Literature DB >> 33420797

ECMO for COVID-19 patients in Europe and Israel.

Roberto Lorusso1,2, Alain Combes3, Valeria Lo Coco1, Maria Elena De Piero1, Jan Belohlavek4.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33420797      PMCID: PMC7796689          DOI: 10.1007/s00134-020-06272-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Intensive Care Med        ISSN: 0342-4642            Impact factor:   17.440


× No keyword cloud information.
Dear Editor, As of October 17th the novel coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2) caused a pandemic disease (coronavirus disease 2019, COVID-19) 40 million people worldwide, with almost one million deaths [1]. Although most patients have an uncomplicated clinical course, the more severe forms of COVID-19 require hospitalization and intensive care unit admission [2]. Conventional high-flow oxygen therapy, non-invasive and/or invasive mechanical ventilation, often in combination with pronepositioning, have all been reported to be effective in the majority of patients [2]. However, in severe cases, life-threatening, refractory hypoxemia may occur [2]. Secondary infections, myocardial disease involvement and a hypercoaguable state with/without pulmonary embolism may also contribute to the complexity of treating these critically ill patients [3-5]. In such cases rescue therapy may be required. The World Health Organization (WHO) [6], the Extracorporeal Life Support Organization (www.elso.org) and others have advocated the use of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) for patients with severe cardiorespiratory failure. Few patients in China received ECMO support in the early phase of the pandemic and the mortality rate among these patients was high [7]. Initial experience with COVID-19 in Europe was similar as the high number of critically ill patients disrupted usual care pathways and stretched hospital resources [2]. There was probably some hesitation to provide a form of support which is considered highly resource consuming. However, despite the rapid growth in the number of critically ill COVID-19 patients in Europe, over time an unexpectedly high number of severely compromised patients were considered eligible for ECMO support. At this time the Steering Committee of the European chapter of the Extracorporeal Life Support Organization (Euro-ELSO) initiated prospective data collection among European and Israeli centres with the intention of providing near real-time information on ECMO use in COVID-19. The study was approved by the Maastricht University Ethical Committee (coordinating center) and is registered under ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04366921. Data are collected weekly and reported anonymously through the Euro-ELSO website https://www.euroelso.net/covid-19/covid-19-survey/. This voluntary study includes basic data on patients´ age and gender, the details of their ECMO treatment and real-time status (i.e., ongoing, successfully weaned, or died). Since March 15th, 2020, 177 centres from Europe and Israel have joined the study, routinely reporting on the ECMO support they provide to COVID-19 patients. The mean annual number of cases treated with ECMO in the participating centres before the pandemic (2019) was 55. The number of COVID-19 patients has increased rapidly each week reaching 1531 treated patients as of September 14th. The greatest number of cases has been reported from France (n = 385), UK (n = 193), Germany (n = 176), Spain (n = 166), and Italy (n = 136) (See Supplementary Fig. 1). The mean age of treated patients was 52.6 years (range 16–80), 79% were male. The ECMO configuration used was VV in 91% of cases, VA in 5% and other in 4%. The mean PaO2 before ECMO implantation was 65 mmHg. The mean duration of ECMO support thus far has been 18 days and the mean ICU length of stay of these patients was 33 days. As of the 14th September, overall 841 patients have been weaned from ECMO support, 601 died during ECMO support, 71 died after withdrawal of ECMO, 79 are still receiving ECMO support and for 10 patients status n.a. (Fig. 1).
Fig. 1

European trends of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in COVID-19 as of September 14th, 2020. a Absolute number of ECMO cases as observed in 177 European/Israeli centres. b Number and percentage of ongoing cases, 2 patients at the 2nd run of ECMO included. c Number of patients deceased on ECMO and after ECMO weaning. Currently, 44% died overall, 8,4% died after weaning, e.g. 4,7% of all

European trends of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in COVID-19 as of September 14th, 2020. a Absolute number of ECMO cases as observed in 177 European/Israeli centres. b Number and percentage of ongoing cases, 2 patients at the 2nd run of ECMO included. c Number of patients deceased on ECMO and after ECMO weaning. Currently, 44% died overall, 8,4% died after weaning, e.g. 4,7% of all Our preliminary data suggest that patients placed on ECMO with severe refractory respiratory or cardiac failure secondary to COVID-19 have a reasonable (55%) chance of survival. Further extensive data analysis is expected to provide invaluable information on the demographics, severity of illness, indications and different ECMO management strategies in these patients. Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material. Supplementary material 1 (JPG 398 kb)
  5 in total

