Literature DB >> 32767075

The prevalence, risk factors and outcome of cardiac dysfunction in hospitalized patients with COVID-19.

Yuman Li1,2, He Li1,2, Meng Li1,2, Li Zhang3,4, Mingxing Xie5,6.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32767075      PMCID: PMC7411264          DOI: 10.1007/s00134-020-06205-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Intensive Care Med        ISSN: 0342-4642            Impact factor:   41.787


× No keyword cloud information.
Dear Editor, Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is an emerging outbreak caused by the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). Although sharing considerable similarities with SARS, cardiac injury was more frequently reported in SARS-CoV-2 [1]. However, the incidence and clinical significance of cardiac insufficiency in COVID-19 have not yet been well described. The purpose of our study was to purse the prevalence, risk factors and outcome of cardiac dysfunction in hospitalized patients with COVID-19. We included 157 consecutive adult patients who were diagnosed with COVID-19. Clinical data were obtained from electronic medical records. Left ventricular (LV) and right ventricular (RV) structure and function were evaluated using bedside transthoracic echocardiography. Heart failure (HF) was classified into heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) and heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). The definitions of HF and RV dysfunction were based on the American Heart Association Guidelines [2, 3]. RV dysfunction was found in 40 (25.5%) unselected patients, 26 (28.9%) patients requiring high flow oxygen and 15 (41.7%) patients requiring mechanical ventilation. HF was presented in 28 (17.8%) unselected patients consisting of 24 (15.3%) HFpEF and 4 (2.5%) HFrEF, 22 (24.4%) patients requiring high flow oxygen and 11 (30.6%) patients requiring mechanical ventilation. 9 (5.7%) patients had biventricular dysfunction. Clinical and echocardiographic characteristics of patients with COVID-19 are shown in Supplementary Tables 1 and 2. Compared with patients without cardiac insufficiency,those with cardiac insufficiency had more comorbidities and complications as well as poorer prognosis. A multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) was independently predictive of cardiac dysfunction (Supplementary Table 3), which contributed to higher mortality (Fig. 1a). Moreover, LV and RV dysfunction were more frequent in patients with elevated high-sensitivity troponin I (hs-TNI) than those without (Fig. 1b). During hospitalization, 23 patients died. The incidence of LV and RV dysfunction were higher in non-survivors than survivors (Fig. 1c). The mortality was 3.0% for patients without cardiac dysfunction and normal hs-TNI levels, 6.7% for those with cardiac dysfunction and normal hs-TNI levels, 13.3% for those without cardiac dysfunction but elevated hs-TNI levels, and 64.0% for those with cardiac dysfunction and elevated hs-TNI (Fig. 1d, e). In multivariate Cox analysis, hs-TNI elevation, mechanical ventilation and RV dysfunction were independent predictors of higher mortality (Supplementary Table 4).
Fig. 1

a Bar graphs illustrate the mortality of patients with/without right ventricular dysfunction (RVD) and patients with/without heart failure (HF). b Bar graphs show the prevalence of RVD and HF in patients with/without elevated high-sensitivity troponin I (hs-TNI). c Bar graphs demonstrate the incidence of RVD and HF in non-survivors and survivors. d Kaplan–Meier curves in COVID-19 patients with/without RVD and with/without elevated hs-TNI Levels. e Kaplan–Meier curves in COVID-19 patients with/without HF and with/without elevated hs-TNI Levels

a Bar graphs illustrate the mortality of patients with/without right ventricular dysfunction (RVD) and patients with/without heart failure (HF). b Bar graphs show the prevalence of RVD and HF in patients with/without elevated high-sensitivity troponin I (hs-TNI). c Bar graphs demonstrate the incidence of RVD and HF in non-survivors and survivors. d Kaplan–Meier curves in COVID-19 patients with/without RVD and with/without elevated hs-TNI Levels. e Kaplan–Meier curves in COVID-19 patients with/without HF and with/without elevated hs-TNI Levels Our study demonstrated that the prevalence of RV dysfunction was higher than that of LV dysfunction in patients with COVID-19. Direct viral damage, aggravation of a systemic inflammatory response, and hypoxemia may all contribute to cardiac injury. Furthermore, RV function can be worsened by increased afterload, which are likely involve ARDS, hypoxic pulmonary vasoconstriction, microthrombi within the pulmonary vasculature and microvascular injury [4, 5]. Additionally, our findings revealed that mortality was highest in patients with increased troponin associated with RV dysfunction. Elevations of cardiac troponin and RV dysfunction were independently predictive of higher mortality, highlighting the significance of closely monitoring the changes of cardiac troponin and RV function. In summary, elevated cardiac troponin together with RV dysfunction may be crucial for risk stratification of COVID-19 patients and should be taken into consideration when applying prevention and therapy. Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material. Supplementary file1 (DOCX 50 kb) Supplementary file2 (DOCX 33 kb)
  5 in total

1.  2013 ACCF/AHA guideline for the management of heart failure: executive summary: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on practice guidelines.

