Literature DB >> 32750221

Cardiovascular disease, risk factors, and health behaviors among cancer survivors and spouses: A MEPS Study.

Lixin Song1,2, Ting Guan3, Peiran Guo1, Fengyu Song4, Courtney Van Houtven5,6,7, Xianming Tan2,8, Thomas C Keyserling9.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to examine the prevalences of CVD, CVD risk factors. and health behaviors among cancer survivor-spouse dyads, assess how these prevalences differ by role (survivor vs spouse) and gender, and report congruences in health behaviors between survivors and their spouses.
METHODS: We identified 1026 survivor-spouse dyads from the 2010-2015 Medical Expenditure Panel Survey. We used weighted multivariable logistic and linear regressions to analyze the data related to CVD, CVD risk factors, and health behaviors.
RESULTS: Survivors and spouses reported high prevalences of CVD and CVD risk factors but low engagement in healthy behaviors, including non-smoking, physical activity, and maintaining a healthy weight (proxy for healthy diet). Gender and role differences were significantly related to the prevalence of CVD, CVD risk factors, and health behaviors among survivors and spouses. From 39% to 88% of survivors and spouses were congruent in their current smoking status, physical activity engagement/disengagement, and BMI.
CONCLUSION: Cancer survivors and spouses have high rates of CVD and CVD risk factors and poor engagement in healthful lifestyle behaviors. A high proportion of survivors and spouses were congruent in their current smoking status, physical activity engagement/disengagement, and BMI. Effective lifestyle interventions are needed for this high-risk population. Couple-focused interventions may be well-suited for these dyads and warrant further study. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS: Both cancer survivors and their spouses need to be non-moking, more physically active, and maintain normal BMI in order to reduce their high risk of CVD and CVD risk factors.
© 2020 The Authors. Cancer Medicine published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS); cancer; cardiovascular disease (CVD); family; health behavior; quality of life

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32750221      PMCID: PMC7520310          DOI: 10.1002/cam4.3336

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Med        ISSN: 2045-7634            Impact factor:   4.452


INTRODUCTION

The rapidly growing number of long‐term and older cancer survivors has increased concern about late cancer treatment‐related adverse effects and health outcomes attributed to common comorbidities among cancer survivors. Of particular concern is cardiovascular disease (CVD; eg heart attack, stroke) and major CVD risk factors (eg hypertension, high cholesterol, and diabetes) as CVD has become the leading cause of noncancer mortality among cancer survivors. , While cancer survivors in general have a higher risk of CVD compared with the general population, male cancer survivors have a higher prevalence of CVD than their female counterparts. Because the risk and severity of CVD are associated with health behaviors (eg smoking, diet, and exercise), , , , , the American Cancer Society (ACS) recommends that cancer survivors avoid smoking, engage in regular physical activity, maintain a healthy weight, and consume at least five servings of fruits and vegetables each day. , However, many cancer survivors do not follow these recommendations. , Research has also found gender differences in health behaviors among cancer survivors. Compared to male survivors, females maintain a healthier diet but engage in lower rates of physical activities. , For cancer survivors in an intimate relationship, the impact of cancer extends to their spouses, , who are often the primary source of support and caregiver of cancer patients. Survivors’ spouses experience persistent psychological distress and are also at increased risk for CVD. A study using a large cancer caregiver sample (N = 774 with 65.1% spouses) found that the most commonly reported medical morbidities among caregivers were heart disease and CVD risk factors, such as hypertension and high cholesterol. Unhealthy behaviors, eg tobacco smoking and physical inactivity, are also common among cancer caregivers. With regard to health behaviors of survivors and their spouses, interdependence theory posits that the marriage and interactions between couple members may facilitate health behavior changes, which can be either health‐compromising or health‐enhancing. Cancer survivors and spouses often have similar or congruent health behaviors, including physical activity and diet, and spouses are strongly influenced by survivors in terms of health behavior change. Given the growing burden of CVD and CVD risk factors in cancer survivors and spouses, as well as the interdependent influence of health behaviors between partners, attention to cardiovascular health and health behaviors among couples coping with cancer has become increasingly important. Although previous research has investigated the prevalence of CVD, CVD risk factors, and health behaviors among cancer survivors and spouses, most studies have assessed survivors and spouses separately. The few studies that have examined survivors and spouses as dyads used small samples of patients with specific types of cancer. Furthermore, little research has systematically examined (a) role (survivor vs spouse) and gender differences related to CVD and CVD risk factor prevalence and (b) congruence of health behaviors between cancer survivors and their spouses. This study used a sample from a set of large‐scale surveys of cancer survivors and their spouses across the US to examine (a) the prevalence of CVD, CVD risk factors, and health behaviors (smoking, physical activity and healthy diet); (b) the role and gender differences in prevalence of CVD, CVD risk factors, and health behaviors; and (c) the congruence (positive and negative) in health behaviors between survivors and their spouses. Based on prior research and interdependence theory, we hypothesized that most cancer survivors and spouses would have high levels of congruent health behaviors.

