Members of the genus Plagiostoma inhabit leaves, stems, twigs, and branches of woody and herbaceous plants predominantly in the temperate Northern Hemisphere. An account of all known species of Plagiostoma including Cryptodiaporthe is presented based on analyses of morphological, cultural, and DNA sequence data. Multigene phylogenetic analyses of DNA sequences from four genes (β-tubulin, ITS, rpb2, and tef1-α) revealed eight previously undescribed phylogenetic species and an association between a clade composed of 11 species of Plagiostoma and the host family Salicaceae. In this paper these eight new species of Plagiostoma are described, four species are redescribed, and four new combinations are proposed. A key to the 25 accepted species of Plagiostoma based on host, shape, and size of perithecia, perithecial arrangement in the host, and microscopic characteristics of the asci and ascospores is provided. Disposition of additional names in Cryptodiaporthe and Plagiostoma is also discussed.
Members of the genus Plagiostoma inhabit leaves, stems, twigs, and branches of woody and herbaceous plants predominantly in the temperate Northern Hemisphere. An account of all known species of Plagiostoma including Cryptodiaporthe is presented based on analyses of morphological, cultural, and DNA sequence data. Multigene phylogenetic analyses of DNA sequences from four genes (β-tubulin, ITS, rpb2, and tef1-α) revealed eight previously undescribed phylogenetic species and an association between a clade composed of 11 species of Plagiostoma and the host family Salicaceae. In this paper these eight new species of Plagiostoma are described, four species are redescribed, and four new combinations are proposed. A key to the 25 accepted species of Plagiostoma based on host, shape, and size of perithecia, perithecial arrangement in the host, and microscopic characteristics of the asci and ascospores is provided. Disposition of additional names in Cryptodiaporthe and Plagiostoma is also discussed.
Entities:
Keywords:
Ascomycota; Betulaceae; Fraxinus; Salicaceae; Sordariomycetidae; epitypification; new species; phylogeny
The genus Plagiostoma (Gnomoniaceae, Diaporthales)
includes microscopic fungi that inhabit the leaves, stems, twigs, and branches
of woody and herbaceous plants from a range of families including the
Betulaceae, Euphorbiaceae, Geraniaceae, Hippocastanaceae, Oleaceae,
Polygonaceae, Salicaceae, Sapindaceae, and Staphylaceae in
temperate regions of the Northern Hemisphere
(Sogonov ). Although some species of Plagiostoma cause
diseases, most do not show symptoms prior to production of perithecia on dead
tissues. Described by Fuckel
(1870), the morphological
concept of Plagiostoma remained relatively unchanged
(Barr 1978,
Monod 1983) until recently.
Multigene phylogenetic studies suggest that the genus Plagiostoma
forms a highly supported monophyletic clade that includes the type species of
Plagiostoma, P. euphorbiae, and the type species of
Cryptodiaporthe, C. aesculi, among others
(Mejía , Sogonov ). Sogonov et al.
(2008) included 13 species in
the genus Plagiostoma, several of which were previously placed in
Cryptodiaporthe.A brief historical account of the major taxonomic treatments of
Plagiostoma and Cryptodiaporthe illustrates the views of
these genera through time. Fuckel
(1870) proposed the genus
Plagiostoma for sphaericeaous species characterised by flattened
perithecia oriented horizontally having short, lateral, erumpent necks. Fuckel
(1870) included the genera
Ceratostoma, Gnomonia, Linospora, Melanospora, and
Rhaphidospora together with Plagiostoma in the tribe
Ceratostomeae of the Sphaeriacei. In his original
description of Plagiostoma, Fuckel
(1870) included four species,
P. euphorbiae, P. petiolicola, P devexum, and P. suspecta.
Fuckel's concept of Plagiostoma was followed by Höhnel
(1917) and von Arx
(1951) who, like Fuckel,
considered Plagiostoma to be relatively closely related to
Gnomonia, the name on which the Gnomoniaceae is based. These
authors differentiated Gnomonia from Plagiostoma mainly by
orientation of the perithecial neck. Gnomonia was characterised by
having central, upright, perithecial necks in contrast to species of
Plagiostoma with eccentric, laterally oriented, perithecial necks. In
her treatment of the order Diaporthales, Barr
(1978) followed Fuckel's
concept of Plagiostoma and placed Gnomonia and
Plagiostoma in the same suborder Gnomoniineae but in
different families, i.e. Gnomonia in the Gnomoniaceae and
Plagiostoma in the Valsaceae. The Valsaceae was
defined based on having “beaks oblique or lateral, erumpent separately
or converging through stromatic disc”
(Barr, 1978 p. 15). Barr
(1978) made nine new
combinations in Plagiostoma expanding the number of species in the
genus to 13.In his monograph of the Gnomoniaceae, Monod
(1983) accepted most species
treated by Barr (1978).
However, Monod considered that the typification of Plagiostoma as
P. euphorbiae by Höhnel
(1917) was not representative
of Plagiostoma because the perithecial necks of this species are
eccentric rather than lateral as stipulated by Fuckel
(1870). Monod
(1983) transferred P.
euphorbiae to the genus Gnomonia and re-typified
Plagiostoma with P. devexum. In agreement with Barr
(1991) and Sogonov et
al. (2008) the
typification of the genus Plagiostoma with P. euphorbiae by
Höhnel (1917) is accepted
here because this typification predates Monod
(1983) and is in accordance
with Article 10 of the International Code of Botanical Nomenclature
(McNeill ). In addition, the character of perithecial neck orientation
has been found not to be phylogenetically informative
(Sogonov ).Cryptodiaporthe was described by Petrak
(1921) for species with
euvalsoid arrangement of perithecia and, in contrast to Diaporthe,
lacks a blackened margin in the substratum surrounding the perithecia. In
describing Cryptodiaporthe, Petrak
(1921) designated C.
aesculi as type and included C. hystrix and C.
populina. Later, Wehmeyer
(1933) recircumscribed
Cryptodiaporthe emphasising the lack of a blackened margin within the
substratum and made 17 new combinations in this genus for species previously
included in Diaporthe expanding the genus to 19 species.In this study, specimens of Plagiostoma were collected primarily
from North America but also from South America, Europe, and China. Among these
recent collections eight new species were discovered and a number of described
species were recollected, cultured, and sequenced. A multigene phylogenetic
analysis is provided of 24 of the 25 species of Plagiostoma accepted
here. Eight new species are described and illustrated, four species are
redescribed, and four new combinations are proposed. A key to the 25 accepted
species of Plagiostoma is provided along with the disposition of
additional species names in Cryptodiaporthe and
Plagiostoma.
MATERIAL AND METHODS
Collection of specimens, culture preparation, and morphological
observations
Collections were made as listed in Table
1 from the following countries mainly during the spring and
summers of 2007 and 2008: Argentina (Tucumán), China (Yunnan), France
(Deux-Sèvres Département), Germany (Frankfurt), and the United
States of America (California, Maryland, New York, Oregon, Washington).
Specimens consisting of overwintered, dead, attached, or fallen twigs and
branches with perithecia were placed in paper bags, air-dried, and stored at
8–10 °C in sealed plastic bags for a period of 1 wk to 6 mo before
processing. All specimens are deposited in the U.S. National Fungus
Collections (BPI).
Table 1.
Isolates with sequences included in the phylogenetic analysis of
Plagiostoma. Types and epitypes are indicated in bold.
Taxon
Specimen
Culture
Country
Host
Collector
β-tubulin
ITS
rpb2
tef1-α
Apiognomonia hystrix
CBS-H 11343
CBS 911.79
Switzerland
Acer pseudoplatanus
M. Monod
GU366973
DQ313549
EU219260
GU353957
Apiognomonia veneta
NA
CBS 897.79
Switzerland
Platanus orientalis
M. Monod
GU377974
DQ313532
EU219259
GU353958
Plagiostoma aesculi
BPI 748430
CBS 109765
Austria
Aesculus hippocastaneum
W. Jaklitsch
GU367021
DQ323530
EU199138
GU354004
BPI 878950
CBS 126127 (= LCM
447.01)
Germany
Aesculus hippocastaneum
L.C. Mejía
GU367019
GU367076
GU367110
GU354002
BPI 878950
LCM 447b.01
Germany
Aesculus hippocastaneum
L.C. Mejía
GU367020
GU367077
GU367111
GU354003
BPI 840942
CBS 121905
Austria
Aesculus hippocastaneum
W. Jaklitsch
GU367022
EU254994
EU219269
GU354005
Plagiostoma amygdalinae
NA
CBS 791.79
Switzerland
Euphorbia amygdaloides
M. Monod
GU367030
EU254995
GU367113
GU354012
Plagiostoma apiculatum
BPI 747938
CBS 109775 (= AR
3455)
Austria
Salix sp.
W. Jaklitsch
GU367008
DQ323529
EU199141
GU353990
BPI 878951
LCM 393.01
France
Salix dasyclados
L.C. Mejía
GU367010
GU367067
GU367101
GU353992
BPI 878952
CBS 126126 (= LCM
436.01)
USA: WA
Salix sitchensis
L.C. Mejía
GU367009
GU367066
GU367100
GU353991
Plagiostoma barriae
BPI 878954
LCM 601.01
USA: WA
Acer macrophyllum
L.C. Mejía
GU366996
GU367054
GU367091
GU353980
Plagiostoma convexum
BPI 843490
CBS 123206
USA: NY
Salix sp.
L. Vasilyeva
GU367011
EU255047
-
GU353994
Plagiostoma devexum
BPI 843489
CBS 123201
USA: NY
Polygonum sp.
L. Vasilyeva
GU367027
EU255001
EU219258
GU354010
Plagiostoma dilatatum
BPI 878957
CBS 124976 (= LCM
402.02)
France
Salix irrorata
L.C. Mejía
GU367013
GU367070
GU367104
GU353996
BPI 878958
LCM 403.02
France
Salix caprea
L.C. Mejía
GU367012
GU367069
GU367103
GU353995
Plagiostoma euphorbiaceum
NA
CBS 816.79
Switzerland
Euphorbia palustris
M. Monod
GU367031
EU255003
-
GU354013
Plagiostoma euphorbiae
NA
CBS 340.78
The Netherlands
Euphorbia palustris
W. Gams
GU367034
DQ323532
EU219292
GU354016
Plagiostoma exstocollum
BPI 878961
CBS 127662 (= LCM
468.01)
USA: OR
Corylus californica
L.C. Mejía
GU366988
GU367046
GU367086
GU353972
BPI 878959
LCM 422.01
USA: OR
Corylus californica
L.C. Mejía
GU366985
GU367043
GU367085
GU353969
Plagiostoma fraxini
BPI 746412
CBS 109498
USA: MD
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
S. Redlin
GU367033
AY455810
EU219263
GU354015
Plagiostoma geranii
NA
CBS 824.79
Switzerland
Geranium sylvaticum
M. Monod
GU367032
EU255009
EU219273
GU354014
Plagiostoma imperceptibile
BPI 878967
LCM 456.01
USA: CA
Salix sp.
L.C. Mejía
GU367002
GU367059
GU367094
GU353984
Plagiostoma oregonense
BPI 878968
CBS 126124 (= LCM
597.01)
USA: OR
Salix sp.
L.C. Mejía
GU367016
GU367073
GU367107
GU353999
Plagiostoma ovalisporum
BPI 878969
CBS 124977 (= LCM
458.01)
USA: ID
Salix sp.
L.C. Mejía
GU367015
GU367072
GU367106
GU353998
Plagiostoma petiolophilum
BPI 878970
CBS 126123 (= LCM
181.01)
USA: NY
Acer spicatum
L.C. Mejía
GU367023
GU367078
GU367112
GU354006
BPI 863769
AR 3821
USA: NY
Acer sp.
L. Vasilyeva
GU367025
EU255039
EU219257
GU354008
Plagiostoma populinum
NA
CBS 144.57
The Netherlands
Populus trichocarpa
B. Gerrits van den Ende
GU367018
GU367075
GU367109
GU354001
NA
CBS 174.58
The Netherlands
Populus canadensis
B. Gerrits van den Ende
GU367017
GU367074
GU367108
GU354000
Plagiostoma pulchellum
BPI 878971
CBS 126653 (= LCM
365.04)
USA: MD
Salix babylonica
L.C. Mejía
GU367006
GU367063
GU367098
GU353987
BPI 878972
LCM 371.02
USA: MD
Salix babylonica
L.C. Mejía
GU367007
GU367064
GU367099
GU353988
BPI 878973
LCM 438.04
USA: WA
Salix lucida
L.C. Mejía
GU366004
GU367061
GU367096
GU353985
BPI 878974
LCM 623.01
Argentina
Salix humboldtiana
L.C. Mejía
GU367005
GU367062
GU367097
GU353986
NA
CBS 170.69
The Netherlands
Populus balsamifera
Unknown
-
EU255043
-
GU353989
Plagiostoma rhododendri
NA
CBS 847.79
Switzerland
Rhododendron hirsutum
M. Monod
GU367026
EU255044
EU2192578
GU354009
Plagiostoma robergeanum
BPI 843593
CBS 121472
Austria
Staphylea pinnata
W. Jaklitsch
GU367029
EU255046
EU219262
GU354011
Plagiostoma salicellum
BPI 843527
CBS 121466 (= AR
3828)
Austria
Salix alba
W. Jaklitsch
GU366978
EU254996
EU219278
GU353962
BPI 878975
CBS 126121 (= LCM
449.01)
Germany
Salix repens
L.C. Mejía
GU366977
GU367037
GU367081
GU353961
Plagiostoma samuelsii
BPI 878977
CBS 125668 (= LCM
454.04)
USA: CA
Alnus tenuifolia
L.C. Mejía
GU366993
GU367051
GU367089
GU353977
BPI 878979
LCM 596.01
USA: WA
Alnus sp.
L.C. Mejía
GU366994
GU367052
GU367090
GU353978
Plagiostoma versatile
BPI 878980
CBS 124978 (= LCM
594.01)
USA: WA
Salix scouleriana
L.C. Mejía
GU366979
GU367038
GU367082
GU393963
BPI 878981
LCM 595.01
USA: WA
Salix scouleriana
L.C. Mejía
GU366980
GU367039
GU367083
GU393964
BPI 878982
LCM 598.01
USA: OR
Salix sp.
L.C. Mejía
GU366981
GU367040
GU367084
GU393965
BPI 877702
CBS 121251
Canada
Salix sp.
M.V. Sogonov
GU366982
EU255059
EU219268
GU393966
Plagiostoma yunnanense
BPI 878983
CBS 124979 (= LCM
513.03)
China
Salix sp.
L.C. Mejía
GU366975
GU367035
GU367079
GU353959
Plagiostoma yunnanense
BPI 878983
LCM 513.02
China
Salix sp.
L.C. Mejía
GU366976
GU367036
GU367080
GU353960
Isolates with sequences included in the phylogenetic analysis of
Plagiostoma. Types and epitypes are indicated in bold.Observations, measurements, and digital imaging of morphological characters
and isolation of cultures were performed using the same equipment and
procedures as in Mejía et al.
(2008). AxioVision v. 4.7.2.0
(Carl Zeiss Image Solutions, Carl Zeiss, New York, NY, USA) was used in
conjunction with those methods to measure structures. Fresh specimens were
mounted in water for microscopic observations; dried specimens were mounted in
3 % potassium hydroxide. Cultural characteristics were observed on Potato
Dextrose Agar (PDA, Difco™, Becton, Dickinson & Co., Sparks, MD,
USA) 7 d after plating as described in Mejía et al.
(2008). Colony diameters were
measured twice perpendicularly and averaged and thus are listed as average
colony diameter (a.c.d.). Representative cultures of species considered in
this study were deposited at the Centraalbureau voor Schimmelcultures (CBS,
The Netherlands) as listed in Table
1.
DNA extraction and PCR amplification
DNA extractions were done as described by Mejía et al.
