Literature DB >> 34690260

Cardiac point-of-care ultrasound in hospitalized coronavirus disease-2019 patients: findings and association with outcome.

Vered Gilad1, Vincenzo De Marzo1,2, Giulia Guglielmi1,2, Roberta Della Bona1, Stefano Giovinazzo1, Fabio Pescetelli1,2, Alberto Valbusa1, Gian Paolo Bezante1, Andrea De Maria3,4, Nicolò Patroniti5,6, Diego Ferone7,8, Paolo Pelosi5,6, Matteo Bassetti3,4, Italo Porto1,2.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 34690260      PMCID: PMC8654100          DOI: 10.2459/JCM.0000000000001177

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown)        ISSN: 1558-2027            Impact factor:   2.160


× No keyword cloud information.

To the Editor

Coronavirus disease (COVID-19), caused by novel severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), rapidly spread worldwide becoming a pandemic.[1,2] Whereas most clinical manifestations of COVID-19 are related to respiratory distress, cardiovascular involvement has been reported, showing association with worse outcome and higher mortality.[3-5] Given consistent limitations and risks for echocardiography in COVID-19, both American and European echocardiography societies released recommendations to limit systematic echocardiography examination to problem-tailored and time-limited examination, also known as ‘point-of-care ultrasound’ (POCUS).[6,7] We aimed to describe cardiac POCUS findings in COVID-19 patients admitted to a tertiary Italian university hospital, stratified according to respiratory distress grade, and to assess the association of cardiac POCUS findings with outcome.

Methods

All laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 patients admitted to our hospital, San Martino Hospital, Genoa, Italy, between 1 March 2020 and 30 April 2020 who underwent cardiac POCUS during hospital stay were analysed. According to the respiratory distress degree,[8] patients were classified into mild, moderate, and severe respiratory distress grade. All methods were extensively described in Supplemental Digital Content S1.

Results

The final population included 138 patients. Table 1 depicts the patients’ characteristics and findings.
Table 1