METHODS

Study population

We analyzed the publicly available deidentified data from the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS) (https://www.meps.ahrq.gov/mepsweb/) between 2010 and 2015. MEPS is a set of large‐scale surveys of health care utilization and expenditures of noninstitutionalized individuals, their families, medical providers, and employers across the United States. Information about MEPS methodology has been published previously. Adult cancer survivors (aged ≥ 18 years) were identified using respondents’ response to the question ‘‘Have you ever been told by a doctor or other health professional that you had cancer or a malignancy of any kind?’’ Respondents were deemed to be cancer survivors and eligible for this study if they reported to have been diagnosed with at least one type of the following 10 types of cancers, ie breast, prostate, lung, colon, bladder, uterine corpus, melanoma, non‐Hodgkin lymphoma, thyroid, and kidney ‐ the most common types of cancers in the United States from 2010 to 2015. Spouses were linked to the survivors by a spousal identifier if survivors reported being married.

Measurement

According to the American Heart Association and MEPS, CVD includes coronary heart disease, stroke, angina, heart attack, and other heart disease, and major CVD risk factors include hypertension, high cholesterol, and diabetes. Adult respondents were asked whether they had ever been diagnosed as having one or more of these conditions. The health behaviors reported, including smoking, physical activity, and diet intake, were based on the US Preventive Services Task Force (A and B recommendations). Smoking status was assessed using the question “currently smoke” answered by yes or no. Physical activity was measured using the question “currently spend half hour or more in moderate to vigorous physical activity at least five times a week” answered by yes or no. As MEPS did not include questions on dietary intake, we used Body Mass Index (BMI) as a crude proxy of diet quality. Covariates of this study included participant age, gender, race/ethnicity, education, insurance coverage, family income, census region, and cancer type, which were obtained from the MEPS household component. Because the study variables were not asked in each round of the surveys, we used the CVD, CVD risks, and health behaviors noted in the earliest round (eg currently smoke was measured in rounds 2 and 4, the variable in round 2 was used) and used covariates that were measured in the same round or the nearest round of outcomes.

Statistical analyses

To examine the prevalence of CVD, CVD risk factors, and health behaviors, we calculated weighted percentages (SAS Proc surveyfreq) of dyads’ (survivors and spouses) self‐reported diagnosis of CVD, CVD risk factors, and health behaviors. We utilized dichotomous variables to indicate whether cancer survivors and spouses met recommended guidelines for smoking and physical activity. Based on the criteria from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, cancer survivors and spouses were categorized as underweight (BMI < 18.5), normal (BMI = 18.5‐24.9), overweight (BMI = 25.0‐29.9) and obese (BMI ≥ 30.0). To examine the role and gender differences in the prevalence of CVD, CVD risk factors, and health behaviors, we used weighted multivariable logistic regressions (SAS Proc surveylogistic) that modeled the effects of gender, role (survivor vs spouse) and the gender*role interaction on the categorical outcomes while controlling for covariates (ie, age, race, education level, insurance status, poverty status). This weighted regression approach accounted for the fact that MEPS has a complex sample design and also accounted for the dependence of outcomes of couples from the same family (families are considered as clusters in the MEPS survey). When the interaction effect was not significant, the models were refitted without the interaction term to obtain the parsimonious models. The same process for continuous outcomes was conducted using weighted linear regression (SAS Proc surveyreg). We used personal weights (ie, reflecting adjustments for survey nonresponse from the panel survey) in all regression analyses. To examine the congruence in health behaviors between cancer survivors and spouses, we calculated the weighted proportion of couples that were positively congruent, negatively congruent, and incongruent for health behavior guidelines. Couples were considered positively congruent if both met the recommended health behaviors guidelines outlined by the US Preventive Services Task Force (A and B recommendations) ; negatively congruent if neither met the guidelines; or incongruent if one met the guidelines for each health behavior and the other did not. We used family weights in congruence analyses because congruence in health behaviors is a family level outcome. We examined the congruence among all survivors and spouses, and also based on the gender of survivors. Missing data were not a severe issue in this study because the number of variables with missing values was small and missing rates were low (ranging between 0% and 9.16%). We followed the pairwise deletion approach to include as many as possible samples in each analysis. This caused slight variation in sample sizes across analyses of different outcomes.

