Tree inhabiting gnomoniaceous species from China, with Cryphogonomonia gen. nov. proposed.

Species of Gnomoniaceae are commonly associated with leaf spot diseases of a wide range of plant hosts worldwide. During our investigation of fungi associated with tree diseases in China, several gnomoniaceous isolates were recovered from symptomatic branches and leaves on different woody plants in the Fagaceae, Pinaceae, and Salicaceae families. These isolates were studied by applying a polyphasic approach including morphological, cultural data, and phylogenetic analyses of partial ITS, LSU, tef1, rpb2 and tub2 gene sequences. As a result, three species were identified with characters fitting into the family Gnomoniaceae. One of these species is described herein as Cryphognomonia pini gen. et sp. nov., characterized by developed pseudostromata and ascospores with obvious hyaline sheath; Gnomoniopsis xunwuensis sp. nov. is illustrated showing sympodially branched conidiophore, oval or fusiform conidia; and one known species, Plagiostoma populinum. The current study improves the understanding of gnomoniaceous species causing diebacks and leaf spot on ecological and economic forest trees. Qin Yang, Ning Jiang, Cheng-Ming Tian.

Introduction

The (, , ) is a family of perithecial ascomycetes that occur as endophytes, pathogens, or saprobes on growing and overwintered leaves of hardwood trees, shrubs, and herbaceous plants (Walker 2012). Many species in the cause serious tree diseases such as cherry leaf scorch ( (Pers.) Höhn.), oak dieback ( (Roberge) Höhn), sycamore canker ( (Sacc. & Speg.) Höhn), and chestnut dieback ( Tian & Jiang) (Sogonov et al. 2008; Walker et al. 2010; Jiang et al. 2019).

The sexual morph of is characterized by ascomata that are generally immersed, solitary or aggregated in an undeveloped stroma (Rossman et al. 2007; Sogonov et al. 2008). The perithecia are dark brown to black and pseudoparenchymatous with central, eccentric, or lateral necks (Rossman et al. 2007; Sogonov et al. 2008). Asci usually have an inconspicuous or distinct apical ring. Ascospores are generally small, hyaline, uniseptate. The asexual morph is characterized by acervular or pycnidial, phialidic, with non-septate conidia (Monod 1983).

The generic concepts of were recently revised based on a survey of leaf-inhabiting diaporthalean fungi (Sogonov et al. 2008). Phylogenetic analyses of molecular markers is the primary methodology for systematic studies of the , however, host specificity and morphology can also be useful for species identification. Recent phylogenetic studies have shown that species of often have a narrow host range associating with a single host genus or species (Mejía et al. 2008, 2011a, b, 2012; Sogonov et al. 2008; Walker et al. 2010, 2012, 2013). For example, is a well-defined genus which was frequently limited to a single host species, especially in the host family , except for on spp. and type species on spp. (Mejía et al. 2008, 2011b).

Several fungal species of , from , from , and from , have been reported from China (Fan et al. 2016; Gong et al. 2017; Jiang and Tian 2019; Jiang et al. 2019). In the present study, tree inhabiting gnomoniaceous species, mainly on cankered branches and leaves, were surveyed in China. The aim of the present study was to identify these fungi via morphology and multi-locus phylogeny based on modern taxonomic concepts.

Materials and methods

Isolates

Fresh specimens of -related fungi were collected from branches and leaves of hosts in Beijing, Jiangxi and Shaanxi provinces (Tables 1–3). Isolates from host material were obtained by removing a mucoid spores mass from perithecia and pycnidia-like conidiomata, spreading the suspension on the surface of 1.8% potato dextrose agar (PDA), and incubating at 25 °C for up to 24 h. Single germinating conidia/ascospore was removed and plated on to fresh PDA plates. Specimens are deposited in the Museum of the Beijing Forestry University (). Axenic cultures are maintained in the China Forestry Culture Collection Centre ().

Table 1.

