Literature DB >> 32748237

Automatic processing of gaze movements to quantify gaze scanning behaviors in a driving simulator.

Garrett Swan1, Robert B Goldstein2, Steven W Savage2, Lily Zhang2, Aliakbar Ahmadi2,3, Alex R Bowers2.   

Abstract

Eye and head movements are used to scan the environment when driving. In particular, when approaching an intersection, large gaze scans to the left and right, comprising head and multiple eye movements, are made. We detail an algorithm called the gaze scan algorithm that automatically quantifies the magnitude, duration, and composition of such large lateral gaze scans. The algorithm works by first detecting lateral saccades, then merging these lateral saccades into gaze scans, with the start and end points of each gaze scan marked in time and eccentricity. We evaluated the algorithm by comparing gaze scans generated by the algorithm to manually marked "consensus ground truth" gaze scans taken from gaze data collected in a high-fidelity driving simulator. We found that the gaze scan algorithm successfully marked 96% of gaze scans and produced magnitudes and durations close to ground truth. Furthermore, the differences between the algorithm and ground truth were similar to the differences found between expert coders. Therefore, the algorithm may be used in lieu of manual marking of gaze data, significantly accelerating the time-consuming marking of gaze movement data in driving simulator studies. The algorithm also complements existing eye tracking and mobility research by quantifying the number, direction, magnitude, and timing of gaze scans and can be used to better understand how individuals scan their environment.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Driving simulation; Eye and head scanning; Eye movement event detection; Gaze tracking

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 32748237      PMCID: PMC7854873          DOI: 10.3758/s13428-020-01427-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Res Methods        ISSN: 1554-351X


  28 in total

1.  Most naturally occurring human saccades have magnitudes of 15 degrees or less.

Authors:  A T Bahill; D Adler; L Stark
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol       Date:  1975-06

2.  Some hazards are more attractive than others: drivers of varying experience respond differently to different types of hazard.

Authors:  David Crundall; Peter Chapman; Steven Trawley; Lyn Collins; Editha van Loon; Ben Andrews; Geoffrey Underwood
Journal:  Accid Anal Prev       Date:  2011-11-17

3.  Young novice drivers: careless or clueless?

Authors:  A James McKnight; A Scott McKnight
Journal:  Accid Anal Prev       Date:  2003-11

4.  The effect of sampling rate and lowpass filters on saccades - A modeling approach.

Authors:  David J Mack; Sandro Belfanti; Urs Schwarz
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2017-12

5.  Fatal accidents of older drivers.

Authors:  L E Hakamies-Blomqvist
Journal:  Accid Anal Prev       Date:  1993-02

6.  Comparing the Glance Patterns of Older versus Younger Experienced Drivers: Scanning for Hazards while Approaching and Entering the Intersection.

Authors:  Matthew R E Romoser; Alexander Pollatsek; Donald L Fisher; Carrick C Williams
Journal:  Transp Res Part F Traffic Psychol Behav       Date:  2013-01

7.  Compensatory eye and head movements of patients with homonymous hemianopia in the naturalistic setting of a driving simulation.

Authors:  Markus Bahnemann; Johanna Hamel; Sophie De Beukelaer; Sven Ohl; Stefanie Kehrer; Heinrich Audebert; Antje Kraft; Stephan A Brandt
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2014-11-09       Impact factor: 4.849

8.  Head movements while crossing streets: effect of vision impairment.

Authors:  Shirin E Hassan; Duane R Geruschat; Kathleen A Turano
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 1.973

9.  Gaze control in humans: eye-head coordination during orienting movements to targets within and beyond the oculomotor range.

Authors:  D Guitton; M Volle
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1987-09       Impact factor: 2.714

10.  Driving with hemianopia: IV. Head scanning and detection at intersections in a simulator.

Authors:  Alex R Bowers; Egor Ananyev; Aaron J Mandel; Robert B Goldstein; Eli Peli
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2014-03-13       Impact factor: 4.799

View more
  4 in total

1.  Head Scanning Behavior Predicts Hazard Detection Safety Before Entering an Intersection.

Authors:  Steven W Savage; Lily Zhang; Garrett Swan; Alex R Bowers
Journal:  Hum Factors       Date:  2021-08-26       Impact factor: 3.598

2.  Gaze During Locomotion in Virtual Reality and the Real World.

Authors:  Jan Drewes; Sascha Feder; Wolfgang Einhäuser
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2021-05-24       Impact factor: 4.677

3.  Driving With Hemianopia VII: Predicting Hazard Detection With Gaze and Head Scan Magnitude.

Authors:  Garrett Swan; Steven W Savage; Lily Zhang; Alex R Bowers
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2021-01-11       Impact factor: 3.048

4.  Driving With Hemianopia X: Effects of Cross Traffic on Gaze Behaviors and Pedestrian Responses at Intersections.

Authors:  Jing Xu; Vilte Baliutaviciute; Garrett Swan; Alex R Bowers
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2022-07-11       Impact factor: 3.473

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.