| Literature DB >> 32744157 |
Raul C Camacho1, Seohee You1, Katharine E D'Aquino1, Wenyu Li1, Yuanping Wang1, Joseph Gunnet1, James Littrell1, Jian Shen Qi1, Lijuan Kang2, Wenying Jian2, Mary MacDonald3, Timothy Tat3, Derek Steiner3, Yue-Mei Zhang1, James Lanter1, Raymond Patch1, Rui Zhang1, Jiali Li3, Suzanne Edavettal3, Wilson Edwards3, Thai Dinh3, Li Ying Wang3, Judy Connor3, Michael Hunter3, Ellen Chi3, Ronald V Swanson3, James N Leonard1, Martin A Case3.
Abstract
The long circulating half-life and inherently bivalent architecture of IgGs provide an ideal vehicle for presenting otherwise short-lived G-protein-coupled receptor agonists in a format that enables avidity-driven enhancement of potency. Here, we describe the site-specific conjugation of a dual agonist peptide (an oxyntomodulin variant engineered for potency and in vivo stability) to the complementarity-determining regions (CDRs) of an immunologically silent IgG4. A cysteine-containing heavy chain CDR3 variant was identified that provided clean conjugation to a bromoacetylated peptide without interference from any of the endogenous mAb cysteine residues. The resulting mAb-peptide homodimer has high potency at both target receptors (glucagon receptor, GCGR, and glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor, GLP-1R) driven by an increase in receptor avidity provided by the spatially defined presentation of the peptides. Interestingly, the avidity effects are different at the two target receptors. A single dose of the long-acting peptide conjugate robustly inhibited food intake and decreased body weight in insulin resistant diet-induced obese mice, in addition to ameliorating glucose intolerance. Inhibition of food intake and decrease in body weight was also seen in overweight cynomolgus monkeys. The weight loss resulting from dosing with the bivalently conjugated dual agonist was significantly greater than for the monomeric analog, clearly demonstrating translation of the measured in vitro avidity to in vivo pharmacology.Entities:
Keywords: Antibody-peptide conjugates; GPCR agonists; half-life extension; oxyntomodulin
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32744157 PMCID: PMC7531507 DOI: 10.1080/19420862.2020.1794687
Source DB: PubMed Journal: MAbs ISSN: 1942-0862 Impact factor: 5.857
Figure 1.Schematic illustration of mAb-peptide homodimeric conjugate 2. mAb HC shown in green, LC in blue. OXM peptide shown as gray circles. The variable and constant regions of the mAb are labeled. For monomeric conjugate 1, one of the OXM peptides was replaced by acetamide.
Figure 2.Ex vivo human plasma stability of 2 over 1 week (filled circles). Percentage remaining is measured by functional assay at recombinant GLP1 receptors. The negative control (open circles) is a bioconjugate of a different oxyntomodulin variant known to be unstable in human plasma.
Pharmacokinetic parameters of 2 in DIO mice, Tg32 mice, SD rats, and cynomolgus monkeys. Exposures were measured by LCMS determination of intact mass. Mouse values were calculated from pooled samples.
| DIO mice | Tg32 mice | SD rats | Cynomolgus monkey | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SC | SC | SC | IV | SC | IV | |
| Cmax (nM) | 55.5 | 138.0 | 5.7 ± 2.1 | N/A | 89.1 ± 8.7 | N/A |
| Tmax (hr) | 48.0 | 24.0 | 64.0 ± 13.9 | N/A | 56.0 ± 13.9 | N/A |
| AUC (nM*hr) | 6850 | 413.6 | 456 ± 154 | 865 ± 185 | 11,700 ± 1380 | 14,700 ± 5260 |
| t1/2 (hr) | 62.0 | 45.6 | 38.5 ± 12.8 | 26.2 ± 6.2 | 51.9 ± 6.2 | 55.9 ± 41.7 |
Figure 3.Pharmacokinetics of 2 in lean cynomolgus monkeys over 10 days. Exposures are shown for intravenous (IV) and subcutaneous (SC) administration. Exposures were measured by LCMS determination of intact mass.