(2008) using a Fast Prep FP
120 with Lysing Matrix “A” (MP Biomedicals, Solon, OH, USA) for
mechanical lysis. Four gene fragments were amplified and sequenced for the
phylogenetic analyses: the complete nuclear ribosomal internal transcribed
spacer regions 1 and 2 including 5.8 S rDNA (ITS), regions of the RNA
polymerase second largest subunit (rpb2), beta-tubulin
(β-tubulin), and translation elongation factor 1-alpha
(tef1-α) genes. The ITS and rpb2 genes were amplified
and sequenced as described in Mejía et al.
(2008) in 25 μL reactions
with two internal sequencing primers designed specifically for species of
Plagiostoma: rpb2 Plag-F (5' CGT CGC TGC ATY ATC TCR CA 3')
and rpb2 Plag-R (5' TGY GAG ATR ATG CAG CGA CG 3').
β-tubulin was amplified using primers T1 and T22 and sequenced
with the PCR primers and the internal primers T2 and T12 from O'Donnell &
Cigelnik (1997). For some
isolates it was necessary to amplify the tef1-α region in two
fragments using the following primer combinations: EF1-728F /EF1-1199R and
EF1-983F/EF1-1567R (Carbone & Kohn
1999, Castlebury, unpubl. data, for primer 1199R 5' GGG AAG TAC
CMG TGA TCA TGT 3', Rehner
2001). The rpb2 gene could not be amplified for P.
convexum, P. euphorbiaceum, and P. pulchellum
CBS 170.69. In
addition, β-tubulin could not be amplified for P.
pulchellum CBS
170.69. For the purpose of determining taxonomic affinities of
species previously described as Cryptodiaporthe or
Plagiostoma but not congeneric with P. euphorbiae (type
species), a region of the nuclear ribosomal large subunit (LSU) was amplified
as described in Castlebury et al.
(2002).
Phylogenetic analyses
Editing and alignment of DNA sequences were performed as described in
Mejía et al.
(2008). Individual genes were
aligned separately and subsequently concatenated into a single alignment.
Table 1 includes detailed
information about the gene sequences including GenBank numbers. The
concatenated sequence alignment includes β-tubulin (1584 bp),
ITS (625 bp), rpb2 (1212 bp), and tef1-α (1149 bp) for
a total of 4570 bp and 45 isolates. The taxa included in this alignment
represent 24 of the 25 accepted species of Plagiostoma with
Apiognomonia hystrix and A. veneta as outgroup taxa.
Outgroup selection was based on the sister relationship of the genus
Apiognomonia with Plagiostoma as inferred by a three-gene
phylogeny of the family Gnomoniaceae
(Sogonov ). Positions with ambiguous alignment were excluded from the
analyses.The concatenated alignment was partitioned by gene and codon position for
β-tubulin, rpb2, and tef1-α using PAUP
(Swofford 2002). The gene
partitions were analysed for conflict with the partition homogeneity test
(PHT) as implemented in PAUP (Swofford
2002) using the following settings: 100 homogeneity replicates, 10
random sequence addition replicates, and MULTREES off. Conflict among gene
partitions was assessed by reciprocal bootstrap analyses
(Reeb )
using distance settings for each partition as determined by Modeltest v. 3.7
(Posada & Crandall 1998)
following the Bayesian Information Criterion (BIC).Genes were first analysed individually and then as a combined alignment
using maximum parsimony, Bayesian, and maximum likelihood analyses. Trees and
bootstrap support of branches were estimated by MP analysis as in Sogonov
et al. (2008) with
all characters considered unordered with equal weight and an additional
analysis with unordered characters weighted as follows: weight = 3 for first
and second codon positions and weight = 1 for third codon position.
Additionally, trees were estimated using Bayesian analysis with the program
MrBayes v. 3.1.2 (Huelsenbeck &
Ronquist 2001) as described in Sogonov et al.
(2008) with sampling every 500
generations. Model settings for each gene were determined using the program
MrModeltest v. 2 (Nylander
2004) and selected based on the Akaike Information Criterion
(AIC). The first 50 000 generations were discarded (burn-in period) based on
comparison of tree likelihood scores. A 50 % majority rule consensus tree and
a consensus phylogram were constructed from the trees saved after the burn-in
period. The Bayesian posterior probabilities (PP) of nodes of the consensus
trees are presented in Fig. 1.
Trees were also estimated by Maximum Likelihood (ML) analysis using the
program PAUP (Swofford 2002)
as described in Sogonov et al.
(2008) with Modeltest v. 3.7
(Posada & Crandall 1998)
used to estimate the best model for the concatenated alignment. Maximum
likelihood bootstrap analysis was not conducted.
Fig. 1.
Maximum likelihood phylogenetic tree (ML score = - lnL 13921.12887)
estimated from sequences of the β-tubulin, ITS, rpb2,
and tef1-α genes for 24 species of Plagiostoma and two
species of Apiognomonia. Bayesian posterior probabilities greater
than 80 % are shown above each branch and maximum parsimony bootstrap values
greater than 70 % are shown below branches. Trees for each gene were also
generated; see online Supplementary Information.
RESULTS
Collection of specimens
The following plant species are reported as new hosts for species of
Plagiostoma: Alnus tenuifolia, Salix dasyclados, S. humboldtiana,
S. irrorata, S. lucida, and S. sitchensis
(Table 1). Plagiostoma
pulchellum from Argentina and P. yunnanense from southwestern
China were collected in regions where no species of Plagiostoma had
been previously reported.The partition homogeneity test suggested conflict among the four genes
(ITS, rpb2, β-tubulin, and tef1-α) sequenced for
this study (P = 0.01) with rpb2 as the source of this conflict. For
combinations of the remaining three genes (ITS, β-tubulin, and
tef1-α), no incongruence among gene trees was detected when all
three were analysed (P = 0.09), with P = 0.07 for ITS and
β-tubulin and P = 0.24 for ITS and tef1-α. The
following are the likelihood settings estimated for each gene for the
reciprocal NJ bootstrap analyses: ITS: Base = equal Nst = 2 TRatio = 2.5434
Rates = equal Pinvar = 0.8337; rpb2: Base = equal Nst = 6 Rmat =
(1.0000 4.6961 1.0000 1.0000 13.3827) Rates = gamma Shape = 0.2029 Pinvar = 0;
β-tubulin: Base = (0.2006 0.3249 0.2505) Nst = 2 TRatio = 2.1757
Rates = gamma Shape = 0.5017 Pinvar = 0; and tef1-α: Base =
(0.1918 0.3110 0.2229) Nst = 2 TRatio = 1.8586 Rates = gamma Shape = 0.6109
Pinvar = 0.The ITS, β-tubulin, and tef1-α trees
individually resolved terminal clades for most of the species analysed. Trees
for each gene are provided - see online Supplementary Information. No single
gene analysis resolved all the species of Plagiostoma with bootstrap
support higher than 70 %. The following numbers of species were resolved by
genes with bootstrap > 70 %: ITS = 11, rpb2 = 9,
β-tubulin = 12, and tef1-α = 11. In general,
rpb2 was not as useful for resolving clades of closely related
species as the other three genes. The ITS gene resolved and supported all
terminal clades except P. amygdalinae and P. euphorbiaceae
for which the sequences were nearly identical. However, it did not support
backbone nodes at levels greater than 70 %. In contrast, bootstrap support
greater than 90 % for all backbone nodes containing two or more species was
obtained in the β-tubulin, rpb2, and tef1-α gene
trees. The topology of the individual gene trees differed only slightly. One
topological conflict supported by bootstrap values greater than 70 % was
observed between the β-tubulin analysis resulting in a clade (97
%) that included all species of Plagiostoma on Salicaceae
and the rpb2 analysis resulting in a clade (72 %) that included some
but not all the species on Salicaceae with some species on other
hosts.Phylogenetic trees resulting from the combined four-gene dataset (ITS,
β-tubulin, rpb2, and tef1-α) were compared with
those resulting from the ITS, β-tubulin, tef1-α dataset
found to be conflict-free by the PHT. Maximum parsimony analyses of the
four-gene combination resulted in 114 equally parsimonious trees (length =
1713, CI = 0.689, RI = 0.809) for the unweighted analysis and 42 equally
parsimonious trees (length = 2062, CI = 0.689, RI = 0.807) for the weighted
analysis. Fifty percent majority rule consensus trees computed for each
analysis did not differ in the terminal species clades but higher bootstrap
support was obtained for several clades in the weighted analysis. Maximum
parsimony analysis of the three-gene combination composed of ITS,
β-tubulin, and tef-α resulted in eight equally
parsimonious trees (length = 1275, CI = 0.707, RI = 0.817). The tree
topologies obtained by MP analyses of the two alignments did not contradict
each other; however, bootstrap support for several nodes increased in analyses
of the four-gene combination. Therefore, subsequent analyses were performed on
the four-gene combination.The following models were the best estimates for each gene and were applied
during the Bayesian analyses: HKY + I + G for ITS and tef1-α,
SYM + G for rpb2, and HKY + G for β-tubulin. The model
TrN+G was estimated to be the best for the entire alignment by both hLRT and
BIC and those settings were applied to the maximum likelihood analysis: Base =
(0.2245 0.2859 0.2454) Nst = 6 Rmat = (1.0000 3.5234 1.0000 1.0000 5.8336)
Rates = gamma Shape = 0.2849 Pinvar = 0. Bayesian, ML, MP, and weighted
parsimony (WP) analyses of the four-gene alignment all resulted in the same
topology. Maximum likelihood analysis of the concatenated alignment of four
genes resulted in one tree –lnL score of 13921.12887 and is presented as
the inferred phylogeny of Plagiostoma
(Fig. 1). Bayesian PP and MP
bootstraps are shown above and below the branches. This phylogeny of
Plagiostoma supports the recognition of eight new species, which are
described in the taxonomic section of this work. Bayesian PP and MP bootstrap
supports greater than 90 % were obtained for all the species of
Plagiostoma in this multigene phylogeny. Plagiostoma
euphorbiae-verrucosae is not included in the multigene phylogeny as only
the ITS was available for this species. This species was confirmed as
belonging in Plagiostoma by analysis of ITS sequences (tree not
shown).
Evaluation of clades and species
Both Bayesian analysis and MP bootstrapping support a clade containing 11
species that occurs exclusively on hosts of the family Salicaceae.
All of these species occur on the bark of twigs and branches with one species,
Plagiostoma versatile, also occurring in the leaf midvein and
petioles. Within the species on Salicaceae, one clade consists of
four closely related species characterised by having an expanded perithecial
neck: P. apiculatum, P. dilatatum, P. imperceptibile, and P.
pulchellum. These species are distinguished by morphological features
such as perithecium size, ascospore size and length-to-width (l: w) ratio, and
hyphal colour in culture. Plagiostoma imperceptibile is characterised
by having ascospores longer than 18 μm but with a length-width ratio (l: w)
less than five. Plagiostoma pulchellum is characterised by having
ascospores with a l: w greater than five and by producing rosy-coloured hyphae
that become dark green on PDA. Plagiostoma apiculatum and P.
dilatatum are similar to one another but the perithecia and ascospores of
P. dilatatum are larger than those of P. apiculatum. Plagiostoma
convexum with a moderately expanded perithecial neck is highly supported
(> 95 % MP, PP) as basal to these four species.Maximum likelihood phylogenetic tree (ML score = - lnL 13921.12887)
estimated from sequences of the β-tubulin, ITS, rpb2,
and tef1-α genes for 24 species of Plagiostoma and two
species of Apiognomonia. Bayesian posterior probabilities greater
than 80 % are shown above each branch and maximum parsimony bootstrap values
greater than 70 % are shown below branches. Trees for each gene were also
generated; see online Supplementary Information.Plagiostoma ovalisporum and the pathogenic species P.
populinum are closely related and contained within a larger clade
including the five species previously mentioned (100 % MP, PP). The remaining
species of Plagiostoma on Salicaceae form a weakly supported
clade sister to the species on Salicaceae with expanded necks
mentioned above. This clade contains three species having cylindrical, usually
elongated, perithecial necks, and elongated ascospores: P. salicellum, P.
versatile, and P. yunnanense. The remaining member of this
clade, P. oregonense, is characterised by short, expanded perithecial
necks and short ascospores.Bayesian PP and MP bootstrapping also support a clade (83 % MP, 100 % PP)
of eight species with hosts representing a range of woody and herbaceous plant
families. One of the subclades in this group is composed of three species that
grow on Euphorbiaceae: P. amygdalinae, P. euphorbiaceum, and
P. euphorbiae, type species of the genus. Basal to these species is
P. fraxinum on Fraxinus pennsylvanica. A second subclade
contains P. exstocollum and P. samuelsii both on betulaceous
hosts and P. rhododendri on Rhododendron. The rest of the
species included in the tree, namely P. aesculi, P. barriae, P. geranii,
P. petiolophilum, and P. robergeanum, are relatively distant
from one another and the species previously mentioned. Plagiostoma
robergeanum, a species that grows on Staphylea (Staphyleaceae)
in Europe, was basal to the other species of Plagiostoma.Specimens of P. pulchellum were collected in Europe, North America
(USA), and South America (Argentina). This species is recognised as the most
widely distributed species of Plagiostoma included in this study and
is presented here as the first report of Gnomoniaceae for South
America. Plagiostoma yunnanense is the first report of
Plagiostoma for China.
DISCUSSION
Due to the morphological diversity in species of Plagiostoma, as
illustrated in Figs 2,
3,
4,
5,
6, no single morphological
character is unique or diagnostic for this genus. The following morphological
characters differentiate Plagiostoma from other genera of the
Gnomoniaceae as defined by Sogonov et al.
(2008, table 2). Unlike
Gnomonia, species of Plagiostoma have perithecia that often
collapse from the base when dry as illustrated in Sogonov et al.
(2008, fig. 43 B–C). In
Plagiostoma the neck length is short to long about equal or less than
the diameter of perithecia, while in Ophiognomonia the perithecial
neck length is usually very long, often pointed, and 2.5–5 times the
perithecial diameter. Species of Ophiognomonia occur only on leaves
while those of Plagiostoma are found on leaves as well as woody
tissues. Except for P. rhododendri, the ascospores of
Plagiostoma are not broader at the upper part as in
Gnomoniopsis. Ascospores of Plagiostoma are never
cylindrical or femuroid as in Cryptosporella. Species of
Plagiostoma with ellipsoid, aseptate ascospores similar to those of
C. hypodermia do not have a valsoid arrangement of perithecia as do
species of Cryptosporella.
Species of Plagiostoma, except for P. rhododendri, are
not apiosporous, differentiating them from species of Apiognomonia
except A. hystrix, which possesses flattened perithecial necks.
Species of Pleuroceras have elongated ascospores that are quite
distinct from those of Plagiostoma. The type and only species of
Ditopella, D. ditopa, is characterised by having polysporic asci.
Phragmoporthe conformis, a species closely related to Ditopella
ditopa, is characterised by phragmosporic ascospores, a character not
present in Plagiostoma. The perithecia of Amphiporthe
hranicensis, the type species of Amphiporthe, are grouped near
the base of the entostroma and, thus, are different from those found in
Plagiostoma. In addition, Amphiporthe hranicensis produces
perithecia in clusters of up to 20, with perithecial necks protruding as a
group from the host periderm and surrounded by gray stromatic tissue.Perithecial neck characters and ascospore morphology are the most important
characters for differentiating Plagiostoma from other genera in the
Gnomoniaceae. Host identity, geographic locality, and presence or
absence of stroma are secondary characters for the identification of species.