Baseline clinical features, point-of-care ultrasound findings, and outcome

Respiratory distress grade
VariableOverall (n = 138)Mild (n = 38)Moderate (n = 35)Severe (n = 65)P value
Baseline clinical features
 Age65.5 (12.9)69.3 (16.2)67.1 (11.1)62.5 (10.8) 0.022
 Sex (male)100 (72.5)21 (55.3)24 (68.6)55 (84.6) 0.005
 Caucasian125 (90.6)34 (89.5)30 (85.7)61 (93.8)0.399
 Hypertension74 (53.6)21 (55.3)22 (62.9)31 (47.7)0.340
 Diabetes23 (16.7)7 (18.4)9 (25.7)7 (10.8)0.151
 Respiratory disease23 (16.7)8 (21.1)5 (14.3)10 (15.4)0.689
 Chronic kidney disease21 (15.2)7 (18.4)10 (28.6)4 (6.2) 0.010
 Inflammatory disease22 (15.9)4 (10.5)11 (31.4)7 (10.8) 0.015
 Ischemic heart disease21 (15.2)10 (26.3)8 (22.9)3 (4.6) 0.004
 Previous LV dysfunction10 (7.2)5 (13.2)5 (14.3)0 (0.0) 0.008
 Atrial fibrillation16 (11.6)10 (26.3)4 (11.4)2 (3.1) 0.002
 D-dimer (μg/l)2108.0 (1246.8–6914.8)1424.00 (858.0–2688.3)1757.0 (1359.5–3619.5)4406.0 (1673.0–13553.0) <0.001
 CRP (mg/l)90.0 (36.0–177.0)46.0 (11.8–73.9)80.0 (51.4–143.0)136.0 (62.5–262.5) <0.001
 Troponin (μg/l)0.02 (0.01–0.12)0.01 (0.01–0.08)0.01 (0.01–0.06)0.03 (0.01–0.15) 0.001
 NT-proBNP (ng/l)674.0 (166.0–2036.0)904.5 (221.0–2786.5)369.0 (114.3–2114.5)674.0 (168.0–1396.0)0.344
POCUS findings
 LV dilatation7 (5.1)2 (5.3)2 (5.7)3 (4.6)0.550
 LV hypertrophy53 (38.4)8 (21.1)15 (42.9)30 (46.1) 0.026
 EF0.188
  Normal120 (87.0)33 (86.8)30 (85.7)57 (87.7)
  Mild dysfunction12 (8.7)3 (7.9)5 (14.3)4 (6.2)
  Moderate dysfunction3 (2.2)1 (2.6)0 (0.0)2 (3.1)
  Severe dysfunction3 (2.2)1 (2.6)1 (2.9)1 (1.5)
 LV regional dysfunction17 (12.3)6 (15.8)6 (17.1)5 (7.7)0.339
 Prosthesis valve6 (4.3)1 (2.6)2 (5.7)3 (4.6)0.799
 Valve disease20 (14.5)6 (15.8)5 (14.3)9 (13.8) 0.073
 LA enlargement20 (14.5)9 (23.7)6 (17.1)5 (7.7)0.150
 RV dilatation37 (26.8)5 (13.2)6 (17.1)26 (40.0) 0.004
 RV dysfunction7 (5.1)1 (2.6)1 (2.9)5 (7.7)0.404
 Tricuspid regurgitation0.500
  Moderate14 (10.1)4 (10.5)3 (8.5)7 (10.7)
  Severe2 (1.4)0 (0)1 (2.8)1 (1.5)
 Augmented sPAP32 (23.1)9 (23.7)5 (14.3)18 (27.6)0.305
 Pericardial effusion50 (36.2)13 (34.2)12 (34.3)25 (38.5)0.622
  Mild48 (35.6)13 (34.2)12 (34.3)23 (35.4)
  Moderate2 (1.5)0 (0.0)0 (0.0)2 (3.1)
  Severe0 (0.0)0 (0.0)0 (0.0)0 (0.0)
  Tamponade0 (0.0)0 (0.0)0 (0.0)0 (0.0)
 Intracardiac thrombosis2 (1.5)0 (0.0)0 (0.0)2 (3.1)0.340
Outcomes
 All-cause death37 (26.8)5 (13.2)6 (17.1)26 (40.0)0.171
 Myocardial injury51 (37.0)10 (26.3)11 (31.4)30 (46.2) 0.001
 Pulmonary embolism37 (26.8)6 (15.8)8 (22.9)23 (35.4) 0.029
  Macro22 (15.9)4 (10.5)6 (17.1)12 (18.5)
  Micro15 (10.9)2 (5.3)2 (5.7)11 (16.9)
 Venous thromboembolism4 (2.9)0 (0.0)1 (2.9)3 (4.6) 0.053
 Thrombolysis6 (4.3)0 (0.0)0 (0.0)6 (9.2) 0.032
 Myocardial infarction4 (2.9)1 (2.6)1 (1.9)2 (3.1)0.308
 New onset LV dysfunction5 (3.6)0 (0.0)0 (0.0)5 (7.7) 0.056
 Arrhythmia15 (10.9)2 (5.3)2 (5.7)11 (16.9)0.292
  Atrial14 (10.1)2 (5.3)2 (5.7)10 (15.4)
  Ventricular1 (0.7)0 (0.0)0 (0.0)1 (1.5)
 Myocarditis1 (0.7)0 (0.0)0 (0.0)1 (1.5)0.405
 Pericarditis1 (0.7)1 (2.6)0 (0.0)0 (0.0)0.308

All measures expressed as n (%), mean (SD) or median with IQR (quartile 1 to quartile 3). CRP, C-reactive protein; EF, ejection fraction; LV, left ventricular; NT-proBNP, N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide; POCUS, point-of-care ultrasound; RV, right ventricular; sPAP, systolic pulmonary artery pressure.

Bold face reports significant p values (<0.05).

Baseline clinical features, point-of-care ultrasound findings, and outcome All measures expressed as n (%), mean (SD) or median with IQR (quartile 1 to quartile 3). CRP, C-reactive protein; EF, ejection fraction; LV, left ventricular; NT-proBNP, N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide; POCUS, point-of-care ultrasound; RV, right ventricular; sPAP, systolic pulmonary artery pressure. Bold face reports significant p values (<0.05). POCUS findings are described in Fig. 1, and outcomes are described in Fig. 2, both stratified according to respiratory distress grade at time of POCUS execution.
Fig. 1

Point-of-care ultrasound findings according to respiratory distress grade. EF, ejection fraction; LA, left atrium; LV, left ventricle; RD, respiratory distress; RV, right ventricle; sPAP, systolic pulmonary artery pressure.

Fig. 2

Outcomes according to respiratory distress grade. LV, left ventricle; RD, respiratory distress.

