Literature DB >> 12971927

Young novice drivers: careless or clueless?

A James McKnight1, A Scott McKnight.   

Abstract

The per-mile accident rate of 16-year-old novices is approximately 10 times that of adults, a difference that has been attributed to the immaturity of youth and the errors of inexperience. Research separating the two influences shows that, over the first few years, the effects of experience greatly exceed those of age, with reductions of approximately two-thirds in the first 500 miles of driving. A study was undertaken to identify the behavioral antecedents of young driver accidents, including any subset of antecedents that could account for the inordinately high initial accident rate. Narrative descriptions of more than 2000 accidents involving 16-19-year-old drivers in two states were analyzed for behavioral contributors. The great majority of non-fatal accidents resulted from errors in attention, visual search, speed relative to conditions, hazard recognition, and emergency maneuvers, with high speeds and patently risky behavior accounting for but a small minority. Differences in the types of errors by first year novices and more experienced youth were relatively few in number and small in magnitude, indicating that the benefits of experience apply rather generally across all aspects of driving.

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12971927     DOI: 10.1016/s0001-4575(02)00100-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Accid Anal Prev        ISSN: 0001-4575


  50 in total

1.  Crash and risky driving involvement among novice adolescent drivers and their parents.

Authors:  Bruce G Simons-Morton; Marie Claude Ouimet; Zhiwei Zhang; Sheila E Klauer; Suzanne E Lee; Jing Wang; Paul S Albert; Thomas A Dingus
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2011-10-20       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  Using an eye-tracker to assess the effectiveness of a three-dimensional riding simulator in increasing hazard perception.

Authors:  Concetta F Alberti; Luciano Gamberini; Anna Spagnolli; Diego Varotto; Luca Semenzato
Journal:  Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw       Date:  2012-04-23

3.  Assessing the residual teen crash risk factors after graduated drivers license implementation.

Authors:  Craig P Thor; Hampton C Gabler
Journal:  Ann Adv Automot Med       Date:  2010

4.  Are Driving Simulators Effective Tools for Evaluating Novice Drivers' Hazard Anticipation, Speed Management, and Attention Maintenance Skills.

Authors:  Elsa Chan; Anuj K Pradhan; Alexander Pollatsek; Michael A Knodler; Donald L Fisher
Journal:  Transp Res Part F Traffic Psychol Behav       Date:  2010-09-01

5.  Driving after pediatric traumatic brain injury: Impact of distraction and executive functioning.

Authors:  Megan E Narad; Patrick Nalepka; Aimee E Miley; Dean W Beebe; Brad G Kurowski; Shari L Wade
Journal:  Rehabil Psychol       Date:  2020-06-11

Review 6.  Reducing young driver road trauma: guidance and optimism for the future.

Authors:  T M Senserrick
Journal:  Inj Prev       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 2.399

Review 7.  Can novice drivers be trained to scan for information that will reduce their likelihood of a crash?

Authors:  D L Fisher; A P Pollatsek; A Pradhan
Journal:  Inj Prev       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 2.399

8.  Do Young Drivers Become Safer After Being Involved in a Collision?

Authors:  Fearghal O'Brien; Joe Bible; Danping Liu; Bruce G Simons-Morton
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2017-02-01

9.  Adolescent Cellphone Use While Driving: An Overview of the Literature and Promising Future Directions for Prevention.

Authors:  M Kit Delgado; Kathryn J Wanner; Catherine McDonald
Journal:  Media Commun       Date:  2016-06-16

10.  Can younger drivers be trained to scan for information that will reduce their risk in roadway traffic scenarios that are hard to identify as hazardous?

Authors:  A K Pradhan; A Pollatsek; M Knodler; D L Fisher
Journal:  Ergonomics       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 2.778

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.