, polar image descriptors, and polar Fourier transforms, were extracted from the images and used as predictor variables in the different approaches evaluated. In addition, DL image encoders that take raw 3D images as input were also tested. This latter method achieved the best overall performance, with the lowest mean absolute scaled error (MASE) and root mean square error for all traits, and the highest predictive squared correlation (R2). The median predicted MASE achieved by this method was 2.69, 5.02, and 13.56, and R2 of 0.86, 0.50, and 0.45, for BW, MD, and BF, respectively. In conclusion, it was demonstrated that it is possible to successfully predict BW, MD, and BF via CVS on a fully automated setting using 3D images collected in farm conditions. Moreover, DL algorithms simplified and optimized the data analytics workflow, with raw 3D images used as direct inputs, without requiring prior image processing.
© The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Society of Animal Science. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  body composition; image analysis; machine learning; precision livestock farming; ultrasound

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32770242      PMCID: PMC7447136          DOI: 10.1093/jas/skaa250

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Sci        ISSN: 0021-8812            Impact factor:   3.159


  11 in total

1.  Measurement of bovine sperm nuclear shape using Fourier harmonic amplitudes.

Authors:  G C Ostermeier; G A Sargeant; J J Parrish
Journal:  J Androl       Date:  2001 Jul-Aug

2.  The relationship between body dimensions of living pigs and their carcass composition.

Authors:  A B Doeschl-Wilson; D M Green; A V Fisher; S M Carroll; C P Schofield; C T Whittemore
Journal:  Meat Sci       Date:  2005-03-02       Impact factor: 5.209

3.  Lean meat prediction with HGP, CGM and CSB-Image-Meater, with prediction accuracy evaluated for different proportions of gilts, boars and castrated boars in the pig population.

Authors:  B Engel; E Lambooij; W G Buist; P Vereijken
Journal:  Meat Sci       Date:  2011-08-02       Impact factor: 5.209

4.  A novel automated system to acquire biometric and morphological measurements and predict body weight of pigs via 3D computer vision.

Authors:  Arthur F A Fernandes; João R R Dórea; Robert Fitzgerald; William Herring; Guilherme J M Rosa
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2019-01-01       Impact factor: 3.159

5.  Estimation of carcass composition and cut composition from computed tomography images of live growing pigs of different genotypes.

Authors:  Maria Font-i-Furnols; Anna Carabús; Candido Pomar; Marina Gispert
Journal:  Animal       Date:  2014-09-12       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Modelling interactions between farmer practices and fattening pig performances with an individual-based model.

Authors:  A Cadéro; A Aubry; L Brossard; J Y Dourmad; Y Salaün; F Garcia-Launay
Journal:  Animal       Date:  2017-11-16       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Regularization Paths for Generalized Linear Models via Coordinate Descent.

Authors:  Jerome Friedman; Trevor Hastie; Rob Tibshirani
Journal:  J Stat Softw       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 6.440

8.  Non-invasive methods for the determination of body and carcass composition in livestock: dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging and ultrasound: invited review.

Authors:  A M Scholz; L Bünger; J Kongsro; U Baulain; A D Mitchell
Journal:  Animal       Date:  2015-03-06       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 9.  Precision Livestock Farming in Swine Welfare: A Review for Swine Practitioners.

Authors:  Madonna Benjamin; Steven Yik
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2019-03-31       Impact factor: 2.752

10.  Precision pig feeding: a breakthrough toward sustainability.

Authors:  Candido Pomar; Aline Remus
Journal:  Anim Front       Date:  2019-03-30
View more
  3 in total

1.  Predicting ribeye area and circularity in live calves through 3D image analyses of body surface.

Authors:  Joseph G Caffarini; Tiago Bresolin; Joao R R Dorea
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2022-09-01       Impact factor: 3.338

2.  Estimating genetics of body dimensions and activity levels in pigs using automated pose estimation.

Authors:  Wim Gorssen; Carmen Winters; Roel Meyermans; Rudi D'Hooge; Steven Janssens; Nadine Buys
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-09-13       Impact factor: 4.996

Review 3.  Image Analysis and Computer Vision Applications in Animal Sciences: An Overview.

Authors:  Arthur Francisco Araújo Fernandes; João Ricardo Rebouças Dórea; Guilherme Jordão de Magalhães Rosa
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2020-10-21
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.