Yuman Li1,2, He Li1,2, Meng Li1,2, Li Zhang3,4, Mingxing Xie5,6. 1. Department of Ultrasound, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, 1277# Jiefang Ave, Wuhan, 430022, China. 2. Hubei Province Key Laboratory of Molecular Imaging, Wuhan, 430022, China. 3. Department of Ultrasound, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, 1277# Jiefang Ave, Wuhan, 430022, China. zli429@hust.edu.cn. 4. Hubei Province Key Laboratory of Molecular Imaging, Wuhan, 430022, China. zli429@hust.edu.cn. 5. Department of Ultrasound, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, 1277# Jiefang Ave, Wuhan, 430022, China. xiemx@hust.edu.cn. 6. Hubei Province Key Laboratory of Molecular Imaging, Wuhan, 430022, China. xiemx@hust.edu.cn.
Dear Editor,Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is an emerging outbreak caused by the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). Although sharing considerable similarities with SARS, cardiac injury was more frequently reported in SARS-CoV-2 [1]. However, the incidence and clinical significance of cardiac insufficiency in COVID-19 have not yet been well described. The purpose of our study was to purse the prevalence, risk factors and outcome of cardiac dysfunction in hospitalized patients with COVID-19.We included 157 consecutive adult patients who were diagnosed with COVID-19. Clinical data were obtained from electronic medical records. Left ventricular (LV) and right ventricular (RV) structure and function were evaluated using bedside transthoracic echocardiography. Heart failure (HF) was classified into heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) and heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). The definitions of HF and RV dysfunction were based on the American Heart Association Guidelines [2, 3].RV dysfunction was found in 40 (25.5%) unselected patients, 26 (28.9%) patients requiring high flow oxygen and 15 (41.7%) patients requiring mechanical ventilation. HF was presented in 28 (17.8%) unselected patients consisting of 24 (15.3%) HFpEF and 4 (2.5%) HFrEF, 22 (24.4%) patients requiring high flow oxygen and 11 (30.6%) patients requiring mechanical ventilation. 9 (5.7%) patients had biventricular dysfunction. Clinical and echocardiographic characteristics of patients with COVID-19 are shown in Supplementary Tables 1 and 2. Compared with patients without cardiac insufficiency,those with cardiac insufficiency had more comorbidities and complications as well as poorer prognosis. A multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) was independently predictive of cardiac dysfunction (Supplementary Table 3), which contributed to higher mortality (Fig. 1a). Moreover, LV and RV dysfunction were more frequent in patients with elevated high-sensitivity troponin I (hs-TNI) than those without (Fig. 1b). During hospitalization, 23 patients died. The incidence of LV and RV dysfunction were higher in non-survivors than survivors (Fig. 1c). The mortality was 3.0% for patients without cardiac dysfunction and normal hs-TNI levels, 6.7% for those with cardiac dysfunction and normal hs-TNI levels, 13.3% for those without cardiac dysfunction but elevated hs-TNI levels, and 64.0% for those with cardiac dysfunction and elevated hs-TNI (Fig. 1d, e). In multivariate Cox analysis, hs-TNI elevation, mechanical ventilation and RV dysfunction were independent predictors of higher mortality (Supplementary Table 4).
Fig. 1
a Bar graphs illustrate the mortality of patients with/without right ventricular dysfunction (RVD) and patients with/without heart failure (HF). b Bar graphs show the prevalence of RVD and HF in patients with/without elevated high-sensitivity troponin I (hs-TNI). c Bar graphs demonstrate the incidence of RVD and HF in non-survivors and survivors. d Kaplan–Meier curves in COVID-19 patients with/without RVD and with/without elevated hs-TNI Levels. e Kaplan–Meier curves in COVID-19 patients with/without HF and with/without elevated hs-TNI Levels
a Bar graphs illustrate the mortality of patients with/without right ventricular dysfunction (RVD) and patients with/without heart failure (HF). b Bar graphs show the prevalence of RVD and HF in patients with/without elevated high-sensitivity troponin I (hs-TNI). c Bar graphs demonstrate the incidence of RVD and HF in non-survivors and survivors. d Kaplan–Meier curves in COVID-19 patients with/without RVD and with/without elevated hs-TNI Levels. e Kaplan–Meier curves in COVID-19 patients with/without HF and with/without elevated hs-TNI LevelsOur study demonstrated that the prevalence of RV dysfunction was higher than that of LV dysfunction in patients with COVID-19. Direct viral damage, aggravation of a systemic inflammatory response, and hypoxemia may all contribute to cardiac injury. Furthermore, RV function can be worsened by increased afterload, which are likely involve ARDS, hypoxic pulmonary vasoconstriction, microthrombi within the pulmonary vasculature and microvascular injury [4, 5]. Additionally, our findings revealed that mortality was highest in patients with increased troponin associated with RV dysfunction. Elevations of cardiac troponin and RV dysfunction were independently predictive of higher mortality, highlighting the significance of closely monitoring the changes of cardiac troponin and RV function. In summary, elevated cardiac troponin together with RV dysfunction may be crucial for risk stratification of COVID-19 patients and should be taken into consideration when applying prevention and therapy.Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.Supplementary file1 (DOCX 50 kb)Supplementary file2 (DOCX 33 kb)
Authors: Clyde W Yancy; Mariell Jessup; Biykem Bozkurt; Javed Butler; Donald E Casey; Mark H Drazner; Gregg C Fonarow; Stephen A Geraci; Tamara Horwich; James L Januzzi; Maryl R Johnson; Edward K Kasper; Wayne C Levy; Frederick A Masoudi; Patrick E McBride; John J V McMurray; Judith E Mitchell; Pamela N Peterson; Barbara Riegel; Flora Sam; Lynne W Stevenson; W H Wilson Tang; Emily J Tsai; Bruce L Wilkoff Journal: Circulation Date: 2013-06-05 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Marvin A Konstam; Michael S Kiernan; Daniel Bernstein; Biykem Bozkurt; Miriam Jacob; Navin K Kapur; Robb D Kociol; Eldrin F Lewis; Mandeep R Mehra; Francis D Pagani; Amish N Raval; Carey Ward Journal: Circulation Date: 2018-04-12 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Roberto Lorusso; Alain Combes; Valeria Lo Coco; Maria Elena De Piero; Jan Belohlavek Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2021-01-09 Impact factor: 17.440
Authors: Shahanshah Khan; Mahnoush S Shafiei; Christopher Longoria; John W Schoggins; Rashmin C Savani; Hasan Zaki Journal: Elife Date: 2021-12-06 Impact factor: 8.140
Authors: Vered Gilad; Vincenzo De Marzo; Giulia Guglielmi; Roberta Della Bona; Stefano Giovinazzo; Fabio Pescetelli; Alberto Valbusa; Gian Paolo Bezante; Andrea De Maria; Nicolò Patroniti; Diego Ferone; Paolo Pelosi; Matteo Bassetti; Italo Porto Journal: J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown) Date: 2022-01-01 Impact factor: 2.160