Stephanie A Leonard1, Chris J Kennedy, Suzan L Carmichael, Deirdre J Lyell, Elliott K Main. 1. Departments of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Pediatrics and the California Maternal Quality Care Collaborative, Stanford University, Stanford, and the Division of Epidemiology and Biostatistics and the Berkeley Institute for Data Science, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, California.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To develop and validate an expanded obstetric comorbidity score for predicting severe maternal morbidity that can be applied consistently across contemporary U.S. patient discharge data sets. METHODS: Discharge data from birth hospitalizations in California during 2016-2017 were used to develop the score. The outcomes were severe maternal morbidity, defined using the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention index, and nontransfusion severe maternal morbidity (excluding cases where transfusion was the only indicator of severe maternal morbidity). We selected 27 potential patient-level risk factors for severe maternal morbidity, identified using International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision, Clinical Modification diagnosis codes. We used a targeted causal inference approach integrated with machine learning to rank the risk factors based on adjusted risk ratios (aRRs). We used these results to assign scores to each comorbidity, which sum to a single numeric score. We validated the score in California and national data sets and compared the performance to that of a previously developed obstetric comorbidity index. RESULTS: Among 919,546 births, the rates of severe maternal morbidity and nontransfusion severe maternal morbidity were 168 and 74 per 10,000 births, respectively. The highest risk comorbidity was placenta accreta spectrum (aRR of 30.5 for severe maternal morbidity and 54.7 for nontransfusion severe maternal morbidity) and the lowest was gestational diabetes mellitus (aRR of 1.06 for severe maternal morbidity and 1.12 for nontransfusion severe maternal morbidity). Normalized scores based on the aRR were developed for each comorbidity, which ranged from 1 to 59 points for severe maternal morbidity and from 1 to 36 points for nontransfusion severe maternal morbidity. The overall performance of the expanded comorbidity scores was good (C-statistics were 0.78 for severe maternal morbidity and 0.84 for nontransfusion severe maternal morbidity in California data and 0.82 and 0.87, respectively, in national data) and improved on prior comorbidity indices developed for obstetric populations. Calibration plots showed good concordance between predicted and actual risks of the outcomes. CONCLUSION: We developed and validated an expanded obstetric comorbidity score to improve comparisons of severe maternal morbidity rates across patient populations with different comorbidity case mixes.
OBJECTIVE: To develop and validate an expanded obstetric comorbidity score for predicting severe maternal morbidity that can be applied consistently across contemporary U.S. patient discharge data sets. METHODS: Discharge data from birth hospitalizations in California during 2016-2017 were used to develop the score. The outcomes were severe maternal morbidity, defined using the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention index, and nontransfusion severe maternal morbidity (excluding cases where transfusion was the only indicator of severe maternal morbidity). We selected 27 potential patient-level risk factors for severe maternal morbidity, identified using International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision, Clinical Modification diagnosis codes. We used a targeted causal inference approach integrated with machine learning to rank the risk factors based on adjusted risk ratios (aRRs). We used these results to assign scores to each comorbidity, which sum to a single numeric score. We validated the score in California and national data sets and compared the performance to that of a previously developed obstetric comorbidity index. RESULTS: Among 919,546 births, the rates of severe maternal morbidity and nontransfusion severe maternal morbidity were 168 and 74 per 10,000 births, respectively. The highest risk comorbidity was placenta accreta spectrum (aRR of 30.5 for severe maternal morbidity and 54.7 for nontransfusion severe maternal morbidity) and the lowest was gestational diabetes mellitus (aRR of 1.06 for severe maternal morbidity and 1.12 for nontransfusion severe maternal morbidity). Normalized scores based on the aRR were developed for each comorbidity, which ranged from 1 to 59 points for severe maternal morbidity and from 1 to 36 points for nontransfusion severe maternal morbidity. The overall performance of the expanded comorbidity scores was good (C-statistics were 0.78 for severe maternal morbidity and 0.84 for nontransfusion severe maternal morbidity in California data and 0.82 and 0.87, respectively, in national data) and improved on prior comorbidity indices developed for obstetric populations. Calibration plots showed good concordance between predicted and actual risks of the outcomes. CONCLUSION: We developed and validated an expanded obstetric comorbidity score to improve comparisons of severe maternal morbidity rates across patient populations with different comorbidity case mixes.
Authors: Sarah Rae Easter; Brian T Bateman; Valerie Horton Sweeney; Karen Manganaro; Sarah C Lassey; Joshua J Gagne; Julian N Robinson Journal: Am J Obstet Gynecol Date: 2019-06-20 Impact factor: 8.661
Authors: Elizabeth Wall-Wieler; Suzan L Carmichael; Ronald S Gibbs; Deirdre J Lyell; Anna I Girsen; Yasser Y El-Sayed; Alexander J Butwick Journal: Obstet Gynecol Date: 2019-08 Impact factor: 7.661
Authors: Mona T Lydon-Rochelle; Victoria L Holt; Jennifer C Nelson; Vicky Cárdenas; Carolyn Gardella; Thomas R Easterling; William M Callaghan Journal: Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol Date: 2005-11 Impact factor: 3.980
Authors: Brian T Bateman; Jill M Mhyre; Sonia Hernandez-Diaz; Krista F Huybrechts; Michael A Fischer; Andreea A Creanga; William M Callaghan; Joshua J Gagne Journal: Obstet Gynecol Date: 2013-11 Impact factor: 7.661
Authors: Kazuyoshi Aoyama; Rohan D'Souza; Ruxandra Pinto; Joel G Ray; Andrea Hill; Damon C Scales; Stephen E Lapinsky; Gareth R Seaward; Michelle Hladunewich; Prakesh S Shah; Robert A Fowler Journal: PLoS One Date: 2018-12-04 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Danielle M Panelli; Stephanie A Leonard; Peiyi Kan; Kimford J Meador; Thomas F McElrath; Kelly F Darmawan; Suzan L Carmichael; Deirdre J Lyell; Yasser Y El-Sayed; Maurice L Druzin; Tiffany C Herrero Journal: Obstet Gynecol Date: 2021-11-01 Impact factor: 7.661
Authors: Mark A Clapp; Ellen Kim; Kaitlyn E James; Roy H Perlis; Anjali J Kaimal; Thomas H McCoy; Sarah Rae Easter Journal: JAMA Netw Open Date: 2022-10-03
Authors: Helen D Bailey; Akilew A Adane; Scott W White; Brad M Farrant; Carrington C J Shepherd Journal: Arch Gynecol Obstet Date: 2022-09-15 Impact factor: 2.493
Authors: Halley Ruppel; Vincent X Liu; Patricia Kipnis; Monique M Hedderson; Mara Greenberg; Heather Forquer; Brian Lawson; Gabriel J Escobar Journal: Womens Health Rep (New Rochelle) Date: 2021-11-02
Authors: Claire M Phibbs; Katy B Kozhimannil; Stephanie A Leonard; Scott A Lorch; Elliott K Main; Susan K Schmitt; Ciaran S Phibbs Journal: J Perinatol Date: 2022-02-18 Impact factor: 3.225