1.  Association of Cardiac Injury With Mortality in Hospitalized Patients With COVID-19 in Wuhan, China.

Authors:  Shaobo Shi; Mu Qin; Bo Shen; Yuli Cai; Tao Liu; Fan Yang; Wei Gong; Xu Liu; Jinjun Liang; Qinyan Zhao; He Huang; Bo Yang; Congxin Huang
Journal:  JAMA Cardiol       Date:  2020-07-01       Impact factor: 14.676

2.  Clinical features of patients infected with 2019 novel coronavirus in Wuhan, China.

Authors:  Chaolin Huang; Yeming Wang; Xingwang Li; Lili Ren; Jianping Zhao; Yi Hu; Li Zhang; Guohui Fan; Jiuyang Xu; Xiaoying Gu; Zhenshun Cheng; Ting Yu; Jiaan Xia; Yuan Wei; Wenjuan Wu; Xuelei Xie; Wen Yin; Hui Li; Min Liu; Yan Xiao; Hong Gao; Li Guo; Jungang Xie; Guangfa Wang; Rongmeng Jiang; Zhancheng Gao; Qi Jin; Jianwei Wang; Bin Cao
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2020-01-24       Impact factor: 79.321

3.  High risk of thrombosis in patients with severe SARS-CoV-2 infection: a multicenter prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Julie Helms; Charles Tacquard; François Severac; Ian Leonard-Lorant; Mickaël Ohana; Xavier Delabranche; Hamid Merdji; Raphaël Clere-Jehl; Malika Schenck; Florence Fagot Gandet; Samira Fafi-Kremer; Vincent Castelain; Francis Schneider; Lélia Grunebaum; Eduardo Anglés-Cano; Laurent Sattler; Paul-Michel Mertes; Ferhat Meziani
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2020-05-04       Impact factor: 17.440

4.  Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation for Coronavirus Disease 2019 in Shanghai, China.

Authors:  Xin Li; Zhen Guo; Bailing Li; Xiaolin Zhang; Rui Tian; Wei Wu; Zhongwei Zhang; Yunfei Lu; Nan Chen; Sean P Clifford; Jiapeng Huang
Journal:  ASAIO J       Date:  2020-05       Impact factor: 2.872

5.  The prevalence, risk factors and outcome of cardiac dysfunction in hospitalized patients with COVID-19.

Authors:  Yuman Li; He Li; Meng Li; Li Zhang; Mingxing Xie
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2020-08-07       Impact factor: 41.787

  5 in total
  33 in total

1.  Defining and understanding the "extra-corporeal membrane oxygenation gap" in the veno-venous configuration: Timing and causes of death.

Authors:  Samuel Heuts; Maged Makhoul; Abdulrahman N Mansouri; Fabio Silvio Taccone; Amir Obeid; Mirko Belliato; Lars Mikael Broman; Maximilian Malfertheiner; Paolo Meani; Giuseppe Maria Raffa; Thijs Delnoij; Jos Maessen; Gil Bolotin; Roberto Lorusso
Journal:  Artif Organs       Date:  2021-09-07       Impact factor: 2.663

2.  ECMO Support and Operator Safety in the Context of COVID-19 Outbreak: A Regional Center Experience.

Authors:  Giorgia Montrucchio; Gabriele Sales; Rosario Urbino; Umberto Simonetti; Chiara Bonetto; Erik Cura Stura; Erika Simonato; Giovanni Fuoco; Vito Fanelli; Luca Brazzi
Journal:  Membranes (Basel)       Date:  2021-04-30

3.  Human factors in ECLS - A keystone for safety and quality - A narrative review for ECLS providers.

Authors:  Justyna Swol; Daniel Brodie; Anne Willers; Bishoy Zakhary; Joseph Belezzo; Zachary Shinar; Scott D Weingart; Jonathan W Haft; Roberto Lorusso; Giles J Peek
Journal:  Artif Organs       Date:  2021-11-05       Impact factor: 2.663