Authors:  Clyde W Yancy; Mariell Jessup; Biykem Bozkurt; Javed Butler; Donald E Casey; Mark H Drazner; Gregg C Fonarow; Stephen A Geraci; Tamara Horwich; James L Januzzi; Maryl R Johnson; Edward K Kasper; Wayne C Levy; Frederick A Masoudi; Patrick E McBride; John J V McMurray; Judith E Mitchell; Pamela N Peterson; Barbara Riegel; Flora Sam; Lynne W Stevenson; W H Wilson Tang; Emily J Tsai; Bruce L Wilkoff
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2013-06-05       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 2.  Evaluation and Management of Right-Sided Heart Failure: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association.

Authors:  Marvin A Konstam; Michael S Kiernan; Daniel Bernstein; Biykem Bozkurt; Miriam Jacob; Navin K Kapur; Robb D Kociol; Eldrin F Lewis; Mandeep R Mehra; Francis D Pagani; Amish N Raval; Carey Ward
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2018-04-12       Impact factor: 29.690

3.  Facing COVID-19 in the ICU: vascular dysfunction, thrombosis, and dysregulated inflammation.

Authors:  Daniel E Leisman; Clifford S Deutschman; Matthieu Legrand
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2020-04-28       Impact factor: 17.440

4.  Clinical predictors of mortality due to COVID-19 based on an analysis of data of 150 patients from Wuhan, China.

Authors:  Qiurong Ruan; Kun Yang; Wenxia Wang; Lingyu Jiang; Jianxin Song
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2020-03-03       Impact factor: 17.440

5.  Spectrum of Cardiac Manifestations in COVID-19: A Systematic Echocardiographic Study.

Authors:  Yishay Szekely; Yael Lichter; Philippe Taieb; Ariel Banai; Aviram Hochstadt; Ilan Merdler; Amir Gal Oz; Ehud Rothschild; Guy Baruch; Yogev Peri; Yaron Arbel; Yan Topilsky
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2020-05-29       Impact factor: 29.690

  5 in total
  9 in total

Review 1.  Role of Cardiac Macrophages on Cardiac Inflammation, Fibrosis and Tissue Repair.

Authors:  William P Lafuse; Daniel J Wozniak; Murugesan V S Rajaram
Journal:  Cells       Date:  2020-12-31       Impact factor: 6.600

2.  SARS-CoV-2 spike protein induces inflammation via TLR2-dependent activation of the NF-κB pathway.

Authors:  Shahanshah Khan; Mahnoush S Shafiei; Christopher Longoria; John Schoggins; Rashmin C Savani; Hasan Zaki
Journal:  bioRxiv       Date:  2021-03-17

3.  Prognostic Value of Right Ventricular Ejection Fraction Assessed by 3D Echocardiography in COVID-19 Patients.

Authors:  Yanting Zhang; Wei Sun; Chun Wu; Yiwei Zhang; Li Cui; Yuji Xie; Bin Wang; Lin He; Hongliang Yuan; Yongxing Zhang; Yu Cai; Meng Li; Yu Zhang; Yun Yang; Yuman Li; Jing Wang; Yali Yang; Qing Lv; Li Zhang; Mingxing Xie
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2021-02-09

4.  ECMO for COVID-19 patients in Europe and Israel.

Authors:  Roberto Lorusso; Alain Combes; Valeria Lo Coco; Maria Elena De Piero; Jan Belohlavek
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2021-01-09       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 5.  Myocardial Involvement in COVID-19: an Interaction Between Comorbidities and Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction. A Further Indication of the Role of Inflammation.

Authors:  Gregorio Zaccone; Daniela Tomasoni; Leonardo Italia; Carlo Mario Lombardi; Marco Metra
Journal:  Curr Heart Fail Rep       Date:  2021-04-22

6.  SARS-CoV-2 spike protein induces inflammation via TLR2-dependent activation of the NF-κB pathway.

Authors:  Shahanshah Khan; Mahnoush S Shafiei; Christopher Longoria; John W Schoggins; Rashmin C Savani; Hasan Zaki
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2021-12-06       Impact factor: 8.140

7.  The Utility of Handheld Cardiac and Lung Ultrasound in Predicting Outcomes of Hospitalised Patients With COVID-19.

Authors:  Ziv Dadon; Nir Levi; Amir Orlev; Daniel Belman; Evan Avraham Alpert; Michael Glikson; Shmuel Gottlieb; Adi Butnaru
Journal:  Can J Cardiol       Date:  2021-12-03       Impact factor: 5.223

8.  Clinical outcomes of COVID-19 patients with rheumatic diseases: a retrospective cohort study and synthesis analysis in Wuhan, China.

Authors:  Geyao Qi; Hao Wang; Yufeng Guo; Chi Peng; Chenxu Zhang; Ting Chen; Jia He; Zhichao Jin
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2022-02-16       Impact factor: 3.650

9.  Cardiac point-of-care ultrasound in hospitalized coronavirus disease-2019 patients: findings and association with outcome.

Authors:  Vered Gilad; Vincenzo De Marzo; Giulia Guglielmi; Roberta Della Bona; Stefano Giovinazzo; Fabio Pescetelli; Alberto Valbusa; Gian Paolo Bezante; Andrea De Maria; Nicolò Patroniti; Diego Ferone; Paolo Pelosi; Matteo Bassetti; Italo Porto
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown)       Date:  2022-01-01       Impact factor: 2.160

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.