Literature DB >> 32770240

AVIFAVIR for Treatment of Patients With Moderate Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19): Interim Results of a Phase II/III Multicenter Randomized Clinical Trial.

Andrey A Ivashchenko1, Kirill A Dmitriev2, Natalia V Vostokova3, Valeria N Azarova3, Andrew A Blinow4, Alina N Egorova3, Ivan G Gordeev5, Alexey P Ilin6, Ruben N Karapetian7, Dmitry V Kravchenko6, Nikita V Lomakin8, Elena A Merkulova3, Natalia A Papazova9, Elena P Pavlikova10, Nikolay P Savchuk11, Elena N Simakina12, Tagir A Sitdekov2, Elena A Smolyarchuk13, Elena G Tikhomolova14, Elena V Yakubova4, Alexandre V Ivachtchenko11.   

Abstract

In May 2020 the Russian Ministry of Health granted fast-track marketing authorization to RNA polymerase inhibitor AVIFAVIR (favipiravir) for the treatment of COVID-19 patients. In the pilot stage of Phase II/III clinical trial, AVIFAVIR enabled SARS-CoV-2 viral clearance in 62.5% of patients within 4 days, and was safe and well-tolerated. Clinical Trials Registration. NCT04434248.
© The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press for the Infectious Diseases Society of America.

Entities:  

Keywords:  AVIFAVIR; COVID-19; SARS-CoV-2; favipiravir

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 32770240      PMCID: PMC7454388          DOI: 10.1093/cid/ciaa1176

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Infect Dis        ISSN: 1058-4838            Impact factor:   9.079


The pandemic of the novel coronavirus infection (COVID-19) represents an unprecedented disaster for healthcare providers and economy worldwide. The urgent requirement for effective treatments has sparked an intense effort on the part of the pharmaceutical industry and shifted drug development to a new scale of commitment and collaboration. Repositioning of antiviral drugs that could be effective against SARS-CoV-2 is one of the common strategies in the fight against COVID-19. In May 2020, remdesivir received conditional approval from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of hospitalized patients with severe COVID-19. However, there are still limited data on its efficacy and safety and limitations of the intravenous route of administration [1]. Thus, the development of the effective oral antiviral agents for use at earlier stages of the disease is still warranted. Favipiravir is an RNA-dependent RNA polymerase inhibitor marketed in Japan (Avigan) and China (Favilavir) as a second-line treatment of novel or re-emerging influenza outbreaks [2]. Earlier this year it was reported to demonstrate antiviral activity against SARS-CoV-2 in Vero E6 cells (EC50, 61.88 μM, CC50 > 400 μM, SI > 6.46) and to provide shorter viral clearance time in patients with COVID-19 [3]. A nonrandomized study conducted in China demonstrated a median viral clearance time of 4 days, versus a period of 11 days for lopinavir/ritonavir (P < .001) [4]. The World Health Organization (WHO) also listed Favipiravir as a candidate experimental treatment (broad spectrum antiviral) [5]. Favipiravir, under brand name AVIFAVIR, was resynthesized and developed in Russia by the joint venture of Russian Direct Investment Fund and ChemRar Group. Following preclinical tests, a Phase II/III clinical trial of AVIFAVIR in patients with COVID-19 was initiated. This brief report provides the interim results of the study from 60 patients enrolled in the pilot stage (Phase II).

