| Literature DB >> 35628776 |
Moneerah J Alqahtani1,2, Engy Elekhnawy3, Walaa A Negm4, Sebaey Mahgoub5, Ismail A Hussein6.
Abstract
Recently, Candida glabrata has been recognized as one of the most common fungal species that is highly associated with invasive candidiasis. Its spread could be attributed to its increasing resistance to antifungal drugs. Thus, there is a high need for safer and more efficient therapeutic alternatives such as plant extracts. Here, we investigated the antifungal potential of Encephalartos villosus leaves methanol extract (EVME) against C. glabrata clinical isolates. Tentative phytochemical identification of 51 metabolites was conducted in EVME using LC-MS/MS. EVME demonstrated antifungal activity with minimum inhibitory concentrations that ranged from 32 to 256 µg/mL. The mechanism of the antifungal action was studied by investigating the impact of EVME on nucleotide leakage. Additionally, a sorbitol bioassay was performed, and we found that EVME affected the fungal cell wall. In addition, the effect of EVME was elucidated on the efflux activity of C. glabrata isolates using acridine orange assay and quantitative real-time PCR. EVME resulted in downregulation of the expression of the efflux pump genes CDR1, CDR2, and ERG11 in the tested isolates with percentages of 33.33%, 41.67%, and 33.33%, respectively. Moreover, we investigated the in vivo antifungal activity of EVME using a murine model with systemic infection. The fungal burden was determined in the kidney tissues. Histological and immunohistochemical studies were carried out to investigate the effect of EVME. We noticed that EVME reduced the congestion of the glomeruli and tubules of the kidney tissues of the rats infected with C. glabrata. Furthermore, it decreased both the proinflammatory cytokine tumor necrosis factor-alpha and the abnormal collagen fibers. Our results reveal, for the first time, the potential in vitro (by inhibition of the efflux activity) and in vivo (by decreasing the congestion and inflammation of the kidney tissues) antifungal activity of EVME against C. glabrata isolates.Entities:
Keywords: LC–MS/MS; TNF-α; efflux; kidney; qRT-PCR; survival curve
Year: 2022 PMID: 35628776 PMCID: PMC9146621 DOI: 10.3390/jof8050521
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Fungi (Basel) ISSN: 2309-608X
Phytochemical profiling of EVME via LC–MS/MS (negative mode) analysis.
| No. | Error | Metabolite Name | Rt Min | Molecular Formula | Identification | Fragments or | Precursor | Theoretical Mass | Ref. | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||||||||
| 1 | −4.7 | D-Malic acid | 1.098 | C4H6O5 | Beta hydroxy acids and derivatives | 59.01, 71.01, 115.00 133.01 | 133.0150 | 134.0230 | [ | |
| 2 | −2.1 | Shikimic acid | 1.111 | C7H10O5 | Shikimic acids and derivatives | 73.02, 137.04, 173.04 | 173.0460 | 174.0540 | [ | |
| 3 | −0.1 | Maleic acid | 1.112 | C4H4O4 | Dicarboxylic acids and derivatives | 71.01, 115.01 | 115.0032 | 116.0112 | ||
| 4 | −0.2 | D-Quinic acid | 1.136 | C7H12O6 | Quinic acids and derivatives | 85.02, 145.04, 173.04, 191.05 | 191.0562 | 192.0642 | ||
| 5 | −0.9 | 3,4-Dihydroxy | 1.257 | C7H6O4 | Hydroxybenzoic acid derivatives | 109.03, 153.01 | 153.0187 | 154.0267 | [ | |
