Literature DB >> 24490929

Low-cost monitoring of Campylobacter in poultry houses by air sampling and quantitative PCR.

M S R Søndergaard1, M H Josefsen, C Löfström, L S Christensen, K Wieczorek, J Osek, J Hoorfar.   

Abstract

The present study describes the evaluation of a method for the quantification of Campylobacter by air sampling in poultry houses. Sampling was carried out in conventional chicken houses in Poland, in addition to a preliminary sampling in Denmark. Each measurement consisted of three air samples, two standard boot swab fecal samples, and one airborne particle count. Sampling was conducted over an 8-week period in three flocks, assessing the presence and levels of Campylobacter in boot swabs and air samples using quantitative real-time PCR. The detection limit for air sampling was approximately 100 Campylobacter cell equivalents (CCE)/m3. Airborne particle counts were used to analyze the size distribution of airborne particles (0.3 to 10 μm) in the chicken houses in relation to the level of airborne Campylobacter. No correlation was found. Using air sampling, Campylobacter was detected in the flocks right away, while boot swab samples were positive after 2 weeks. All samples collected were positive for Campylobacter from week 2 through the rest of the rearing period for both sampling techniques, although levels 1- to 2-log CCE higher were found with air sampling. At week 8, the levels were approximately 10(4) and 10(5) CCE per sample for boot swabs and air, respectively. In conclusion, using air samples combined with quantitative real-time PCR, Campylobacter contamination could be detected earlier than by boot swabs and was found to be a more convenient technique for monitoring and/or to obtain enumeration data useful for quantitative risk assessment of Campylobacter.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24490929     DOI: 10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-13-268

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Food Prot        ISSN: 0362-028X            Impact factor:   2.077


  7 in total

1.  Emission Sources of Campylobacter from Agricultural Farms, Impact on Environmental Contamination and Intervention Strategies.

Authors:  Vanessa Szott; Anika Friese
Journal:  Curr Top Microbiol Immunol       Date:  2021       Impact factor: 4.291

2.  Detection of Salmonella enterica in Meat in Less than 5 Hours by a Low-Cost and Noncomplex Sample Preparation Method.

Authors:  M S R Fachmann; C Löfström; J Hoorfar; F Hansen; J Christensen; S Mansdal; M H Josefsen
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2017-02-15       Impact factor: 4.792

3.  A Multicenter Proposal for a Fast Tool To Screen Biosecure Chicken Flocks for the Foodborne Pathogen Campylobacter.

Authors:  Jeffrey Hoorfar; Ivana Koláčková; Gro S Johannessen; Giuliano Garofolo; Francesca Marotta; Kinga Wieczorek; Jacek Osek; Mona Torp; Bjørn Spilsberg; Camilla Sekse; Natasia Rebekka Thornval; Renáta Karpíšková
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2020-10-01       Impact factor: 4.792

4.  Efficiency of Airborne Sample Analysis Platform (ASAP) bioaerosol sampler for pathogen detection.

Authors:  Anurag Sharma; Elizabeth Clark; James D McGlothlin; Suresh K Mittal
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2015-05-27       Impact factor: 5.640

5.  Contamination Sources and Transmission Routes for Campylobacter on (Mixed) Broiler Farms in Belgium, and Comparison of the Gut Microbiota of Flocks Colonized and Uncolonized with Campylobacter.

Authors:  Karolien Hertogs; Annelies Haegeman; Dries Schaumont; Philippe Gelaude; Lieven De Zutter; Jeroen Dewulf; Marc Heyndrickx; Geertrui Rasschaert
Journal:  Pathogens       Date:  2021-01-13

6.  Monitoring of Campylobacter jejuni in a chicken infection model by measuring specific volatile organic compounds and by qPCR.

Authors:  Julia Hankel; Timothy Gibson; Julia Skov; Karsten Brandt Andersen; Michelle Dargatz; Andreas Kappel; Frank Thiemann; Ben Curtis; Bussarakam Chuppava; Christian Visscher
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-07-11       Impact factor: 4.996

7.  Identification of Transmission Routes of Campylobacter and On-Farm Measures to Reduce Campylobacter in Chicken.

Authors:  Sara Frosth; Oskar Karlsson-Lindsjö; Adnan Niazi; Lise-Lotte Fernström; Ingrid Hansson
Journal:  Pathogens       Date:  2020-05-09
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.