Literature DB >> 32759354

A Diagnostic Stewardship Intervention To Improve Blood Culture Use among Adult Nonneutropenic Inpatients: the DISTRIBUTE Study.

Valeria Fabre1, Eili Klein2,3, Alejandra B Salinas4, George Jones4, Karen C Carroll5, Aaron M Milstone6,7, Joe Amoah6, Yea-Jen Hsu8, Avinash Gadala7, Sanjay Desai9, Amit Goyal10, David Furfaro11, Jacquelyn Zimmerman12, Susan Lin13, Sara E Cosgrove1.   

Abstract

Interventions to optimize blood culture (BCx) practices in adult inpatients are limited. We conducted a before-after study evaluating the impact of a diagnostic stewardship program that aimed to optimize BCx use in a medical intensive care unit (MICU) and five medicine units at a large academic center. The program included implementation of an evidence-based algorithm detailing indications for BCx use and education and feedback to providers about BCx rates and indication inappropriateness. Neutropenic patients were excluded. BCx rates from contemporary control units were obtained for comparison. The primary outcome was the change in BCxs ordered with the intervention. Secondary outcomes included proportion of inappropriate BCx, solitary BCx, and positive BCx. Balancing metrics included compliance with the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) SEP-1 BCx component, 30-day readmission, and all-cause in-hospital and 30-day mortality. After the intervention, BCx rates decreased from 27.7 to 22.8 BCx/100 patient-days (PDs) in the MICU (P = 0.001) and from 10.9 to 7.7 BCx/100 PD for the 5 medicine units combined (P < 0.001). BCx rates in the control units did not decrease significantly (surgical intensive care unit [ICU], P = 0.06; surgical units, P = 0.15). The proportion of inappropriate BCxs did not significantly change with the intervention (30% in the MICU and 50% in medicine units). BCx positivity increased in the MICU (from 8% to 11%, P < 0.001). Solitary BCxs decreased by 21% in the medicine units (P < 0.001). Balancing metrics were similar before and after the intervention. BCx use can be optimized with clinician education and practice guidance without affecting sepsis quality metrics or mortality.
Copyright © 2020 American Society for Microbiology.

Entities:  

Keywords:  bacteremia; blood culture; diagnostic stewardship; indications

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32759354      PMCID: PMC7512168          DOI: 10.1128/JCM.01053-20

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Microbiol        ISSN: 0095-1137            Impact factor:   5.948


  17 in total

1.  Appropriateness of blood culture testing parameters in routine practice. Results from a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  V Vitrat-Hincky; P François; J Labarère; C Recule; J P Stahl; P Pavese
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2010-11-18       Impact factor: 3.267

2.  Analysis of strategies to improve cost effectiveness of blood cultures.

Authors:  Oren Zwang; Richard K Albert
Journal:  J Hosp Med       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 2.960

3.  Contaminant blood cultures and resource utilization. The true consequences of false-positive results.

Authors:  D W Bates; L Goldman; T H Lee
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1991-01-16       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  Active Monitoring and Feedback to Improve Blood Culture Fill Volumes and Positivity Across a Large Integrated Health System.

Authors:  Reeti Khare; Tarush Kothari; Joseph Castagnaro; Bryan Hemmings; May Tso; Stefan Juretschko
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2020-01-02       Impact factor: 9.079

5.  Prescribers' knowledge, attitudes and perceptions about blood culturing practices for adult hospitalized patients: a call for action.

Authors:  Valeria Fabre; Aaron M Milstone; Sara C Keller; Karen C Carroll; Sara E Cosgrove
Journal:  Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol       Date:  2018-09-18       Impact factor: 3.254

6.  Evaluation of an intervention to improve blood culture practices: a cluster randomised trial.

Authors:  P Pavese; M Maillet; V Vitrat-Hincky; C Recule; J-P Vittoz; A Guyomard; A Seigneurin; P François
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2014-07-02       Impact factor: 3.267

Review 7.  Practical Guidance for Clinical Microbiology Laboratories: A Comprehensive Update on the Problem of Blood Culture Contamination and a Discussion of Methods for Addressing the Problem

Authors:  Gary V Doern; Karen C Carroll; Daniel J Diekema; Kevin W Garey; Mark E Rupp; Melvin P Weinstein; Daniel J Sexton
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2019-10-30       Impact factor: 26.132

8.  Blood cultures in acute surgical admissions.

Authors:  D F J Dunne; R McDonald; R Ratnayake; H Z Malik; R Ward; G J Poston; S W Fenwick
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 1.891

9.  Does This Patient Need Blood Cultures? A Scoping Review of Indications for Blood Cultures in Adult Nonneutropenic Inpatients.

Authors:  Valeria Fabre; Sima L Sharara; Alejandra B Salinas; Karen C Carroll; Sanjay Desai; Sara E Cosgrove
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2020-08-22       Impact factor: 9.079

10.  Follow-up Blood Cultures in Gram-Negative Bacteremia: Are They Needed?

Authors:  Christina N Canzoneri; Bobak J Akhavan; Zehra Tosur; Pedro E Alcedo Andrade; Gabriel M Aisenberg
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2017-11-13       Impact factor: 9.079

View more
  5 in total

1.  Biographical Feature: Karen C. Carroll, M.D.

Authors:  Erik Munson
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2021-07-19       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  Underutilization and Quality Gaps in Blood Culture Processing in Public Hospitals of Peru.

Authors:  Fiorella Krapp; Claudia Rondon; Catherine Amaro; Evelyn Barco-Yaipén; María Valera-Krumdieck; Rubén Vásquez; Alexander Briones; Martin Casapia; Antonio Burgos; Favio Sarmiento López; Pierina Vilcapoma; Roberto Díaz Sipión; Miguel Villegas-Chiroque; Kelly Castillo; Jimena Pino-Dueñas; Edwin Cuaresma Cuadros; Hugo Alpaca-Salvador; René Campana; Teresa Peralta Córdova; Elizett Sierra Chavez; Carla Aguado Ventura; Marjan Peeters; Jan Jacobs; Coralith Garcia
Journal:  Am J Trop Med Hyg       Date:  2021-12-06       Impact factor: 2.345

Review 3.  Blood Culture Utilization in the Hospital Setting: a Call for Diagnostic Stewardship.

Authors:  Valeria Fabre; Karen C Carroll; Sara E Cosgrove
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2021-07-14       Impact factor: 11.677

4.  Follow-up blood cultures in Pseudomonas aeruginosa bacteremia: A potential target for diagnostic stewardship.

Authors:  Alexis L Green; Yuanyuan Liang; Lyndsay M O'Hara; Lisa Pineles; Scott Sorongon; Anthony D Harris; Jonathan D Baghdadi
Journal:  Antimicrob Steward Healthc Epidemiol       Date:  2021-08-27

5.  Confidence interval methods for antimicrobial resistance surveillance data.

Authors:  Erta Kalanxhi; Gilbert Osena; Geetanjali Kapoor; Eili Klein
Journal:  Antimicrob Resist Infect Control       Date:  2021-06-09       Impact factor: 4.887

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.