| 6 | 3.1 | Caffeic acid | 1.344 | C9H8O4 | Hydroxycinnamic acids | 59.02, 89.02, 135.04, 179.05 | 179.0545 | 180.0625 | ||
| 7 | 4.4 | 3-(4-Hydroxy-3-methoxy-phenyl) prop-2-enoic acid | 2.076 | C10H10O4 | Hydroxycinnamic acids | 134.03, 193.05 | 193.0524 | 194.0604 | ||
| 8 | 0.8 | Salicylic acid | 4.442 | C7H6O3 | Salicylic acid | 91.02, 108.01, 136.01, 137.02 | 137.0238 | 138.0318 | [ | |
| 9 | 0.8 | (+/−)-cis,trans-abscisic acid | 5.286 | C15H20O4 | Abscisic acids and derivatives | 151.07, 219.13, 263.11 | 263.1278 | 264.1358 | [ | |
| 10 | −0.7 | 5-Methoxy salicylic acid | 6.857 | C8H8O4 | M-Methoxybenzoic acids and derivatives | 108.02, 152.01, 167.03 | 167.0352 | 168.0432 | ||
| 11 | 6.0 | Rosmarinic acid | 7.136 | C18H16O8 | Coumaric acids and derivatives | 181.04, 329.09, 359.11 | 359.1105 | 360.1185 | [ | |
| 12 | −3.1 | Isocitrate | 27.721 | C6H8O7 | Tricarboxylic acids and derivatives | 150.96, 190.95 | 191.1050 | 192.1130 | ||
|
| ||||||||||
| 13 | −3.7 | Baicalein-7- | 1.293 | C21H18O11 | 445.07 | Flavonoid-7- | 102.95, 191.05, 269.02 377.07, 445.14 | 445.1807 | 446.1887 | [ |
| 14 | −2.1 | Isorhamnetin-3- | 4.930 | C28H32O16 | 623.12 | Flavonoid-3- | 285.03, 470.87, 579.00, 623.12 | 623.1269 | 624.1349 | [ |
| 15 | −3.1 | Procyanidin B2 | 5.006 | C30H26O12 | 577.13 | Biflavonoids and polyflavonoids | 407.07, 425.08, 577.13 | 577.1369 | 578.1449 | [ |
| 16 | 5.0 | Kaempferol-3- | 5.223 | C21H20O10 | 431.18 | Flavonoid-3- | 151.04, 179.05, 362.88, 431.19 | 431.1890 | 432.1970 | |
| 17 | −3.6 | Daidzein-8-C-glucoside | 5.452 | C21H20O9 | 415.15 | Isoflavonoid C-glycosides | 210.92, 286.92, 415.16 | 415.1572 | 416.1652 | [ |
| 18 | −0.1 | Naringenin-7- | 6.170 | C21H22O10 | 433.20 | Flavonoid-7- | 271.06, 387.18, 433.10 | 433.2068 | 434.2148 | |
| 19 | −2.2 | (+−)-Taxifolin | 6.492 | C15H12O7 | 303.05 | Flavanonols | 125.02, 179.00, 1990.95, 285.04, 303.04 | 303.0520 | 304.0600 | |
| 20 | 2.5 | Hyperoside | 6.542 | C21H20O12 | 463.08 | Flavonoid-3- | 218.94, 286.94. 300.02, 326.92, 394.90, 463.08 | 463.0858 | 464.0938 | |
| 21 | 0.5 | Apigenin 8- | 6.542 | C21H20O10 | 431.09 | Flavonoid 8- | 269.04,311.05, 362.89, 431.20 | 431.0956 | 432.1036 | |
| 22 | −0.1 | Formononetin | 6.734 | C16H12O4 | 267.08 | 4’- | 133.02, 193.04, 252.06, 267.08 | 267.0875 | 268.0955 | |
| 23 | 0.9 | Procyanidin B1 | 6.785 | C30H26O12 | 577.14 | Biflavonoids and polyflavonoids | 245.04, 425.08, 577.12 | 577.1337 | 578.1417 | [ |
| 24 | 0.6 | Luteolin-7- | 6.913 | C21H20O11 | 447.09 | Flavonoid-7- | 285.03, 327.04, 447.09 | 447.0923 | 448.1003 | |
| 25 | 8.9 | Isookanin-7-glucoside | 6.926 | C21H22O11 | 449.09 | Flavonoid-7- | 151.00, 287.04, 449.09 | 449.0952 | 450.1032 | |
| 26 | 0.4 | Isorhamnetin-3- | 7.417 | C22H22O12 | 477.10 | Flavonoid-3- | 285.03, 299.01, 315.04, 477.09 | 477.1033 | 478.1113 | |
| 27 | −0.1 | Kaempferol-7-neohesperidoside | 7.539 | C27H30O15 | 593.14 | Flavonoid-7- | 269.04, 593.13, | 593.1483 | 594.1563 | |
| 28 | −0.9 | Apigenin-7- | 7.700 | C21H20O10 | 431.09 | Flavonoid-7- | 268.03, 311.06, 431.09 | 431.0988 | 432.1068 | |
| 29 | 10.9 | Kaempferol-3-Glucuronide | 7.893 | C21H18O12 | 461.10 | Flavonoid-3- | 256.92, 299.09, 392.89, 461.09 | 461.1031 | 462.1111 | |