For example, the presence of white stromatic tissues surrounding the emerging
perithecial necks is diagnostic in species such as P. aesculi, P.
salicellum, and P. samuelsii. Within Plagiostoma
perithecial neck shape ranges from very short, cylindrical to expanded and
thick or thin, cylindrical and elongated with various shapes in the opening
area, e.g. conic, flared, or rounded. In one species, P.
versatile, the perithecial neck can be both very short when on twigs or
elongated when on a leaf midvein suggesting that this structure varies with
substrate. Four species, P. apiculatum, P. convexum, P. dilatatum,
and P. imperceptibile, are characterised by having an apically
expanded perithecial neck. The expanded neck was noticed by Wallroth (1833, as
coronatum dilatatis) and Butin
(1958, as cushion- or pad-like
structure) but neither of these authors used this character to differentiate
species. This structure may be involved in rupture of host periderm and
release of the ascospores.The asci of Plagiostoma are clavate, obclavate, ovoidal,
cylindrical, or cylindric-fusoid, generally with a short stalk but with a long
stalk in P. imperceptibile. Ascospores of Plagiostoma are
ellipsoid, ellipsoid-fusoid, oblong-ellipsoid, or ovoid usually with one
median septum, although three species, P. euphorbiae-verrucosae, P.
fraxini, and P. ovalisporum, have non-septate ascospores and one
species, P. rhododendri, is apiosporous. Ascospores vary in size from
short, 7.7–13.8 × 2.2–6.6 μm in P. fraxini, to
relatively long, 18–27 × 3–4 μm in P. versatile
and P. yunnanense. Most species lack appendages although P.
salicellum has short, thick, evanescent appendages and P.
devexum and P. samuelsii may have long, thin appendages.
Morphological characters that are phylogenetically informative for subclades
of Plagiostoma include the expanded neck characteristic of species
with broadly ellipsoid ascospores versus the cylindrical neck characteristic
of species with narrowly ellipsoidal ascospores.In traditional classification schemes of the Diaporthales,
Cryptodiaporthe and Plagiostoma were considered distinct and not
closely related genera, each with a specific morphology and arrangement of
perithecia (Barr 1978,
Kobayashi 1970,
Monod 1983). Species of
Plagiostoma were characterised by the lack of a stroma and production
of a single perithecium, primarily on leaves. Species of
Cryptodiaporthe were characterised by production of a rudimentary
stroma and grouped perithecia, primarily in the bark of their host branches.
The differences between Cryptodiaporthe and Plagiostoma have
been emphasised such that some authors placed them in different families or
subfamilies (Barr 1978,
Wehmeyer 1975).Monod's (1983) concept of
Plagiostoma differed significantly from the concept presented here.
Of the 13 species treated by Monod
(1983) as
Plagiostoma, only Plagiostoma devexum is accepted here in
that genus. Of the 13 species of Plagiostoma accepted by Sogonov
et al. (2008), only
P. euphorbiae and P. devexum were originally described as
Plagiostoma with Plagiostoma barriae newly described in that
work. Plagiostoma aesculi and P. salicellum were previously
regarded by Wehmeyer (1933) as
Cryptodiaporthe. Four additional species of Cryptodiaporthe
are here formally combined in Plagiostoma, namely P. apiculatum,
P. convexum, P. populinum, and P. pulchellum. The recognition of
these four species formerly classified as Cryptodiaporthe salicina
broadens the range of morphological and ecological traits of the genus
Plagiostoma. The pathogenic species, P. apiculatum, P.
fraxini, and P. populinum, contrasts with the concept of
Plagiostoma as primarily saprobic.The economically important species of Plagiostoma are pathogens
that cause cankers on willows and poplars. Plagiostoma apiculatum
(synonym Cryptodiaporthe salicella) is here determined to be the
correct name for the fungus causing a canker disease of willow
(Sinclair & Lyon 2005).
This species, referred to by the anamorph Diplodina microsperma, has
been reported as the most abundant endophyte in healthy twigs of Salix
fragilis in England (Petrini &
Fisher 1990) and is thus an important component of the host
microbiota. Similarly, the closely related species P. dilatatum, P.
imperceptibile, and P. pulchellum form a black halo or spot on
the host surface, a feature that may be associated with the early stages of
canker development. Whether or not these species are primarily pathogenic or
establish an asymptomatic infection that later develops into cankers needs to
be determined. These species form a highly supported monophyletic group
(Fig. 1) characterised by
having an expanded perithecial neck and broad ellipsoid to renoid ascospores.
This group of species is part of a larger, highly supported clade that also
includes P. convexum, P. ovalisporum, and P. populinum
(synonym Cryptodiaporthe populea), the pathogen causing a canker of
poplars. Plagiostoma fraxini causes anthracnose on ash (Fraxinus
pennsylvanica) and fringetree (Chionanthus retusis)
(Gregory ,
Sinclair & Lyon 2005), and
is sister to the clade containing three species on Euphorbiaceae.Species of Plagiostoma occur on a broad range of host plant
families within the Eudicots, although most species are associated with
Rosids. This study shows an association between a clade composed of 11 species
of Plagiostoma and the host family Salicaceae
(Fig. 1) especially on the
genus Salix. Most of the species of Plagiostoma on
Salix have expanded necks. These findings agree with those for other
genera within the Gnomoniaceae that are associated primarily with
specific host genera in the Betulaceae such as
Cryptosporella on Alnus and Betula
(Mejía ) and Gnomonia on the Coryloideae
(Sogonov ).
TAXONOMY
KEY TO SPECIES OF PLAGIOSTOMA
1. Ascospores
non-septate............................................................................................................................................................................
2
1'. Ascospores
1-septate................................................................................................................................................................................
42. Ascospores ovoid, (12–)14–16(–17) ×
7–8(–9) μm. On twigs of Salix sp., in North America
(USA: ID).............................. P. ovalisporum
2'.
Ascospores ellipsoid-fusoid. Not on Salix, in Europe and North
America.................................................................................................
33. Ascospores 20–25.5 × 5.3–6 μm fide Monod
(1983), with pointed ends. On
Euphorbia, in Europe.................. P.
euphorbiae-verrucosae
3'. Ascospores
(7.7–)8.6–12.7(–13.8) × (2.2)2.8–5.9(–6.6)
μm fide Redlin & Stack
(1988). On
Chionanthus and Fraxinus (Oleaceae), in Canada and
USA.......................................................................................................................................................................
P. fraxini4. On
Salicaceae...........................................................................................................................................................................................
5
4'. On hosts other than the
Salicaceae........................................................................................................................................................
145. Perithecia neck cylindric. On woody substrates except P.
versatile, which occurs on both leafy and woody
substrates.......................... 6
5'. Perithecial neck dilated
i.e. with an expanded or thickened area that appears disk-like when
seen from above, like a thick collar in section, usually appearing with a
black halo or black spot in host surface where perithecial necks protrude. On
woody substrates..... 106. Perithecial neck surrounded by a whitish stroma. On Salix, in
Europe...................................................................................
P. salicellum
6'. Perithecial neck without a whitish stroma. On
Salix or Populus, in Europe and
elsewhere......................................................................
77. On twigs and branches of Populus, in Europe and North America
(USA). Ascospores 14–16 × 6–9 μm fide Butin
(1958).................................................................................................................................................................................................
P. populinum
7'. On twigs and branches of Salix, in
China, Europe, and North America. Ascospores greater than 16 μm
long........................................ 88. Ascospores ellipsoid-fusoid, constricted, curved, tapering to acute
ends, (16–)18–20 (–22) × 4–5 μm. In Europe
and North America (USA:
NY)................................................................................................................................................................................
P. convexum
8'. Ascospores ellipsoid-elongated, slightly
constricted, straight to slightly curved, rounded ends, generally longer than
20 μm. In China or North
America.........................................................................................................................................................................
99. Perithecial neck slightly twisted in upper half, of constant length.
Ascospores (19–)23–26(–27) × 3–4 μm. On
Salix sp., in China
(Yunnan)................................................................................................................................................................
P. yunnanense
9'. Perithecial neck straight, of variable length,
very short in twigs, longer in leaves. Ascospores
(18–)20–23(–25) × 3–4 μm. On Salix
spp., in North America (Pacific Northwest
region).......................................................................................................
P. versatile10. Ascospores ellipsoid to broadly ellipsoid, constricted, tapering to
narrowly rounded ends, (16–)17–19(–22) ×
(4–)6(–7) μm. On Salix, in North America (USA:
OR).................................................................................................................................
P. oregonense
10'. Ascospores oblong-ellipsoid to renoid, not or
slightly constricted, rounded ends, size different than above. On
Populus and Salix, in North America and
elsewhere.............................................................................................................................................................
1111. Ascospores usually straight, sometimes slightly curved, l: w > 5,
(17–)18–22(–27) × (5–)6–7(–7.5)
μm. On Populus and Salix, in Europe, North and South
America
(Argentina)...................................................................................................................
P. pulchellum
11'. Ascospores slightly curved, l: w < 5. On
Salix spp., in Europe and North
America................................................................................
1212. Asci ovoid elongated, with long, usually persistent stalk. Ascospores
(18–)19–20(–21) × (5–)6–7(–8) μm,
l: w (2.5–)2.9–3.1(–3.8). On Salix sp., in North
America (USA:
CA).........................................................................................................................
P. imperceptibile
12'. Asci cylindric, often with long but not
persistent stalk. Ascospores averaging < 18 μm long. In Europe and North
America.................. 1313. Ascospores (12–)13–15(–22) ×
4–5(–7) μm, mean = 15 × 5 μm, l: w
(2.6–)3.0–3.3(–3.8). On Salix, in Europe
(France)..... P. dilatatum
13'. Ascospores
(12–)16–18.5(–21) × (3–)5–6(–7)
μm, mean = 17 × 6 μm, l: w (2.4–)2.9–3.2(–4.0).
On Salix, in Europe and North
America.........................................................................................................................................................................
P. apiculatum14. On hosts in the
Euphorbiaceae...............................................................................................................................................................
15
14'. On hosts other than
Euphorbiaceae........................................................................................................................................................
1715. On leaves of Euphorbiaceae, specifically Euphorbia
amygdaloides and E. stepposa. Ascospores 13–15.5 ×
2.3–3 μm fide Monod
(1983 as Gnomonia
amygdalinae), with a thin appendage at each
end.............................................................................
P. amygdalinae
15'. On twigs, branches, or stems of the
Euphorbiaceae. Ascospores without
appendages.........................................................................
1616. Perithecial neck less than 100 μm. Ascospores
(12–)13–13.5(–15.5) × (3–)3.5(–4) μm
fide Sogonov et al.
(2008)............ P.
euphorbiae
16'. Perithecial neck 100–150 μm. Ascospores
14–17.5 × 3.5–4.5 μm fide Monod
(1983 as Gnomonia
euphorbiacea)..... P. euphorbiaceum17. On
Acer...................................................................................................................................................................................................
18
17'. On hosts other than
Acer........................................................................................................................................................................
1918. On leaves, twigs, and branches of Acer spp., in the Pacific
Northwest region of USA. Ascospores (11.5–)14–15.5(–17.5)
× (2.5–)3.5–4(–4.5) μm fide Sogonov et
al.
(2008)..............................................................
P. barriae
18'. On leaves, twigs, and branches of Acer
saccharum and A. spicatum, in eastern USA and Canada. Ascospores
7–12 × 1–2.5 μm fide Barr
(1978)..................................................................................................................................................................
P. petiolophilum19. Ascospores with thin, deliquescent
appendages....................................................................................................................................
20
19'. Ascospores without
appendages............................................................................................................................................................
2120. Necks eccentric, stout, cone-shaped, surrounded by a whitish stroma.
Ascospores (10–)11–12(–19) × 3–4 μm. On
Alnus spp., in the Pacific Northwest region of
USA............................................................................................................
P. samuelsii
20'. Necks marginal, cylindrical, without whitish
stroma. Ascospores 8–10 × 2–3 μm fide Monod
(1983). On Persicaria
and Polygonum, rarely on Rumex and Vitis, in Europe
and USA
(NY)...............................................................................................................
P. devexum21. Ascospore upper cell rounded, basal cell short-conic, 13–16
× 4–5 μm/12–16 × 5–7 μm fide
Monod 1983 &
Remler 1979 as
Apiognomonia rhododendri. In pedicels and branches of
Rhododendron spp., in
Europe.................................................. P.
rhododendri
21'. Ascospores not as
above........................................................................................................................................................................
2222. In dead stems of herbaceous plants, specifically Geranium
spp., in Europe. Ascospores 13–18 × 1.8–2.5 μm
fide Monod
(1983)........................................................................................................................................................................
P. geranii
22'. In twigs and branches of woody plants, in Europe
or North
America......................................................................................................
2323. Perithecia in groups, with necks closely appressed as a mass emerging
together or in a row, surrounded by a white stroma. On Aesculus
hippocastanum, in
Europe......................................................................................................................................
P. aesculi
23'. Perithecia in groups or solitary, with necks
emerging together or not, surrounded or not by a brownish stroma. On hosts
other than Aesculus hippocastanum, in Europe or North
America..........................................................................................
2424. Stroma brownish, covering perithecia but not surrounding necks.
Perithecia arranged in groups, with necks emerging together but oriented in
different directions where they protrude through host epidermis. On
Corylus californica, in the Pacific Northwest region of
USA......................................................................................................................................................................................
P. exstocollum
24'. Stroma absent. Perithecia solitary or in
groups with convergent, protruding necks. On Staphylea, in
Europe.................. P. robergeanum
DESCRIPTIONS
Fuckel, Jahrb. Nassauischen Vereins Naturk.
23–24: 118. 1870.Lectotype designated by Höhnel
(1917): Plagiostoma
euphorbiae (Fuckel) Fuckel, Jahrb. Nassauischen Vereins Naturk.
23–24: 118. 1870.= Cryptodiaporthe Petr., Ann. Mycol. 19: 118. 1921. Lectotype
designated by Clements and Shear
(1931): Cryptodiaporthe
aesculi (Fuckel) Petr., now Plagiostoma aesculi (Fuckel)
Sogonov, Stud. Mycol. 62: 69. 2008.= Rostrocoronophora Munk, Dansk Bot. Arkiv 15: 98. 1953. Type:
R. geranii (Hollós) Munk, now Plagiostoma geranii
(Hollós) Sogonov, Stud. Mycol. 62: 72. 2008.Anamorph: Diplodina Westend., Bull. Acad. Roy. Sci.
Belgique, sér. 2, 2: 562. 1857.Anamorph type species: Diplodina salicis Westend.,
Bull. Acad. R. Sci. Belg., Cl. Sci., sér. 2 12(7)
(1857), now recognised as Diplodina microsperma (Johnst.) B. Sutton,
Mycol. Pap. 141: 69. 1977 fide Sutton
(1980).Perithecia produced in dead, fallen or still attached host organs,
immersed in bark of stems, branches, and twigs, in midvein or petiole of
leaves (P. fraxini on leaf lamina), on stalks of herbaceous plants,
and on peduncles (P. rhododendri). Most species initially appearing
as conic-shaped or rounded elevations, usually 0.2–0.5 mm high ×
1–2 mm diam, produced where a single perithecium or group of perithecia
push up host surface from below. Perithecial necks protrude through epidermis
or periderm making a small hole or slit, with perithecia partially or
completely exposed by peeling host periderm. In bark, perithecia arranged in
groups or solitary, scattered, numerous; in leaves, perithecia discrete, but
growing close together. Stroma scanty, flocculose, gray, brownish,
cream, yellowish white, or whitish. Perithecia black, globose,
slightly flattened or suboblate, usually collapsed from base when dry, with or
without stromatic tissue surrounding neck. Neck central to marginal,
mostly cylindrical, also flattened, short and stout, upright, straight or
contorted, or slanted and straight; 30–150 μm diam not including
expanded area, with or without a disk-like expansion, up to 450 μm diam;
apex rounded, acute, flared, cupulate, papillate, or conic, black, brown,
yellow or hyaline, with or without furrows. Asci clavate, obclavate,
ovoidal to cylindrical and cylindric-fusoid, usually with a short stalk, with
a long stalk in P. imperceptibile, with a conspicuous apical ring
that may appear single and thick or as two refractive bodies, eight ascospores
arranged obliquely parallel, biseriate, multiseriate, or twisted.