RESULTS

We identified 1026 cancer survivor‐spouse dyads (Table 1). The majority of survivors were white (89.28%) and equal numbers were male and female. The most commonly diagnosed cancers were breast (28.16%), prostate (25.72%), melanoma (16%), and colon (7.52%). The majority of spouses were white (88.71%) and female (51.07%). The mean ages were 62.2 and 61.2 years for survivors and spouses respectively.
TABLE 1

Sample characteristics

CharacteristicsSurvivorsSpouses
N%N%
Gender
Female51349.75%51451.07%
Male51350.25%51248.93%
Race
White81389.28%81088.71%
Blacks1456.73%1466.85%
Others683.99%704.44%
Hispanic
Yes1556.75%1647.07%
Family income b
Poor and near poor1339.21%1369.43%
Low13210.59%13110.71%
Middle31028.06%30728.54%
High45152.14%45251.32%
Education
≤8th grade875.10%754.29%
9th‐12th grade764.75%765.16%
GED or high school degree30128.55%32631.91%
Associate's degree or <4‐year college degree26125.84%24124.51%
4‐year college degree, bachelor's degree16318.44%18317.99%
Master's, doctorate, or professional degree13817.32%12516.16%
Insurance coverage
Private69173.47%70574.40%
Public29123.11%24821.04%
Uninsured443.42%734.56%
Census region
Northeast17216.46%17216.02%
Midwest21022.27%21022.69%
South40140.39%40140.04%
West24320.89%24321.25%
Cancer type a
Breast27528.16%NA
Prostate28025.72%
Melanoma13416.00%
Colorectal927.52%
Uterus777.28%
Non‐Hodgkin lymphoma516.42%
Lung514.11%
Bladder393.88%
Kidney226.30%
Thyroid406.20%
MeanSDMeanSD
Age62.200.5061.170.51

Percentages reflect weighting to account for population and family variances in the studies examined.

Patients could have more than one type of cancer.

Family income in MEPS was derived by constructing person‐level total income comprising annual earnings from various of sources, described as a percentage of poverty that was computed by dividing all person‐level total income of a family (family income) by the applicable poverty line (based on family size and composition), classified into one of five poverty categories: negative or poor (less than 100%), near poor (100% to less than 125%), low income (125% to less than 200%), middle income (200% to less than 400%), and high income (greater than or equal to 400%). (See MEPS documentation for details).

Sample characteristics Percentages reflect weighting to account for population and family variances in the studies examined. Patients could have more than one type of cancer. Family income in MEPS was derived by constructing person‐level total income comprising annual earnings from various of sources, described as a percentage of poverty that was computed by dividing all person‐level total income of a family (family income) by the applicable poverty line (based on family size and composition), classified into one of five poverty categories: negative or poor (less than 100%), near poor (100% to less than 125%), low income (125% to less than 200%), middle income (200% to less than 400%), and high income (greater than or equal to 400%). (See MEPS documentation for details).

