Literature DB >> 21086006

Appropriateness of blood culture testing parameters in routine practice. Results from a cross-sectional study.

V Vitrat-Hincky1, P François, J Labarère, C Recule, J P Stahl, P Pavese.   

Abstract

We aimed to assess the appropriateness of routine blood culture testing parameters and antimicrobial therapy for patients with suspected bloodstream infection. We conducted a cross-sectional study of blood cultures registered in the microbiological laboratory at a university-affiliated hospital from 4 to 15 June 2007. Using a structured implicit chart review, two infectious disease specialists assessed the appropriateness of the testing parameters and antimicrobial therapy. Overall, 2,696 blood culture bottles were collected from 260 patients during their stay, including 955 bottles that were evaluated during the study period. The indication of fungal and bacterial blood cultures was rated as appropriate for 75% (95% confidence interval [CI], 65-83) and 91% (95% CI, 87-95) of patients. Only 45% (95% CI, 39-52) of patients had an adequate number of blood cultures (i.e., two to four). An optimal volume of blood (i.e., ≥10 mL) was inoculated in 13% (95% CI, 11-15) of adult bottles. Empirical antimicrobial therapy was appropriate for 60% (95% CI, 43-76) of patients with positive blood cultures. There is room for improvement regarding routine blood culture testing parameters and antimicrobial therapy. The effectiveness of multifaceted interventions in altering the appropriateness of blood culture parameters deserves further research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21086006     DOI: 10.1007/s10096-010-1115-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis        ISSN: 0934-9723            Impact factor:   3.267


  35 in total

Review 1.  Blood cultures: clinical aspects and controversies.

Authors:  J M Mylotte; A Tayara
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 3.267

2.  Blood cultures in the critical care unit: improving utilization and yield.

Authors:  Shirin Shafazand; Ann B Weinacker
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 9.410

Review 3.  Update on detection of bacteremia and fungemia.

Authors:  L G Reimer; M L Wilson; M P Weinstein
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 26.132

4.  Predicting bacteremia at the bedside.

Authors:  Fabián Jaimes; Clara Arango; Giovanni Ruiz; Jorge Cuervo; Juan Botero; Gloria Vélez; Natalia Upegui; Faber Machado
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2004-01-13       Impact factor: 9.079

5.  Adjustment of antibiotic treatment according to the results of blood cultures leads to decreased antibiotic use and costs.

Authors:  Dag Berild; Atefeh Mohseni; Lien My Diep; Mogens Jensenius; Signe Holta Ringertz
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  2005-12-30       Impact factor: 5.790

Review 6.  Updated review of blood culture contamination.

Authors:  Keri K Hall; Jason A Lyman
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 26.132

7.  Contaminant blood cultures and resource utilization. The true consequences of false-positive results.

Authors:  D W Bates; L Goldman; T H Lee
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1991-01-16       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 8.  Current blood culture methods and systems: clinical concepts, technology, and interpretation of results.

Authors:  M P Weinstein
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 9.079

9.  Bacteremia in febrile patients. A clinical model for diagnosis.

Authors:  L Leibovici; S Greenshtain; O Cohen; F Mor; A J Wysenbeek
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  1991-09

10.  Repeating blood cultures during hospital stay: practice pattern at a teaching hospital and a proposal for guidelines.

Authors:  M S Tabriz; K Riederer; J Baran; R Khatib
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Infect       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 8.067

View more
  6 in total

1.  Evaluation of an intervention to improve blood culture practices: a cluster randomised trial.

Authors:  P Pavese; M Maillet; V Vitrat-Hincky; C Recule; J-P Vittoz; A Guyomard; A Seigneurin; P François
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2014-07-02       Impact factor: 3.267

2.  A Diagnostic Stewardship Intervention To Improve Blood Culture Use among Adult Nonneutropenic Inpatients: the DISTRIBUTE Study.

Authors:  Valeria Fabre; Eili Klein; Alejandra B Salinas; George Jones; Karen C Carroll; Aaron M Milstone; Joe Amoah; Yea-Jen Hsu; Avinash Gadala; Sanjay Desai; Amit Goyal; David Furfaro; Jacquelyn Zimmerman; Susan Lin; Sara E Cosgrove
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2020-09-22       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 3.  Blood Culture Utilization in the Hospital Setting: a Call for Diagnostic Stewardship.

Authors:  Valeria Fabre; Karen C Carroll; Sara E Cosgrove
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2021-07-14       Impact factor: 11.677

4.  Effect of blood volume in standard anaerobic blood culture bottles of the BacT/ALERT 3D system used for the detection of pathogens and time to detection.

Authors:  Seong Chun Kim; Sunjoo Kim; Dong-Hyun Lee; Sae-Rom Choi; Jeong-Sook Kim
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-02-03       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 5.  How to Optimize the Use of Blood Cultures for the Diagnosis of Bloodstream Infections? A State-of-the Art.

Authors:  Brigitte Lamy; Sylvie Dargère; Maiken C Arendrup; Jean-Jacques Parienti; Pierre Tattevin
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2016-05-12       Impact factor: 5.640

6.  Quality of blood culture testing - a survey in intensive care units and microbiological laboratories across four European countries.

Authors:  Roland P H Schmitz; Peter M Keller; Michael Baier; Stefan Hagel; Mathias W Pletz; Frank M Brunkhorst
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2013-10-21       Impact factor: 9.097

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.