Point-of-care ultrasound findings according to respiratory distress grade. EF, ejection fraction; LA, left atrium; LV, left ventricle; RD, respiratory distress; RV, right ventricle; sPAP, systolic pulmonary artery pressure. Outcomes according to respiratory distress grade. LV, left ventricle; RD, respiratory distress. At multivariate logistic regression analysis, left ventricular (LV) hypertrophy (P = 0.030) was significantly associated with severe respiratory distress and right ventricular (RV) dilatation (P = 0.036) was significantly associated with longer in-hospital stay. No cardiac POCUS parameter was associated with cardiovascular outcomes (all P > 0.05) (Table 2).
Table 2

Multivariate logistic regression models for severe respiratory distress and length of hospital stay (adjusted for age and sex); Cox regression model for all-cause in-hospital death (adjusted for age and sex)

UnivariateMultivariate
VariableOR95% CIP valueOR95% CIP value
Severe respiratory distress
 Age 0.96 0.94–0.99 0.010 0.96 0.92–0.99 0.041
  Sex (male)3.421.54–8.100.003
  D-dimer1.011.00–1.020.055
 CRP 1.01 1.01–1.02 <0.001 1.02 1.01–1.04 <0.001
 Myocardial injury 8.20 3.69–19.66 <0.001 2.49 1.77–9.19 0.024
 Previous ischemic heart disease 0.15 0.03–0.47 0.003 0.35 0.13–0.91 0.012
 Atrial fibrillation 0.13 0.02–0.51 0.010 0.18 0.06–0.52 0.005
  RV dilatation3.761.71–8.740.001
 LV hypertrophy 3.18 1.38–8.09 0.010 3.59 1.20–12.40 0.030
Length of hospital stay
 Age 1.03 1.00–1.05 0.027 1.03 1.01–1.12 0.038
 Sex (male)1.340.63–2.860.447
 Respiratory failure of severe grade 2.26 1.14–4.56 0.020 2.83 1.22–6.79 0.027
  D-Dimer1.011.01–1.020.024
  Troponin elevation3.651.59–8.230.004
 RV dilatation 5.22 3.14–27.05 0.038 2.80 1.43–24.06 0.036
  LV regional dysfunction5.231.82–8.520.038

CI, confidence interval; CRP, C-reactive protein; HR, hazard ratio; LV, left ventricle; OR, odds ratio; RV, right ventricle.

Bold face reports significant p values (<0.05).

Multivariate logistic regression models for severe respiratory distress and length of hospital stay (adjusted for age and sex); Cox regression model for all-cause in-hospital death (adjusted for age and sex) CI, confidence interval; CRP, C-reactive protein; HR, hazard ratio; LV, left ventricle; OR, odds ratio; RV, right ventricle. Bold face reports significant p values (<0.05).

Comment

Our study has the following main findings: most common cardiac POCUS abnormalities in COVID-19 patients were LV hypertrophy, mild pericardial effusion and RV dilatation, with LV and RV systolic functions mostly preserved; LV hypertrophy was independently associated with severe respiratory distress; RV dilatation was independently associated with longer hospital stay; no cardiac POCUS parameter was associated with in-hospital mortality. Arterial hypertension, highly prevalent within our cohort (53.6%), is the most common cause for LV hypertrophy.[9] Hypertensive heart disease is characterized by cardiac fibrosis, increased myocardial stiffness, microvascular dysfunction, abnormal ventricular--vascular interactions and progressive diastolic dysfunction.[10] Diastolic dysfunction was demonstrated as a major predictor of mortality in patients with sepsis and septic shock,[11] and recent reports showed a higher degree of diastolic dysfunction associated with poorer prognosis in COVID-19 patients.[12,13] Multiple extracardiac mechanisms may induce RV dilatation in COVID-19 patients: extensive lung damage, hypoxic vasoconstriction, excessive positive end-expiratory pressure, high-pressure mechanical ventilation, pulmonary vascular diseases, and pulmonary embolism. Whereas RV dilatation was a common finding, RV dysfunction was infrequent (5.1%) in our cohort. Although our results are in contrast to previous reports, conventional RV functional parameters (TAPSE, Tei index and RV S’ velocity) resulted within normal ranges both by Szekely et al.[13] and Li et al.,[14] for which RV dysfunction was determined by short pulmonary acceleration time and reduced RV strain, respectively. These results suggest that RV dysfunction in COVID-19 patients is generally modest and that conventional RV function parameters may be insufficient for risk stratification in this population. Left ventricle dysfunction was uncommon (13%) and the vast majority of patients had only mild LV dysfunction (66.6%), similar to D’Andrea et al.'s[15] findings. Moreover, whereas myocardial injury was frequent and independently associated with in-hospital mortality, most patients had minimal troponin I increase. Limitations to our study are principally related to the particular situation in which we were operating: the retrospective design, the potential selection bias as only selected COVID-19 patients underwent cardiac POCUS, the lack of prior echocardiographic data for comparison, the lack of systematic diastole assessment, the small sample size, and the large confidence intervals of the estimates.

