Literature DB >> 21751882

The percutaneous nephrolithotomy global study: classification of complications.

Gaston Labate1, Pranjal Modi, Anthony Timoney, Luigi Cormio, Xiaochun Zhang, Michael Louie, Magnus Grabe, Jean Rosette On Behalf Of The Croes Pcnl Study Group.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: This study evaluated postoperative complications of percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) and the influence of selected factors on the risk of complications using the Clinical Research Office of the Endourological Society (CROES) PCNL Global Study database. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The CROES PCNL Global Study collected prospective data for consecutive patients who were treated with PCNL at centers around the world for 1 year. Complications were evaluated by the modified Clavien classification system.
RESULTS: Of 5724 patients with Clavien scores, 1175 (20.5%) patients experienced one or more complications. The most frequent complications were fever and bleeding. Urinary leakage, hydrothorax, hematuria, urinary tract infection, pelvic perforation, and urinary fistula also occurred in ≥20 patients in each group. The majority of complications (n=634, 54.0%) were classified as Clavien grade I. Two patients died in the postoperative period. The largest absolute increases in mean Clavien score were associated with American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status classification IV (0.75) or III (0.34), anticoagulant medication use (0.29), positive microbiologic culture from urine (0.24), and the presence of concurrent cardiovascular disease (0.15). Multivariate regression analysis revealed that operative time and ASA score were significant predictors of higher mean Clavien scores.
CONCLUSION: The majority of complications after PCNL are minor. Longer operative time and higher ASA scores are associated with the risk of more severe postoperative complications in PCNL.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21751882     DOI: 10.1089/end.2011.0067

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Endourol        ISSN: 0892-7790            Impact factor:   2.942


  53 in total

Review 1.  Planning and Execution of Access for Percutaneous Renal Stone Removal in a Community Hospital Setting.

Authors:  Robert M Springer
Journal:  Semin Intervent Radiol       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 1.513

Review 2.  Risk factors for sepsis after percutaneous renal stone surgery.

Authors:  Evgeniy I Kreydin; Brian H Eisner
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2013-09-03       Impact factor: 14.432

3.  A comparison of standard PCNL and staged retrograde FURS in pelvis stones over 2 cm in diameter: a prospective randomized study.

Authors:  Nihat Karakoyunlu; Goksel Goktug; Nevzat Can Şener; Kursad Zengin; Ismail Nalbant; Ufuk Ozturk; Ugur Ozok; Abdurrahim Imamoglu
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2015-04-03       Impact factor: 3.436

4.  Comparison of intraoperative and postoperative complications based on ASA risks in patients who underwent percutaneous nephrolithotomy.

Authors:  Hüseyin Buğra Karakaş; İzzet Çiçekbilek; Adem Tok; Tamer Alışkan; Bülent Akduman
Journal:  Turk J Urol       Date:  2016-09

5.  The evolution of percutaneous nephrolithotomy: Analysis of a single institution experience over 25 years.

Authors:  Jennifer Bjazevic; Linda Nott; Philippe D Violette; Thomas Tailly; Marie Dion; John D Denstedt; Hassan Razvi
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2019-10       Impact factor: 1.862

6.  A preliminary study: the role of preoperative procalcitonin in predicting postoperative fever after mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy in patients with a negative baseline urine culture.

Authors:  Deng Li; Minglei Sha; Lei Chen; Yinglong Xiao; Jun Lu; Yi Shao
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2019-02-12       Impact factor: 3.436

7.  Improved nephrostomy tube can reduce percutaneous nephrolithotomy postoperative bleeding.

Authors:  Xiangfei He; Donghua Xie; Chengtian Du; Wenbin Zhu; Wenzhi Li; Kai Wang; Yang Li; Hua Lu; Fengfu Guo
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2015-03-15

8.  Minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy: an alternative to retrograde intrarenal surgery and shockwave lithotripsy.

Authors:  Stephan Kruck; Aristoteles G Anastasiadis; Thomas R W Herrmann; Ute Walcher; Mohamed F Abdelhafez; André P Nicklas; Lillian Hölzle; David Schilling; Jens Bedke; Arnulf Stenzl; Udo Nagele
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2012-10-11       Impact factor: 4.226

9.  [Complications in percutaneous lithotomy].

Authors:  M Ritter; M-C Rassweiler; M S Michel
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 0.639

10.  Costs variations for percutaneous nephrolithotomy in the U.S. from 2003-2015: A contemporary analysis of an all-payer discharge database.

Authors:  Jeffrey J Leow; Anne-Sophie Valiquette; Benjamin I Chung; Steven L Chang; Quoc-Dien Trinh; Rus Korets; Naeem Bhojani
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2018-06-19       Impact factor: 1.862

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.