Strains and GenBank accession numbers used in the phylogenetic analyses of

Species	Strains	Genbank accession number
		ITS	LSU	tef1	rpb2
Alnecium auctum	CBS 124263	KF570154	KF570154	KF570200	KF570170
Ambarignomonia petiolorum	CBS 116866	EU199193	AY818963	NA	EU199151
	CBS 121227	EU254748	EU255070	EU221898	EU219307
Amphiporthe tiliae	CBS 119289	EU199178	EU199122	NA	EU199137
Anisogramma anomala	529478	EU683064	EU683066	NA	NA
Anisogramma virgultorum	529479	EU683062	EU683065	NA	NA
Apiognomonia errabunda	AR 2813	DQ313525	NG027592	DQ313565	DQ862014
Apiognomonia veneta	MFLUCC 16-1193	MF190114	MF190056	NA	NA
Apioplagiostoma populi	858501	KP637024	NA	NA	NA
Asteroma alneum	CBS 109840	EU167609	EU167609	NA	NA
Asteroma sp.	Masuya 8Ah9-1	NA	AB669035	NA	NA
Cryphognomonia pini	CFCC 53020	MK432672	MK429915	MK578144	MK578100
	CFCC 53021	MK432673	MK429916	MK578145	MK578101
Cryptosporella hypodermia	CBS 116866	EU199181	AF408346	NA	EU199140
Discula destructiva	MD 254	AF429741	AF429721	AF429732	NA
Ditopella biseptata	MFLU 15-2661	MF190147	MF190091	NA	MF377616
Ditopella ditopa	CBS 109748	DQ323526	EU199126	NA	EU199145
Ditopellopsis sp.	CBS 121471	EU254763	EU255088	EU221936	EU219254
Flavignomonia rhoigena	CFCC 53118	MK432674	MK429917	NA	MK578102
	CFCC 53119	MK432675	MK429918	NA	MK578103
	CFCC 53120	MK432676	MK429919	NA	MK578104
Gnomonia gnomon	CBS 199.53	DQ491518	AF408361	EU221885	EU219295
	CBS 829.79	AY818957	AY818964	EU221905	NA
Gnomoniopsis alderdunensis	CBS 125680	GU320825	NA	NA	NA
Gnomoniopsis chamaemori	CBS 803.79	EU254808	EU255107	NA	NA
Gnomoniopsis racemula	AR 3892	EU254841	EU255122	EU221889	EU219241
Mamianiella coryli	BPI 877578	EU254862	NA	NA	NA
Marsupiomyces quercina	MFLUCC 13-0664	MF190116	MF190061	NA	NA
Marsupiomyces epidermoidea	MFLU 15-2921	NA	MF190058	NA	NA
Melanconis marginalis	CBS 109744	EU199197	AF408373	EU221991	EU219301
Neognomoniopsis quercina	CBS 145575	MK876399	MK876440	NA	NA
Occultocarpon ailaoshanense	LCM 524.01	JF779849	JF779853	NA	JF779856
	LCM 522.01	JF779848	JF779852	JF779862	JF779857
Ophiognomonia melanostyla	LCM 389.01	JF779850	JF779854	NA	JF779858
Ophiognomonia vasiljevae	AR 4298	EU254977	EU255162	EU221999	EU219331
Plagiostoma aesculi	AR 3640	EU254994	EU255164	NA	EU219269
Linospora capreae	CBS 372.69	NA	AF277143	NA	NA
Pleuroceras oregonense	AR 4333	EU255060	EU255196	EU221931	EU219313
Pleuroceras pleurostylum	CBS 906.79	EU255061	EU255197	EU221962	EU219311
Phragmoporthe conformis	AR 3632	NA	AF408377	NA	NA
Valsalnicola oxystoma	AR 5137	JX519561	NA	NA	NA
	AR 4833	JX519559	JX519563	NA	NA
Sirococcus tsugae	AR 4010	EF512478	EU255207	EU221928	EU219289
	CBS 119626	EU199203	EU199136	EF512534	EU199159
Tenuignomonia styracis	BPI 89278	NA	LC379288	LC379282	LC379294

Note: NA, not applicable. Strains in this study are marked in bold.

Table 3.

Strains and GenBank accession numbers used in the phylogenetic analyses of .