Prevalence of CVD, CVD risk factors, and health behaviors

The most common types of CVD and risk factors were similar among survivors and spouses (Figure 1A) including high blood pressure, high cholesterol, other heart disease (ie any other kind of heart disease or condition excluding coronary heart disease, angina, or heart attack) and diabetes. The prevalence of health behaviors was also similar in survivors and spouses (Figure 1B).
FIGURE 1

A, Prevalence of the CVD, CVD risk factors, and (B) health behaviors

A, Prevalence of the CVD, CVD risk factors, and (B) health behaviors

Role and gender differences in prevalence of CVD, CVD risk factors, and health behaviors

In the full model (Table 2), the odds of males (averaged across roles) having coronary heart disease, heart attack, high blood pressure, high cholesterol, and diabetes were, respectively, 1.46 (P < .001), 1.45 (P < .01), 1.13 (P < .05), 1.19 (P < .01), and 1.23 (P < .01) times as high as the odds for females, The interaction effect of role and gender on the prevalence of angina was positive and significant (P < .01), suggesting that the gender effect (male vs female) was significantly stronger among patients than among spouses; the odds of reporting angina were the highest among male survivors but lowest among female spouses.
TABLE 2

Associations between role, gender, and prevalence of CVD, CVD risk factors, and health behaviors as assessed in multivariable model

Covariates β WaldOdds ratio95% Confidence interval
CVD & CVD risk factors
Coronary heart diseaseRole0.060.281.060.851.32
Gender0.3812.57*** 1.461.181.80
Role × gender0.002501.000.831.21
AnginaRole0.090.381.090.831.44
Gender0.222.371.250.941.65
Role × gender0.386.87** 1.461.101.93
Heart attackRole0.141.771.150.931.43
Gender0.3710.8** 1.451.161.81
Role × gender0.131.151.140.901.42
Other heart diseaseRole0.11.71.110.951.29
Gender−0.0090.020.990.861.14
Role × gender0.060.571.060.911.23
StrokeRole0.192.751.210.971.50
Gender−0.040.130.960.761.21
Role × gender0.23.171.220.981.53
High blood pressureRole0.093.211.090.991.21
Gender0.124.32* 1.131.011.27
Role × gender0.092.351.090.981.22
High cholesterolRole0.092.551.090.981.23
Gender0.178.83** 1.191.061.32
Role × gender0.092.281.090.971.24
DiabetesRole0.060.711.060.921.22
Gender0.216.98** 1.231.051.43
Role × gender0.11.391.110.941.30
Health behaviors
Currently nonsmokingRole−0.122.360.890.761.03
Gender−0.218.4** 0.810.710.94
Role × gender−0.020.050.980.811.19
Physical activityRole−0.093.770.910.841.00
Gender0.1915.01*** 1.211.101.33
Role × gender−0.040.460.960.861.08
BMI b Role−0.235.21*
Gender0.5201.37***
Role × gender0.7312.35**

In models, referent for role is spouse and for gender is female. Covariates include age, race, education level, insurance status, poverty status, and Role*Gender interaction. When Role*Gender was insignificant, we refitted the models without this interaction term. However, results were very similar to the full models which are reported in this table.

The odds ratio of BMI and 95% confidence interval of the odds ratio are not reported because BMI is a continuous outcome.

P ≤ .05.

P ≤ .01.

P ≤ .001.

Associations between role, gender, and prevalence of CVD, CVD risk factors, and health behaviors as assessed in multivariable model In models, referent for role is spouse and for gender is female. Covariates include age, race, education level, insurance status, poverty status, and Role*Gender interaction. When Role*Gender was insignificant, we refitted the models without this interaction term. However, results were very similar to the full models which are reported in this table. The odds ratio of BMI and 95% confidence interval of the odds ratio are not reported because BMI is a continuous outcome. P ≤ .05. P ≤ .01. P ≤ .001. Regarding health behaviors, the odds of males (averaged across roles) currently non‐smoking was 0.81 (P < .01) and the odds of males engaging in physical activity was 1.21 (P < .001) compard to females. The interaction of role and gender effects on BMI was positive and significant (P < .01), indicating that the gender effect (male vs female) was significantly stronger among patients than among spouses; the male survivors had the highest BMI and female survivors had the lowest BMI. The results of the parsimonious model (Appendix: 1) were very similar to the full model results, thus they were not reported.