METHODS

This was an adaptive, multicenter, open label, randomized, Phase II/III clinical trial of AVIFAVIR versus standard of care (SOC) in hospitalized patients with moderate COVID-19 pneumonia. The study design was based on WHO R&D Blueprint recommendations [6]. The pilot stage of the study was conducted in April and May 2020 at 6 Russian clinical sites in Moscow, Smolensk, and Nizhniy Novgorod (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04434248). The Independent Data Monitoring Committee (IDMC) reviewed the results of the interim analysis. The eligible patients included hospitalized men and nonpregnant women of 18 years or older who signed the informed consent form, had moderate PCR-confirmed COVID-19 (positive test at screening), were able to administrate the drug orally and willing to use adequate contraception during the study and 3 months after its completion. The patients were randomized at a 1:1:1 ratio to receive either AVIFAVIR 1600 mg BID on Day 1, followed by 600 mg BID on Days 2–14 (1600/600 mg), or AVIFAVIR 1800 mg BID on Day 1, followed by 800 mg BID on Days 2–14 (1800/800 mg), or SOC according to the Russian guidelines for treatment of COVID-19 [7]. During the study, patients in all groups were allowed to use pathogenetic and symptomatic treatment; patients in the AVIFAVIR groups were not allowed to use other antivirals or antimalarial drugs. The objective of the pilot stage of the study was a preliminary assessment of the efficacy and safety of AVIFAVIR, and to select the optimal dosing regimen for further evaluation at the pivotal stage (Phase III). The primary efficacy endpoint at the pilot stage was the elimination of SARS-CoV-2 by Day 10 (defined as two negative PCR tests with at least a 24-hour interval). Qualitative Real-Time RT-PCR tests were performed at local laboratories of the clinical sites or in the central laboratory of Rospotrebnadzor. The study assessments included daily vital signs, SpO2 and WHO Ordinal Scale for Clinical Improvement (WHO-OSCI); PCR for SARS-CoV-2 detection in nasopharyngeal and/or oropharyngeal swabs at baseline and on Days 5, 10, and 15; chest computed tomography (CT) scan at baseline and on Day 15; physical examination, complete blood count, biochemistry, C-reactive protein (CRP), urinalysis, and electrocardiogram at baseline and on Days 5 and 15. If not discharged from the hospital earlier, the patients attended follow-up visits on Day 22 and Day 29. All patients were followed until Day 29. The “go-no-go” decision to start the pivotal stage of the study was based on the exact single-stage Phase II assessment at one-sided α = 0.05 and 80% power [8]. 13/18 (72.2%) or more patients would have been sufficient to demonstrate that the viral clearance in 80% of patients by Day 10 was plausible, and that the response was greater than the presumably noneffective level of 50%. The secondary endpoints that were assessed during the interim analysis were the rate of viral clearance by Day 5, time to normalization of clinical symptoms (ie, body temperature), changes on CT scan by Day 15, and incidence and severity of adverse events related to the study drug.

RESULTS

Upon signing the informed consent form and confirmed eligibility criteria, 60 patients hospitalized with COVID-19 pneumonia were randomized into 3 treatment groups: AVIFAVIR 1600/600 mg, AVIFAVIR 1800/800 mg, or SOC. Each group comprised 20 patients and all randomized patients constituted safety and intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis sets. The AVIFAVIR and control groups were generally comparable in demographic and baseline characteristics. 28/60 (46.7%) had risk factors for severe disease (ie, age 60 and older and/or concurrent chronic conditions); 45/60 (75.0%) were on ambient air (Score 3 on WHO-OSCI) and 15/60 (25.0%) required supplemental oxygen via mask or nasal cannula (Score 4 on WHO-OSCI); 15/60 (25.0%) had body temperature >38oC, and 42/60 (70.0%) had CRP > 10 mg/L. Mean disease duration at baseline was 6.7 days from the start of the symptoms. In the AVIFAVIR groups, the study drug was administered for a mean period of 10.9 ± 2.8 days. In the SOC group, hydroxychloroquine or chloroquine was administered to 15/20 (75.0%) patients, lopinavir/ritonavir was used in 1/20 (5%) patient, and 4/20 (20%) patients did not receive etiotropic treatment. The concomitant therapy of COVID-19 in all groups included antibiotics, anticoagulants, and/or immunosuppressants, as well as symptomatic treatment. Both dosing regimens of AVIFAVIR demonstrated similar virologic response. On Day 5, the viral clearance was achieved in 25/40 (62.5%) patients on AVIFAVIR and in 6/20 (30.0%) patients on SOC (P = .018). By Day 10 the viral clearance was achieved in 37/40 (92.5%) patients (see Figure 1A) on AVIFAVIR and in 16/20 (80.0%) patients on SOC (P = .155). Thus, the required number of responders to demonstrate proof of concept was attained.
Figure 1.

A, Elimination of SARS-CoV-2 in nasopharyngeal and/or oropharyngeal swabs of patients treated with AVIFAVIR or SOC on Day 5 and Day 10 of the study treatment. B, Time to normal body temperature in patients treated with AVIFAVIR or SOC (Kaplan-Meier curves). Abbreviations: SARS-CoV-2, severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2; SOC, standard of care.