Species	Strain	Genbank accession number
		ITS	tef1	tub2
Apiognomonia errabunda	AR 4182	DQ313543	KJ509937	KJ509947
Plagiostoma aceris-palmati	CBS 137265	KJ509959	KJ509938	KJ509949
Plagiostoma aesculi	CBS 121905	EU254994	GU367022	GU354005
Plagiostoma amygdalinae	CBS 791.79	EU254995	GU367030	GU354012
Plagiostoma apiculatum	CBS 109775	DQ323529	GU367008	GU353990
	CBS 126126	GU367066	GU367009	GU353991
Plagiostoma barriae	LCM 601.01	GU367054	GU366997	GU353980
	LCM 484.01	GU367053	GU366995	GU353979
Plagiostoma convexum	CBS 123206	EU255047	EU219112	GU353994
Plagiostoma devexum	CBS 123201	EU255001	GU367027	GU354010
Plagiostoma dilatatum	LCM 403.02	GU367069	GU367012	GU353995
	CBS 124976	GU367070	GU367014	GU353996
Plagiostoma euphorbiaceum	CBS 816.79	EU255003	EU219158	GU354013
Plagiostoma euphorbiae	CBS 340.78	DQ323532	GU367034	GU354016
	CBS 817.79	KJ509960	GU367028	KJ509950
Plagiostoma exstocollum	CBS 127662	GU367046	GU366988	GU353972
	LCM 422.01	GU367043	GU366989	GU353969
Plagiostoma fraxini	CBS 121258	EU255008	KJ509939	KJ509951
	CBS 109498	AY455810	GU367033	GU354015
Plagiostoma geranii	CBS 824.79	EU255009	GU367032	GU354014
Plagiostoma imperceptibile	LCM 456.01	GU367059	GU367002	GU353984
Plagiostoma jonesii	MFLUCC 16–1189	MF190159	NA	MF377589
Plagiostoma mejianum	CBS 137266	KJ509961	KJ509940	KJ509952
Plagiostoma oregonense	CBS 126124	GU367073	GU367016	GU353999
Plagiostoma ovalisporum	CBS 124977	GU367072	GU367015	GU353998
Plagiostoma petiolophilum	AR 3821	EU255039	GU367025	GU354008
	CBS 126123	GU367078	GU367023	GU354006
Plagiostoma populinum	CFCC 53016	MK432677	MK578070	MK578146
	CFCC 53017	MK432678	MK578071	MK578147
Plagiostoma populinum	CBS 174.58	GU367074	GU367017	GU354000
	CBS 144.57	GU367075	GU367018	GU354001
Plagiostoma pulchellum	CBS 170.69	EU255043	KJ509941	GU353989
	CBS 126653	GU367063	GU367006	GU353987
Plagiostoma rhododendri	CBS 847.79	EU255044	GU367026	GU354009
Plagiostoma robergeanum	CBS 121472	EU255046	GU367029	GU354011
Plagiostoma rubrosporum	CBS 137267	KJ509962	KJ509942	KJ509953
Plagiostoma salicellum	CBS 126121	GU367037	GU366977	GU353961
	CBS 121466	EU254996	GU366978	GU353962
Plagiostoma salicicola	MFLUCC 13–0656	MF190161	NA	NA
Plagiostoma samuelsii	CBS 125668	GU367051	GU366993	GU353977
	LCM 596.01	GU367052	GU366994	GU353978
Plagiostoma triseptatum	CBS 137268	KJ509963	KJ509943	KJ509954
Plagiostoma tsukubense	CBS 137269	KJ509964	KJ509944	KJ509955
	CBS 137270	KJ509965	KJ509945	KJ509956
Plagiostoma versatile	CBS 124978	GU367038	GU366979	GU393963
	LCM 598.01	GU367040	GU366981	GU393965
Plagiostoma yunnanense	LCM 513.02	GU367036	GU366976	GU353960
	CBS 124979	GU367035	GU366975	GU353959

Note: NA, not applicable. Strains in this study are marked in bold.

Morphological analysis

Morphological observations of the asexual/sexual morph in the natural environment were based on features of the conidiomata or ascomata on infected plant tissues and micromorphology, supplemented by cultural characteristics. Ascomata and conidiomata from tree barks were sectioned by hand, using a double-edged blade and structures were observed under a dissecting microscope. The gross morphology of conidiomata or ascomata was recorded using a Leica stereomicroscope (M205 FA). Fungal structures were mounted in clear lactic acid and micromorphological characteristics were examined using a Leica compound microscope (DM 2500) with differential interference contrast (DIC) optics. Thirty measurements of each structure were determined for each collection. Colony characters and pigment production on PDA were noted after 10 d. Colony colors were described according to Rayner (1970).