Ascospores ellipsoid, ellipsoid-fusoid, oblong-ellipsoid, ovoid,
hyaline, non- or 1-septate, constricted or not at median to submedian septum,
apiosporous in P. rhododendri, often with four or more rounded
guttules, or appearing granulated, with or without an appendage at each end.
Cultures of Plagiostoma generally grow moderately (4 cm) to fast
(5–6 cm) diam after 7 d on PDA, velvety, granular, with concentric halo,
with scant aerial mycelium, translucent, white, pale to very dark gray, hazel,
dark green, olive or with various dark yellow to orange pigmentation, margins
fringed, stringed, or root-like.
Species of Plagiostoma
(Fuckel) Sogonov, Stud. Mycol. 62: 69.
2008.
Basionym: Cryptospora aesculi Fuckel, Jahrb.
Nassauischen Vereins Naturk. 23–24: 193. 1870.≡ Cryptosporella aesculi (Fuckel) Sacc., Michelia 1: 30.
1877.[≡ Diaporthe aesculi (Fuckel) Höhn., Ann. Mycol. 16:
116. 1918, nom. illeg. non Cooke & Harkn. 1881]≡ Cryptodiaporthe aesculi (Fuckel) Petr., Ann. Mycol.
19:119. 1921.Note: Sogonov et al.
(2008) provided a description
and illustrations of this species. Cultures are illustrated here in
Fig. 7A–B.
Fig. 7.
Culture morphology. A–B. Plagiostoma aesculi.
CBS 126127 =
LCM447.01. C–F. P. apiculatum. C–D. LCM 393.01.
E–F. CBS
126126 = LCM436.01. G–H. P. barriae. LCM 601.02.
I–L. P. dilatatum. I–J. LCM 402.01. K–L. LCM
403.01. M–P. P. exstocollum. M–N. LCM 422.02. O–P.
LCM 468.02. Q–R. P. imperceptibile. LCM 456.01. S–T.
P. oregonense. Ex-type
CBS 126124 = LCM
597.01. U–V. P. ovalisporum.LCM 458.05. W–X. P.
petiolophilum. CBS
126123 = LCM 181.01. A–D, I–L, W–X. Colony
habit, 10 d, 23 °C. E–H, M–R, U–V. Colony habit, 9 d, 23
°C. S–T. Colony habit, 7 d, 23 °C. A, C, E, G, I, K, M, O, Q, S,
U, W. Reverse. B, D, F, H, J, L, N, P, R, T, V, X. Surface.
Specimen examined: Germany, Langen, on branches of Aesculus
hippocastaneum, L.C. Mejía, BPI 878950, culture LCM 447.01 =
CBS 126127.(Fuckel) Sogonov, Stud. Mycol. 62:
70. 2008.
Basionym: Gnomonia amygdalinae Fuckel, Jahrb.
Nassauischen Vereins Naturk. 23–24: 121. 1870.≡ Gnomoniella amygdalinae (Fuckel) Sacc., Syll. Fung. 1:
418. 1882.= Gnomoniella amygdalinae f. euphorbiae-stepposae Sandu,
Stud. Cercet. Biol., Bot. 18: 18. 1966 fide Monod
(1983).Note: Monod (1983)
provided a detailed description of this species as Gnomonia
amygdalinae. Although ITS sequences of P. amygdalinae (Monod 207
= CBS 791.79) and
P. euphorbiaceum (MS196 =
CBS 121241, Monod
465 = CBS 816.79)
suggest that these taxa are the same, the multigene phylogeny obtained here
reveals that P. amygdalinae and P. euphorbiaceum are
distinct species. Plagiostoma amygdalinae occurs on leaves and has a
longer and thinner perithecial neck, shorter asci, thinner apical ring, and
ascospores not constricted at septum and thinner than P.
euphorbiaceum that occurs on twigs, stems, and branches (also see
Monod 1983).(Wallr.) L.C. Mejía, comb.
nov. MycoBank
MB515689. Figs
2A–J,
7C–F
Basionym:
Sphaeria apiculata Wallr., Fl. Crypt. Germ. 2: 778. 1833.≡ Metasphaeria apiculata (Wallr.) Sacc., Syll. Fung. 2: 166.
1883.≡ Gnomonia apiculata (Wallr.) G. Winter, Rabenh., Kryptog.-
Fl., ed. 2, vol. 1(2): 589. 1887.≡ Diaporthe spina Fuckel var. apiculata (Wallr.)
Rehm, Ann. Mycol. 7: 404. 1909.≡ Cryptodiaporthe apiculata (Wallr.) Petr., Ann. Mycol. 19:
177. 1921.Anamorph: Diplodina microsperma (Johnst.) B. Sutton,
Mycol. Pap. 141: 69. 1977.Perithecia immersed in bark, solitary, scattered, appearing
initially as slight punctiform elevations of periderm surrounded by a black
halo with tip of neck protruding through slit, usually with three short
radiating slits, halo paler in some collections, later becoming completely
black, globose, (223–)252–364(–440) μm high ×
(349–)370–476(–477) μm diam (mean = 314 × 429
μm, SD 59, 77, n = 8), each with one neck. Neck central to
eccentric, straight to oblique, with a pale brown papilla, with an expanded
area that appears disk-like, sometimes evident only as a thick neck, initially
below epidermis, becoming exposed, producing a black halo at surface,
(115–)159–256(–351) μm long (mean = 208, SD 78, n = 8),
expanded area (187–)224–340(–389) μm diam (mean = 284, SD
74, n = 8), (62.5–)81–128(–134) μm diam at apex (mean =
104, SD 29, n = 7). Asci cylindrical,
(45–)51–80(–86) × 10–16(–18) μm (mean =
68 × 13, SD 15, 4, n = 19), apical ring 2.5–5.0 μm diam,
variable in shape e.g. elongated as two bodies or hexagonal, with
eight ascospores arranged biseriate to multiseriate. Ascospores
oblong-ellipsoid, slightly tapering to rounded ends, straight to slightly
curved, one median to submedian septum, not constricted,
(12–)16–18.5(–21) × (3–)5–6(–7)
μm (mean = 16.5 × 5.5, SD 2.5, 1.0, n = 106), l: w
(2.4–)2.9–3.2(–4) (mean = 3.0, SD 0.3, n = 106), with
granular cytoplasm.Morphology on natural substrate. A–J: Plagiostoma
apiculatum: A,B,I,J = BPI 799002 (lectotype), C–G = BPI 747938
(epitype), H = BPI 878952. K–R. P. convexum: K–M = BPI
799418 (lectotype), L–R = BPI 843490 (epitype). Bars = (A, K) 1 mm;
(B–F, L, O–Q) 100 μm; (G–J, M–N, R) 10 μm.Cultures: Moderate to fast growth on PDA after 7 d a.c.d. 5 cm (SD
0.4, n = 4), thin aerial mycelium of velvety granular texture, central area
vinaceous buff 45, with scattered black mycelial clumps of 0.5 mm diam in
central area, margin white, stringy; reverse similar but slightly darker.Habitat and host: On dead twigs and branches of Salix
spp., Salix alba, S. alba subsp. vitellina, S. dasyclados,
and S. sitchensis (Salicaceae).Distribution: Europe and North America.Lectotype of Sphaeria apiculata designated here: BPI 799092,
labelled Sphaeria apiculata Wallr., ex. Herb. Strasbourg.Epitype of Sphaeria apiculata designated here:Austria,
Vienna, 21st district, Marchfeldkanalweg, MTB 7764/1, on
Salix sp., 20 May 2000, W. Jaklitsch 1463, BPI 747938, derived
culture CBS 109775
= AR3455.Exsiccatus examined: Fungi Rhenani 918, as Sphaeria
apiculata, from Salix vitellina, BPI bound.Additional specimens examined: Austria, Vienna, St.
Margareten im Rosental, Kaernten, Drau-Auen, 9452/1, on Salix alba, 2
May 2002, W. Jaklitsch 1890, BPI 843511, derived culture AR 3826; St.
Margareten im Rosental, Drau-Auen, Kaernten. 9452/2, on Salix alba,
14 Apr. 2001, W. Jaklitsch 1741, BPI 872037. France, Deux-Sèvres
Département, Melle, Melle Arboretum, 15 Apr. 2008, on twigs of
Salix dasyclados, L.C. Mejía 393, BPI 878951, derived cultures
L.C. Mejía 393.01 and
CBS 124974 =
LCM393.03. USA, Washington, Kitsap County, Kitsap Memorial State Park,
on twigs of Salix sitchensis, 28 May 2008, L.C. Mejía 436, BPI
878952, derived culture CBS
126126 = LCM436.01.Notes: The specimen designated here as lectotype is part of the
collection of Sphaeria apiculata referred to in the protologue. It
agrees with Wallroth's description of S. apiculata. Fuckel
(1870) recircumscribed
Sphaeria apiculata Wallr. based on Fungi Rhenani 918. The original
Latin description of Sphaeria apiculata includes morphological
characters of the perithecia such as an apiculate papilla, i.e.
“coronatum dilatatis”, here interpreted as the
disk-shaped expansion of the perithecial neck, and “nucleo
atro” at the apex. These morphological characters are present in
the type specimen BPI 799092 of S. apiculata designated here as the
lectotype. The protologue of S. apiculata by Wallroth (1833) does not
include a description of the ascospores, however, the fungus on this specimen
contains broadly ellipsoid ascospores. This specimen and thus Plagiostoma
apiculatum is distinctive and differs from Plagiostoma
salicellum as discussed under that species.The concept of the name Sphaeria apiculata has been confused. The
following is an account of this species and its various synonyms based on the
results of our study of the original description, type specimens, and relevant
later specimens. Höhnel
(1917), Petrak
(1921), and later authors
considered Sphaeria apiculata to have narrowly elongated ascospores
while Wehmeyer (1933)
recognised this species as having broadly ellipsoid ascospores and considered
Cryptodiaporthe salicina to be a synonym. Höhnel
(1917) examined specimens made
by Rehm, Krieger, and his own of Diaporthe spina and considered this
name to be a synonym of Sphaeria apiculata. He acknowledged
differences in perithecial neck length among collections of these two species.
To determine the synonymy of these two species we compared the original
description of D. spina with the original description of S.
apiculata by Wallroth (1833) as well as the recircumscription by Fuckel
(1870). In his original
description of D. spina Fuckel
(1870) provided a drawing that
is quite unlike the original description of S. apiculata. Based on
the comparison of descriptions and the specimens observed, we do not consider
S. apiculata and D. spina to be synonyms. The synonymy of
these two species proposed by Höhnel
(1917) and accepted by
Petrak's (1921) who provided a
description of Cryptodiaporthe apiculata (≡ Sphaeria
apiculata) may be the reason that later authors considered S.
apiculata to be characterised by narrow, elongated ascospores as
described and observed for D. spina.Sogonov, Stud. Mycol. 62: 69. 2008.Note: Sogonov et al.
(2008) provided a description
and illustrations of this species. Cultures of isolates used in this study are
illustrated in Fig. 7G–H.
Originally described from the state of Washington (USA), this species is here
reported from Oregon.Specimens examined: USA, Oregon, on Acer sp., coll. L.C.
Mejía LCM 484.01, BPI 878953, derived culture
CBS 126125 = LCM
484.01; Washington, on Acer macrophyllum, L.C. Mejía 601, BPI
87895, derived culture LCM 601.01.(Preuss) L.C. Mejía, comb.
nov. MycoBank
MB515690.
Fig.
2K–R.
Basionym: Sphaeria convexa
Preuss, Linnea 26: 714. 1853.≡ Diaporthe convexa (Preuss) Sacc., Syll. Fung. 1: 630.
1882.= Cryptodiaporthe salicina Wehm. as (Curr.) Wehm., The Genus
Diaporthe Nitschke and its Segregates p. 194. 1933.[≡ Sphaeria salicina Curr., Trans. Linn. Soc. Lond., 22:
279, 1858 non Sphaeria salicina Pers., 1796]≡ Diaporthe punctata (Cooke) Berl. & Voglino,
Syll. Fung., Add. 108. 1886.Perithecia immersed in bark, solitary or in groups of up to four,
appearing initially as slight conic elevation of periderm with apex protruding
through a small hole, black, globose, (180–)213–258(–326)
μm high × (282–)303–352(–415) μm diam (mean =
238 × 329, SD 38, 44, n = 13), each with one neck. Neck central
to eccentric, cylindrical, thick, usually thicker toward apex, some thicker
elsewhere on neck, upright, diagonally straight, or curved, closely appressed
when in groups, (82–)161–204(–222) μm long (mean = 176,
SD 36, n = 13), (71–)82–104(–121) μm diam at base (mean =
95, SD 16, n = 13), (64–)78–108(–128) μm diam at apex
(mean = 93, SD 21, n = 13), apex usually paler. Asci clavate,
(54–)60–63(–69) × (14–)15–18(–20)
μm (mean = 61 × 17, SD 4.5, 2.2, n = 8) apical ring 3.0–4.0
μm diam, with eight ascospores arranged obliquely parallel to multiseriate.
Ascospores ellipsoid-fusoid, tapering toward rounded ends, curved or
straight, one median to submedian septum, constricted,
(16–)18–20(–22) × 4–5 μm (mean = 18.5 ×
4.5, SD 1.0, 0.4, n = 51), l: w (3.2–)3.9–4.5(–4.9) (mean =
4.2, SD 0.4, n = 51), with four refractive bodies of various shapes, often
globose.Habitat and host: On twigs of Salix spp.Distribution: Germany, USA (New York).Lectotype specimen of Sphaeria convexa designated here:
Sphaeria convexa Preuss, without other data, ex. Herb. Brussels in
Shear study collection types and rarities, BPI 799418.Epitype specimen of Sphaeria convexa designated here: USA,
New York, Tompkins Co., near Ithaca, Arnot Forest, on Salix sp., 12
Jul 2002, L. Vasilyeva, BPI 843490, derived culture
CBS 123206.Notes: Plagiostoma convexum as Sphaeria convexa
was considered a synonym of Cryptodiaporthe salicina by Wehmeyer
(1933). Plagiostoma
convexum has ascospores that agree with those drawn by Wehmeyer
(1933 as C. salicina,
plate XIII, figs 3–5). In his description of S. salicina,
Currey (1858) mentions that the
septum in the sporidia (ascospores) is “often very difficult to make
out”, but the ascospores in his drawing have a septum. The rest of his
description agrees with the description of S. convexa. It also agrees
with the lectotype specimen of S. convexa, BPI 799418 ex. Herb.
Brussels with a note on the label saying apparently from Preuss). This
evidence suggests that S. salicina Curr. 1858 and S. convexa
Preuss 1852 represent the same species. Because S. salicina Curr. is
a later homonym of Sphaeria salicina Pers. 1796, this basionym cannot
be used and the next available epithet is S. convexa; hence the
correct name for this taxon is Plagiostoma convexum. The specimen BPI
799418 is here designated the lectotype and the specimen BPI 843490 with the
ex-epitype culture CBS
123206 is designated the epitype of Sphaeria convexa.Wehmeyer (1933) listed 28
synonyms of Cryptodiaporthe salicina. Among specimens that Wehmeyer
(1933) recognised under that
name, Butin (1958) elaborated
differences in ascospore morphology, conidial state, host, and ecological
characteristics and distinguished three species: C. apiculata
(Wallr.) Petr., C. populea (Sacc.) Butin, and C. pulchella
(Sacc.) Butin, here accepted as Plagiostoma apiculatum, P. populinum,
and P. pulchellum. Butin
(1958) did not consider any of
these species to be conspecific with Sphaeria salicina Curr. On the
contrary he listed Cryptodiaporthe salicina based on Sphaeria
salicina Curr. as a synonym of Cryptodiaporthe salicella, here
recognised as Plagiostoma salicellum. Although Wehmeyer
(1933) listed Sphaeria
sphingiophora Oudem. 1873 [≡ Diaporthe sphingiophora
(Oudem.) Sacc.] as a synonym of C. salicella, S. sphingiophora occurs
on Cornus. It is unlikely to be the same species as P. convexum.