Congruence in health behaviors between survivors and their spouses

Regarding smoking (Figure 2), 88.07% (n = 746) of all couples were congruent, including 84.24% positively congruent (neither partner was smoking) and 3.83% negatively congruent couples (ie both survivors and spouses were smoking). For physical activity (Figure 2), 62.81% (n = 590) of cancer survivors and their spouses were congruent, 29.14% were positively congruent (both partners physically active) and 33.67% were negatively congruent (neither physically active). For BMI (Figure 2), 39.08% (n = 389) of couples were congruent, including 9.99% positively congruent (both partners’ BMI were within normal range). Among 29.09% (n = 286) of the couples who had negatively congruent BMI, 16.39% were both overweight and 12.70% were both obese. The congruence results of these health behaviors among male and female cancer survivors and their spouses were similar to those of all survivors and spouses (see Figure 2).
FIGURE 2

Congruence of health behaviors between cancer survivors and their spouses

Congruence of health behaviors between cancer survivors and their spouses

DISCUSSION

In this study using the data from a set of large surveys across the US, we found high prevalence of CVD and CVD risk factors (eg high blood pressure, high cholesterol, and diabetes) among cancer survivors and spouses, and a significant proportion of this population did not report engaging in healthy behaviors (ie nonsmoking, regular physical activity, and maintaining healthy weight). In addition, we identified gender and role differences in the prevalence of CVD, CVD risk factors, and health behaviors among survivors and spouses. Consistent with existing evidence of substantial gender differences in the prevalence of CVD in the general population, we found gender differences in the prevalence of CVD and CVD risk factors among cancer survivors and spouses. Importantly, we found that 39% to 88% of the survivors and spouses were congruent (positive or negative) in their smoking status, physical activity and BMI. The results of this study complement and expand the existing evidence on CVD risk and lifestyle behaviors among healthy couples, cancer patients in a national inpatient sample database, and cancer caregivers. CVD and CVD risk factors are common among cancer survivors and their spouses. In fact, CVD has become the leading cause of death in cancer survivors. Cancer survivors may experience adverse CVD events related to their cancer treatment (eg chemotherapies and radiation therapies) or as a result of progression of underlying CVD and CVD risk factors. , Similarly, spousal caregivers are at an increased risk for CVD and CVD risk factors (eg stroke, hypertension). , , Adding to this literature, our study examined the prevalences of CVD and CVD risk factors among survivors and their spouses, as well as gender and role differences in prevalence. Although risk is high for both members of this dyad, we observed (a) that the odds of males reporting CVD and CVD risk factors (such as coronary heart disease, heart attack, high blood pressure, high cholesterol, and diabetes) were significantly higher than those of females and (b) a gender and role interaction effect on angina (ie male survivors had the highest odds while female spouses had the lowest odds of reporting angina). The collective evidence suggests that male survivors and spouse caregivers may need special support to reduce their CVD risks and promote health. Lack of physical activity, smoking, and being overweight or obese have been associated with an increased risk of CVD and CVD risk factors, , cancer recurrence, , and mortality among cancer survivors. , , It is concerning that survivors and spouses in this sample across the US had unhealthy behaviors (ie smoking, physical inactivity, and overweight or obese). Approximately 10% of the survivors and spouses were smokers, which is lower than the general population in the United States (19.3%) ; while about half of the survivors and spouses met the physical activity guideline recommended by ACS, which is equivalent to the American adults (47.1%‐50.0%) ; and 68%‐70% were overweight or obese, which is slightly lower than the American adults (>70%). Consistent with interdependence theory, which suggests marriage and interactions between couple members may facilitate health behavior change, we found moderate to high congruence in health behaviors between cancer survivors and spouses, including high levels of positive congruence in their nonsmoking status, physical activity engagement/disengagement, and overweight and obese BMI. Our work extends the large body of evidence that has shown the congruence of health behaviors within healthy couples (eg dietary intake, smoking and alcohol consumption) to cancer survivors and their spouses. Couples often share a lifestyle, have a common living environment, pool resources, and cope with common stressors (such as cancer diagnosis and/or treatment). Shared major and minor life events contribute to behavioral convergence, contributing to couples' similar health and health behaviors and tendency to converge over time. Our findings, in conjunction with the literature on health risk for cancer survivors and their spouses, underscore the need to develop effective lifestyle interventions for this high‐risk population. Because both survivors and spouses are at high risk for lifestyle‐related morbidity and mortality, couples‐based therapy may be an efficient and effective modality of care and should be a high priority area for future research. In support of a focus on couples‐based interventions, researchers have documented strong spousal associations in smoking, exercise, alcohol consumption, diet, and obesity. , , Therefore, involving partners in behavior change interventions may help improve the outcomes (nonsmoking, more physical activity engagement, and normal BMI). Research has also shown that men and women are more likely to make a positive health behavior change if their partner does so, and with a stronger effect than if the partner had been consistently healthy in that domain. Therefore, interventions that are targeted toward cancer survivors but also tailored to the spouse's needs may be most effective at helping cancer survivors and spouses make positive health behavior change and maintain a healthful lifestyle over time. Compared to the general population, cancer survivors and spouses more commonly receive certain preventive health care services (eg serum cholesterol testing, routine physical check‐ups and flu vaccination) potentially due to their relatively frequent contact with medical providers. Given this frequent contact, innovative interventions should be developed and evaluated for this clinical context to grasp the teachable moments in support of improving lifestyle behaviors. In addition to the clinical context, cancer survivors and spouses should also be encouraged to engage in community‐based programs that promote a healthful lifestyle. The study has the following limitations. As several studies using MEPS have indicated, , , publically available MEPS data do not include the time of cancer diagnosis, stage, and treatments; therefore, we could not examine whether CVD, risk factors, and health behaviors in cancer survivors and spouses change over time. Neither were we able to discern the effects of cancer stage and related treatment. However, according to the American Cancer Society Nutrition and Physical Activity Guidelines for Cancer Survivors, all survivors, regardless of their type of cancer and stage, are encouraged to maintain healthy behaviors across the continuum of survivorship. MEPS uses the self‐report assessments for CVD, risk factors, and health behaviors, which are typically inferior to objective indicators. MEPS also has limited dietary data. In addition, this study combined data across different types of cancer, which may have masked important heterogeneity in CVD and CVD risk factors. However, previous population‐based research has found little variability in health behavior patterns (physical inactivity, diet, and being obese) except for smoking. Future research needs to include cancer‐specific information in modeling and objective data as well. In addition, we did not report on the predictors of congruence in health behaviors among couples, a topic we will address in a future report. Nonetheless, this study contributes to the limited literature describing the prevalence of CVD, CVD risk factors, and health behaviors in couples among cancer survivors and their spouses. Using the data from a set of large surveys across the United States, our findings suggest the need for developing effective, couple‐focused and role/gender‐tailored interventions to promote health behaviors and improve cardiovascular health in this population.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS

Conceptualization: LS, FS, CVH. Methodology: LS, PG, XMT. Data analyses: LS, PG, XMT. Writing (manuscript preparation, visualization): LS, TG, PG, FS, XMT. Writing (review and editing): LS, FS, CVH, XMT, TCK. Project administration: LS, TG, PG. Supervision: LS.

COMPLIANCE WITH ETHICAL STANDARDS

This study involved secondary database analysis of a publicly available database, and hence, formal consent is not required.
CVD & CVD risk factorsCovariatesβWaldOdds ratio95% Confidence Interval
Coronary heart diseaseRole0.060.341.060.871.30
Gender0.3812.68***1.461.181.79
Role*Gender
AnginaRole
GenderSame as full model
Role*Gender
Heart attackRole0.183.281.200.991.46
Gender0.3811.72***1.461.171.80
Role*Gender
Other heart diseaseRole0.101.781.110.951.29
Gender−0.010.010.990.871.14
Role*Gender
StrokeRole0.192.861.210.971.49
Gender−0.020.030.980.781.23
Role*Gender
High blood pressureRole0.093.131.090.991.21
Gender0.124.09*1.131.001.26
Role*Gender
High cholesterolRole0.092.471.090.981.22
Gender0.168.43**1.171.051.31
Role*Gender
DiabetesRole0.071.031.070.941.23
Gender0.216.90**1.231.051.43
Role*Gender
Health behaviorsCovariates
Currently nonsmokingRole−0.122.390.890.751.03
Gender−0.218.46**0.810.710.93
Role*Gender
Physical activityRole−0.093.750.910.841.00
Gender0.1915.30***1.211.101.33
Role*Gender
BMIRole
GenderSame as full model
Role*Gender
  48 in total

Review 1.  Health concordance within couples: a systematic review.