DNA extraction, PCR amplification and sequencing

Total genomic DNA was extracted from fresh mycelium grown on PDA using a cetyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB) method (Doyle and Doyle 1990). PCR amplifications were performed in a DNA Engine Peltier Thermal Cycler (PTC-200; Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, CA, USA). The primer sets ITS1 and ITS4 (White et al. 1990) were used to amplify the ITS region. The primer sets LR0R and LR7 (Vilgalys and Hester 1990; Vilgalys and Sun 1994) were used to amplify the nuclear ribosomal large subunit (LSU) region. The primer sets EF1-728F (Carbone and Kohn 1999) and EF1-1567R (Rehner 2001) were used to amplify a partial fragment of the translation elongation factor 1-α gene (tef1-α). The primer sets RPB2-5F and fRPB2-7cR (Liu et al. 1999) were used to amplify the partial RNA polymerase II subunit (rpb2) region. The primer sets T1 (O’Donnell and Cigelnik 1997) and Bt2b (Glass and Donaldson 1995) were used to amplify the beta-tubulin gene (tub2). The PCR conditions were: an initial denaturation step of 5 min at 94 °C followed by 35 cycles of 30 sec at 94 °C, 50 sec at 48 °C (ITS, LSU) or 54 °C (tef-1α) or 55 °C (, ) and 1 min at 72 °C, and a final elongation step of 7 min at 72 °C. PCR amplification products were assayed via electrophoresis in 2% agarose gels. DNA sequencing was performed using an ABI PRISM 3730XL DNA Analyser with a BigDye Terminater Kit v.3.1 (Inv-itrogen, USA) at the Shanghai Invitrogen Biological Technology Company Limited (Beijing, China).

Phylogenetic analyses

The quality of our amplified nucleotide sequences was checked and combined by SeqMan v.7.1.0 and reference sequences were retrieved from the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI), based on Mejía et al. (2011a), Senanayake et al. (2018), Jiang and Tian (2019), and Jiang et al. (2019), supplemented by sequences of and from Crous et al. (2019) and Minoshima et al. (2019). Sequences were aligned using MAFFT v. 6 (Katoh and Toh 2010) and manually corrected using Bioedit 7.0.9.0 (Hall 1999).

The phylogenetical analyses were conducted using Maximum Parsimony (MP), Maximum Likelihood (ML) and Bayesian inference (BI). MP was performed with PAUP v. 4.0b10 (Swofford 2003) using tree-bisection-reconnection (TBR) as the branch-swapping algorithm. Other calculated parsimony scores were tree length (TL), consistency index (CI), retention index (RI), and rescaled consistency (RC). ML was performed with RAxML (Stamatakis 2006) as implemented in raxmlGUI 1.3 (Silvestro and Michalak 2012), using the ML + rapid bootstrap setting and the GTRGAMMA substitution model with 1000 bootstrap replicates. BI was performed using a Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) algorithm in MrBayes v. 3.0b4 (Ronquist and Huelsenbeck 2003). Two MCMC chains, started from random trees for 1,000,000 generations and trees, were sampled every 100th generation, resulting in a total of 10,000 trees. The first 25% of trees were discarded as burn-in of each analysis. Branches with significant Bayesian Posterior Probabilities (BPP) were estimated in the remaining 7500 trees. Phylogenetic trees were viewed with FigTree v.1.4.3 (Rambaut 2016) and processed by Adobe Illustrator CS5. Alignment and trees were deposited in TreeBASE (submission ID: S26271). The nucleotide sequence data of the new taxa have been deposited in GenBank (Tables 1–3).

Results

The first sequences dataset for the ITS, LSU, tef1, and was analyzed to focus on . The alignment included 45 taxa, including the outgroup sequences of (Table 1). The aligned four-locus datasets included 3388 characters. Of these, 2180 characters were constant, 198 variable characters were par-simony-uninformative and 1010 characters were parsimony informative. The heuristic search using maximum parsimony (MP) generated 4 parsimonious trees (TL = 3241, CI = 0.539, RI = 0.672, RC = 0.362), from which one was selected (Fig. 1). In the phylogenetic tree, two strains form a well-supported clade (MP/ML/BI=100/100/1) sister to the species from .

Figure 1.

Maximum parsimony phylogram of based on a combined matrix of ITS, LSU, tef1 and genes. The MP and ML bootstrap support values above 50% are shown at the first and second position, respectively. Thickened branches represent posterior probabilities above 0.90 from BI. Scale bar: 80 nucleotide substitutions. Strains in this study are in blue and ex-type strains are in blod.

