Literature DB >> 23330947

Exploring avidity: understanding the potential gains in functional affinity and target residence time of bivalent and heterobivalent ligands.

Georges Vauquelin1, Steven J Charlton.   

Abstract

Bivalent ligands are increasingly important therapeutic agents. Although the naturally occurring antibodies are predominant, it is becoming more common to combine different antibody fragments or even low molecular weight compounds to generate heterobivalent ligands. Such ligands exhibit markedly increased affinity (i.e. avidity) and target residence time when both pharmacophores can bind simultaneously to their target sites. This is because binding of one pharmacophore forces the second tethered one to stay close to its corresponding site. This 'forced proximity' favours its binding and rebinding (once dissociated) to that site. However, rebinding will also take place when the diffusion of freshly dissociated ligands is merely slowed down. The present differential equation-based simulations explore the way both situations affect ligand binding. Both delay the attainment of binding equilibrium (resulting in steep saturation curves) and also increase the target residence time. Competitive ligands are able to interfere in a concentration-dependent manner, although much higher concentrations are required in the 'forced proximity' situation. Also, it is only in that situation that the ligand shows increased affinity. These simulations shed light on two practical consequences. Depending on the pharmacokinetic half-life of the bivalent ligand in the body, it may not have sufficient time to achieve equilibrium with the target. This will result in lower potency than expected, although it would have significant advantages in terms of residence time. In in vitro experiments, the manifestation of steep saturation curves and of accelerated dissociation in the presence of competitive ligands could mistakenly be interpreted as evidence for non-competitive, allosteric interactions.
© 2013 The Authors. British Journal of Pharmacology © 2013 The British Pharmacological Society.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23330947      PMCID: PMC3623049          DOI: 10.1111/bph.12106

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Pharmacol        ISSN: 0007-1188            Impact factor:   8.739


  55 in total

1.  Guide to Receptors and Channels (GRAC), 5th edition.

Authors:  Stephen P H Alexander; Alistair Mathie; John A Peters
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 8.739

Review 2.  Structural basis of allosteric ligand-receptor interactions in the insulin/relaxin peptide family: implications for other receptor tyrosine kinases and G-protein-coupled receptors.

Authors:  Pierre De Meyts; Lisbeth Gauguin; Angela Manegold Svendsen; Mazen Sarhan; Louise Knudsen; Jane Nøhr; Vladislav V Kiselyov
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 5.691

3.  Analysis of mass transport-limited binding kinetics in evanescent wave biosensors.

Authors:  P Schuck; A P Minton
Journal:  Anal Biochem       Date:  1996-09-05       Impact factor: 3.365

Review 4.  New protein engineering approaches to multivalent and bispecific antibody fragments.

Authors:  A Plückthun; P Pack
Journal:  Immunotechnology       Date:  1997-06

5.  Approximating the effects of diffusion on reversible reactions at the cell surface: ligand-receptor kinetics.

Authors:  B Goldstein; M Dembo
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 4.033

6.  THRX-198321 is a bifunctional muscarinic receptor antagonist and beta2-adrenoceptor agonist (MABA) that binds in a bimodal and multivalent manner.

Authors:  Tod Steinfeld; Adam D Hughes; Uwe Klein; Jacqueline A M Smith; Mathai Mammen
Journal:  Mol Pharmacol       Date:  2010-12-07       Impact factor: 4.436

7.  A novel multivalent ligand that bridges the allosteric and orthosteric binding sites of the M2 muscarinic receptor.

Authors:  Tod Steinfeld; Mathai Mammen; Jacqueline A M Smith; Richard D Wilson; Jeffrey R Jasper
Journal:  Mol Pharmacol       Date:  2007-05-03       Impact factor: 4.436

8.  Avidity-mediated enhancement of in vivo tumor targeting by single-chain Fv dimers.

Authors:  Gregory P Adams; Mei-Sheng Tai; John E McCartney; James D Marks; Walter F Stafford; L L Houston; James S Huston; Louis M Weiner
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2006-03-01       Impact factor: 12.531

9.  Micropharmacology of monoclonal antibodies in solid tumors: direct experimental evidence for a binding site barrier.

Authors:  M Juweid; R Neumann; C Paik; M J Perez-Bacete; J Sato; W van Osdol; J N Weinstein
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1992-10-01       Impact factor: 12.701

Review 10.  Contribution of dead-space microdomains to tortuosity of brain extracellular space.

Authors:  Sabina Hrabetová; Charles Nicholson
Journal:  Neurochem Int       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 3.921

View more
  84 in total

Review 1.  On the different experimental manifestations of two-state 'induced-fit' binding of drugs to their cellular targets.

Authors:  Georges Vauquelin; Isabelle Van Liefde; David C Swinney
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2016-03-15       Impact factor: 8.739

Review 2.  G Protein-Coupled Receptors in Asthma Therapy: Pharmacology and Drug Action.

Authors:  Stacy Gelhaus Wendell; Hao Fan; Cheng Zhang
Journal:  Pharmacol Rev       Date:  2020-01       Impact factor: 25.468

3.  Simplified models for heterobivalent ligand binding: when are they applicable and which are the factors that affect their target residence time.

Authors:  Georges Vauquelin
Journal:  Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol       Date:  2013-06-28       Impact factor: 3.000

4.  FEZ1 Is Recruited to a Conserved Cofactor Site on Capsid to Promote HIV-1 Trafficking.

Authors:  Pei-Tzu Huang; Brady James Summers; Chaoyi Xu; Juan R Perilla; Viacheslav Malikov; Mojgan H Naghavi; Yong Xiong
Journal:  Cell Rep       Date:  2019-08-14       Impact factor: 9.423

5.  'Partial' competition of heterobivalent ligand binding may be mistaken for allosteric interactions: a comparison of different target interaction models.

Authors:  Georges Vauquelin; David Hall; Steven J Charlton
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2015-03-17       Impact factor: 8.739

Review 6.  Link between a high k on for drug binding and a fast clinical action: to be or not to be?

Authors:  Georges Vauquelin
Journal:  Medchemcomm       Date:  2018-08-16       Impact factor: 3.597

Review 7.  Protein-Catalyzed Capture Agents.

Authors:  Heather D Agnew; Matthew B Coppock; Matthew N Idso; Bert T Lai; JingXin Liang; Amy M McCarthy-Torrens; Carmen M Warren; James R Heath
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2019-03-06       Impact factor: 60.622

8.  Interplay between Affinity and Valency in Effector Cell Degranulation: A Model System with Polcalcin Allergens and Human Patient-Derived IgE Antibodies.

Authors:  Gintare Bucaite; Tara Kang-Pettinger; Jorge Moreira; Hannah J Gould; Louisa K James; Brian J Sutton; James M McDonnell
Journal:  J Immunol       Date:  2019-08-28       Impact factor: 5.422

Review 9.  Chemical space of Escherichia coli dihydrofolate reductase inhibitors: New approaches for discovering novel drugs for old bugs.

Authors:  Bharath Srinivasan; Sam Tonddast-Navaei; Ambrish Roy; Hongyi Zhou; Jeffrey Skolnick
Journal:  Med Res Rev       Date:  2018-09-07       Impact factor: 12.944

10.  Porcine Circovirus 2 Uses a Multitude of Weak Binding Sites To Interact with Heparan Sulfate, and the Interactions Do Not Follow the Symmetry of the Capsid.

Authors:  Sonali Dhindwal; Bryant Avila; Shanshan Feng; Reza Khayat
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2019-03-05       Impact factor: 5.103

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.