| Literature DB >> 32761213 |
Xin-Jia Wang1,2,3, Spencer C H Barrett4, Li Zhong1,3, Zhi-Kun Wu5, De-Zhu Li1,2, Hong Wang1, Wei Zhou1,2.
Abstract
The evolutionary transition from outcrossing to selfing can have important genomic consequences. Decreased effective population size and the reduced efficacy of selection are predicted to play an important role in the molecular evolution of the genomes of selfing species. We investigated evidence for molecular signatures of the genomic selfing syndrome using 66 species of Primula including distylous (outcrossing) and derived homostylous (selfing) taxa. We complemented our comparative analysis with a microevolutionary study of P. chungensis, which is polymorphic for mating system and consists of both distylous and homostylous populations. We generated chloroplast and nuclear genomic data sets for distylous, homostylous, and distylous-homostylous species and identified patterns of nonsynonymous to synonymous divergence (dN/dS) and polymorphism (πN/πS) in species or lineages with contrasting mating systems. Our analysis of coding sequence divergence and polymorphism detected strongly reduced genetic diversity and heterozygosity, decreased efficacy of purifying selection, purging of large-effect deleterious mutations, and lower rates of adaptive evolution in samples from homostylous compared with distylous populations, consistent with theoretical expectations of the genomic selfing syndrome. Our results demonstrate that self-fertilization is a major driver of molecular evolutionary processes with genomic signatures of selfing evident in both old and relatively young homostylous populations.Entities:
Keywords: zzm321990 Primulazzm321990 ; deleterious mutations; effective population size; mating system; selection efficacy
Mesh:
Year: 2021 PMID: 32761213 PMCID: PMC7782863 DOI: 10.1093/molbev/msaa199
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Mol Biol Evol ISSN: 0737-4038 Impact factor: 16.240
Fig. 1.(a) Floral phenotypes associated with the breakdown of distyly to long homostyly and the mating-system transition from outcrossing to selfing that is involved. Solid arrow indicates the evolutionary transition; dashed arrows indicate predominant matings. Branch models tested with codeml in PAML analyses: (b) Mout-self: two ω for outcrossing (thin black) and selfing (thick orange) branches; (c) Mint-ext: two ω for internal (thin black) and external (thick blue) branches; (d) M3: three ω for internal branches (thin black), outcrossing (thick blue), and selfing (thick orange) external branches. Outcrossing and selfing branches on models are indicated by O and S.
Fig. 2.Protein evolution of 72 chloroplast genes among 60 Primula species and 445 nuclear orthologs among 12 Primula species. Plot of dN/dS values in selfing (x-axis) and outcrossing (y-axis) branches from the model Mout-self for (a) chloroplast genes and (c) nuclear orthologs, respectively. Plot of dN/dS values in external (x-axis) and internal (y-axis) branches from the model Mint-ext for (b) chloroplast genes and (d) nuclear orthologs, respectively. Genes with statistically significant differences between model Mout-self/Mint-ext and null model (M0) are in red.
Fig. 3.Distributions of the differences of ω (dN/dS) estimated separately in Mout-self and Mint-ext for (a) 72 chloroplast genes and for (b) 445 nuclear orthologs, respectively. Two ratios (ωout and ωself) in Mout-self are given for outcrossing and selfing branches. Two ratios (ωint and ωext) in Mint-ext are estimated for internal and external branches.
Summary of Chloroplast and Nuclear Genome Data for the Two Lineages (outcrossing vs. selfing) of Primula chungensis.
| Lineage |
| Site Class |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ( | |||||||||
| Outcrossing lineage (distylous) | 5 | Synonymous | 14,549 | 7 | 0.19 | 0.23 | 0.368 | 0.391 | −1.222 |
| Nonsynonymous | 48,216 | 9 | 0.07 | 0.09 | |||||
| Selfing lineage (homostylous) | 8 | Synonymous | 14,547 | 4 | 0.13 | 0.11 | 0.385 | 0.455 | 0.826 |
| Nonsynonymous | 48,218 | 6 | 0.05 | 0.05 | |||||
| ( | |||||||||
| Outcrossing lineage (distylous) | 4 | Synonymous | 435,550 | 1,321 | 1.65 | 1.64 | 0.280 | 0.287 | −0.050 |
| Nonsynonymous | 1,432,160 | 1,222 | 0.47 | 0.47 | |||||
| Selfing lineage (homostylous) | 9 | Synonymous | 435,534 | 1,331 | 1.17 | 1.12 | 0.284 | 0.295 | 0.131 |
| Nonsynonymous | 1,423,176 | 1,258 | 0.34 | 0.33 | |||||
Note.—Nucleotide diversity (π), Watterson’s theta (θW), and test for neutrality (D; Tajima’s D based on π and θW) for each lineage are given.
n, sample size; Nsites, number of sites; S, polymorphisms.
Fig. 4.The MK test separating the outcrossing and selfing lineages of Primula chungensis from outgroup (P. mallophylla and P. secundiflora) based on (a) nuclear and (b) chloroplast genome data. Synonymous polymorphism (PS) and divergence (DS) are indicated by blue and white bars, respectively; nonsynonymous polymorphism (PN) and divergence (DN) are indicated by gray and black bars, respectively; numbers above each bar indicate the total numbers of each type of site.
Fig. 5.Distribution of fitness effects (DFE) of new nonsynonymous mutations falling in different Nes categories for outcrossing and selfing lineages of Primula chungensis. Nes is the product of Ne and the selection coefficient (s). Nine selfing and four outcrossing individuals were used to generate the DFEs. Error bars on top of each Nes category are 95% confidence intervals from 200 bootstrap replicates generated by resampling over loci. Comparisons between the two lineages at P < 0.05 significance level are indicated by *.
Parameters of the Fitness Distribution of Nonsynonymous Mutations (β, mean S), Rate of Adaptive Evolution (α), Adaptive (ωα), and Nonadaptive Proportion (ωd) of dN/dS for the Selfing and Outcrossing Lineages of Primula chungensis Estimated with the Method of DFE (see Materials and Methods for details).
| Outcrossing Lineage | Selfing Lineage | |
|---|---|---|
|
| 0.322 (0.243,0.375) | 0.195 (0.166, 0.226) |
| Mean | 69.048 (56.698, 97.609) | 732.82 (603.530, 915.048) |
|
| 0.250 (0.058, 0.445) | 0.163 (−0.167, 0.322) |
|
| 0.057 (0.012, 0.112) | 0.038 (−0.035, 0.079) |
|
| 0.170 (0.139, 0.231) | 0.198 (0.167, 0.247) |
β, the shape parameter of the gamma distribution assumed for the estimations of S.