Literature DB >> 32769183

A Multicenter Proposal for a Fast Tool To Screen Biosecure Chicken Flocks for the Foodborne Pathogen Campylobacter.

Jeffrey Hoorfar1, Ivana Koláčková2, Gro S Johannessen3, Giuliano Garofolo4, Francesca Marotta4, Kinga Wieczorek5, Jacek Osek5, Mona Torp3, Bjørn Spilsberg3, Camilla Sekse3, Natasia Rebekka Thornval6, Renáta Karpíšková2.   

Abstract

The present multicenter study aimed at assessing the performance of air sampling as a novel method for monitoring Campylobacter in biosecure poultry farms. We compared, using a harmonized procedure, the bacteriological isolation protocol (ISO 10272-1:2017) and a real-time PCR method used on air filter samples. Air samples and boot swabs were collected from 62 biosecure flocks from five European countries during the summer of 2019. For air filters, the frequency of PCR-positive findings was significantly higher (n = 36; 58%) than that obtained with the cultivation methods (P < 0.01; standardized residuals). The cultivation protocols (one with Bolton enrichment and one with Preston enrichment) were comparable to each other but returned fewer positive samples (0 to 8%). The association between type of sample and frequency of PCR-positive findings was statistically confirmed (P < 0.01; Fisher´s exact test), although no culture-positive air filters were detected using direct plating. For the boot swabs, the highest number of positive samples were detected after enrichment in Preston broth (n = 23; 37%), followed by direct plating after homogenization in Preston (n = 21; 34%) or Bolton broth (n = 20; 32%). It is noteworthy that the flocks in Norway, a country known to have low Campylobacter prevalence in biosecure chicken flocks, tested negative for Campylobacter by the new sensitive approach. In conclusion, air sampling combined with real-time PCR is proposed as a multipurpose, low-cost, and convenient screening method that can be up to four times faster and four times more sensitive than the current boot-swab testing scheme used for screening biosecure chicken production.IMPORTANCE Campylobacter bacteria are the cause of the vast majority of registered cases of foodborne illness in the industrialized world. In fact, the bacteria caused 246,571 registered cases of foodborne illness in 2018, which equates to 70% of all registered cases in Europe that year. An important tool to prevent campylobacters from making people sick is good data on where in the food chain the bacterium is present. The present study reports a new test method that quadruples the likelihood of identifying campylobacter-positive chicken flocks. It is important to identify campylobacter-positive flocks before they arrive at the slaughterhouse, because negative flocks can be slaughtered first in order to avoid cross-contamination along the production line.
Copyright © 2020 American Society for Microbiology.

Entities:  

Keywords:  PCR; air sampling; campylobacteriosis; pathogen testing; rapid diagnosis; risk assessment; zoonoses

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32769183      PMCID: PMC7531958          DOI: 10.1128/AEM.01051-20

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol        ISSN: 0099-2240            Impact factor:   4.792


  19 in total

1.  Interlaboratory diagnostic accuracy of a Salmonella specific PCR-based method.

Authors:  Burkhard Malorny; Jeffrey Hoorfar; Marta Hugas; Annet Heuvelink; Patrick Fach; Lüppo Ellerbroek; Cornelia Bunge; Christina Dorn; Reiner Helmuth
Journal:  Int J Food Microbiol       Date:  2003-12-31       Impact factor: 5.277

2.  Surveillance programme for Campylobacter species in Swedish broilers, July 2001 to June 2002.

Authors:  I Hansson; E Olsson Engvall; J Lindblad; A Gunnarsson; I Vågsholm
Journal:  Vet Rec       Date:  2004-08-14       Impact factor: 2.695

Review 3.  Rapid detection, characterization, and enumeration of foodborne pathogens.

Authors:  J Hoorfar
Journal:  APMIS Suppl       Date:  2011-11

4.  Genetic diversity and description of transmission routes for Campylobacter on broiler farms by amplified-fragment length polymorphism.

Authors:  G Johnsen; H Kruse; M Hofshagen
Journal:  J Appl Microbiol       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 3.772

5.  Factors associated with carcass contamination by Campylobacter at slaughterhouse in cecal-carrier broilers.

Authors:  Xavier Malher; Matthieu Simon; Valérie Charnay; Rosine Danguy des Déserts; Anne Lehébel; Catherine Belloc
Journal:  Int J Food Microbiol       Date:  2011-07-08       Impact factor: 5.277

Review 6.  Global Epidemiology of Campylobacter Infection.

Authors:  Nadeem O Kaakoush; Natalia Castaño-Rodríguez; Hazel M Mitchell; Si Ming Man
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 26.132

7.  Low-cost monitoring of Campylobacter in poultry houses by air sampling and quantitative PCR.

Authors:  M S R Søndergaard; M H Josefsen; C Löfström; L S Christensen; K Wieczorek; J Osek; J Hoorfar
Journal:  J Food Prot       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 2.077

8.  Association of Campylobacter spp. levels between chicken grow-out environmental samples and processed carcasses.

Authors:  Matthew W Schroeder; Joseph D Eifert; Monica A Ponder; David G Schmale
Journal:  Poult Sci       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 3.352

9.  Rapid quantification of viable Campylobacter bacteria on chicken carcasses, using real-time PCR and propidium monoazide treatment, as a tool for quantitative risk assessment.

Authors:  M H Josefsen; C Löfström; T B Hansen; L S Christensen; J E Olsen; J Hoorfar
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2010-06-18       Impact factor: 4.792

10.  Trends in Campylobacter incidence in broilers and humans in six European countries, 1997-2007.

Authors:  S Jore; H Viljugrein; E Brun; B T Heier; B Borck; S Ethelberg; M Hakkinen; M Kuusi; J Reiersen; I Hansson; E Olsson Engvall; M Løfdahl; J A Wagenaar; W van Pelt; M Hofshagen
Journal:  Prev Vet Med       Date:  2009-10-17       Impact factor: 2.670

View more
  1 in total

1.  Rapid Oxford Nanopore Technologies MinION Sequencing Workflow for Campylobacter&amp;nbsp;jejuni Identification in Broilers on Site-A Proof-of-Concept Study.

Authors:  Clara Marin; Francisco Marco-Jiménez; Llucia Martínez-Priego; Griselda De Marco-Romero; Vicente Soriano-Chirona; Laura Lorenzo-Rebenaque; Giuseppe D'Auria
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2022-08-13       Impact factor: 3.231

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.