The second dataset with ITS, tef1 and sequences were analyzed in combination to infer the interspecific relationships within . The alignment included 36 taxa, including the outgroup sequences of and (Table 2). The aligned three-locus datasets included 2481 characters. Of these, 1443 characters were constant, 186 variable characters were par-simony-uninformative and 852 characters were parsimony informative. The heuristic search using maximum parsimony (MP) generated one parsimonious tree (TL = 2644, CI = 0.620, RI = 0.781, RC = 0.485), which is shown in Fig. 2. In the phylogenetic tree, three strains form a well-supported clade (MP/ML/BI=100/100/1) that does not include any previously described species.

Table 2.

Strains and GenBank accession numbers used in the phylogenetic analyses of

Species	Strain	Genbank accession number
		ITS	tef1	tub2
Apiognomonia veneta	CBS 342.86	DQ313531	DQ318036	EU219235
Gnomoniopsis alderdunensis	CBS 125679	GU320826	GU320813	GU320788
	CBS 125680	GU320825	GU320801	GU320787
	CBS 125681	GU320827	GU320802	GU320789
Gnomoniopsis chamaemori	CBS 804.79	GU320817	GU320809	GU320777
Gnomoniopsis chinensis	CFCC 52286	MG866032	MH545370	MH545366
	CFCC 52287	MG866033	MH545371	MH545367
	CFCC 52288	MG866034	MH545372	MH545368
	CFCC 52289	MG866035	MH545373	MH545369
Gnomoniopsis clavulata	CBS 121255	EU254818	GU320807	EU219211
Gnomoniopsis comari	CBS 806.79	EU254821	GU320810	EU219156
	CBS 807.79	EU254822	GU320814	GU320779
	CBS 809.79	EU254823	GU320794	GU320778
Gnomoniopsis daii	CFCC 54043	MN598671	MN605519	MN605517
	CMF002B	MN598672	MN605520	MN605518
Gnomoniopsis fructicola	CBS 121226	EU254824	GU320792	EU219144
	CBS 208.34	EU254826	GU320808	EU219149
	CBS 125671	GU320816	GU320793	GU320776
Gnomoniopsis guttulata	MS 0312	EU254812	NA	NA
Gnomoniopsis idaeicola	CBS 125672	GU320823	GU320797	GU320781
	CBS 125673	GU320824	GU320798	GU320782
	CBS 125674	GU320820	GU320796	GU320780
	CBS 125675	GU320822	GU320799	GU320783
	CBS 125676	GU320821	GU320811	GU320784
Gnomoniopsis macounii	CBS 121468	EU254762	GU320804	EU219126
Gnomoniopsis occulta	CBS 125677	GU320828	GU320812	GU320785
	CBS 125678	GU320829	GU320800	GU320786
Gnomoniopsis paraclavulata	CBS 123202	GU320830	GU320815	GU320775
Gnomoniopsis racemula	CBS 121469	EU254841	GU320803	EU219125
Gnomoniopsis sanguisorbae	CBS 858.79	GU320818	GU320805	GU320790
Gnomoniopsis smithogilvyi	CBS 130190	JQ910642	KR072534	JQ910639
	CBS 130189	JQ910644	KR072535	JQ910641
	CBS 130188	JQ910643	KR072536	JQ910640
	MUT 401	HM142946	KR072537	KR072532
	MUT 411	HM142948	KR072538	KR072533
Gnomoniopsis tormentillae	CBS 904.79	EU254856	GU320795	EU219165
Gnomoniopsis xunwuensis	CFCC 53115	MK432667	MK578067	MK578141
	CFCC 53116	MK432668	MK578068	MK578142
	CFCC 53117	MK432669	MK578069	MK578143
Plagiostoma euphorbiae	CBS 340.78	DQ323532	GU354016	GU367034

Note: NA, not applicable. Strains in this study are marked in bold.

Figure 2.

Maximum parsimony phylogram of based on a combined matrix of ITS, tef1-α and genes. The MP and ML bootstrap support values above 50% are shown at the first and second position, respectively. Thickened branches represent posterior probabilities above 0.90 from BI. Scale bar: 80 nucleotide substitutions. Strains in this study are in blue and ex-type strains are in blod.

The third dataset with ITS, tef1 and sequences were analyzed in combination to infer the interspecific relationships within . The alignment included 48 taxa, including the outgroup sequences of (Table 3). The aligned three-locus datasets included 2311 characters. Of these, 1556 characters were constant, 204 variable characters were parsimony-uninformative and 551 characters were parsimony informative. The heuristic search using maximum parsimony (MP) generated 6 parsimonious trees (TL = 1462, CI = 0.685, RI = 0.779, RC = 0.534), from which one was selected (Fig. 3). In the phylogenetic tree, four strains from this study group in a well-supported clade with . The topologies resulting from MP, ML and BI analyses of the concatenated dataset were congruent.