Acknowledgements

GECOVID-19 Study group: Anna Alessandrini; Marco Camera; Emanuele Delfino; Andrea De Maria; Chiara Dentone; Antonio Di Biagio; Ferdinando Dodi; Antonio Ferrazin; Giovanni Mazzarello; Malgorzata Mikulska; Laura Nicolini; Federica Toscanini; Daniele Roberto Giacobbe; Antonio Vena; Lucia Taramasso; Elisa Balletto; Federica Portunato; Eva Schenone; Nirmala Rosseti; Federico Baldi; Marco Berruti; Federica Briano; Silvia Dettori; Laura Labate; Laura Magnasco; Michele Mirabella; Rachele Pincino; Chiara russo; Giovanni Sarteschi; Chiara sepulcri; Stefania Tutino (Clinica di Malattie Infettive); Roberto Pontremoli; Valentina Beccati; Salvatore Casciaro; Massimo Casu; Francesco Gavaudan; Maria Ghinatti; Elisa Gualco; Giovanna Leoncini; Paola Pitto; Kassem salam (Clinica di Medicina interna 2); Angelo Gratarola; Mattia Bixio; Annalisa Amelia; Andrea Balestra; Paola Ballarino; Nicholas Bardi; Roberto Boccafogli; Francesca Caserza; Elisa Calzolari; Marta Castelli; Elisabetta Cenni; Paolo Cortese; Giuseppe Cuttone; Sara Feltrin; Stefano Giovinazzo; Patrizia Giuntini; Letizia Natale; Davide Orsi; Matteo Pastorino; Tommaso Perazzo; Fabio Pescetelli; Federico Schenone; Maria Grazia Serra; Marco Sottano (Anestesia e Rianimazione; Emergenza Covid padiglione 64 ‘Fagiolone’); Iole Brunetti; Maurizio Loconte; Lorenzo Ball; Denise Battaglini; Chiara Robba; Nicolo’ Patroniti (Anestesiologia e Terapia Intensiva); Roberto Tallone; Massimo Amelotti; Marie Jeanne Majabò; Massimo Merlini; Federica Perazzo (Cure intermedie); Nidal Ahamd; Paolo Barbera; Marta Bovio; Paola Campodonico; Andrea Collidà; Ombretta Cutuli; Agnese Lomeo; Francesca Fezza Nicola Gentilucci; Nadia Hussein; Emanuele Malvezzi; Laura Massobrio; Giulia Motta; Laura Pastorino; Nicoletta Pollicardo; Stefano Sartini; Paola Vacca Valentina Virga (Dipartimento di Emergenza ed accettazione); Italo Porto; Gian Paolo Bezante; Roberta Della Bona; Giovanni La Malfa; Alberto Valbusa; Vered Gil Ad (Clinica Malattie Cardiovascolari); Emanuela Barisione; Michele Bellotti; Aloe’ Teresita; Alessandro Blanco; Marco Grosso; Maria Grazia Piroddi; Maria Grazia Piroddi (Pneumologia ad Indirizzo Interventistico); Paolo Moscatelli; Paola Ballarino; Matteo Caiti; Elisabetta Cenni; Patrizia Giuntini; Ottavia Magnani (Medicine d’Urgenza); Samir Sukkar; Ludovica Cogorno; Raffaella Gradaschi; Erica Guiddo; Eleonora Martino; Livia Pisciotta (Dietetica e nutrizione clinica); Bruno Cavagliere; Rossi Cristina; Farina Francesca (Direzione delle Professioni sanitarie); Giacomo Garibotto; Pasquale Esposito (clinica nefrologica; dialisi e trapianto); Giovanni Passalacqua; Diego Bagnasco; Fulvio Braido; Annamaria Riccio; Elena Tagliabue (Clinica Malattie Respiratorie ed Allergologia); Claudio Gustavino; Antonella Ferraiolo (Ostetricia e Ginecologia); Salvatore Giuffrida; Nicola Rosso (Direzione Amministrativa); Alessandra Morando; Riccardo Papalia; Donata Passerini; Gabriella Tiberio (Direzione di presidio); Giovanni Orengo; Alberto Battaglini (Gestione del rischio clinico); Silvano Ruffoni; Sergio Caglieris.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.
  13 in total