Diaporthe cupulata Berl. & Destrée was considered a synonym of
Sphaeria convexa by Wehmeyer
(1933), however, the ascospore
sizes of these species are different. We do not consider them to be
synonymous. The specimen at BPI of Sphaeria salicina Pers.,
Scleromyceti Sueciae 10, was examined and determined to be a species of
Valsa.(Desm.) Fuckel, Jahrb. Nassauischen
Vereins Naturk. 23–24: 119. 1870.
Basionym: Sphaeria
devexa Desm., Pl. Cryptog. Nord. de France, Edit. II, Ser. II, No. 367.
1856.≡ Gnomonia devexa (Desm.) Auersw. in Gonn. & Rabenh.,
Mycol. Europ. 5/6: 23. 1869.≡ Gnomoniella devexa (Desm.) Sacc., Syll. Fung. 1: 417.
1881.≡ Gnomoniopsis devexa (Desm.) Moesz & Smarods,
Bot. Közlem. 38: 68. 1941.= Sphaeria excentrica Cooke & Peck, Annual Rep. New York State
Mus. 25: 105. 1873 fide Monod
(1983).≡ Gnomoniella excentrica (Cooke & Peck) Sacc., Syll.
Fung. 1: 418. 1882.= Diaporthe sechalinensis Sacc., Atti Del Congr. Bot. Di Palermo
1902: 52. 1902 fide Monod
(1983).= Ceriosporella polygoni A. L. Sm. & Ramsb., Trans. Brit.
Mycol. Soc. 4: 325. 1914 fide Monod
(1983).Note: Barr (1978)
and Monod (1983) provided
detailed descriptions of this species.L.C. Mejía, sp. nov.
MycoBank MB515700.
Figs 3A–D,
7I–L.Etymology: dilatatum - dilate; referring to the dilated
or expanded area of the perithecial neck that appears disk-like when seen from
above, and like a thick collar in section.Perithecia globosa, (277–)320–442(–502) μm elata,
(382–)475–572(–642) μm diametro; rostrum breve, apice
punctatum, (152–)257–308(–327) μm longum, cum expansa
area disciformi vertice visu, simili collo in sectione,
(217–)352–401(–452) μm diametro ubi latissima,
(92–)95–108(–122) μm diametro apice. Ascosporae
reniformes vel oblongo-ellipticae, uni-septatae, constrictae ubi medianae vel
submedianae septatae, (12–)13–15(–22) ×
(4–)4–5(–7) μm, L:l
(2.6–)3.0–3.3(–3.8).Perithecia immersed in bark, solitary or aggregated, appearing
initially as slight elevation of periderm surrounded by a black halo, later
developing into a black circular spot, apex protruding through a tiny slit,
globose, (277–)320–442(–502) μm high ×
(382–)475–572(–642) μm diam (mean = 383 × 515, SD
78, 79, n1 = 11, n2 = 10), each with one neck. Neck central to
eccentric, relatively short, with punctate ostiolar opening, expanded,
initially below epidermis, appearing disk-like when seen from above, like a
thick collar in section, becoming exposed, with black halo or circular area
below epidermis, when epidermis removed, exposing expanded neck and apex,
sometimes two necks joined at expanded area; sometimes black mycelium of
developing conidioma above perithecia; neck
(152–)257–308(–327) μm long (mean = 263, SD 61, n = 10),
(217–) 352–401(–452) μm diam at base (mean = 367, SD 67,
n = 10), (92–)95–108(–122) μm diam at apex (mean = 103,
SD 10, n = 9). Asci cylindric, (48–)54–62(–77)
× (8–)12–14(–18) μm (mean = 58 × 13, SD 7.2,
2.5, n = 15), long stalked, apical ring 2.1–4.3 μm diam, appearing
rectangular, with eight ascospores arranged obliquely parallel to
multiseriate. Ascospores renoid to oblong-ellipsoid, slightly
tapering to rounded ends, slightly curved, one, median to submedian septum,
slightly constricted, (12–)13–15(–22) ×
4–5(–7) μm (mean = 15 × 5, SD 2.5, 1.0, n = 48), l: w
(2.6–)3.0–3.3(–3.8) (mean = 3.2, SD 0.3, n = 48), with
granular cytoplasm.Cultures: Moderate to fast growth on PDA after 7 d a.c.d. 5.2 cm
(SD 0.2, n = 8), thin aerial mycelium of velvety to granular texture, whitish
to vinaceous buff 86, becoming olivaceous 48 toward margin; fasiculate
mycelium buff 45 developing from concave central area; reverse same; 7 d
a.c.d. denser mycelium hazel 88 in centre, with vinaceous 86, black droplets
on surface, with immersed mycelium dark, reverse dark, with a lighter halo and
whitish to translucent margin.Habitat and host: On dead, still attached twigs of Salix
caprea and S. irrorata (Salicaceae).Distribution: France (Melle).Holotype: France, Deux-Sèvres Département,
Melle, Melle Arboretum, on Salix irrorata, 15 Apr 2008, L.C.
Mejía 402, BPI 878959, derived cultures
CBS 124976 = LCM
402.02, = LCM402.01.Additional specimens examined: France, Deux-Sèvres
Département, Foret del' Hermitain, on Salix caprea, 17 Apr.
2008, L.C. Mejía 403, BPI 878958, derived cultures LCM403.01,
LCM403.02.Notes: The intricate mycelium that develops above the body of the
perithecia in some pustules resembles the conidioma of Diplodina, the
anamorph of Plagiostoma.Morphology on natural substrate. A–D: Plagiostoma dilatatum:
A–C = BPI 878959 (holotype), D = BPI 878958. E–H: P.
exstocollum: E–G = BPI 878961 (holotype), H = BPI 878964.
I–M: P. imperceptibileBPI 878967 (holotype). Bars = (A, E, I)
1mm; (M) 200 μm; (B, F, H, J) 100 μm; (C–D) 20 μm; (G,
K–L) 10 μm.(Fuckel) Fuckel, Jahrb. Nassauischen
Vereins Naturk. 23–24: 118. 1870.
Basionym: Sphaeria
euphorbiae Fuckel, Enumeratio Fung. Nassoviae p. 69. 1860.≡ Gnomonia euphorbiae (Fuckel) Sacc., Michelia 2: 312.
1881.≡ Gnomoniella euphorbiae (Fuckel) Sacc., Syll. Fung. 1: 418.
1882.= Gnomoniella tithymalina Sacc. & Briard, Rev. Mycol.
(Toulouse) 7: 209. 1885 fide Monod
(1983).Note: This species was fully described and illustrated by
Fröhlich & Hyde
(1995) and Sogonov et
al. (2008).(Sacc. & Briard) Sogonov,
Stud. Mycol. 62: 72. 2008.
Basionym: Gnomonia
euphorbiacea Sacc. & Briard, Rev. Mycol. (Toulouse) 7: 208. 1885.Note: Monod (1983)
provided a detailed description of this species. Plagiostoma
euphorbiaceum is phylogenetically related to P. amygdalinae as
discussed under that species.(M. Monod) Sogonov, Stud.
Mycol. 62: 72. 2008
Basionym: Gnomoniella
euphorbiae-verrucosae M. Monod, Beih. Sydowia 9: 42. 1983.Note: Monod (1983)
provided a detailed description of this species.L.C. Mejía, sp. nov.
MycoBank MB515701.
Figs 3E–H,
7M–P.Etymology: exsto –standing out; collus
–neck, referring to the perithecial neck that emerges from the host
periderm.Perithecia suboblata, (186–)194–227(–278) μm etata,
(219–)269–336(–341) μm diámetro, rostrum
(197–)247–281(–382) μm longum,
(50–)53–63(–67) μm diamwtro basi,
(39–)44–49(–50) μm diametro apice. Ascosporae
ellipsoideae, uni-septatae, constrictae ubi submedianae septatae,
(9–)10–15(–16) × (2–)2–3(–4) μm,
L:l (3–)4–4.5(–6).Perithecia immersed in bark, aggregated in groups up to 12, joined
by a scanty, brownish to cream stroma, occasionally solitary, appearing as
elevations in bark where perithecial necks emerge through slit or crack in
periderm, usually ellipsoid in shape when seen from top, black, suboblate,
(186–)194–227(–278) μm high ×
(219–)269–336(–341) μm diam (mean = 216 × 293, SD
31, 49, n = 9), each with one neck. Neck marginal, slightly sulcate,
long, (197–)247–281(–382) μm long (mean = 270, SD 54, n =
9), (50–) 53–63(–67) μm diam at base (mean = 59, SD 6.1,
n = 9), (39–)44–49(–50) μm diam at apex (mean = 46, SD
3.7, n = 9). Asci cylindric to clavate,
(15–)39–57(–76) × (3.5–)6.5–11(–13)
μm (mean = 49.5 × 8.5, SD 15.1, 2.6, n = 26), apical ring
1.5–3.5 μm diam, with eight ascospores arranged biseriate.
Ascospores ellipsoid, tapering to rounded ends, 1-septate,
constricted at submedian septum, (9–) 10–15(–16) ×
2–3(–4) μm (mean = 12.5 × 3.0, SD 2.4, 0.7, n = 49), l: w
(3–)4–4.5(–6) (mean = 4.3, SD 0.4, n = 49), usually with at
least four refractive circular bodies in each ascospore, two large ones on
each side of septum, one smaller one at end of each cell.Cultures: Moderate to fast growth on PDA after 7 d a.c.d. 4.3 cm
(SD 1, n = 16), thin aerial mycelium appearing velvety, margin fringed,
stringy, whitish to buff 45 or vinaceous buff 86 from top, with a slightly to
pronounced halo of thick, white mycelium extending about 2 cm from centre,
reverse whitish to buff 45.Habitat and host: On dead, still attached, overwintered twigs of
Corylus californica (Betulaceae).Distribution: USA (Oregon).Holotype: USA, Oregon, Jackson Co., Upper Rogue River,
River Bridge Campground, on Corylus californica, 20 May 2008, L.C.
Mejía 468, BPI 878961, derived culture
CBS 127663 =
LCM468.01.Specimens examined: USA, Oregon, Jackson Co., River Bridge
Campground, Upper Rogue River, on Corylus californica, 20 May 2008,
L.C. Mejía 469, BPI 878962; on Corylus californica, 21 May
2008, L.C. Mejía 422, BPI 878959, derived culture LCM422.02; on
Corylus californica, 21 May 2008, L.C. Mejía 472, BPI 878963,
derived culture LCM472.01; Upper Rogue River trail, on Corylus
californica, 21 May 2008, L.C. Mejía 473, BPI 878964, derived
culture LCM473.01; Oregon, Lane Co., Willamette National Forest, Salmon Creek,
22 May 2008. L.C. Mejía 483, BPI 878965, derived culture LCM483.01; on
Corylus californica, 23 May 2008, L.C. Mejía 464, BPI 878960,
derived culture LCM464.(Redlin & Stack) Sogonov, Stud.
Mycol. 62: 72. 2008.
Basionym: Gnomoniella fraxini Redlin
& Stack, Mycotaxon 32:185. 1988.Note: This species, often as its anamorph referred to as
Discula fraxinea (Peck) Redlin & Stack, causes an anthracnose
disease of ash and fringetree (Oleaceae) known most commonly in the
eastern and midwestern United States, rarely from Oregon
(Gregory ,
Rossman ).
Redlin & Stack (1988)
provided a detailed description of this species as Gnomoniella
fraxini.(Hollós) Sogonov, Stud. Mycol.
62: 72. 2008.
Basionym: Gnomonia geranii Hollós,
Annls. Mus. Nat. Hung. 7: 52. 1909.≡ Rostrocoronophora geranii (Hollós) Munk, Dansk Bot.
Arkiv 15: 98. 1953.Note: Müller & Arx
(1962) and Monod
(1983) provided detailed
descriptions of this species as Gnomonia geranii.L.C. Mejía, sp.
nov. MycoBank
MB515702. Figs
3I–M,
7Q–R.Etymology: imperceptibile referring to the very short,
non-protruding neck, thus the species is difficult to see in nature.Perithecia globosa, (289–)309–356(–414) μm elata,
(385–)412–462(–504) μm diametro, rostrum breve,
(136–)175–211(–225) μm longum, cum expansa area,
disciformi vertice visu, simili collo in sectione,
(251–)301–318(–351) μm diametro ubi latissima,
(87–)89–100(–113) μm diametro apice. Ascosporae
reniformes vel oblongo-ellipticae, uniseptatae, constrictae ubi septatae,
(18–)19–20(–21) × (5–)6–7(–8) μm,
L:l (2.5–)2.9–3.1(–3.8).Perithecia immersed in bark, solitary, appearing as slight
elevations of periderm, central area pale, delimited by black halo from which
apex of neck protrudes, black, globose, (289–)309–356(–414)
μm high × (385–)412–462(–504) μm diam (mean =
338 × 437, SD 44, 41, n = 7), each with one neck. Neck central
to eccentric, short, with apex scarcely protruding through a tiny slit, with
neck expanded below epidermis, disk-like when seen from above, like a thick
collar in section, with black halo or circular black spot through epidermis or
black when exposed, (136–)175–211(–225) μm long (mean =
189, SD 38, n = 4), (251–)301–318(–351) μm diam at widest
point (mean = 307, SD 36.3, n = 5), (87–)89–100(–113) μm
diam at apex (mean = 97.5, SD 10.5, n = 5). Asci ovoid elongate,
often with long, slender, persistent stalk, (67–)76–80(–87)
× (13–)18–21(–24) μm (mean = 77.5 × 19.5, SD
4.9, 3.1, n = 11), apical ring 3.0–4.5 μm diam, with eight ascospores
arranged obliquely parallel to multiseriate. Ascospores renoid to
oblong-ellipsoid, slightly tapering to broadly rounded ends, slightly curved,
one median septum, slightly constricted, (18–)19–20(–21)
× (5–)6–7(–8) μm (mean = 19.5 × 6.5, SD 0.9,
0.6, n = 45), l: w (2.5–)3(–4) (mean = 3, SD 0.3, n = 45), with
granular cytoplasm.Cultures: Moderate growth on PDA after 7 d a.c.d. 4 cm (SD 0.4, n
= 4), thin aerial mycelium of velvety, powdery texture, margin stringy, colour
grey becoming vinaceous buff 86 from the top, reverse isabelline 65.Habitat and host: On twigs of Salix sp.
(Salicaeae).Distribution: USA (California).Holotype: USA, California, Shasta Co., Cow Creek, close to
Old Station, on Salix sp., 18 May 2008, L.C. Mejía 456, BPI
878967, derived cultures LCM456.01 and LCM456.02 =
CBS 127495.Note: Plagiostoma imperceptibile has an expanded neck
similar to other species in the clade, specifically P. apiculatum, P.
convexum, P. dilatatum, and P. pulchellum
(Fig. 1).L.C. Mejía, sp. nov.
MycoBank MB515703.
