Literature DB >> 22250747

Rapid detection, characterization, and enumeration of foodborne pathogens.

J Hoorfar1.   

Abstract

As food safety management further develops, microbiological testing will continue to play an important role in assessing whether Food Safety Objectives are achieved. However, traditional microbiological culture-based methods are limited, particularly in their ability to provide timely data. The present review discusses the reasons for the increasing interest in rapid methods, current developments in the field, the research needs, and the future trends. The advent of biotechnology has introduced new technologies that led to the emergence of rapid diagnostic methods and altered food testing practices. Rapid methods are comprised of many different detection technologies, including specialized enzyme substrates, antibodies and DNA, ranging from simple differential plating media to the use of sophisticated instruments. The use of non-invasive sampling techniques for live animals especially came into focus with the 1990s outbreak of bovine spongiform encephalopathy that was linked to the human outbreak of Creutzfeldt Jakob's Disease. Serology is still an important tool in preventing foodborne pathogens to enter the human food supply through meat and milk from animals. One of the primary uses of rapid methods is for fast screening of large number of samples, where most of them are expected to be test-negative, leading to faster product release for sale. This has been the main strength of rapid methods such as real-time Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR). Enrichment PCR, where a primary culture broth is tested in PCR, is the most common approach in rapid testing. Recent reports show that it is possible both to enrich a sample and enumerate by pathogen-specific real-time PCR, if the enrichment time is short. This can be especially useful in situations where food producers ask for the level of pathogen in a contaminated product. Another key issue is automation, where the key drivers are miniaturization and multiple testing, which mean that not only one instrument is flexible enough to test for many pathogens but also many pathogens can be detected with one test. The review is mainly based on the author's scientific work that has contributed with the following new developments to this field: (i) serologic tests for large-scale screening, surveillance, or eradication programs, (ii) same-day detection of Salmonella that otherwise was considered as difficult to achieve, (iii) pathogen enumeration following a short log-phase enrichment, (iv) detection of foodborne pathogens in air samples, and finally (v) biotracing of pathogens based on mathematical modeling, even in the absence of isolate. Rapid methods are discussed in a broad global health perspective, international food supply, and for improvement of quantitative microbial risk assessments. The need for quantitative sample preparation techniques, culture-independent, metagenomic-based detection, online monitoring, a global validation infrastructure has been emphasized. The cost and ease of use of rapid assays remain challenging obstacles to surmount.
© 2011 The Author. APMIS © 2011 APMIS.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22250747     DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0463.2011.02767.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  APMIS Suppl        ISSN: 0903-465X


  9 in total

Review 1.  Nucleic acid-based biotechnologies for food-borne pathogen detection using routine time-intensive culture-based methods and fast molecular diagnostics.

Authors:  Amira Souii; Manel Ben M'hadheb-Gharbi; Jawhar Gharbi
Journal:  Food Sci Biotechnol       Date:  2016-02-29       Impact factor: 2.391

Review 2.  Foodomics and Food Safety: Where We Are.

Authors:  Uroš Andjelković; Martina Šrajer Gajdošik; Dajana Gašo-Sokač; Tamara Martinović; Djuro Josić
Journal:  Food Technol Biotechnol       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 3.918

3.  A Multicenter Proposal for a Fast Tool To Screen Biosecure Chicken Flocks for the Foodborne Pathogen Campylobacter.

Authors:  Jeffrey Hoorfar; Ivana Koláčková; Gro S Johannessen; Giuliano Garofolo; Francesca Marotta; Kinga Wieczorek; Jacek Osek; Mona Torp; Bjørn Spilsberg; Camilla Sekse; Natasia Rebekka Thornval; Renáta Karpíšková
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2020-10-01       Impact factor: 4.792

4.  Multiplex T-RFLP allows for increased target number and specificity: detection of Salmonella enterica and six species of Listeria in a single test.

Authors:  Geoffrey N Elliott; Nadine Thomas; Marion Macrae; Colin D Campbell; Iain D Ogden; Brajesh K Singh
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-08-24       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Single-channel multiplexing without melting curve analysis in real-time PCR.

Authors:  Young-Jo Lee; Daeyoung Kim; Kihoon Lee; Jong-Yoon Chun
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2014-12-11       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Evaluation of the performance of quantitative detection of the Listeria monocytogenes prfA locus with droplet digital PCR.

Authors:  Anna Kristina Witte; Susanne Fister; Patrick Mester; Dagmar Schoder; Peter Rossmanith
Journal:  Anal Bioanal Chem       Date:  2016-08-24       Impact factor: 4.142

7.  Towards diagnostic metagenomics of Campylobacter in fecal samples.

Authors:  Sandra Christine Andersen; Kristoffer Kiil; Christoffer Bugge Harder; Mathilde Hasseldam Josefsen; Søren Persson; Eva Møller Nielsen; Jeffrey Hoorfar
Journal:  BMC Microbiol       Date:  2017-06-08       Impact factor: 3.605

8.  High-Throughput 16S rRNA Sequencing to Assess Potentially Active Bacteria and Foodborne Pathogens: A Case Example in Ready-to-Eat Food.

Authors:  Marina Mira Miralles; Lucia Maestre-Carballa; Monica Lluesma-Gomez; Manuel Martinez-Garcia
Journal:  Foods       Date:  2019-10-11

9.  Identification and Discrimination of Salmonella enterica Serovar Gallinarum Biovars Pullorum and Gallinarum Based on a One-Step Multiplex PCR Assay.

Authors:  Dan Xiong; Li Song; Zhiming Pan; Xinan Jiao
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2018-07-31       Impact factor: 5.640

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.