1.  Development of a COVID-19 Point-of-Care Ultrasound Protocol.

Authors:  Gary Huang; Alexander Vengerovsky; Amy Morris; James Town; David Carlbom; Younghoon Kwon
Journal:  J Am Soc Echocardiogr       Date:  2020-04-23       Impact factor: 5.251

Review 2.  From Left Ventricular Hypertrophy to Dysfunction and Failure.

Authors:  Davide Lazzeroni; Ornella Rimoldi; Paolo G Camici
Journal:  Circ J       Date:  2016-02-05       Impact factor: 2.993

3.  Association of Cardiac Injury With Mortality in Hospitalized Patients With COVID-19 in Wuhan, China.

Authors:  Shaobo Shi; Mu Qin; Bo Shen; Yuli Cai; Tao Liu; Fan Yang; Wei Gong; Xu Liu; Jinjun Liang; Qinyan Zhao; He Huang; Bo Yang; Congxin Huang
Journal:  JAMA Cardiol       Date:  2020-07-01       Impact factor: 14.676

4.  A novel coronavirus outbreak of global health concern.

Authors:  Chen Wang; Peter W Horby; Frederick G Hayden; George F Gao
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2020-01-24       Impact factor: 79.321

5.  Spectrum of Cardiac Manifestations in COVID-19: A Systematic Echocardiographic Study.

Authors:  Yishay Szekely; Yael Lichter; Philippe Taieb; Ariel Banai; Aviram Hochstadt; Ilan Merdler; Amir Gal Oz; Ehud Rothschild; Guy Baruch; Yogev Peri; Yaron Arbel; Yan Topilsky
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2020-05-29       Impact factor: 29.690

6.  Right Ventricular Function and Pulmonary Pressures as Independent Predictors of Survival in Patients With COVID-19 Pneumonia.

Authors:  Antonello D'Andrea; Raffaella Scarafile; Lucia Riegler; Biagio Liccardo; Fabio Crescibene; Rosangela Cocchia; Eduardo Bossone
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2020-06-24

7.  COVID-19 pandemic and cardiac imaging: EACVI recommendations on precautions, indications, prioritization, and protection for patients and healthcare personnel.

Authors:  Helge Skulstad; Bernard Cosyns; Bogdan A Popescu; Maurizio Galderisi; Giovanni Di Salvo; Erwan Donal; Steffen Petersen; Alessia Gimelli; Kristina H Haugaa; Denisa Muraru; Ana G Almeida; Jeanette Schulz-Menger; Marc R Dweck; Gianluca Pontone; Leyla Elif Sade; Bernhard Gerber; Pal Maurovich-Horvat; Tara Bharucha; Matteo Cameli; Julien Magne; Mark Westwood; Gerald Maurer; Thor Edvardsen
Journal:  Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2020-06-01       Impact factor: 6.875

8.  Characteristics and clinical significance of myocardial injury in patients with severe coronavirus disease 2019.

Authors:  Shaobo Shi; Mu Qin; Yuli Cai; Tao Liu; Bo Shen; Fan Yang; Sheng Cao; Xu Liu; Yaozu Xiang; Qinyan Zhao; He Huang; Bo Yang; Congxin Huang
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2020-06-07       Impact factor: 29.983

9.  The prevalence, risk factors and outcome of cardiac dysfunction in hospitalized patients with COVID-19.

Authors:  Yuman Li; He Li; Meng Li; Li Zhang; Mingxing Xie
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2020-08-07       Impact factor: 41.787

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Laboratory Biomarkers for Diagnosis and Prognosis in COVID-19.

Authors:  Denise Battaglini; Miquéias Lopes-Pacheco; Hugo C Castro-Faria-Neto; Paolo Pelosi; Patricia R M Rocco
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2022-04-27       Impact factor: 8.786

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.