Literature DB >> 34260274

Blood Culture Utilization in the Hospital Setting: a Call for Diagnostic Stewardship.

Valeria Fabre1,2, Karen C Carroll3, Sara E Cosgrove1,2.   

Abstract

There has been significant progress in detection of bloodstream pathogens in recent decades with the development of more sensitive automated blood culture detection systems and the availability of rapid molecular tests for faster organism identification and detection of resistance genes. However, most blood cultures in clinical practice do not grow organisms, suggesting that suboptimal blood culture collection practices (e.g., suboptimal blood volume) or suboptimal selection of patients to culture (i.e., blood cultures ordered for patients with low likelihood of bacteremia) may be occurring. A national blood culture utilization benchmark does not exist, nor do specific guidelines on when blood cultures are appropriate or when blood cultures are of low value and waste resources. Studies evaluating the potential harm associated with excessive blood cultures have focused on blood culture contamination, which has been associated with significant increases in health care costs and negative consequences for patients related to exposure to unnecessary antibiotics and additional testing. Optimizing blood culture performance is important to ensure bloodstream infections (BSIs) are diagnosed while minimizing adverse events from overuse. In this review, we discuss key factors that influence blood culture performance, with a focus on the preanalytical phase, including technical aspects of the blood culture collection process and blood culture indications. We highlight areas for improvement and make recommendations to improve current blood culture practices among hospitalized patients.

Entities:  

Keywords:  benchmark; blood culture; healthcare resources; indications; utilization

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34260274      PMCID: PMC8925908          DOI: 10.1128/JCM.01005-21

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Microbiol        ISSN: 0095-1137            Impact factor:   11.677


  49 in total

1.  Clinical significance of repeat blood cultures during febrile neutropenia in adult acute myeloid leukaemia patients undergoing intensive chemotherapy.

Authors:  Shun-Ichi Kimura; Ayumi Gomyo; Jin Hayakawa; Masaharu Tamaki; Yu Akahoshi; Naonori Harada; Tomotaka Ugai; Machiko Kusuda; Kazuaki Kameda; Hidenori Wada; Yuko Ishihara; Koji Kawamura; Kana Sakamoto; Miki Sato; Kiriko Terasako-Saito; Misato Kikuchi; Hideki Nakasone; Shinichi Kako; Aki Tanihara; Yoshinobu Kanda
Journal:  Infect Dis (Lond)       Date:  2017-06-20

2.  Value of anaerobic blood cultures in pediatrics.

Authors:  A Gené; E Palacín; J J García-García; C Muñoz-Almagro
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 3.267

3.  Analysis of strategies to improve cost effectiveness of blood cultures.

Authors:  Oren Zwang; Richard K Albert
Journal:  J Hosp Med       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 2.960

4.  Diagnostic Stewardship-Leveraging the Laboratory to Improve Antimicrobial Use.

Authors:  Daniel J Morgan; Preeti Malani; Daniel J Diekema
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2017-08-15       Impact factor: 56.272

5.  Association of a blood culture utilization intervention on antibiotic use in a pediatric intensive care unit.

Authors:  Anna C Sick-Samuels; Charlotte Z Woods-Hill; James C Fackler; Pranita D Tamma; Sybil A Klaus; Elizabeth E Colantuoni; Aaron M Milstone
Journal:  Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol       Date:  2019-02-15       Impact factor: 3.254

Review 6.  Advances in Rapid Molecular Blood Culture Diagnostics: Healthcare Impact, Laboratory Implications, and Multiplex Technologies.

Authors:  Rosemary C She; Jeffrey M Bender
Journal:  J Appl Lab Med       Date:  2018-11-21

7.  Detailed Analysis of the Characteristics of Sample Volume in Blood Culture Bottles.

Authors:  Claes Henning; Nilsu Aygül; Patrik Dinnétz; Karin Wallgren; Volkan Özenci
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2019-07-26       Impact factor: 5.948

8.  Who needs a blood culture? A prospectively derived and validated prediction rule.

Authors:  Nathan I Shapiro; Richard E Wolfe; Sharon B Wright; Richard Moore; David W Bates
Journal:  J Emerg Med       Date:  2008-05-16       Impact factor: 1.484

9.  Infectious Diseases Society of America Position Paper: Recommended Revisions to the National Severe Sepsis and Septic Shock Early Management Bundle (SEP-1) Sepsis Quality Measure.

Authors:  Chanu Rhee; Kathleen Chiotos; Sara E Cosgrove; Emily L Heil; Sameer S Kadri; Andre C Kalil; David N Gilbert; Henry Masur; Edward J Septimus; Daniel A Sweeney; Jeffrey R Strich; Dean L Winslow; Michael Klompas
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2021-02-16       Impact factor: 9.079

10.  Diagnosis and Treatment of Adults with Community-acquired Pneumonia. An Official Clinical Practice Guideline of the American Thoracic Society and Infectious Diseases Society of America.

Authors:  Joshua P Metlay; Grant W Waterer; Ann C Long; Antonio Anzueto; Jan Brozek; Kristina Crothers; Laura A Cooley; Nathan C Dean; Michael J Fine; Scott A Flanders; Marie R Griffin; Mark L Metersky; Daniel M Musher; Marcos I Restrepo; Cynthia G Whitney
Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  2019-10-01       Impact factor: 21.405

View more
  1 in total

1.  Follow-up Blood Culture Practices for Gram-Negative Bloodstream Infections in Immunocompromised Hosts at a Large Academic Medical Center.

Authors:  Lauren Groft Buzzalino; James Mease; Ciera L Bernhardi; Jacqueline T Bork; J Kristie Johnson; Kimberly C Claeys
Journal:  Open Forum Infect Dis       Date:  2022-04-15       Impact factor: 4.423

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.