In vitro potencies, mean ± SEM, of 1, 2 and native oxyntomodulin (OXM) on cells expressing (a) GLP-1R and (b) GCGR of various species.
| a | GLP-1R EC50 (nM) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| human | cyno | rat | mouse | |
| 1 | 1.00 ± 0.06 | 0.89 ± 0.01 | ||
| 2 | 0.37 ± 0.04 | 0.40 ± 0.03 | 0.97 ± 0.13 | 0.57 ± 0.21 |
| OXM | 2.40 ± 0.59 | 0.80 ± 0.07 | 0.98 ± 0.16 | 1.90 ± 0.31 |
| b | GCGR EC50 (nM) | |||
| 1 | 45.40 ± 7.03 | 20.47 ± 1.35 | ||
| 2 | 2.31 ± 0.46 | 2.03 ± 0.14 | 5.90 ± 1.46 | 0.74 ± 0.30 |
| OXM | 3.01 ± 0.35 | 0.49 ± 0.08 | 12.74 ± 3.54 | 6.31 ± 2.58 |
Inhibition constants, mean ± SEM, of 1, 2 and GLP1 vs radiolabeled GLP1. Human GLP-1R membranes were incubated with 0.3 nM [125]I-GLP1.
| human GLP-1R Ki (nM) | |
|---|---|
| 1 | 19.44 ± 3.93 |
| 2 | 2.39 ± 0.55 |
| GLP1 | 0.53 ± 0.03 |
Figure 4.Single dose effects of 2 on (a) glucose excursions and (b) net AUC in insulin-resistant DIO mice. Groups were compared using One-way ANOVA, followed by Tukey’s multiple comparison post-hoc test (*p < .05, versus Vehicle).
Figure 5.Repeat dosing effects of 2 on (a) food intake and (b) weight change in DIO mice over 9 days. Weight change was measured in pair-fed animals where the food intake between the dosed and non-dosed arms is matched. For (a), groups were compared using Linear mixed model, followed by Tukey’s multiple comparison post-hoc test (*p < .05, Vehicle versus 4 nmol/kg; ^p < .05, Vehicle versus 1 & 2 nmol/kg; #p < .05, 4 nmol/kg versus 1 & 2 nmol/kg). For (b), groups were compared using Two-way ANOVA repeated measures, followed by Tukey’s multiple comparison post-hoc test (*p < .05, Vehicle versus all groups; ^p < .05, between all groups treated with 2; #p < .05, between all groups treated with 2 and their respective PF [pair-fed] groups).
Figure 6.(a) Single dose terminal exposures of 1 and 2 in DIO mice. Exposures were measured by LCMS of the intact conjugates. (b) Effects of a single dose of 1 and 2 on body weight. (c) Effects of a single dose of 1 and 2 on plasma FGF21. For (a), groups were compared using One-way ANOVA, followed by Tukey’s multiple comparison post-hoc test (*p < .05, 2 [10 nmol/kg] versus 1 & 2 [3 nmol/kg]; ^p < .05, 1 [10 nmol/kg] versus 2 [10 nmol/kg]). For (b), groups were compared using Two-way ANOVA repeated measures, followed by Tukey’s multiple comparison post-hoc test (*p < .05, Vehicle versus all groups; ^p < .05, 2 [3 nmol/kg] versus 1 [3 nmol/kg]; #p < .05, 1 & 2 [3 nmol/kg] versus 1 & 2 [10 nmol/kg]; $p < .05, Vehicle versus all groups except 1 [3 nmol/kg]; @p < .05, 1 [10 nmol/kg] versus 2 [3 & 10 nmol/kg]). For (c), groups were compared using One-way ANOVA, followed by Tukey’s multiple comparison post-hoc test (*p < .05, Vehicle versus all groups except 1 [3 nmol/kg]; ^p < .05, 2 [3 nmol/kg] versus 2 [10 nmol/kg] & 1 [3 nmol/kg]; #p < .05, 1 [10 nmol/kg] versus 1 [3 nmol/kg]).
Figure 7.(a) Single dose exposures of 2 in overweight cynomolgus monkeys. Exposures were measured by LCMS of the intact conjugate. Effects of a single dose of 2 on (b) food intake and (c) weight change. Animals were dosed subcutaneously at day 0. For (b), groups were compared using Two-way ANOVA repeated measures, followed by Tukey’s multiple comparison post-hoc test (*p < .05, 1 nmol/kg versus all other doses; ^p < .05, 1 nmol/kg versus 5 & 7.5 nmol/kg). For (c), groups were compared using Two-way ANOVA repeated measures, followed by Tukey’s multiple comparison post-hoc test (*p < .05, versus respective baseline).