Figure 3.

Maximum parsimony phylogram of based on a combined matrix of ITS, tef1-α and genes. The MP and ML bootstrap support values above 50% are shown at the first and second position, respectively. Thickened branches represent posterior probabilities above 0.90 from BI. Scale bar: 30 nucleotide substitutions. Strains in this study are in blue.

Taxonomy

C.M. Tian & N. Jiang gen. nov.

C9CCE66F-0558-5DBF-BB0E-433C484F1A90

829509

Etymology.

Crypho + gnomonia, referring to the cryptic stromata on hosts.

Type species.

C.M. Tian & N. Jiang

Description.

erumpent, causing a pustulate bark surface. yellowish to brownish. lacking. conspicuous, flask-shaped to spherical, umber to fuscous black, regularly scattered. deliquescent. fusoid, 8-spored, biseriate, with an apical ring. hyaline, clavate to cylindrical, smooth, multi-guttulate, symmetrical to asymmetrical, straight to slightly curved, bicellular, with a median septum distinctly constricted, with distinct hyaline sheath. : not observed.

Notes.

was classified as a new genus in throughout molecular data and the characteristics of sexual morph. Morphologically, can be distinguished from the other genera by pseudostromata and ascospores with obvious hyaline sheath.

C.M. Tian & N. Jiang sp. nov.

DDB2516A-8F2F-5985-8344-22CAEA479CB2

829510

Figure 4

Figure 4.

on (BJFC-S1725) A–C habit of ascomata on twigs D, E transverse section of ascomata F longitudinal section through ascomata G asci H, I ascospores. Scale bars: 2 mm (A); 500 μm (B–F); 10 μm (G–I).

Diagnosis.

differs from its closest phylogenetic neighbor, , in ITS, LSU, tef1 and loci based on the alignments deposited in TreeBASE.

Named after the genus of the host plant from which the holotype was collected, .

erumpent, causing a pustulate bark surface, 650–1200 µm diam., containing up to 12 perithecia. yellowish to brownish. lacking. Perithecia conspicuous, flask-shaped to spherical, umber to fuscous black, regularly scattered, 350–600 µm diam. deliquescent. fusoid, 8-spored, biseriate, with an apical ring, (60–)65–80(–90) × (21–)22–31(–35) µm. hyaline, clavate to cylindrical, smooth, multi-guttulate, symmetrical to asymmetrical, straight to slightly curved, bicellular, with a median septum distinctly constricted, with distinct hyaline sheath, (15.5–)18–25(–27) × (8.5–)9.5–11.5(–12) µm. : not observed.

Culture characters.

Cultures incubated on PDA at 25 °C in the dark, initially pale white, becoming olive-green after 3 wk. The colonies are flat, with regular margins; texture initially uniform, becoming compact after 1 month.

Specimens examined.

China. Shaanxi Province: Ankang City, Huoditang forest farm, , on branches of , 8 June 2018, N. Jiang & C.M. Tian (holotype BJFC-S1725; ex-type living culture: CFCC 53020); , on branches of , 8 June 2018, N. Jiang & C.M. Tian (BJFC-S1726; living culture: CFCC 53021).

is the type species of , and occurs on in China. Morphologically, is characterized based on bicellular ascospores with obvious hyaline sheath. In the phylogenetic tree, this species is most closely related to (Fig. 1). However, can be distinguished from based on ITS, LSU, tef1 and loci (73/512 in ITS, 4/775 in LSU, 186/437 in tef1 and 90/1064 in ).

C.M. Tian & Q. Yang sp. nov.

C1F2771E-F584-598A-B96A-C7DF66F49514

829529

Figure 5

Figure 5.

on (BJFC-S1688) A symptoms on leaves of host plant B the colony on PDAC conidiomata on PDAD, E conidiophores attached with condia F conidia. Scale bars: 500 μm (C); 20 μm (D–F).

differs from its closest phylogenetic neighbor, , in ITS, tef1 and loci based on the alignments deposited in TreeBASE.

Named after the County (Xunwu), where the species was first collected.