A, Elimination of SARS-CoV-2 in nasopharyngeal and/or oropharyngeal swabs of patients treated with AVIFAVIR or SOC on Day 5 and Day 10 of the study treatment. B, Time to normal body temperature in patients treated with AVIFAVIR or SOC (Kaplan-Meier curves). Abbreviations: SARS-CoV-2, severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2; SOC, standard of care. The median time to body temperature normalization (<37oC) was 2 days (IQR 1–3) in the AVIFAVIR groups and 4 days (IQR 1–8) in the SOC group (P = .007) (see Figure 1B). By Day 15, chest CT scans improved in 36/40 (90.0%) patients on AVIFAVIR and 16/20 (80.0%) patients on SOC (P = .283). Adverse drug reactions to AVIFAVIR were reported in 7/40 (17.5%) patients, including diarrhea, nausea, vomiting, chest pain, and an increase in liver transaminase levels. The adverse drug reactions were mild to moderate and caused early discontinuation of the study drug in 2/40 (5.0%) patients. Two patients on AVIFAVIR 1600/600 mg were moved to intensive care unit, received mechanical ventilation, and later died. Both patients had the increased risk of severe disease, including diabetes mellitus, arterial hypertension, obesity, CRP > 50 mg/L, and supplemental oxygen at baseline. 13/20 (65.0%) patients on AVIFAVIR 1600/600 mg, 17/20 (85.0%) patients on AVIFAVIR 1800/800 mg, and 17/20 (85.0%) patients on SOC were discharged from the hospital and/or achieved Score 2 on WHO-OSCI by Day 15.

DISCUSSION

AVIFAVIR demonstrated rapid antiviral response against SARS-CoV-2. The proportion of patients who achieved negative PCR on Day 5 on both dosing regimens of AVIFAVIR was twice as high as in the control group (P < .05). The median loading dose of AVIFAVIR given to responders was 43.9 mg/kg (IQR 40.0–47.1), and to those with positive PCR on Day 5, it was 39.1 mg/kg (IQR 35.6–43.9). There were no new safety concerns related to AVIFAVIR as all adverse reactions were mild to moderate in severity and were consistent with those reported previously for AVIGAN [2, 9]. No increasing toxicity was observed in patients who received higher doses of AVIFAVIR. Based on this observation, it was decided to introduce a weight-based dosing regimen of AVIFAVIR in the pivotal stage of the study with the target loading dose of ≥44 mg/kg and the treatment duration of up to 10 days. While clinical effects of AVIFAVIR will be further studied in the pivotal stage of the study, the pilot data demonstrates proof of concept and high treatment potential of the drug in moderately ill patients. It also suggests that the administration of AVIFAVIR to patients with signs of respiratory distress and cytokine storm should be considered only as part of the combination therapy that includes anti-inflammatory agents with proven efficacy against COVID-19. Based on the interim results of the Phase II/III clinical trial, the Russian Ministry of Health granted a conditional marketing authorization to AVIFAVIR, which makes it the only approved oral drug for treatment of moderate COVID-19 to date.
  5 in total

1.  Sample size tables for exact single-stage phase II designs.

Authors:  R P A'Hern
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2001-03-30       Impact factor: 2.373

2.  A review of the safety of favipiravir - a potential treatment in the COVID-19 pandemic?

Authors:  Victoria Pilkington; Toby Pepperrell; Andrew Hill
Journal:  J Virus Erad       Date:  2020-04-30

3.  Experimental Treatment with Favipiravir for COVID-19: An Open-Label Control Study.

Authors:  Qingxian Cai; Minghui Yang; Dongjing Liu; Jun Chen; Dan Shu; Junxia Xia; Xuejiao Liao; Yuanbo Gu; Qiue Cai; Yang Yang; Chenguang Shen; Xiaohe Li; Ling Peng; Deliang Huang; Jing Zhang; Shurong Zhang; Fuxiang Wang; Jiaye Liu; Li Chen; Shuyan Chen; Zhaoqin Wang; Zheng Zhang; Ruiyuan Cao; Wu Zhong; Yingxia Liu; Lei Liu
Journal:  Engineering (Beijing)       Date:  2020-03-18       Impact factor: 7.553

Review 4.  Available Evidence and Ongoing Clinical Trials of Remdesivir: Could It Be a Promising Therapeutic Option for COVID-19?

Authors:  Mekonnen Sisay
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2020-05-26       Impact factor: 5.810

5.  Remdesivir and chloroquine effectively inhibit the recently emerged novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) in vitro.