| 30 | −3.7 | 3’ 4’ 5 7-Tetrahydroxy | 8.678 | C13H12O6 | 287.05 | Flavanones | 135.04, 151.00, 218.94, 287.06 | 287.0984 | 288.1064 | |
| 31 | −0.2 | Kaempferol-3- | 8.751 | C20H18O10 | 417.11 | Flavonoid-3- | 179.05, 362.88, 431.19 | 417.1194 | 418.1274 | |
| 32 | −0.1 | Naringenin | 9.744 | C15H12O5 | 271.09 | Flavanones | 228.07, 255.05, 271.09 | 271.0985 | 272.1065 | [ |
| 33 | −2.6 | 3’-Methoxy-4’,5,7-trihydroxy flavonol | 10.368 | C16H12O7 | 315.05 | Flavonols | 257.04, 300.02, 315.04 | 315.0528 | 316.0608 | |
| 34 | −3.0 | Apigenin | 10.428 | C15H10O5 | 269.04 | Flavones | 117.03, 151.00, 181.06, 225.05, 269.04 | 269.0467 | 270.0547 | [ |
| 35 | 0.8 | Luteolin | 11.175 | C15H10O6 | 285.07 | Flavones | 151.00, 270.06, 263.11 | 285.0763 | 286.0843 | [ |
| 36 | 0.7 | Rhoifolin | 11.421 | C27H30O14 | 577.13 | Flavonoid-7- | 291.19, 464.94, 577.13 | 577.1346 | 578.1426 | |
| 37 | −4.0 | 3 5 7-Trihydroxy-4’-methoxyflavone | 12.886 | C16H12O6 | 299.09 | Flavonols | 119.04, 179.03, 193.05, 299.09 | 299.0558 | 300.0638 | |
| 38 | −0.1 | 4’,5,7-Trihydroxy flavonol | 13.890 | C15H10O6 | 285.11 | Flavonols | 119.04, 149.99, 165.02, 285.07 | 285.1115 | 286.1195 | |
| 39 | −0.4 | Hesperetin | 14.598 | C16H14O6 | 301.10 | 4’- | 138.03, 151.03, 286.08, 301.10 | 301.0692 | 302.0772 | [ |
| 40 | −0.2 | Luteolin-3’, 7-di- | 17.799 | C27H30O16 | 609.13 | Flavonoid-7- | 564.90, 594.11, 609.13 | 609.1440 | 610.1520 | |
|
| ||||||||||
| 41 | −0.8 | 3-Hydroxy-3-Methyl glutaric acid | 1.159 | C6H10O5 | 161.04 | Hydroxy fatty acids | 57.03, 99.04, 161.04 | 161.0452 | 162.0532 | |
| 42 | −2.7 | 2-Isopropyl malic acid | 1.331 | C7H12O5 | 175.05 | Hydroxy fatty acids | 101.02, 113.05, 175.06 | 175.0599 | 176.0679 | |
| 43 | −0.5 | Citraconic acid | 1.394 | C5H6O4 | 129.01 | Methyl-branched fatty acids | 84.99, 129.01 | 129.0189 | 130.0269 | |
| 44 | 1.5 | Citramalate | 1.407 | C5H8O5 | 147.06 | Hydroxy fatty acids | 72.98, 87.00, 129.01, 147.06 | 147.0647 | 148.0727 | |
| 45 | −4.0 | Gamma-Linolenic acid | 18.900 | C18H30O2 | 277.14 | Linoleic acids and derivatives | 141.09, 233.15, 277.13 | 277.1465 | 278.1545 | |
|
| ||||||||||
| 46 | −0.3 | E-3,4,5’-Trihydroxy-3’-glucopyranosyl stilbene | 1.123 | C20H22O9 | 405.01 | Stilbene glycosides | 190.96, 191.05, 243.02, 369.03, 405.09 | 405.1208 | 406.1288 | |
| 47 | −0.6 | Esculin | 1.172 | C15H16O9 | 339.12 | Coumarin glycosides | 149.01, 175.02, 202.90, 295.10, 339.11 | 339.1296 | 340.1376 | |
| 48 | 0.2 | Catechin | 5.452 | C15H14O6 | 289.07 | Catechins | 109.02, 125.02, 179.03, 203.03, 245.07, 289.06 | 289.0711 | 290.0791 | [ |
| 49 | 3.0 | Hinokitiol | 6.815 | C10H12O2 | 163.07 | Tropolones | 119.08, 135.08, 163.07 | 163.0751 | 164.0831 | |
| 50 | −0.4 | Daphnetin | 7.295 | C9H6O4 | 177.01 | 7,8-Dihydroxycoumarins | 117.09, 133.03, 149.02, 163.01, 177.01 | 177.018 | 178.0260 | |
| 51 | 1.0 | 9.547 | C21H24O9 | 419.07 | Stilbene glycosides | 257.02, 343.01, 363.12, 419.06 | 419.0748 | 420.0828 | ||
Figure 1The total ion chromatogram of EVME presented the major identified metabolites (D-(−)-quinic acid, luteolin-7-O-glucoside, apigenin-7-O-glucoside, naringenin, apigenin, and hesperetin according to the retention time) via LC–ESI–MS/MS in negative ion mode.