On PDA: pycnidial, (115–)130–210(–250) μm diam., globose, solitary to gregarious, or occasionally coalescing, deeply embedded in the medium, erumpent, brown to dark black. White to cream conidial drops exuding from the ostioles. (40–)43–58(–60.5) × 2–2.5(–3) μm, cylindrical, hyaline, phiailidic, branched or sympodially branched, straight or slightly curved. oval or fusiform, straight to slightly curved, hyaline, multiguttules, (14–)16.5–20 × 4–5.5 µm.

Cultures incubated on PDA at 25 °C in the dark. Colony originally compact and flat with white aerial mycelium, then developing pale brown aerial mycelium at the center and blackish green mycelium at the marginal area, zonate with 2 well defined zones with regular edge; conidiomata dense, regularly distributed over agar surface.

China. Jiangxi Province: Ganzhou City, Xunwu County, , on leaves of , 12 May 2018, Q. Yang, Y. Liu & Y.M. Liang (holotype BJFC-S1688; ex-type living culture: CFCC 53115); , on leaves of , 12 May 2018, Q. Yang, Y. Liu & Y.M. Liang (BJFC-S1689; living culture: CFCC 53116 and CFCC 53117).

is associated with leaf spot of , representing the first report from this host in China. It is characterized by sympodially branched conidiophore and oval or fusiform conidia. Morphologically, differs from in having bigger conidia (16.5–20 × 4–5.5 vs. 5.5–7 × 2–3.5 µm) (Jiang and Tian 2019). The phylogenetic inferences indicated this species as an individual well-supported clade (MP/ML/BI=100/100/1) in the genus (Fig. 2).

(Fuckel) L.C. Mejía. Stud. Mycol. 68: 225. 2011.

ACBB0FE2-EF21-5D11-B50D-8F58DF82058D

Figure 6

Figure 6.

on (BJFC-S1724) A–C habit of conidiomata on twigs D transverse section through conidiomata E longitudinal section through conidiomata F, G conidiogenous cells attached with conidia H, I condia. Scale bars: 2 mm (A); 1 mm (B, C); 500 μm (D, E); 10 μm (F–I).

See Butin (1958)

China. Beijing: Haidian district, , on branches of , 12 November 2017, N. Jiang (BJFC-S1724; living culture: CFCC 53016 and CFCC 53017).

is a common plant pathogenic fungus causing poplar canker in China. The current identification follows previous descriptions and records (Butin 1958). In the present study, two isolates (CFCC 53016 and CFCC 53017) from symptomatic branches of were congruent with based on morphology and DNA sequences data (Fig. 3). We therefore describe as a known species for this clade.

Discussion

In this study, three gnomoniaceous species were identified based on morphological and molecular phylogenetic analyses. As a result, typified with is proposed as a new genus in for its distinct phylogenic position and distinctive sexual morphs. Also, strains were successfully isolated from leaf spot of , and were identified as a new species in , which was typified by having pycnidia with hyaline, oval, one-celled conidia (Walker et al. 2010).

The type species of , , is unique through its developed pseudostromata and ascospores with distinct hyaline sheath. In the molecular phylogeny, is closely related to species of . is characterized by the formation of synnemata and no sexual morph is known for this species (Jiang et al. 2019). However, can be easily distinguished from based on ITS, LSU, tef1 and loci. Therefore, the unique morphology in combination with an isolated phylogenetic position within warrant the establishment of a new genus.

Most species of show host preference or potentially limited host specificity to genera in the , and (Sogonov et al. 2008). In the present study, isolates were collected from leaf spot of , and described as a novel pathogen depending on its asexual state, . Four taxa, , , , and , have been found on host plants. However, can be easily distinguished from the four species in conidial size (16.5–20 × 4–5.5 µm in vs. 5.0–8.0 × 2.0–4.0 µm in vs. 5.0–8.0 × 2.0–3.5 µm in vs. 6.0–9.5 × 2.0–3.5 µm in vs. 4.9–9.8 × 2.9–4.9 µm in ), as well as supported by molecular data (Walker et al. 2010; Crous et al. 2012; Visentin et al. 2012).

is regarded as the pathogen responsible for poplar canker. Butin (1958) presented a full description with illustrations of this species as . Mejía et al. (2011a) treated as a synonym of based on analyses of cultural and DNA sequence data. In this paper, forms a highly supported monophyletic group (Fig. 3) characterized by having conidia with obvious hyaline sheath. It is the first time that we have been able to provide detailed morphological diagrams in China.