Figs 4A–C,
7S–T.Etymology: oregonense –from Oregon, referring to
the only state in the USA where it was collected.Perithecia subglobosa, (261–)270–326(–373) μm elata,
(369–)381–400(–407) μm diametro; rostrum breve,
(156–)168–182(–185) μm longum, cum expansa area,
disciformi vertice visu, simili collo in sectione,
(176–)182–204(–221) μm diametro ubi latissima,
119–120(–121) μm diametro apice. Ascosporae latoellipticae vel
ellipticae, uni-septatae, constrictae medianae vel submedianae septatae,
(16–)17–19(–22)×(4–)6(–7) μm, L:l
(2.6–)2.9–3.2(–4.0).Perithecia immersed in bark, solitary, evident as conic-shaped
elevation of periderm with neck protruding, black, globose to subglobose,
(261–)270–326(–373) μm high ×
(369–)381–400(–407) μm diam (mean = 304 × 389, SD
60, 19, n = 3), each with one neck. Neck eccentric or lateral,
expanded, usually attached to periderm, (156–)168–182(–185)
μm long (mean = 173, SD 16, n = 3), (176–)182–204(–221)
μm diam at base (mean = 195, SD 23, n = 3),
(119–)119–120(–121) μm diam at apex (mean = 120, SD 1.0,
n = 3). Asci cylindric, (74–)78–92(–95) ×
(12–)15–17(–19) μm (mean = 86 × 16, SD 8, 2, n =
10), apical ring 2.8–4.0 μm diam, looks like a stretched hexagon,
with eight ascospores arranged obliquely parallel or biseriate.
Ascospores broadly ellipsoid to ellipsoid, with rounded ends,
1-septate, constricted at median to submedian septum,
(16–)17–19(–22) × (4.5–)5.5–6(–7)
μm (mean = 18.0 × 6.0, SD 1.5, 0.5, n = 36), l: w
(2.6–)2.9–3.2(–4.0) (mean = 3.1, SD 0.3, n = 36), with
granular cytoplasm.Cultures: Moderate growth on PDA after 7 d a.c.d. 4.6 cm (SD 0.1,
n = 2), thin aerial mycelium of felty texture, margin fringed, stringy,
central area white, with a halo of aerial mycelium 1.5 cm from centre,
marginal area buff 45m, reverse with a central circular area of 2 cm diam fawn
87.Habitat and host: On overwintered branches of Salix sp.
(Salicaceae).Distribution: USA (Oregon).Holotype: USA, Oregon, Lincoln Co., Fogarty Creek, on
Salix sp., 24 May 2008, L.C. Mejía 597, BPI 878968, derived
culture LCM597.01 = CBS
126124.L.C. Mejía, sp. nov.
Figs 4D–H,
7U–V.Etymology: ovalis - ovoid; sporum - spore,
referring to the ovoid shape of the ascospores.Perithecia globosa, (246–)277–363(–385) μm elata,
(394–)403–414(–427) μm diametro; rostrum breve,
(131–)146–159(–162) μm longum, apice cupulatum,
(125–)136–153(–194) μm basi,
(113–)117–160(–168) μm diametro apice. Ascosporae
ovoideae, non-septatae, (12–)14–16(–17) ×
(7–)7–8(–9) μm, L:l (1.6–)
1.8–2.0(–2.2). Perithecia immersed in bark, solitary, or
in groups up to five, usually in a row, scattered, erumpent, appearing as
raised, conical area of bark periderm, with neck protruding through slit or
hole, black, globose, (246–)277–363(–385) μm high ×
(394–)403–414(–427) μm diam (mean = 322 × 409, SD
57, 11, n = 6), each with one neck. Neck lateral, short and thick,
apex cupulate, (131–)146–159(–162) μm long (mean = 151,
SD 12, n = 6), (125–)136–153(–194) μm diam at base (mean
= 150, SD 24, n = 6), (113–)117–160(–168) μm diam at apex
(mean = 139, SD 24, n = 6). Asci cylindric to obclavate,
(63.5–) 68.5–75.5(–87.5) ×
(12.5–)14.5–17(–18) μm (mean = 72 × 15.5, SD 6.5,
1.5, n = 19), apical ring 3.5–4.5 μm diam, with eight ascospores
arranged obliquely parallel to biseriate. Ascospores ovoid,
non-septate, appearing double-walled, more evident when stained with cotton
blue lactophenol or Melzer's reagent, (12–)14–16(–17)
× 7–8(–9) μm (mean = 15 × 7.5, SD 1.2, 0.5, n =
35), l: w (1.6–)1.8–2(–2.2) (mean = 1.9, SD 0.1, n =
35).Cultures: Moderate growth on PDA after 7 d a.c.d. 4.2 cm (SD 0.1,
n = 2), thin aerial mycelium of felty texture, margin fringed, like roots,
whitish, with denser mycelium in centre within a radius of 1 cm, reverse buff
45 becoming dark grey, whitish in the margin.Habitat and host: On dead twigs of Salix sp.
(Salicaceae).Holotype:USA, Idaho, Idaho Co., near Burgdorf, Burgdorf Rd.
FR246, parking area at camping site at Three Mile Creek, approx. GPS: N45°
18.139 W 115° 55.782, elevation 6309 ft, on dead twigs of Salix
sp., 5 Sep. 2008 (NAMA Annual Foray, Orson K. Miller Jr. Memorial Foray), A.M.
Minnis s.n., BPI 878969, derived culture
CBS 124977 =
LCM458.01.Notes: This species differs from other species of
Plagiostoma by having ovoid, non-septate ascospores. The other two
known species of Plagiostoma with non-septate ascospores, P.
euphorbiae-verrucosae and P. fraxini, occur on hosts other than
Salix and their ascospores are ellipsoid-fusoid. Unlike P.
dilatatum, P. ovalisporum does not have a circular black halo or spot at
the point where the perithecial necks emerge through the periderm.(Peck) Sogonov, Stud. Mycol. 62:
72. 2008.
Basionym: Sphaeria petiolophila Peck, Annual
Rep. New York State Mus. 35: 144. 1884.≡ Gnomonia petiolophila (Peck) Berl. & Voglino,
Syll. Fung. Addit. 1–4: 90. 1886.≡ Cryptodiaporthe petiolophila (Peck) M.E. Barr, Mycol. Mem.
7: 136. 1978.Notes: Barr (1978)
provided a detailed description of this species as Cryptodiaporthe
petiolophila.(Fuckel) L.C. Mejía, comb.
nov. MycoBank
MB515705.
Basionym:
Cryptospora populina Fuckel, Jahrb. Nassauischen Vereins Naturk.
23/24: 193. 1870.= Diaporthe populea Sacc. in Mouton, Bull. Soc. Roy. Bot. Belgique
26: 174. 1887 fide Butin
(1958).≡ Cryptodiaporthe populea (Sacc.) Butin, Sydowia 11: 31.
1958 [1957].Moderate to fast growth on PDA after 7 d a.c.d. 3.3 cm (SD 1.2, n = 8),
thin aerial mycelium of velvety or felty texture, whitish to buff 45 or rosy
buff 6 in central area and isabeline 65 in the margin, with some droplets
(honey 64) in the centre, with fringed margin appearing like roots, reverse
whitish to fawn 87 or honey 64, in some cultures becoming dark and with a
concentric halo light. Cultures are illustrated in
Fig. 8A–D.
Fig. 8.
Culture morphology. A–D. Plagiostoma populinum. A–B.
CBS 144.57.
C–D. CBS
174.58. E–J. P. pulchellum. E–F. LCM 438.04.
G–H. LCM 371.02. I–J. LCM 623.01. K–L. P.
salicellum. CBS
126121 = LCM449.01. M–P. P. samuelsii. M–N.
Ex-type CBS 125668
= LCM 454.04. O–P. LCM 596.01. Q–V. P. versatile.
Q–R. Ex-type CBS
124978 = LCM 594.01. S–T. LCM 595.01. U–V. LCM 598.01.
W–X. P. yunnanense. Ex-type
CBS 124979 = LCM
513.03. A–D, G–H, W–X. Colony habit, 10 d, 23 °C.
E–F, K–N. Colony habit, 9 d, 23 °C. I–J, O–V.
Colony habit, 7 d, 23 °C. A, C, E, G, I, K, M, O, Q, S, U, W. Reverse. B,
D, F, H, J, L, N, P, R, T, V, X. Surface.
Morphology on natural substrate. A–C: Plagiostoma oregonenseBPI 878968 (holotype). D–H. P. ovalisporum: BPI 878969
(holotype). I–M. P. pulchellum: I, M = BPI 878971, J = BPI
878974, K–L = BPI 878972. Bars = (A, D, I) 1 mm; (K) 300 μm; (B, E,
J) 100 μm; (H, L–M) 20 μm; (C, F–G) 10 μm.Notes: Butin (1958)
presented a full description with illustrations of this species as
Cryptodiaporthe populea. Because the name Cryptodiaporthe
populina (Fuckel) Petr. based on Valsa populina Fuckel was
already occupied in Cryptodiaporthe, Butin
(1958) based his new
combination on Diaporthe populea Sacc. When placed in
Plagiostoma the basionym Cryptospora populina Fuckel
provides the oldest epithet for this species.(Sacc. & Briard) L.C.
Mejía, comb. nov. MycoBank
MB515706. Figs
4I–M,
8E–J.
Basionym:
Diaporthe pulchella Sacc. & Briard in Sacc., Atti Ist. Veneto
Sci. 2, Ser. 6, 437. 1884.≡ Cryptodiaporthe pulchella (Sacc. & Briard) Butin,
Phytopathol. Z. 32: 407. 1958.= Diaporthe recedens Sacc., Ann. Mycol. 12: 290 1914 fide
Butin (1958).Perithecia immersed in bark, solitary, often growing close
together, appearing initially as slight elevation of periderm, with black halo
or black spot where apex protrudes through a small hole, black, globose,
(311–)371–473(–613) μm high ×
(467–)483–642(–660) μm diam (mean = 435 × 563, SD
128, 99, n = 4), each with one neck. Neck central to eccentric,
straight to oblique, with an expanded disk-like area, initially below
epidermis, becoming exposed with time, producing black halo or spot at
surface, (169–)173–319(–388) μm long (mean = 257, SD 105,
n = 4), (153–)209–256(–306) μm diam at widest point (mean
= 231, SD 62.5, n = 4), (93–)99–160(–212) μm diam at apex
(mean = 137, SD 54, n = 4). Asci ovoid elongated,
(75–)85–107(–117) × (15–)17–21(–24)
μm (mean = 95 × 19, SD 13.5, 3.0, n = 15), apical ring 4–4.8
μm diam, very thick, with eight ascospores arranged obliquely parallel to
multiseriate. Ascospores oblong ellipsoid-elongated, slightly
tapering, with rounded ends, straight to slightly curved, one median to
submedian septum, not constricted, (17–)18–22(–27) ×
(5–)6–7(–7.5) μm (mean = 20.3 × 6.3, SD 2.9, 0.6, n
= 39), l: w (2.5–)2.9–3.4(–4.4) (mean = 3.2, SD 0.4, n =
39), with granular cytoplasm.Cultures: Moderate growth on PDA after 7 d a.c.d. 3.9 cm (0.8 n =
6), thin aerial mycelium whitish to rosy vinaceous 58 colour, of velvety,
granular texture due to mycelial clumps ca. 500 um diam, isabeline
65, produced in central area of 2.4 cm diam, central area appearing often
moist, margin translucent to buff 45, with hyphae extending radially, stringy,
becoming fringed toward margin; reverse whitish to rosy vinaceous 58 or
olivaceous. At 14 d small black and dark green slimy droplet surrounded by a
second halo rosy vinaceous 58 with white greyish margin, reverse same colour
pattern.Habitat and host: On dead, still attached branches of Populus
balsamifera, Populus sp., Salix babylonica, S. humboldtiana and
S. lucida (Salicaceae).Distribution: North America, South America (Argentina), and
Europe.Type specimen: France, Troyes, on branch of Populus
alba cv. pyramidalis, Briard n. 5, PAD-not available.Specimens examined: Argentina, Tucumán, vicinity of
Villa Nougués, on twigs of Salix humboldtiana, 16 Nov 2008,
L.C. Mejía 623, BPI 878974, derived cultures LCM623.01 and
LCM623.03.Netherlands, ex leaf of Populus balsamifera,
(CBS 170.69 as
Cryptodiaporthe pulchella. USA, Maryland, Prince George's Co.,
Beltsville, USDA-BARC, outside of B011A, on twigs of Salix
babylonica, 3 Mar 2008, Amy Y. Rossman & L.C. Mejía 365, BPI
878971, derived culture LCM365.04 =
CBS 126653;
Maryland, Prince George's Co., Greenbelt, Lake Artemisia, on twigs of
Salix babylonica, 15 Mar 2008, L.C. Mejía 371, BPI
878972, derived culture LCM371.02; Washington, Kitsap Co., Kitsap Memorial
State Park, on twigs of Salix lucida, 28 May 2008, L.C. Mejía
438, BPI 878973, derived cultures LCM438.03 (=
CBS 126122) and
LCM438.04.Notes: Butin (1958)
refers to this species as saprobic on Populus spp. The evidence
presented in this study shows that this species also infects Salix
spp. and has a more extensive geographic distribution than previously
reported.(Auersw.) Sogonov, Stud. Mycol. 62:
72. 2008.
Basionym: Gnomonia rhododendri Auersw. in Gonn.
& Rabenh., Mycol. Europ. 5/6: 26. 1869.≡ Apiognomonia rhododendri (Auersw.) Remler, Bibliotheca
Mycologica 68: 74. 1979.Note: Remler (1979
as A. rhododendri) and Monod
(1983 as G.
rhododendri) presented descriptions of this species.(Desm.) Sogonov, Stud. Mycol. 62:
73. 2008.
Basionym: Sphaeria robergeana Desm., Ann. Sci.
Nat. Bot. ser. 3, 16: 306. 1851.≡ Diaporthe robergeana (Desm.) Niessl. in Rabenh., Fungi
Europ. 2222. 1882.≡ Cryptodiaporthe robergeana (Desm.) Wehm., The Genus
Diaporthe Nitschke and its Segregates p. 200. 1933.Note: Wehmeyer
(1933) provided a description
of this species as Cryptodiaporthe robergeana.(Fr.) Sogonov, Stud. Mycol. 62: 73.
2008. Fig.
5A–H.
Basionym: Sphaeria salicella Fr.,
Syst. Mycol. 2: 377. 1823.≡ Diaporthe salicella (Fr.) Sacc., Mycotheca Venet. 135.
1873.≡ Gnomonia salicella (Fr.) J. Schröt., Pilze Schles. 3,
2: 392.1897.≡ Chorostate salicella (Fr.) Traverso, Fl. Ital. Crypt. 2:
203. 1906.≡ Cryptodiaporthe salicella (Fr.) Wehm., The Genus
Diaporthe Nitschke and its Segregates p. 193. 1933.Perithecia immersed in bark, solitary or in groups up to five,
scattered, evident as slight elevation of periderm, black, subglobose,
(157–)208–308(–331) μm high ×
(339–)372–410(–507) μm diam (mean = 257 × 397, SD
60, 43, n = 11), each with one neck. Neck cylindrical, eccentric to
lateral, surrounded by a whitish stroma, (96–)147–202(–308)
μm long (mean = 177, SD 67, n = 11), (61–)80–84(–95)
μm diam at base (mean = 81, SD 8.8, n = 11),
(54–)74–85(–91) μm diam at apex (mean = 79, SD 10, n =
11). Asci cylindric to clavate, (40–)51.5–59(–63)
× (11–)13–14(–15) μm (mean = 55 × 13, SD 5.8,
1.4, n = 15), with apical ring 2.0–3.5 μm diam, with eight ascospores
arranged obliquely parallel or irregularly seriate. Ascospores
ellipsoid-elongated, slightly tapering toward rounded ends, 1-septate, often
with short appendages 1.5–2 μm, slightly constricted at median to
submedian septum, (14–)17–20(–27) ×
3–4(–5) μm (mean = 18.5 × 3.5, SD 2.3, 0.5, n = 57), l: w
(3.2–)5.2–6.6(–8.7) (mean = 5.9, SD 1.1, n = 57), with
granular cytoplasm.Habitat and host: On dead, still attached branches of Salix
alba, S. repens, and Salix sp. (Salicaceae).Distribution: Europe.Lectotype of Sphaeria salicella designated here: Scleromyceti
Sueciae 188 issued 1821, Sbarbaro Collection, BPI exsiccati).Epitype of Sphaeria salicella designated here: Austria, St.