Figure 2Time–kill curve of representative C. glabrata isolates showing a decrease in the count of CFU/mL by three log units after treatment with EVME with concentrations of (A) 1× minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) for two hours and (B) 4× MIC for one hour.
Figure 3A representative example of the significant decrease (p < 0.05) in the membrane integrity by EVME by increasing the leakage of nucleic acids.
Figure 4Minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) values of EVME of six C. glabrata isolates showed a substantial increase (p < 0.05) in the presence of sorbitol.
Impact of EVME on efflux pump activity of C. glabrata isolates.
| Efflux Pump Activity | No. of Isolates | |
|---|---|---|
| Before Treatment | After Treatment | |
| Strong | 3 | 1 |
| Moderate | 3 | 1 |
| Weak | 4 | 6 |
| None | 2 | 4 |
Figure 5Downregulation of the gene expression of (A) CDR1, (B) CDR2, and (C) ERG11 after treatment with EVME in C. glabrata isolates C2, C5, C6, C8, C10.
Figure 6The number of colony-forming units per gram (CFU/g) of fungal cells in kidneys of the three groups. The symbol (*) represents a substantial decrease (p < 0.05). There was a non-significant difference between group II and group III.
Figure 7Survival curve of rats of the different groups via Kaplan–Meier survival analysis.
Blood urea and serum creatinine levels in the tested groups.
| Measured Parameter | Group I | Group II | Group III |
|---|---|---|---|
| Blood urea level (mg/dL) | 69 ± 1.40 * | 47.6 ± 1.10 | 48 ± 0.90 |
| Serum creatinine level (mg/dL) | 0.95 ± 0.06 * | 0.7 ± 0.02 | 0.69 ± 0.06 |
The symbol * represents a significant difference from the other two groups (p < 0.05).
Figure 8H&E-stained kidney sections of (A) normal kidney tissues (negative control) showing average-sized glomeruli (red arrows) surrounded by average-sized tubules lined with columnar cells (blue arrows) (×100); (B) group I showing vascular congestion (red arrow) surrounded by atrophic glomeruli (blue arrows) and focal degenerated tubules (green arrow) (×100); (C) group II showing focal vascular congestion (red arrow) surrounded by normal-sized glomeruli (blue arrows) and some atrophic glomeruli (green arrows) surrounded by average-sized tubules (×100); (D) group III shows average-sized glomeruli (blue arrows) and one atrophic glomerulus (green arrow) surrounded by average-sized tubules (×100).
Figure 9Masson’s trichrome staining of the kidney sections of (A) normal kidney tissues (negative control) showing slight amounts of blue-stained collagen fibers in glomeruli (blue arrows) (×100); (B) group I showing a marked increase in the abnormal collagen deposition in the walls of tubules (blue arrows) (×100); (C) group II showing vascular congestion with focal blue-stained collagen fibers deposition around the vessels (blue arrows), no collagen deposition in the tubules (×100); (D) group III showing a marked reduction in the abnormal collagen fibers deposition and slight amounts in the glomeruli (blue arrows), with no collagen deposition in the tubules or the blood vessels (×100).
Figure 10Tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α) immunohistochemical staining of the kidney sections of (A) normal kidney tissues (negative control) showing negative TNF-α staining, with score (0) (×100); (B) group I showing strong TNF-α staining with score (3) (×100); (C) group II showing moderate TNF-α staining with score (2) (×100); (D) group III showing weak TNF-α staining with score (1) (×100).