Authors:  Manli Wang; Ruiyuan Cao; Leike Zhang; Xinglou Yang; Jia Liu; Mingyue Xu; Zhengli Shi; Zhihong Hu; Wu Zhong; Gengfu Xiao
Journal:  Cell Res       Date:  2020-02-04       Impact factor: 25.617

  5 in total
  62 in total

1.  Update of the recommendations of the Sociedade Portuguesa de Cuidados Intensivos and the Infection and Sepsis Group for the approach to COVID-19 in Intensive Care Medicine.

Authors:  João João Mendes; José Artur Paiva; Filipe Gonzalez; Paulo Mergulhão; Filipe Froes; Roberto Roncon; João Gouveia
Journal:  Rev Bras Ter Intensiva       Date:  2022-01-24

Review 2.  An insight into SARS-CoV-2 structure, pathogenesis, target hunting for drug development and vaccine initiatives.

Authors:  Arijit Ghosh; Paritosh K Kar; Anupam Gautam; Rahul Gupta; Rajveer Singh; Rudra Chakravarti; Velayutham Ravichandiran; Shubhra Ghosh Dastidar; Dipanjan Ghosh; Syamal Roy
Journal:  RSC Med Chem       Date:  2022-01-25

3.  An ordinal severity scale for COVID-19 retrospective studies using Electronic Health Record data.

Authors:  Maryam Khodaverdi; Bradley S Price; J Zachary Porterfield; H Timothy Bunnell; Michael T Vest; Alfred Jerrod Anzalone; Jeremy Harper; Wes D Kimble; Hamidreza Moradi; Brian Hendricks; Susan L Santangelo; Sally L Hodder
Journal:  JAMIA Open       Date:  2022-07-09

Review 4.  COVID-19: molecular pathophysiology, genetic evolution and prospective therapeutics-a review.

Authors:  C T Dhanya Raj; Dinesh Kumar Kandaswamy; Ravi Chandra Sekhara Reddy Danduga; Raju Rajasabapathy; Rathinam Arthur James
Journal:  Arch Microbiol       Date:  2021-02-08       Impact factor: 2.552

5.  Favipiravir-induced Liver Injury in Patients with Coronavirus Disease 2019.

Authors:  Pramod Kumar; Anand Kulkarni; Mithun Sharma; Padaki Nagaraja Rao; Duvvuru Nageshwar Reddy
Journal:  J Clin Transl Hepatol       Date:  2021-04-15

Review 6.  Therapeutic strategies to fight COVID-19: Which is the status artis?

Authors:  Cristina Scavone; Annamaria Mascolo; Concetta Rafaniello; Liberata Sportiello; Ugo Trama; Alice Zoccoli; Francesca Futura Bernardi; Giorgio Racagni; Liberato Berrino; Giuseppe Castaldo; Enrico Coscioni; Francesco Rossi; Annalisa Capuano
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2021-05-07       Impact factor: 9.473

7.  Identification and Development of Therapeutics for COVID-19.

Authors:  Halie M Rando; Nils Wellhausen; Soumita Ghosh; Alexandra J Lee; Anna Ada Dattoli; Fengling Hu; James Brian Byrd; Diane N Rafizadeh; Ronan Lordan; Yanjun Qi; Yuchen Sun; Christian Brueffer; Jeffrey M Field; Marouen Ben Guebila; Nafisa M Jadavji; Ashwin N Skelly; Bharath Ramsundar; Jinhui Wang; Rishi Raj Goel; YoSon Park; Simina M Boca; Anthony Gitter; Casey S Greene
Journal:  mSystems       Date:  2021-11-02       Impact factor: 6.496

8.  Favipiravir for the treatment of patients with COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Toshie Manabe; Dan Kambayashi; Hiroyasu Akatsu; Koichiro Kudo
Journal:  BMC Infect Dis       Date:  2021-05-27       Impact factor: 3.090

9.  Pharmacokinetic modelling to estimate intracellular favipiravir ribofuranosyl-5'-triphosphate exposure to support posology for SARS-CoV-2.

Authors:  Henry Pertinez; Rajith K R Rajoli; Saye H Khoo; Andrew Owen
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  2021-07-15       Impact factor: 5.790

Review 10.  Clinical efficacy of antiviral agents against coronavirus disease 2019: A systematic review of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Chih-Cheng Lai; Chien-Ming Chao; Po-Ren Hsueh
Journal:  J Microbiol Immunol Infect       Date:  2021-06-26       Impact factor: 4.399

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.