Literature DB >> 32743702

Blood loss in primary total hip arthroplasty with a short versus conventional cementless stem: a retrospective cohort study.

Mattia Loppini1,2, Antonello Della Rocca3, Davide Ferrentino3, Costanza Pizzi4, Guido Grappiolo3.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: To evaluate the impact of short cementless stem on several clinical and radiographic outcomes, with particular focus on blood loss, in comparison with conventional cementless stem in total hip arthroplasty (THA).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients undergoing THA with GTS short stem or CLS conventional stem were included. Clinical data were retrospectively collected including preoperative and postoperative day 1 value for haemoglobin (HB); rate of postoperative blood transfusions; intraoperative bone infractions; stem alignment; 5-year follow-up Harris Hip Score (HHS) and rate of stem revision at 5 years of follow-up of the short and conventional cementless stem.
RESULTS: GTS and CLS stem group included 374 and 321 patients, respectively. The mean difference between the preoperative and postoperative day 1 HB value was 3.98 g/dL (SD 1.12) and 3.67 g/dL (SD 1.19) in the GTS and CLS group, respectively, which correspond to a crude effect (β) of 0.32 (95% CI 0.15; 0.49) and adjusted effect of 0.11 (95% CI - 0.08; 0.3). GTS group reported a significantly higher number of patients with excellent results in terms of HHS (p = 0.001). The rate of intraoperative bone infractions was 1.6% and 0.3% in the GTS and CLS group, respectively (p = 0.013). At radiographic assessment, the rate of varus position of the stem was 14% in the GTS group and 6% in the CLS group (p < 0.0001). The rate of stem revision at 5 years of follow-up was 0.8% and 0.4% in the GTS and CLS group, respectively (p = 0.63).
CONCLUSIONS: GTS short stem was not associated with a clinically significant lower blood loss in the immediately postoperative period. Unadjusted exploratory analyses show that GTS stem provides the same results of CLS stem in terms of HHS and rate of stem revision at 5 years of follow-up.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Blood loss; Conventional stem; Short stem; Total hip arthroplasty; Uncemented

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32743702     DOI: 10.1007/s00402-020-03561-w

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg        ISSN: 0936-8051            Impact factor:   3.067


  27 in total

1.  Total hip replacement with a short metaphyseal-fitting anatomical cementless femoral component in patients aged 70 years or older.

Authors:  Y-H Kim; J-S Kim; J-W Park; J-H Joo
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2011-05

2.  Mid-term results of 155 patients treated with a collum femoris preserving (CFP) short stem prosthesis.

Authors:  Daniel Briem; Michael Schneider; Nicole Bogner; Nadine Botha; Matthias Gebauer; Thorsten Gehrke; Bernd Schwantes
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2010-05-02       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  Mid-term results of a custom-made short proximal loading femoral component.

Authors:  F S Santori; N Santori
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2010-09

Review 4.  The operation of the century: total hip replacement.

Authors:  Ian D Learmonth; Claire Young; Cecil Rorabeck
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2007-10-27       Impact factor: 79.321

5.  Total hip arthroplasty for primary osteoarthritis in patients fifty-five years of age or older. An analysis of the Finnish arthroplasty registry.

Authors:  Keijo T Mäkelä; Antti Eskelinen; Pekka Pulkkinen; Pekka Paavolainen; Ville Remes
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 5.284

6.  The NANOS short stem in total hip arthroplasty: a mid term follow-up.

Authors:  Max Ettinger; Peter Ettinger; Matthias Lerch; Kerstin Radtke; Stefan Budde; Marco Ezechieli; Christoph Becher; Fritz Thorey
Journal:  Hip Int       Date:  2011 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.135

7.  Changes in daily physical activity before and after total hip arthroplasty. A pilot study using accelerometry.

Authors:  Bingtao Alan Lin; Panos Thomas; Filippo Spiezia; Mattia Loppini; Nicola Maffulli
Journal:  Surgeon       Date:  2012-06-08       Impact factor: 2.392

8.  Cementless short stem hip arthroplasty METHA® as an encouraging option in adults with osteonecrosis of the femoral head.

Authors:  Thilo Floerkemeier; Nora Tscheuschner; Tilman Calliess; Marco Ezechieli; Stephanie Floerkemeier; Stefan Budde; Henning Windhagen; Gabriela von Lewinski
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2012-05-01       Impact factor: 3.067

Review 9.  Short bone-conserving stems in cementless hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Harpal S Khanuja; Samik Banerjee; Deepak Jain; Robert Pivec; Michael A Mont
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2014-10-15       Impact factor: 5.284

10.  Early clinical results of a new conservative hip stem.

Authors:  Jaime J Morales de Cano; Christian Gordo; Jose M Illobre
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2013-02-27
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.