| Literature DB >> 32751474 |
Magdalena Woźniczka1, Manas Sutradhar2, Armando J L Pombeiro2, Mirosława Świątek1, Marek Pająk1, Joanna Gądek-Sobczyńska1, Magdalena Chmiela3, Weronika Gonciarz3, Beata Pasternak4, Aleksander Kufelnicki1.
Abstract
The present study describes the coorEntities:
Keywords: ESI-MS; UV-Vis spectroscopy; biological activity; cobalt(II) complexes; coordination modes; reduced Schiff base; stability constant
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32751474 PMCID: PMC7436002 DOI: 10.3390/molecules25153462
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.411
Figure 1Structure of the ligand N-(2-hydroxybenzyl)alanine, AlaSal (zwitter-ionic form [LH2]).
Decimal logarithms of overall protonation and formation constants in the Co(II)−AlaSal system, βmlh = [MmLlHh]/[M]m[L]l[H]h at 25.0 ± 0.1 °C, I = 0.1 (KNO3) and UV/Vis spectral data. Standard deviations in parentheses after overall protonation and stability constants refer to random errors only.
| Species | log10
| Stepwise Dissociation Constants | Related Constants | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| [L]2− | 236 (8.2 × 103) | |||
| 292 (3.5 × 103) | ||||
| [LH]− | 10.73(1) (OH) | p | 237 (6.1 × 103) | |
| 291 (2.6 × 103) | ||||
| [LH2] | 19.36(1) (NH2+) | p | ~240sh (4.1 × 103) | |
| 274 (2.1 × 103) | ||||
| [LH3]+ | 21.66(2) (COOH) | p | ~298sh (1.6 × 103) | |
| 5.82; 804 | ||||
| [CoL] | 7.98(1) | 508 (21) | ||
| [CoL2]2− | 13.35(2) | 483 (31) | ||
| [CoL3]4− | 16.39(4) | |||
| [CoLH]+ | 13.64(10) | 2.92 4 | ||
| 21.78(2) | 11.06 5 | |||
| [CoL2H]− | 26.35(4) | 15.63 6 | ||
| [CoL3H]3− | ||||
| 5.85; 455 |
1σ—the value of the normalized sum of squared residuals; n—number of titration points; 2 pKa2 = . 3 pKa1 = . 4 . 5 . 6 .
Figure 2Suggested coordination modes of the complexes in the Co(II)–AlaSal system in dependence on the pH.
Figure 3Species distribution curves for the complexes formed in the Co(II)–AlaSal system at ligand-to-metal molar ratio 2:1 as a function of pH relative to (a) Co(II), (b) ligand; CAlaSal = 2.0 × 10−2 M.
Figure 4Absorption spectra of complexes in the Co(II) – AlaSal system (CAlaSal = 2 × 10−3 mol L−1, at ligand-to-metal molar ratio 2:1) in 5 mM Tris-HCl/NaCl buffer at pH 7.2, recorded at consecutive time intervals within the wavelength range (a) 250–900 nm (b) 300–800 nm – extended part of spectra. (c) Time relationship of logarithmic values: ln(Amax−A) at 683 nm.
Antimicrobial activity of tested compounds, prepared directly and stored for two weeks, shown as minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) and minimal bactericidal concentration (MBC). Gentamicin, amoxicillin and amphotericin B used as antibacterial and antifungal reference substances, respectively; (-) not tested.
| Microorganism | MIC/MBC (mM) | MIC = MBC (mM) | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AlaSal | Co(II) Alone | Co(II)–AlaSal Complexes | Gentamicin | Amphotericin B | Amoxicillin | ||||
| MIC | MBC | MIC | MBC | MIC | MBC | ||||
| Gram-negative bacteria | |||||||||
| 1.82 | 1.82 | 0.91 | 1.82 | 1.82 | 1.82 | <0.008 | - | - | |
| 7.30 | >7.30 | 1.82 | 1.82 | 7.30 | >7.30 | <0.004 | - | - | |
| 7.30 | >7.30 | 1.82 | >7.30 | 3.65 | 3.65 | - | - | <0.001 | |
| 7.30 | >7.30 | 1.82 | >7.30 | 3.65 | 3.65 | - | - | <0.001 | |
| Gram-positive bacteria | |||||||||
| 7.30 | >7.30 | 1.82 | 1.82 | 1.82 | 3.65 | <0.26 | - | - | |
| 7.30 | >7.30 | 0.91 | 0.91 | 1.82 | 3.65 | <0.002 | - | - | |
| 7.30 | >7.30 | 0.91 | 0.91 | 1.82 | 3.65 | <0.002 | - | - | |
|
| 7.30 | >7.30 | 0.91 | 0.91 | 1.82 | 3.65 | <0.002 | - | - |
| Fungi | |||||||||
| 3.65 | >7.30 | 0.23 | 3.65 | 1.82 | 3.65 | - | <0.001 | - | |
| 3.65 | >7.30 | 0.23 | 3.65 | 1.82 | 3.65 | - | <0.001 | - | |
| 3.65 | >7.30 | 0.23 | 7.30 | 1.82 | 3.65 | - | <0.001 | - | |
Figure 5Cytotoxic effect of investigated compounds: (a) AlaSal, (b) Co(II)–AlaSal complexes (c) Co(II) alone towards L929 cells. The cytotoxicity was assessed by MTT [3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide)] reduction assay. The cell viability was calculated for four experiments including three repeats for each compound. Complete RMPI-1640 medium (cRPMI) was used as a positive control (C+) of cell viability (100% viable cells) and 0.03% H2O2 as a negative control (C−) of cell viability (100% dead inactive cells). Statistical significance: *•■ p < 0.05; * untreated cells vs. cells treated with tested solution (solution prepared directly); • untreated cells vs. cells treated with tested solution (solution stored for two weeks) ■ solution prepared directly vs. solution stored for two weeks.
Figure 6The percentage of L929 cells with damaged cell nuclei. The cells were stimulated for 24 h with: (a) AlaSal, (b) Co(II)–AlaSal complexes or (c) Co(II) alone and then stained by 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI). Statistical significance: *• p < 0.05; *untreated cells vs. cells treated with tested solution (solution prepared directly); • untreated cells vs. cells treated with tested solution (solution stored for two weeks).
Figure 7Microscopic images of L929 cells with a sign of cell nuclei damage. Cell cultures in complete RMPI-1640 medium (cRPMI) were used as positive control (C+): cells with no sign of cell nuclei damage; cells treated with 0.03% H2O2 were used as negative control (C−): cells with DNA damage. L929 cells stimulated with selected compounds: (a) solution prepared freshly or (b) solution stored for two weeks. The morphology of cell nuclei was assessed by 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) staining. Samples were viewed under a fluorescent microscope (Axio Scope A1, Zeiss).