Literature DB >> 28153661

Reduction of severe maternal morbidity from hemorrhage using a state perinatal quality collaborative.

Elliott K Main1, Valerie Cape2, Anisha Abreo2, Julie Vasher2, Amanda Woods2, Andrew Carpenter3, Jeffrey B Gould2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Obstetric hemorrhage is the leading cause of severe maternal morbidity and of preventable maternal mortality in the United States. The California Maternal Quality Care Collaborative developed a comprehensive quality improvement tool kit for hemorrhage based on the national patient safety bundle for obstetric hemorrhage and noted promising results in pilot implementation projects.
OBJECTIVE: We sought to determine whether these safety tools can be scaled up to reduce severe maternal morbidity in women with obstetric hemorrhage using a large maternal quality collaborative. STUDY
DESIGN: We report on 99 collaborative hospitals (256,541 annual births) using a before-and-after model with 48 noncollaborative comparison hospitals (81,089 annual births) used to detect any systemic trends. Both groups participated in the California Maternal Data Center providing baseline and rapid-cycle data. Baseline period was the 48 months from January 2011 through December 2014. The collaborative started in January 2015 and the postintervention period was the 6 months from October 2015 through March 2016. We modified the Institute for Healthcare Improvement collaborative model for achieving breakthrough improvement to include the mentor model whereby 20 pairs of nurse and physician mentors experienced in quality improvement gave additional support to small groups of 6-8 hospitals. The national hemorrhage safety bundle served as the template for quality improvement action. The main outcome measurement was the composite Centers for Disease Control and Prevention severe maternal morbidity measure, for both the target population of women with hemorrhage and the overall delivery population. The rate of adoption of bundle elements was used as an indicator of hospital engagement and intensity.
RESULTS: Compared to baseline period, women with hemorrhage in collaborative hospitals experienced a 20.8% reduction in severe maternal morbidity while women in comparison hospitals had a 1.2% reduction (P < .0001). Women in hospitals with prior hemorrhage collaborative experience experienced an even larger 28.6% reduction. Fewer mothers with transfusions accounted for two thirds of the reduction in collaborative hospitals and fewer procedures and medical complications, the remainder. The rate of severe maternal morbidity among all women in collaborative hospitals was 11.7% lower and women in hospitals with prior hemorrhage collaborative experience had a 17.5% reduction. Improved outcomes for women were noted in all hospital types (regional, medium, small, health maintenance organization, and nonhealth maintenance organization). Overall, 54% of hospitals completed 14 of 17 bundle elements, 76% reported regular unit-based drills, and 65% reported regular posthemorrhage debriefs. Higher rate of bundle adoption was associated with improvement of maternal morbidity only in hospitals with high initial rates of severe maternal morbidity.
CONCLUSION: We used an innovative collaborative quality improvement approach (mentor model) to scale up implementation of the national hemorrhage bundle. Participation in the collaborative was strongly associated with reductions in severe maternal morbidity among hemorrhage patients. Women in hospitals in their second collaborative had an even greater reduction in morbidity than those approaching the bundle for the first time, reinforcing the concept that quality improvement is a long-term and cumulative process.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  hemorrhage; maternal morbidity; outcomes; quality collaboratives; quality improvement; safety; safety bundles

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28153661     DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2017.01.017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0002-9378            Impact factor:   8.661


  26 in total

1.  Use of Antihypertensive Medications and Uterotonics During Delivery Hospitalizations in Women With Asthma.

Authors:  Whitney A Booker; Zainab Siddiq; Yongmei Huang; Cande V Ananth; Jason D Wright; Kirsten L Cleary; Mary E DʼAlton; Alexander M Friedman
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 7.661

2.  Spread tools: a systematic review of components, uptake, and effectiveness of quality improvement toolkits.

Authors:  Susanne Hempel; Claire O'Hanlon; Yee Wei Lim; Margie Danz; Jody Larkin; Lisa Rubenstein
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2019-08-19       Impact factor: 7.327

3.  Prioritize implementation research to effectively address the maternal health crisis.

Authors:  Jennifer A Callaghan-Koru; Michelle H Moniz; Rebecca F Hamm
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2021-02-07       Impact factor: 8.661

Review 4.  A Review of the Impact of Obstetric Anesthesia on Maternal and Neonatal Outcomes.

Authors:  Grace Lim; Francesca L Facco; Naveen Nathan; Jonathan H Waters; Cynthia A Wong; Holger K Eltzschig
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 7.892

5.  Putting the "M" back in maternal-fetal medicine: A 5-year report card on a collaborative effort to address maternal morbidity and mortality in the United States.

Authors:  Mary E D'Alton; Alexander M Friedman; Peter S Bernstein; Haywood L Brown; William M Callaghan; Steven L Clark; William A Grobman; Sarah J Kilpatrick; Daniel F O'Keeffe; Douglas M Montgomery; Sindhu K Srinivas; George D Wendel; Katharine D Wenstrom; Michael R Foley
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2019-03-05       Impact factor: 8.661

6.  Blood type association with bleeding outcomes at delivery in a large multi-center study.

Authors:  Najeebah A Bade; Jamil M Kazma; Richard L Amdur; Julia Ellis-Kahana; Homa K Ahmadzia
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2020-08       Impact factor: 2.300

7.  Maternal mortality in the United States: research gaps, opportunities, and priorities.

Authors:  Juanita J Chinn; Esther Eisenberg; Shavon Artis Dickerson; Rosalind B King; Nahida Chakhtoura; Issel Anne L Lim; Katherine L Grantz; Charisee Lamar; Diana W Bianchi
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2020-07-17       Impact factor: 8.661

Review 8.  Differentiating Research, Quality Improvement, and Case Studies to Ethically Incorporate Pregnant Women.

Authors:  Julia C Phillippi; Katherine E Hartmann
Journal:  J Midwifery Womens Health       Date:  2017-12-28       Impact factor: 2.388

9.  Severe Maternal Morbidity, A Tale of 2 States Using Data for Action-Ohio and Massachusetts.

Authors:  Elizabeth J Conrey; Susan E Manning; Cynthia Shellhaas; Nicholas J Somerville; Sarah L Stone; Hafsatou Diop; Kristin Rankin; Dave Goodman
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2019-08

10.  Reduction in racial disparities in severe maternal morbidity from hemorrhage in a large-scale quality improvement collaborative.

Authors:  Elliott K Main; Shen-Chih Chang; Ravi Dhurjati; Valerie Cape; Jochen Profit; Jeffrey B Gould
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2020-01-21       Impact factor: 8.661

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.