Margareten im Rosental, Kaernten, Drau-Auen. 9452/1, as Cryptodiaporthe
apiculata on Salix alba, 2 May 2002, W. Jaklitsch 1889, BPI
843527, derived culture CBS
121466.Additional specimen examined: Germany, Langen, on Salix
repens, L.C. Mejía, BPI 878975, derived culture
CBS 126121 = LCM
449.01.Morphology on natural substrate. A–H: Plagiostoma
salicellum: A, B, D, G = Scleromyceti Sueciae 188 (lectotype), C, E, F, H
= BPI 843527 (epitype); note whitish stromatic tissue surrounding perithecial
neck in Figs 5.5 B and C. I–O: P. samuelsii: I, M, P =
BPI 878977 (holotype), N–O = BPI 878979. Bars = (A) 1 mm; (I) 500 μm;
(C, J) 200 μm; (B, K) 100 μm; (D–G) 20 μm; (H, L–P) 10
μm.Notes: The application of the name Sphaeria salicella Fr.
has been the source of confusion and the subject of taxonomic studies since
the 1800's. It was clearly specified by Fries
(1823) that this name is
typified by Fries: Scleromyceti Sueciae 188 issued in 1821. According to
Wehmeyer (1933) and Butin
(1958) confusion about this
name was in part due to the fact that different parts of exsiccati
Scleromyceti Sueciae 188 contain different species. One of the two species has
the narrowly ellipsoid, elongated ascospores of P. salicellum while
the other has the broadly ellipsoid ascospores of P. apiculatum. Not
recognising the confusion regarding Scleromyceti Sueciae 188, Petrak
(1921) wrongly suggested that
S. salicella was characterised by having broadly ellipsoid ascospores
and made a new combination Cryptodiaporthe salicella (Fr.) Petr. in
addition to the new combination C. apiculata (Wallr.) Petr. based on
S. apiculata Wallr. The latter species was wrongly considered to have
narrowly ellipsoid, elongated ascospores. It is not clear if Petrak
(1921) looked at the type
specimen of S. apiculata or if he based his conclusions solely on the
description of S. apiculata by Wallroth (1833).Wehmeyer (1933) arrived at
a conclusion different from that of Petrak
(1921). Wehmeyer
(1933) studied the exsiccati
Scleromyceti Sueciae 188 at the Farlow Herbarium and determined that this
number and hence S. salicella Fr. were characterised by having
narrowly ellipsoid, elongated ascospores. To use his words, S.
salicella represents “the narrow-spored species”. He
synonymised S. salicella Fr. with C. apiculata (Wallr.)
Petr. and published the combination C. salicella (Fr.) Wehm.
(1933) non Petrak
(1921). In addition, Wehmeyer
(1933) made the new
combination C. salicina (Curr.) Wehm. based on S. salicina
Curr. for species having broadly ellipsoid ascospores (see notes under P.
convexum). Later Butin
(1958) studied species of
Cryptodiaporthe on Populus and Salix, examined
Scleromyceti Sueciae 188 at Uppsala Herbarium, and suggested that S.
salicella should be understood as the species with broadly ellipsoid
ascospores and followed Petrak's concept of S. salicella.We studied the Scleromyceti Sueciae 188 (Sbarbaro collection) available at
the BPI Herbarium as well as other exsiccati of taxa that have been
synonymised with S. salicella and C. salicina including
S. apiculata. In doing so we paid close attention to the original
descriptions of S. apiculata Wallr. and S. salicella Fr. In
referring to Scleromyceti Sueciae 188 Fries
(1823) described S.
salicella as having a powdery “albicant” (whitish) stroma and
that the multiple ostioles are “erumpent simultaneously”. The
specimen of Scleromyceti Sueciae 188 at BPI includes all of these
morphological characters and has ascospores that are ellipsoid elongated (see
Fig. 5A, B, D, and G).In their treatment of Plagiostoma, Sogonov et al.
(2008) made the combination
Plagiostoma salicellum (Fr.) Sogonov. In our study of P.
salicellum we noticed that ascospore length and width can be quite
variable, even within an ascus, but with a prevalence of elongated ascospores
(Fig. 5A–H). A second
specimen, BPI 878975 from Germany on Salix repens, was sequenced and
determined to be conspecific with the epitype of P. salicellum within
a major clade containing two other species having cylindrical ostioles and
ellipsoid elongated ascospores. Unlike the lectotype and epitype of P.
salicellium, the ascospores of BPI 878975 are ellipsoid but not
elongated. In spite of this difference in ascospore morphology, BPI 878975 is
P. salicellum based on the cylindrical perithecial neck surrounded by
a whitish stroma as well as DNA sequence data.In summary Plagiostoma salicellum is characterised by having
cylindrical perithecial necks surrounded by a whitish stroma and ascospores
predominantly ellipsoid-elongated, less commonly ellipsoid, tapering to
slightly acute, rounded ends (Fig.
5D–G), unlike P. apiculatum that has oblong
ellipsoid to renoid, broadly rounded ascospores
(Fig. 2H–J).L.C. Mejía, sp. nov.
MycoBank MB515707.
Figs 5I–O,
8M–P.Etymology: Named in honour of distinguished mycologist Gary J.
Samuels for his outstanding contributions to the systematics of
Pyrenomycetes.Perithecia subglobosa, (192–)204–258(–305) μm elata,
(295–)302–327(–334) μm diametro, rostrum conicum,
(114–)128–161(–170) μm longum,
(69–)72–74(–81) μm diametro basi,
(58–)62–73(–78) μm diametro apice. Ascosporae ellipticae,
uni-septatae, constrictae ubi medianae vel submedianae septatae,
(10–)11–12(–19) × 3–4 μm, appendiculatae
duabus extremitatibus, anguste filiformes, ascosporis vulgo 2-plo longiores,
appendices deliquescentes.Perithecia immersed in bark, solitary or in groups up to five,
scattered on substrate, evident as conical shaped elevations of host periderm
with necks protruding through small holes in periderm, black, subglobose,
(192–)204–258(–305) μm high ×
(295–)302–327(–334) μm diam (mean = 239 × 313, SD
43, 16, n = 6), each with one neck. Neck eccentric to lateral,
surrounded by a whitish stroma, cone-shaped with rounded apex,
(114–)128–161(–170) μm long (mean = 145, SD 23, n = 6),
(69–)72–74(–81) μm at base (mean = 73.8, SD 3.9, n = 6),
(58–)62–73(–78) μm at apex (mean = 67.5, SD 8.0, n = 6).
Asci cylindric to clavate, (32–)42–62(–79) ×
(6–)7–11(–12) μm (mean = 53 × 9, SD 13, 2.1, n =
24), apical ring 1.8–3.6 μm diam, with eight ascospores arranged
obliquely parallel or biseriate. Ascospores ellipsoid, 1-septate,
constricted at median to submedian septum, with two deliquescent appendages,
one at end of each cell, narrowly filiform, usually twice the length of
ascospores, (10–)11–12(–19) × 3–4 μm (mean =
12 × 3.5, SD 1.4, 0.2, n = 48), l: w
(2.8–)3.2–3.5(–4.8) (mean = 3.4, SD 0.4, n = 48), with four
refractive bodies in each cell, two big ones near septum, one smaller one at
end of each cell.Cultures: Fast growth on PDA after 7 d reaching edge of petri
plates of 6 cm diam (n = 8), thin aerial mycelium of felty to granular
texture, fringed, stringy margin, with concentric halo of dense mycelium 1.4
cm from centre, buff 45 inside halo or central region, white toward margin,
some cultures with depression at concentric halo, reverse honey 64 developing
a halo fawn 87 near margin.Habitat and host: On dead, still attached twigs and branches of
Alnus incana var. tenuifolia, A. rubra, and Alnus
spp. (Betulaceae).Distribution: USA (California, Oregon, Washington).Holotype: USA, California, Plumas Co., Little Last Chance
Creek, Chilcook Campground, on Alnus incana var. tenuifolia,
17 May 2008, L.C. Mejía 454, BPI 878977, derived
CBS 125668 =
LCM454.04.Specimens examined: USA, Oregon, Jackson Co., Upper Rogue
River, on Alnus (tenuifolia?), 21 May 2008, L.C.
Mejía 419, BPI 878976, derived culture LCM419.01 and LCM419.02; Upper
Rogue River trail on Alnus sp. 21 May 2008, L.C. Mejía 474,
BPI 878978, derived culture LCM474.01; Washington, Clallam Co., Crescent Lake,
on Alnus rubra (branch on soil), 27 May 2008, L.C. Mejía 596,
BPI 878979, derived culture LCM596.01.Notes: Plagiostoma samuelsii is the only species of
Plagiostoma on leaves of Alnus except for P.
jensenii M.E. Barr. Unlike P. samuelsii, P. jensenii
lacks a stroma and perithecial neck and has longer and wider ascospores
(20–30 × 4–6 μm) with very short pulvinate appendages
(Barr 1991). Most likely P.
jensenii does not belong in Plagiostoma.Morphology on natural substrate. A–C. Plagiostoma versatile:
A–B = BPI 878980 (holotype), C = BPI 877702. D–F. P.
yunnanense BPI 878983 (holotype). Bars = (A, C–D, F) 200 μm; (B,
E) 10 μm.L.C. Mejía & Sogonov,
sp. nov. MycoBank
MB515708. Figs
6A–C,
8Q–V.Etymology: versatile –versatile, referring to the
occurrence of this species on different plant organs, twigs, branches, and
leaves; and to the variable nature of the perithecia that grow with short
necks on twigs and branches and with medium to long necks on leaves.Perithecia subglobosa, (178–)194–317(–345) μm elata,
(232–)264–378(–444) μm diametro; rostrum cylindricum,
(60–)77–137(–226) μm longum,
(51–)56–80(–87) μm diamtro basi,
(37–)49–60(–76) μm apice. Ascosporae elliptico-elongatae,
uni-septatae, constrictae ubi medianae vel submedianae septatae,
(18–)20–23(–25) × 3–4 μm, L:l
(4.9–)5.6–6.8(–8.6).Perithecia immersed in bark of twigs or in midvein and petioles of
adaxial and abaxial side of leaves, solitary or in pairs, scattered, on twigs
evident as slight elevations of periderm that appear black, upper part of
perithecia showing a few cell layers below epidermis, on leaves producing
swollen, raised areas on midvein, becoming highly erumpent, cracking periderm
and leaving an ellipsoidal cavity, with longer neck on leaves than on twigs,
black, subglobose, (178–)194–317(–345) μm high ×
(232–)264–378(–444) μm diam (mean = 248 × 323, SD
68.5, 78, n = 8), each with one neck. Neck eccentric to lateral,
short, ostiolar opening sulcate with four grooves,
(60–)77–137(–226) μm long (mean = 115, SD 59.7, n = 8),
(51–)56–80(–87) μm diam at base (mean = 68.5, SD 13.4, n
= 8), (37–)49–60(–76) μm diam at apex (mean = 55, SD
11.8, n = 8). Asci cylindric to clavate,
(49–)54–66(–71) × (11–)13–16(–20)
μm (mean = 60 × 15, SD 7.5, 2.5, n = 15), apical ring 2.0–3.5
μm diam, with eight ascospores arranged biseriate. Ascospores
ellipsoid elongated, slightly tapering toward rounded ends, 1-septate,
constricted at median to submedian septum, (18–)20–23(–25)
× 3–4 μm (mean = 21.5 × 3.5, SD 2.0, 0.4, n = 36), l: w
(4.9–)5.6–6.8(–8.6) (mean = 6.2, SD 1.0, n = 36), usually
with four large refractive bodies, two near septum, one in each end of
cells.Cultures: Fast growth on PDA after 7 d reaching the edge of petri
plates of 6 cm diam (n = 12), thin aerial mycelium of felty to granular
texture, margin fringed, like roots, buff 45 with clumps of white mycelium,
with a halo of elevated mycelium at 1.5 cm from centre, reverse buff 45
becoming dark, with halo visible from reverse.Habitat and hosts: On dead twigs of Salix scouleriana and
Salix sp., on overwintered leaves of Salix sp.
(Salicaceae).Distribution: USA (Oregon, Washington); Canada
(British Columbia).Holotype: USA, Washington, Jefferson Co., intersection of
Upper Hoh River Road & Route 101, on Salix scouleriana, 27 May
2008, L.C. Mejía 594, BPI 878980, derived culture
CBS 124978 =
LCM594.01.Additional specimens examined: Canada, British Columbia,
Vancouver, on overwintered dead leaves of Salix sp., 12 May 2006, M.
V. Sogonov 379, BPI 877702, derived culture
CBS 121251 =
AR4294. USA, Oregon, Lane Co., Willamette Pass, on Salix sp.,
22 May 2008, L.C. Mejía 598, BPI 878982, derived culture LCM598.01;
Washington, Jefferson Co., Hoh River Campground, on Salix
scouleriana, 27 May 2008, L.C. Mejía 595, BPI 878981, derived
culture LCM595.01.Notes: The ascospores of this species are similar to those of
Plagiostoma salicellum, however, the perithecial necks of P.
versatile lack the whitish stroma characteristic of P.
salicellum.L.C. Mejía & Zhu L. Yang,
sp. nov. MycoBank
MB515709. Figs
6D–F,
8W–X.Etymology: referring to the place where this species was
collected: Yunnan, China.Perithecia globosa, (231–)267–311(–318) μm elata,
(282–)312–352(–362) μm diametro, rostrum cylindricum,
contortum, (315–)318–321(–322) μm longum, (77–)
78–81(–82) μm diametro basi, (57–)59–63(–66)
μm diametro apice. Ascosporae elliptico-elongatae, uni-septatae, leviter
vel non constrictum ubi septatae, (19–)23–26(–27) ×
3–4, L:l (6. 6–)6.8–7.9(–8.2).Perithecia immersed, solitary or in groups, numerous, appearing as
conical elevations of periderm where necks protrude, black, globose,
(231–)267–311(–318) μm high ×
(282–)312–352(–362) μm diam (mean = 284 × 328, SD
48, 42, n = 3), each with one neck. Neck eccentric, contorted,
(315–)318–321(–322) μm long (mean = 319, SD 3.8, n = 3),
(77–)78–81(–82) μm diam at base (mean = 79, SD 2.4, n =
3), (57–)59–63(–66) μm diam at apex (mean = 61, SD 4.8, n
= 3). Asci not observed. Ascospores ellipsoid-elongate, with
rounded ends, 1-septate, slightly or not constricted at median to submedian
septum, (19–)23–26(–27) × 3–4 μm (mean = 24
× 3.3, SD 2.7, 0.4, n = 6), l: w (6.6–)6.8–7.9(–8.2)
(mean = 7.3, SD 0.7, n = 6), with granular cytoplasm.Cultures: Moderate growth on PDA after 7 d a.c.d. 3.4 cm (SD 0.2,
n = 4). Mycelium of granular texture, margin stringy, whitish with granules,
becoming grey or vinaceous buff, reverse with dark inclusions near centre,
most of colony whitish.Habitat and host: On dead, still attached branches of
Salix sp. (Salicaceae).Distribution: China (Yunnan).Holotype: China, Yunnan, Ailoshan, on Salix sp.,
14 Jul. 2008, L.C. Mejía 513, BPI 878983, derived cultures
CBS 124979 =
LCM513.03 and LCM513.02.
Additional names in Cryptodiaporthe and
Plagiostoma
J. Reid & Cain, Canad. J. Bot.
40: 839. 1962.Notes: A fresh specimen determined to be this species was cultured
and sequenced. Analyses of LSU and RPB2 sequences place this species in a
basal branch of the Gnomoniaceae.Specimen examined: USA, New York, Adirondacks, Cranberry
Lake, on dead branch of Acer sp., 13 Jun. 2002, L. Vasilyeva, BPI
870989, culture CBS
121465 = AR 3822.(Schwein.) Wehm., The Genus
Diaporthe Nitschke and its Segregates p. 212.