4.  COVID-19 and ECMO: a call for close cooperation and more investigation.

Authors:  Roberto Lorusso; Thomas Mueller
Journal:  Lancet Respir Med       Date:  2021-04-19       Impact factor: 30.700

5.  Expert consensus statements for the management of COVID-19-related acute respiratory failure using a Delphi method.

Authors:  Prashant Nasa; Elie Azoulay; Ashish K Khanna; Ravi Jain; Sachin Gupta; Yash Javeri; Deven Juneja; Pradeep Rangappa; Krishnaswamy Sundararajan; Waleed Alhazzani; Massimo Antonelli; Yaseen M Arabi; Jan Bakker; Laurent J Brochard; Adam M Deane; Bin Du; Sharon Einav; Andrés Esteban; Ognjen Gajic; Samuel M Galvagno; Claude Guérin; Samir Jaber; Gopi C Khilnani; Younsuck Koh; Jean-Baptiste Lascarrou; Flavia R Machado; Manu L N G Malbrain; Jordi Mancebo; Michael T McCurdy; Brendan A McGrath; Sangeeta Mehta; Armand Mekontso-Dessap; Mervyn Mer; Michael Nurok; Pauline K Park; Paolo Pelosi; John V Peter; Jason Phua; David V Pilcher; Lise Piquilloud; Peter Schellongowski; Marcus J Schultz; Manu Shankar-Hari; Suveer Singh; Massimiliano Sorbello; Ravindranath Tiruvoipati; Andrew A Udy; Tobias Welte; Sheila N Myatra
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2021-03-16       Impact factor: 9.097

Review 6.  Extracorporeal Gas Exchange for Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome: Open Questions, Controversies and Future Directions.

Authors:  Marco Giani; Simone Redaelli; Antonio Siragusa; Benedetta Fumagalli; Roberto Rona; Giuseppe Foti
Journal:  Membranes (Basel)       Date:  2021-02-28

7.  Transition from Simple V-V to V-A and Hybrid ECMO Configurations in COVID-19 ARDS.

Authors:  Piotr Suwalski; Jakub Staromłyński; Jakub Brączkowski; Maciej Bartczak; Silvia Mariani; Dominik Drobiński; Konstanty Szułdrzyński; Radosław Smoczyński; Marzena Franczyk; Wojciech Sarnowski; Agnieszka Gajewska; Anna Witkowska; Waldemar Wierzba; Artur Zaczyński; Zbigniew Król; Ewa Olek; Michał Pasierski; Justine Mafalda Ravaux; Maria Elena de Piero; Roberto Lorusso; Mariusz Kowalewski
Journal:  Membranes (Basel)       Date:  2021-06-09

8.  Implementation of new ECMO centers during the COVID-19 pandemic: experience and results from the Middle East and India.

Authors:  Ahmed A Rabie; Mohamed H Azzam; Abdulrahman A Al-Fares; Akram Abdelbary; Hani N Mufti; Ibrahim F Hassan; Arpan Chakraborty; Pranay Oza; Alyaa Elhazmi; Huda Alfoudri; Suneel Kumar Pooboni; Abdulrahman Alharthy; Daniel Brodie; Bishoy Zakhary; Kiran Shekar; Marta Velia Antonini; Nicholas A Barrett; Giles Peek; Alain Combes; Yaseen M Arabi
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2021-06-22       Impact factor: 17.440

9.  ECMO Retrieval over the Mediterranean Sea: Extending Hospital Arms.

Authors:  Brianna A Hildreth; Giovanna Panarello; Gennaro Martucci; Fabio Tuzzolino; Alberto Piacentini; Giovanna Occhipinti; Andrea Giunta; Fabio Genco; Giuseppe M Raffa; Michele Pilato; Guido Capitanio; Antonio Arcadipane
Journal:  Membranes (Basel)       Date:  2021-03-17

10.  Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for COVID-19 during first and second waves.

Authors:  Lars Mikael Broman; Staffan Eksborg; Valeria Lo Coco; Maria Elena De Piero; Jan Belohlavek; Roberto Lorusso
Journal:  Lancet Respir Med       Date:  2021-06-16       Impact factor: 30.700

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.