Literature DB >> 30371785

A novel automated system to acquire biometric and morphological measurements and predict body weight of pigs via 3D computer vision.

Arthur F A Fernandes1, João R R Dórea1, Robert Fitzgerald2, William Herring2, Guilherme J M Rosa1,3.   

Abstract

Computer vision applications in livestock are appealing since they enable measurement of traits of interest without the need to directly interact with the animals. This allows the possibility of multiple measurements of traits of interest with minimal animal stress. In the current study, an automated computer vision system was devised and evaluated for extraction of features of interest, as body measurements and shape descriptors, and prediction of body weight in pigs. From the 655 pigs that had data collected 580 had more than 5 frames recorded and were used for development of the predictive models. The cross-validation for the models developed with data from nursery and finishing pigs presented an R2 ranging from 0.86 (random selected image) to 0.94 (median of images truncated on the third quartile), whereas with the dataset without nursery pigs, the R2 estimates ranged from 0.70 (random selected image) to 0.84 (median of images truncated on the third quartile). However, overall the mean absolute error was lower for the models fitted without data on nursery animals. From the body measures extracted from the image, body volume, area, and length were the most informative for prediction of body weight. The inclusion of the remaining body measurements (width and heights) or shape descriptors to the model promoted significant improvement of the predictions, whereas the further inclusion of sex and line effects were not significant.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30371785      PMCID: PMC6313152          DOI: 10.1093/jas/sky418

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Sci        ISSN: 0021-8812            Impact factor:   3.159


  5 in total

1.  Validation of a digital video tracking system for recording pig locomotor behaviour.

Authors:  Nanna M Lind; Michael Vinther; Ralf P Hemmingsen; Axel K Hansen
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2004-11-14       Impact factor: 2.390

2.  Modelling interactions between farmer practices and fattening pig performances with an individual-based model.

Authors:  A Cadéro; A Aubry; L Brossard; J Y Dourmad; Y Salaün; F Garcia-Launay
Journal:  Animal       Date:  2017-11-16       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Effect of split marketing on the welfare, performance, and carcass traits of finishing pigs.

Authors:  S Conte; P G Lawlor; N O'Connell; L A Boyle
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2011-08-26       Impact factor: 3.159

4.  Genetics of body fat mass and related traits in a pig population selected for leanness.

Authors:  Henry Reyer; Patrick F Varley; Eduard Murani; Siriluck Ponsuksili; Klaus Wimmers
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-08-22       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 5.  How Farm Animals React and Perceive Stressful Situations Such As Handling, Restraint, and Transport.

Authors:  Temple Grandin; Chelsey Shivley
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2015-12-01       Impact factor: 2.752

  5 in total
  12 in total

1.  Predicting ribeye area and circularity in live calves through 3D image analyses of body surface.

Authors:  Joseph G Caffarini; Tiago Bresolin; Joao R R Dorea
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2022-09-01       Impact factor: 3.338

Review 2.  Impact of housing environment and management on pre-/post-weaning piglet productivity.

Authors:  Brett C Ramirez; Morgan D Hayes; Isabella C F S Condotta; Suzanne M Leonard
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2022-06-01       Impact factor: 3.338

Review 3.  ASAS-NANP symposium: mathematical modeling in animal nutrition: limitations and potential next steps for modeling and modelers in the animal sciences.

Authors:  Marc Jacobs; Aline Remus; Charlotte Gaillard; Hector M Menendez; Luis O Tedeschi; Suresh Neethirajan; Jennifer L Ellis
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2022-06-01       Impact factor: 3.338

4.  Comparison of data analytics strategies in computer vision systems to predict pig body composition traits from 3D images.

Authors:  Arthur F A Fernandes; João R R Dórea; Bruno Dourado Valente; Robert Fitzgerald; William Herring; Guilherme J M Rosa
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2020-08-01       Impact factor: 3.159

5.  A Systematic Review on Validated Precision Livestock Farming Technologies for Pig Production and Its Potential to Assess Animal Welfare.

Authors:  Yaneth Gómez; Anna H Stygar; Iris J M M Boumans; Eddie A M Bokkers; Lene J Pedersen; Jarkko K Niemi; Matti Pastell; Xavier Manteca; Pol Llonch
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2021-05-14

6.  Long-Term Tracking of Group-Housed Livestock Using Keypoint Detection and MAP Estimation for Individual Animal Identification.

Authors:  Eric T Psota; Ty Schmidt; Benny Mote; Lance C Pérez
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2020-06-30       Impact factor: 3.576

7.  Modelling the shape of the pig scapula.

Authors:  Øyvind Nordbø
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2020-07-01       Impact factor: 4.297

8.  Pig Weight and Body Size Estimation Using a Multiple Output Regression Convolutional Neural Network: A Fast and Fully Automatic Method.

Authors:  Jianlong Zhang; Yanrong Zhuang; Hengyi Ji; Guanghui Teng
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-06       Impact factor: 3.576

Review 9.  Image Analysis and Computer Vision Applications in Animal Sciences: An Overview.

Authors:  Arthur Francisco Araújo Fernandes; João Ricardo Rebouças Dórea; Guilherme Jordão de Magalhães Rosa
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2020-10-21

10.  Assessing the Feasibility of Using Kinect 3D Images to Predict Light Lamb Carcasses Composition from Leg Volume.

Authors:  Severiano R Silva; Mariana Almeida; Isabella Condotta; André Arantes; Cristina Guedes; Virgínia Santos
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-19       Impact factor: 2.752

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.