1933.
Basionym: Sphaeria aculeans Schwein., Trans. Am.
Phil. Soc., New Series 4(2): 204. 1834,. [1832].Notes: The only available culture of this species was sequenced.
Analyses of LSU sequences place this species in a clade sister to the
Melanconidaceae.Culture sequenced: Japan, on branch of Rhus
javanica, isol. G. Okada,
CBS 525.85.(Westend.) Wehm., The Genus
Diaporthe Nitschke and its Segregates 202.
1933.
Basionym: Sphaeria aubertii Westend., Bull. Acad.
R. Sci. Belg., Cl. Sci., sér. 2: tab. 7, no. 5. 1859.Notes: A culture of this species was sequenced. Analyses of this
LSU sequence suggests that this species is related to the genus
Cryptosporella within the Gnomoniaceae.Culture sequenced:Sweden, Småland, on Myrica
gale, 14 Apr. 1989, K. & L. Holm, isol. O. Constantinescu
89–53, CBS
114196.(Tul. & C. Tul.) Wehm.,
The Genus Diaporthe Nitschke and its Segregates p. 211.
1933.
Basionym: Valsa galericulata Tul. & C. Tul.,
Select. Fung. Carpol. (Paris) 2: 203. 1863.Notes: A fresh specimen determined to be this species was cultured
and sequenced. Analyses of LSU sequences suggest this species belongs in the
Sydowiellaceae.Specimen examined: USA, Tennessee, Great Smoky Mts.
National Park, near Cosby, Horse Trail, on Fagus grandifolia, 25 Mar.
2002, L. Vasilyeva, BPI 863767 ex culture AR 3811.Petr., Sydowia 5: 236.
1951.Notes: A fresh specimen determined to be this species was cultured
and sequenced. Analyses of LSU sequences place this species within the
Diaporthales but not within any described family.Specimen examined: USA, Maryland, Beltsville, on
overwintered twig of Liquidambar styraciflua, 15 May 2001, M. Barr,
isol. A. Rossman, BPI 749123 culture AR 3648 (now dead).(Dearn.) Wehm., The Genus
Diaporthe Nitschke and its Segregates p. 191.
1933.
Basionym: Diaporthe macounii Dearn., Mycologia 8:
100. 1916.Note: This species was included in the genus Gnomoniopsis
(Gnomoniaceae) by Sogonov et al.
(2008).(Delacr.) Petr., Ann. Mycol. 32:
445. 1934.
Basionym: Sphaeria vepris Delacr., Fungi
europ. 443. 1862.Notes: A fresh specimen determined to be this species was cultured
and sequenced. Analyses of LSU sequences place this species within the
Diaporthales but not in any described family.Specimen examined: Austria, Wograda, St. Margareten,
Kaernten, on Rubus idaeus, 27 Oct. 2000, W. Jaklitsch 1661, isol. A.
Rossman, BPI 749132, culture AR 3559.(Dearn. & House) M.E. Barr,
Mycol. Mem. 7: 113. 1978.
Basionym: Gnomoniopsis
acerophila Dearn. & House, Bull. New York State Mus. 233–234:
36. 1921.Notes: A fresh specimen determined to be this species was cultured
and sequenced. This species falls within the Gnomoniaceae according
to analyses of ITS sequences but not within any known genus. The perithecial
neck of this species is lateral, upright, and slightly curved at the apex.Specimens examined: USA, New York, Sullivan Co., Roscoe, on
overwintered leaves of Acer pensylvanicum, Jul. 2005, M.V. Sogonov MS
0302, BPI 877681; Tennessee, Blount Co., Great Smoky Mountains National Park,
Cades Cove, on overwintered petioles of Acer pensylvanicum, 24 May
2006, M.V. Sogonov MS 0467, BPI 877679; Sevier Co., Great Smoky Mountains
National Park, on overwintered leaves and petioles of Acer
pensylvanicum, 22 May 2006, M.V. Sogonov MS 0473, BPI 877682.(Fr.) Arx, Antonie van Leeuwenhoek 17:
264. 1951.= Sphaeria alnea Fr.: Fr., Observ. mycol. 1: 185. 1815: Syst.
Mycol. 2: 520. 1823.Notes: This species is now regarded as Gnomonia alnea
(Fr.) Sogonov and was described and illustrated in Sogonov et al.
(2008).Culture morphology. A–B. Plagiostoma aesculi.
CBS 126127 =
LCM447.01. C–F. P. apiculatum. C–D. LCM 393.01.
E–F. CBS
126126 = LCM436.01. G–H. P. barriae. LCM 601.02.
I–L. P. dilatatum. I–J. LCM 402.01. K–L. LCM
403.01. M–P. P. exstocollum. M–N. LCM 422.02. O–P.
LCM 468.02. Q–R. P. imperceptibile. LCM 456.01. S–T.
P. oregonense. Ex-type
CBS 126124 = LCM
597.01. U–V. P. ovalisporum.LCM 458.05. W–X. P.
petiolophilum. CBS
126123 = LCM 181.01. A–D, I–L, W–X. Colony
habit, 10 d, 23 °C. E–H, M–R, U–V. Colony habit, 9 d, 23
°C. S–T. Colony habit, 7 d, 23 °C. A, C, E, G, I, K, M, O, Q, S,
U, W. Reverse. B, D, F, H, J, L, N, P, R, T, V, X. Surface.Culture morphology. A–D. Plagiostoma populinum. A–B.
CBS 144.57.
C–D. CBS
174.58. E–J. P. pulchellum. E–F. LCM 438.04.
G–H. LCM 371.02. I–J. LCM 623.01. K–L. P.
salicellum. CBS
126121 = LCM449.01. M–P. P. samuelsii. M–N.
Ex-type CBS 125668
= LCM 454.04. O–P. LCM 596.01. Q–V. P. versatile.
Q–R. Ex-type CBS
124978 = LCM 594.01. S–T. LCM 595.01. U–V. LCM 598.01.
W–X. P. yunnanense. Ex-type
CBS 124979 = LCM
513.03. A–D, G–H, W–X. Colony habit, 10 d, 23 °C.
E–F, K–N. Colony habit, 9 d, 23 °C. I–J, O–V.
Colony habit, 7 d, 23 °C. A, C, E, G, I, K, M, O, Q, S, U, W. Reverse. B,
D, F, H, J, L, N, P, R, T, V, X. Surface.(Auersw.) M. Monod, Beihefte
Sydowia 9: 143. 1983.
Basionym: Gnomonia arnstadtiensis
Auersw. in Gonnerm. & Robenh., Mycol. Europ. 5/6: 22. 1869.Notes: This species is now accepted in Gnomonia according
to Sogonov et al.
(2008).(Rehm) M.E. Barr, Mycol. Mem. 7: 112.
1978.
Basionym: Hypospila bavarica Rehm, Ann. Mycol.
6:322. 1908.Note: Based on an LSU sequence, this species belongs in the
Gnomoniaceae but it cannot be placed in a genus.Culture sequenced: Switzerland, on Acer opalus, M.
Monod, CBS
772.79.(Ellis) M.E. Barr, Mycol. Mem. 7: 107.
1978.
Basionym: Diaporthe conradii Ellis, Am. Nat. 17:
316. 1883.Notes: A fresh specimen determined to be this species was cultured
and sequenced. Analysis of the LSU sequence suggests this species is closely
related to Cryptodiaporthe aubertii and Cryptosporella but
not within any known genus in the Gnomoniaceae. The perithecial neck
of this species is lateral and upright.Specimen examined: USA, New Jersey, on living stems of
Hudsonia tomentosa, G. Bills, BPI 746482, culture
CBS 109761 = AR
3488.(Auersw.) M.E. Barr, Mycol. Mem. 7:
115. 1978.
Basionym: Gnomonia inclinata Auersw. in
Rabenh., Mycol. Europ. 5/6: 27. 1869.[≡ Sphaeria inclinata Desm., Ann. Sci. Nat. Bot. III, 16:
315. 1851 non Schwein. 1832]Notes: Two isolates of this species were sequenced. This species
apparently belongs in the Gnomoniaceae but it cannot be placed in a
genus.Cultures sequenced: The Netherlands, on dead leaf of
Acer pseudoplatanus,
CBS 209.67.
Switzerland, on Acer platanoides, M. Monod,
CBS 830.79.M.E. Barr, Mycotaxon 41: 298.
1991.Note: Based on the lack of a perithecial neck and the pulvinate
appendages on the ascospores, P. jensenii most likely does not belong
in Plagiostoma.(P. Karst.) Bolay, Ber. Schweiz. Bot.
Ges. 81: 436. 1972.
Basionym: Gnomonia lugubris P.
Karst., Bidr. Känn. Finl. Nat. Folk 23: 121. 1873.Note: The disposition of this species was not investigated in this
study.(Ellis) M.E. Barr, Mycol. Mem. 7:
117. 1978.
Basionym: Gnomonia magnoliae Ellis, Amer. Nat.
17: 318. 1883.Notes: This species has been reported in leaves of Magnolia
virginiana in North America. The perithecial neck of this species is
lateral and obliquely upright as drawn by Barr
(1978). The disposition of this
species was not investigated in this study.(Ellis & Everh.) M.E. Barr,
Mycol. Mem. 7: 112. 1978.
Basionym: Diaporthe micromegala
Ellis & Everh., Proc. Acad. Nat. Sci. Philadelphia 1893: 449. 1894.Notes: This species is now placed in Ophiognomonia as
O. micromegala (Ellis & Everh.) Sogonov according to Sogonov
et al. (2008).(E. Müll.) M. Monod, Beihefte
Sydowia 9: 146. 1983.
Basionym: Plagiostigme petrakii E.
Müll., Sydowia 18:90. 1965.Note: No material of this species was located.M. Monod, Beihefte Sydowia 9:
151. 1983.Notes: ITS sequences of this species were included in a
phylogenetic analysis. Although closely related to Apiognomonia and
Plagiostoma, the results suggest that this species may represent an
undescribed genus within the Gnomoniaceae.Specimens examined: USA, New York, Adirondack Mts.,
Cranberry Lake, on petioles of Acer sp., 22 Jun. 2002, L. Vasilyeva,
BPI 843494, ex culture AR 3819; ibid., 23 Jun. 2002, L. Vasilyeva,
BPI 843495, ex culture AR 3894; Tennessee, Sevier Co., Great Smokey Mountains
National Park, on overwintered petioles of Acer saccharum,
22 May 2006, M.V. Sogonov MS 0483, BPI 877700.(Petr.) M.E. Barr, Mycol. Mem. 7:
113. 1978.
Basionym: Gnomonia robertiani Petr., Ann.
Mycol. 23: 122. 1925.Note: No material of this species was located.(Lind) Bolay, Ber. Schwiz. Bot.
Ges. 81: 436. 1971.
Basionym: Gnomoniella tormentillae
Lind, Bot. Tidsskr. 41: 217. 1931.Note: This species is now recognised as Gnomoniopsis
tormentillae (Lind) Sogonov according to Sogonov et al.
(2008).
Authors: Michael J Wingfield; Z Wilhelm De Beer; Bernard Slippers; Brenda D Wingfield; Johannes Z Groenewald; Lorenzo Lombard; Pedro W Crous Journal: Mol Plant Pathol Date: 2011-12-06 Impact factor: 5.663
Authors: P W Crous; R G Shivas; W Quaedvlieg; M van der Bank; Y Zhang; B A Summerell; J Guarro; M J Wingfield; A R Wood; A C Alfenas; U Braun; J F Cano-Lira; D García; Y Marin-Felix; P Alvarado; J P Andrade; J Armengol; A Assefa; A den Breeÿen; I Camele; R Cheewangkoon; J T De Souza; T A Duong; F Esteve-Raventós; J Fournier; S Frisullo; J García-Jiménez; A Gardiennet; J Gené; M Hernández-Restrepo; Y Hirooka; D R Hospenthal; A King; C Lechat; L Lombard; S M Mang; P A S Marbach; S Marincowitz; Y Marin-Felix; N J Montaño-Mata; G Moreno; C A Perez; A M Pérez Sierra; J L Robertson; J Roux; E Rubio; R K Schumacher; A M Stchigel; D A Sutton; Y P Tan; E H Thompson; E van der Linde; A K Walker; D M Walker; B L Wickes; P T W Wong; J Z Groenewald Journal: Persoonia Date: 2014-06-10 Impact factor: 11.051
Authors: I C Senanayake; P W Crous; J Z Groenewald; S S N Maharachchikumbura; R Jeewon; A J L Phillips; J D Bhat; R H Perera; Q R Li; W J Li; N Tangthirasunun; C Norphanphoun; S C Karunarathna; E Camporesi; I S Manawasighe; A M Al-Sadi; K D Hyde Journal: Stud Mycol Date: 2017-08-01 Impact factor: 16.097
Authors: P W Crous; J J Luangsa-Ard; M J Wingfield; A J Carnegie; M Hernández-Restrepo; L Lombard; J Roux; R W Barreto; I G Baseia; J F Cano-Lira; M P Martín; O V Morozova; A M Stchigel; B A Summerell; T E Brandrud; B Dima; D García; A Giraldo; J Guarro; L F P Gusmão; P Khamsuntorn; M E Noordeloos; S Nuankaew; U Pinruan; E Rodríguez-Andrade; C M Souza-Motta; R Thangavel; A L van Iperen; V P Abreu; T Accioly; J L Alves; J P Andrade; M Bahram; H-O Baral; E Barbier; C W Barnes; E Bendiksen; E Bernard; J D P Bezerra; J L Bezerra; E Bizio; J E Blair; T M Bulyonkova; T S Cabral; M V Caiafa; T Cantillo; A A Colmán; L B Conceição; S Cruz; A O B Cunha; B A Darveaux; A L da Silva; G A da Silva; G M da Silva; R M F da Silva; R J V de Oliveira; R L Oliveira; J T De Souza; M Dueñas; H C Evans; F Epifani; M T C Felipe; J Fernández-López; B W Ferreira; C N Figueiredo; N V Filippova; J A Flores; J Gené; G Ghorbani; T B Gibertoni; A M Glushakova; R Healy; S M Huhndorf; I Iturrieta-González; M Javan-Nikkhah; R F Juciano; Ž Jurjević; A V Kachalkin; K Keochanpheng; I Krisai-Greilhuber; Y-C Li; A A Lima; A R Machado; H Madrid; O M C Magalhães; P A S Marbach; G C S Melanda; A N Miller; S Mongkolsamrit; R P Nascimento; T G L Oliveira; M E Ordoñez; R Orzes; M A Palma; C J Pearce; O L Pereira; G Perrone; S W Peterson; T H G Pham; E Piontelli; A Pordel; L Quijada; H A Raja; E Rosas de Paz; L Ryvarden; A Saitta; S S Salcedo; M Sandoval-Denis; T A B Santos; K A Seifert; B D B Silva; M E Smith; A M Soares; S Sommai; J O Sousa; S Suetrong; A Susca; L Tedersoo; M T Telleria; D Thanakitpipattana; N Valenzuela-Lopez; C M Visagie; M Zapata; J Z Groenewald Journal: Persoonia Date: 2018-12-14 Impact factor: 11.051
Authors: P W Crous; B A Summerell; L Swart; S Denman; J E Taylor; C M Bezuidenhout; M E Palm; S Marincowitz; J Z Groenewald Journal: Persoonia Date: 2011-10-07 Impact factor: 11.051
Authors: Amy Y Rossman; Gerard C Adams; Paul F Cannon; Lisa A Castlebury; Pedro W Crous; Marieka Gryzenhout; Walter M Jaklitsch; Luis C Mejia; Dmitar Stoykov; Dhanushka Udayanga; Hermann Voglmayr; Donald M Walker Journal: IMA Fungus Date: 2015-06-04 Impact factor: 3.515