Authors:  Deanna Meyler; Jim P Stimpson; M Kristen Peek
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2007-03-19       Impact factor: 4.634

2.  Cancer survivors' adherence to lifestyle behavior recommendations and associations with health-related quality of life: results from the American Cancer Society's SCS-II.

Authors:  Christopher M Blanchard; Kerry S Courneya; Kevin Stein
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2008-05-01       Impact factor: 44.544

3.  Cancer and quality of life in spousal dyads: spillover in couples with and without cancer-related health problems.

Authors:  Kristin Litzelman; Paige A Green; K Robin Yabroff
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2015-07-05       Impact factor: 3.603

4.  Correspondence of physical activity and fruit/vegetable consumption among prostate cancer survivors and their spouses.

Authors:  S Myers Virtue; S L Manne; D Kashy; C J Heckman; T Zaider; D W Kissane; I Kim; D Lee; G Olekson
Journal:  Eur J Cancer Care (Engl)       Date:  2015-03-26       Impact factor: 2.520

5.  A population-based estimate of the prevalence of behavioral risk factors among adult cancer survivors and noncancer controls.

Authors:  Elliot J Coups; Jamie S Ostroff
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 4.018

6.  Do people improve health behavior after their partner is diagnosed with cancer? A prospective study in the Danish diet, Cancer and Health Cohort.

Authors:  Nicole P M Ezendam; Randi V Karlsen; Jane Christensen; Anne Tjønneland; Lonneke V van de Poll-Franse; Annika von Heymann-Horan; Christoffer Johansen; Pernille E Bidstrup
Journal:  Acta Oncol       Date:  2019-02-01       Impact factor: 4.089

7.  Annual Report to the Nation on the status of cancer, 1975-2010, featuring prevalence of comorbidity and impact on survival among persons with lung, colorectal, breast, or prostate cancer.

Authors:  Brenda K Edwards; Anne-Michelle Noone; Angela B Mariotto; Edgar P Simard; Francis P Boscoe; S Jane Henley; Ahmedin Jemal; Hyunsoon Cho; Robert N Anderson; Betsy A Kohler; Christie R Eheman; Elizabeth M Ward
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2013-12-16       Impact factor: 6.860

8.  Cigarette Smoking Before and After Breast Cancer Diagnosis: Mortality From Breast Cancer and Smoking-Related Diseases.

Authors:  Michael N Passarelli; Polly A Newcomb; John M Hampton; Amy Trentham-Dietz; Linda J Titus; Kathleen M Egan; John A Baron; Walter C Willett
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2016-01-25       Impact factor: 44.544

9.  Exercise and Risk of Cardiovascular Events in Women With Nonmetastatic Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Lee W Jones; Laurel A Habel; Erin Weltzien; Adrienne Castillo; Dipti Gupta; Candyce H Kroenke; Marilyn L Kwan; Charles P Quesenberry; Jessica Scott; Barbara Sternfeld; Anthony Yu; Lawrence H Kushi; Bette J Caan
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2016-05-23       Impact factor: 44.544

10.  The influence of partner's behavior on health behavior change: the English Longitudinal Study of Ageing.

Authors:  Sarah E Jackson; Andrew Steptoe; Jane Wardle
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 21.873

View more
  1 in total

1.  Cardiovascular disease, risk factors, and health behaviors among cancer survivors and spouses: A MEPS Study.

Authors:  Lixin Song; Ting Guan; Peiran Guo; Fengyu Song; Courtney Van Houtven; Xianming Tan; Thomas C Keyserling
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2020-08-04       Impact factor: 4.452

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.