| Literature DB >> 32733416 |
Ari S O Lemos1, Jônatas R Florêncio1, Nícolas C C Pinto1, Lara M Campos1, Thiago P Silva2, Richard M Grazul3, Priscila F Pinto4, Guilherme D Tavares5, Elita Scio1, Ana Carolina M Apolônio6, Rossana C N Melo2, Rodrigo L Fabri1.
Abstract
Candida tropicalis is one the most relevant biofilm-forming fungal species increasingly associated with invasive mucosal candidiasis worldwide. The amplified antifungal resistance supports the necessity for more effective and less toxic treatment, including the use of plant-derived natural products. Scopoletin, a natural coumarin, has shown antifungal properties against plant yeast pathogens. However, the antifungal activity of this coumarin against clinically relevant fungal species such as C. tropicalis remains to be established. Here, we investigated the potential antifungal properties and mechanisms of action of scopoletin against a multidrug-resistant C. tropicalis strain (ATCC 28707). First, scopoletin was isolated by high-performance liquid chromatography from Mitracarpus frigidus, a plant species (family Rubiaceae) distributed throughout South America. Next, scopoletin was tested on C. tropicalis cultivated for 48h in both planktonic and biofilm forms. Fungal planktonic growth inhibition was analyzed by evaluating minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC), time-kill kinetics and cell density whereas the mechanisms of action were investigated with nucleotide leakage, efflux pumps and sorbitol and ergosterol bioassays. Finally, the scopoletin ability to affect C. tropicalis biofilms was evaluated through spectrophotometric and whole slide imaging approaches. In all procedures, fluconazole was used as a positive control. MIC values for scopoletin and fluconazole were 50 and 250 μg/L respectively, thus demonstrating a fungistatic activity for scopoletin. Scopoletin induced a significant decrease of C. tropicalis growth curves and cell density (91.7% reduction) compared to the growth control. Its action was related to the fungal cell wall, affecting plasma membrane sterols. When associated with fluconazole, scopoletin led to inhibition of efflux pumps at the plasma membrane. Moreover, scopoletin not only inhibited the growth rate of preformed biofilms (68.2% inhibition at MIC value) but also significantly decreased the extent of biofilms growing on the surface of coverslips, preventing the formation of elongated fungal forms. Our data demonstrate, for the first time, that scopoletin act as an effective antifungal phytocompound against a multidrug-resistant strain of C. tropicalis with properties that affect both planktonic and biofilm forms of this pathogen. Thus, the present findings support additional studies for antifungal drug development based on plant isolated-scopoletin to treat candidiasis caused by C. tropicalis.Entities:
Keywords: Candida spp.; Candida tropicalis; antifungal agents; fungal biofilms; scopoletin
Year: 2020 PMID: 32733416 PMCID: PMC7359730 DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2020.01525
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Microbiol ISSN: 1664-302X Impact factor: 5.640
FIGURE 1Structure of scopoletin.
Minimal Inhibitory Concentration (MIC) values for scopoletin, fluconazole, nystatin, and promethazine against C. tropicalis ATCC® 28707 in the presence or absence of sorbitol or ergosterol.
| Tested compounds | MIC (μg/mL) | ||||
| BHI | BHI + Sorbitol | BHI + Ergosterol | BHI + Scopoletin | BHI + Promethazole | |
| Scopoletin | 50 | >200 | >200 | – | – |
| Fluconazole | 250 | 250 | – | 62.5* | 31.25 |
| Nystatin | 25 | – | >100 | – | – |
| Promethazine | 3.12 | – | – | – | – |
FIGURE 2Time-kill curve for C. tropicalis ATCC® 28707 treated with different concentrations of scopoletin or fluconazole. Yeasts strain in BHI broth with scopoletin or fluconazole in different concentrations (MIC, MIC/2 and MIC/4) were evaluated by OD (530 nm) at 0, 2, 4, 6, 8, and 24 h of incubation at 35°C. Yeasts cultures with scopoletin vehicle served as growth control. The experiments were carried out in triplicate. Graphs were plotted as turbidity versus incubation time, and data represent the mean ± SEM.
FIGURE 3Effect of scopoletin treatment on cell density of C. tropicalis ATCC® 28707. Compared with negative control (vehicle treatment), treatment with scopoletin induced a decrease in cell density similar to fluconozole treatment (positive control). Yeasts cells were stained with DAPI and counted under fluorescence microscopy. Representative images from DAPI-stained C. tropicalis are shown for each experimental group. Experiments were done in triplicate and data represent the mean ± SEM of yeast counted from 10 randomly selected fields/slide (n = 9 slides/time point). Letter (a) indicates statistically differences (ANOVA followed by Bonferroni, P < 0.05).
FIGURE 4Scopoletin treatment induces nucleotide released from C. tropicalis ATCC® 28707. Cultures treated with scopoletin (SCO) or fluconazole (FLU, positive control) were evaluated by nucleotide leakage test. Negative controls (GC) did not receive any treatment. Experiments were carried out in triplicate and data represent the mean ± SD.
FIGURE 5Effect of scopoletin on preformed biofilms of C. tropicalis ATCC® 28707. Scopoletin treatment similar to fluconazole at the same concentrations. In each point, data represent mean ± SEM from at least two independent experiments performed in triplicate. The mean proportions of biofilm inhibition were compared between scopoletin versus fluconazole treatments at the same concentration (MIC: P > 0.999, MIC/2: P > 0.40, MIC/4: P > 0.999; ANOVA followed by Bonferroni, P < 0.05).
FIGURE 6Scopoletin affects C. tropicalis ATCC® 28707 biofilm formation. (A–C) Representative images of biofilms growing on the surface of coverslips. The whole biofilm area is shown in normal fungal growth conditions (A) and after fluconazole (B) or scopoletin (C) treatments. Observe in panels (Ai–Cii) details of fungal cells at higher magnifications. Note in the control (Ai,Aii) the formation of hyphae (arrows) while treated-cells (Bi–Cii) do not exhibit these fungal forms. Coverslips were stained with DAPI and whole biofilm areas were scanned using a 3D Scan Pannoramic Histech Scanner. After acquisition of whole slide images, areas with biofilm were measured using Image J software. (D) Mean percent of biofilm formation was expressed as mean ± SEM and the letter (a) indicate statistical difference (ANOVA followed by Bonferroni, P < 0.05).