Literature DB >> 25381457

Compensatory eye and head movements of patients with homonymous hemianopia in the naturalistic setting of a driving simulation.

Markus Bahnemann1, Johanna Hamel, Sophie De Beukelaer, Sven Ohl, Stefanie Kehrer, Heinrich Audebert, Antje Kraft, Stephan A Brandt.   

Abstract

Homonymous hemianopia (HH) is a frequent deficit resulting from lesions to post-chiasmal brain structures with a significant negative impact on activities of daily living. To address the question how patients with HH may compensate their visual field defect in a naturalistic environment, we performed a driving simulation experiment and quantitatively analyzed both eye and head movements using a head-mounted pupil camera. 14 patients with HH and 14 matched healthy control subjects participated in the study. Based on the detection performance of dynamically moving obstacles, which appeared unexpectedly along the sides of the road track, we divided the patient group into a high- and a low-performance group. Then, we compared parameters of eye and head movements between the two patient groups and the matched healthy control group to identify those which mediate successful detection of potentially hazardous objects. Differences in detection rates could not be explained by demographic variables or the extent of the visual field defect. Instead, high performance of patients with HH in the naturalistic setting of our driving simulation depended on an adapted visual exploratory behavior characterized by a relative increase in the amplitude and a corresponding increase in the peak velocity of saccades, widening horizontally the distribution of eye movements, and by a shift of the overall distribution of saccades into the blind hemifield. The result of the group comparison analyses was confirmed by a subsequent stepwise regression analysis which identified the horizontal spread of eye movements as single factor predicting the detection of hazardous objects.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25381457     DOI: 10.1007/s00415-014-7554-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurol        ISSN: 0340-5354            Impact factor:   4.849


  29 in total

1.  Driving with hemianopia, II: lane position and steering in a driving simulator.

Authors:  Alex R Bowers; Aaron J Mandel; Robert B Goldstein; Eli Peli
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2010-07-29       Impact factor: 4.799

2.  Microsaccades and the velocity-amplitude relationship for saccadic eye movements.

Authors:  B L Zuber; L Stark; G Cook
Journal:  Science       Date:  1965-12-10       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Driving simulation in the clinic: testing visual exploratory behavior in daily life activities in patients with visual field defects.

Authors:  Johanna Hamel; Antje Kraft; Sven Ohl; Sophie De Beukelaer; Heinrich J Audebert; Stephan A Brandt
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2012-09-18       Impact factor: 1.355

4.  Homonymous hemianopias: clinical-anatomic correlations in 904 cases.

Authors:  X Zhang; S Kedar; M J Lynn; N J Newman; V Biousse
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2006-03-28       Impact factor: 9.910

5.  Hemianopic and quadrantanopic field loss, eye and head movements, and driving.

Authors:  Joanne M Wood; Gerald McGwin; Jennifer Elgin; Michael S Vaphiades; Ronald A Braswell; Dawn K DeCarlo; Lanning B Kline; Cynthia Owsley
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2011-03-02       Impact factor: 4.799

6.  The impact of visual field loss on driving performance: evidence from on-road driving assessments.

Authors:  Lyne Racette; Evanne J Casson
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 1.973

7.  Scanning the visual world: a study of patients with homonymous hemianopia.

Authors:  A L Pambakian; D S Wooding; N Patel; A B Morland; C Kennard; S K Mannan
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 10.154

8.  Driving with hemianopia, I: Detection performance in a driving simulator.

Authors:  Alex R Bowers; Aaron J Mandel; Robert B Goldstein; Eli Peli
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2009-07-15       Impact factor: 4.799

9.  Neurological and neuropsychological characteristics of occipital, occipito-temporal and occipito-parietal infarction.

Authors:  Antje Kraft; Cathleen Grimsen; Stefanie Kehrer; Markus Bahnemann; Karoline Spang; Maren Prass; Kerstin Irlbacher; Martin Köhnlein; Anika Lipfert; Freimuth Brunner; Andreas Kastrup; Manfred Fahle; Stephan A Brandt
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2012-10-27       Impact factor: 4.027

10.  Driving with binocular visual field loss? A study on a supervised on-road parcours with simultaneous eye and head tracking.

Authors:  Enkelejda Kasneci; Katrin Sippel; Kathrin Aehling; Martin Heister; Wolfgang Rosenstiel; Ulrich Schiefer; Elena Papageorgiou
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-02-11       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  19 in total

Review 1.  Motor compensation and its effects on neural reorganization after stroke.

Authors:  Theresa A Jones
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2017-03-23       Impact factor: 34.870

Review 2.  Update on the Clinical Approach to Spatial Neglect.

Authors:  A M Barrett; K E Houston
Journal:  Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep       Date:  2019-04-04       Impact factor: 5.081

3.  Pre-training inactivation of basolateral amygdala and mediodorsal thalamus, but not orbitofrontal cortex or prelimbic cortex, impairs devaluation in a multiple-response/multiple-reinforcer cued operant task.

Authors:  Hayley Fisher; Alisa Pajser; Charles L Pickens
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2019-10-09       Impact factor: 3.332

Review 4.  Driving with homonymous visual field loss: a review of the literature.

Authors:  Alex R Bowers
Journal:  Clin Exp Optom       Date:  2016-08-17       Impact factor: 2.742

5.  The effects of age on the contributions of head and eye movements to scanning behavior at intersections.

Authors:  Steven W Savage; Lily Zhang; Garrett Swan; Alex R Bowers
Journal:  Transp Res Part F Traffic Psychol Behav       Date:  2020-07-13

6.  Peripheral Prisms Improve Obstacle Detection during Simulated Walking for Patients with Left Hemispatial Neglect and Hemianopia.

Authors:  Kevin E Houston; Alex R Bowers; Eli Peli; Russell L Woods
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 1.973

7.  Automatic processing of gaze movements to quantify gaze scanning behaviors in a driving simulator.

Authors:  Garrett Swan; Robert B Goldstein; Steven W Savage; Lily Zhang; Aliakbar Ahmadi; Alex R Bowers
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2021-04

8.  The Effects of Compensatory Scanning Training on Mobility in Patients with Homonymous Visual Field Defects: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Gera A de Haan; Bart J M Melis-Dankers; Wiebo H Brouwer; Oliver Tucha; Joost Heutink
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-08-14       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Driving With Hemianopia VI: Peripheral Prisms and Perceptual-Motor Training Improve Detection in a Driving Simulator.

Authors:  Kevin E Houston; Eli Peli; Robert B Goldstein; Alex R Bowers
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2018-01-18       Impact factor: 3.283

10.  Motor Vehicle Collision Involvement among Persons with Hemianopia and Quadrantanopia.

Authors:  Gerald McGwin; Joanne Wood; Carrie Huisingh; Cynthia Owsley
Journal:  Geriatrics (Basel)       Date:  2016-07-18
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.