Literature DB >> 32732434

Differences in the free energies between the excited states of Aβ40 and Aβ42 monomers encode their aggregation propensities.

Debayan Chakraborty1, John E Straub2, D Thirumalai3.   

Abstract

The early events in the aggregation of the intrinsically disordered peptide, amyloid-β (Aβ), involve transitions from the disordered free energy ground state to assembly-competent states. Are the fingerprints of order found in the amyloid fibrils encoded in the conformations that the monomers access at equilibrium? If so, could the enhanced aggregation rate of Aβ42 compared to Aβ40 be rationalized from the sparsely populated high free energy states of the monomers? Here, we answer these questions in the affirmative using coarse-grained simulations of the self-organized polymer-intrinsically disordered protein (SOP-IDP) model of Aβ40 and Aβ42. Although both the peptides have practically identical ensemble-averaged properties, characteristic of random coils (RCs), the conformational ensembles of the two monomers exhibit sequence-specific heterogeneity. Hierarchical clustering of conformations reveals that both the peptides populate high free energy aggregation-prone ([Formula: see text]) states, which resemble the monomers in the fibril structure. The free energy gap between the ground (RC) and the [Formula: see text] states of Aβ42 peptide is smaller than that for Aβ40. By relating the populations of excited states of the two peptides to the fibril formation time scales using an empirical formula, we explain nearly quantitatively the faster aggregation rate of Aβ42 relative to Aβ40. The [Formula: see text] concept accounts for fibril polymorphs, leading to the prediction that the less stable [Formula: see text] state of Aβ42, encoding for the U-bend fibril, should form earlier than the structure with the S-bend topology, which is in accord with Ostwald's rule rationalizing crystal polymorph formation.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Alzheimer’s disease; Ostwald’s rule; free energy gap; polymorphism; protein aggregation

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32732434      PMCID: PMC7443889          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2002570117

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   12.779


  79 in total

1.  Molecular dynamics simulation of amyloid beta dimer formation.

Authors:  B Urbanc; L Cruz; F Ding; D Sammond; S Khare; S V Buldyrev; H E Stanley; N V Dokholyan
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 4.033

2.  Structures of the amyloid β-peptides Aβ1-40 and Aβ1-42 as influenced by pH and a D-peptide.

Authors:  Olujide O Olubiyi; Birgit Strodel
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2012-03-01       Impact factor: 2.991

3.  Effects of the Arctic (E22-->G) mutation on amyloid beta-protein folding: discrete molecular dynamics study.

Authors:  A R Lam; D B Teplow; H E Stanley; B Urbanc
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2008-12-24       Impact factor: 15.419

4.  The recombinant amyloid-beta peptide Abeta1-42 aggregates faster and is more neurotoxic than synthetic Abeta1-42.

Authors:  Verena H Finder; Ivana Vodopivec; Roger M Nitsch; Rudi Glockshuber
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2009-12-21       Impact factor: 5.469

Review 5.  Games played by rogue proteins in prion disorders and Alzheimer's disease.

Authors:  Adriano Aguzzi; Christian Haass
Journal:  Science       Date:  2003-10-31       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  Differences in nucleation behavior underlie the contrasting aggregation kinetics of the Aβ40 and Aβ42 peptides.

Authors:  Georg Meisl; Xiaoting Yang; Erik Hellstrand; Birgitta Frohm; Julius B Kirkegaard; Samuel I A Cohen; Christopher M Dobson; Sara Linse; Tuomas P J Knowles
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-06-17       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Atomic-resolution structure of a disease-relevant Aβ(1-42) amyloid fibril.

Authors:  Marielle Aulikki Wälti; Francesco Ravotti; Hiromi Arai; Charles G Glabe; Joseph S Wall; Anja Böckmann; Peter Güntert; Beat H Meier; Roland Riek
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-07-28       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Amyloid plaque core protein in Alzheimer disease and Down syndrome.

Authors:  C L Masters; G Simms; N A Weinman; G Multhaup; B L McDonald; K Beyreuther
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1985-06       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Monomeric Aβ(1-40) and Aβ(1-42) Peptides in Solution Adopt Very Similar Ramachandran Map Distributions That Closely Resemble Random Coil.

Authors:  Julien Roche; Yang Shen; Jung Ho Lee; Jinfa Ying; Ad Bax
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2016-01-27       Impact factor: 3.162

10.  Cryo-EM structure and polymorphism of Aβ amyloid fibrils purified from Alzheimer's brain tissue.

Authors:  Marius Kollmer; William Close; Leonie Funk; Jay Rasmussen; Aref Bsoul; Angelika Schierhorn; Matthias Schmidt; Christina J Sigurdson; Mathias Jucker; Marcus Fändrich
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2019-10-29       Impact factor: 14.919

View more
  10 in total

1.  Sequence Determines the Switch in the Fibril Forming Regions in the Low-Complexity FUS Protein and Its Variants.

Authors:  Abhinaw Kumar; Debayan Chakraborty; Mauro Lorenzo Mugnai; John E Straub; D Thirumalai
Journal:  J Phys Chem Lett       Date:  2021-09-13       Impact factor: 6.888

Review 2.  Unifying coarse-grained force fields for folded and disordered proteins.

Authors:  Andrew P Latham; Bin Zhang
Journal:  Curr Opin Struct Biol       Date:  2021-09-15       Impact factor: 7.786

Review 3.  Amyloid Oligomers: A Joint Experimental/Computational Perspective on Alzheimer's Disease, Parkinson's Disease, Type II Diabetes, and Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis.

Authors:  Phuong H Nguyen; Ayyalusamy Ramamoorthy; Bikash R Sahoo; Jie Zheng; Peter Faller; John E Straub; Laura Dominguez; Joan-Emma Shea; Nikolay V Dokholyan; Alfonso De Simone; Buyong Ma; Ruth Nussinov; Saeed Najafi; Son Tung Ngo; Antoine Loquet; Mara Chiricotto; Pritam Ganguly; James McCarty; Mai Suan Li; Carol Hall; Yiming Wang; Yifat Miller; Simone Melchionna; Birgit Habenstein; Stepan Timr; Jiaxing Chen; Brianna Hnath; Birgit Strodel; Rakez Kayed; Sylvain Lesné; Guanghong Wei; Fabio Sterpone; Andrew J Doig; Philippe Derreumaux
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2021-02-05       Impact factor: 60.622

4.  Improved coarse-grained model for studying sequence dependent phase separation of disordered proteins.

Authors:  Roshan Mammen Regy; Jacob Thompson; Young C Kim; Jeetain Mittal
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2021-05-24       Impact factor: 6.993

5.  Single-molecule fluorescence imaging and deep learning reveal highly heterogeneous aggregation of amyloid-β 42.

Authors:  Fanjie Meng; Janghyun Yoo; Hoi Sung Chung
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2022-03-15       Impact factor: 12.779

6.  Global Structure of the Intrinsically Disordered Protein Tau Emerges from Its Local Structure.

Authors:  Lukas S Stelzl; Lisa M Pietrek; Andrea Holla; Javier Oroz; Mateusz Sikora; Jürgen Köfinger; Benjamin Schuler; Markus Zweckstetter; Gerhard Hummer
Journal:  JACS Au       Date:  2022-03-01

Review 7.  Conformational Variability of Amyloid-β and the Morphological Diversity of Its Aggregates.

Authors:  Maho Yagi-Utsumi; Koichi Kato
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2022-07-26       Impact factor: 4.927

8.  Small Angle X-ray Scattering Sensing Membrane Composition: The Role of Sphingolipids in Membrane-Amyloid β-Peptide Interaction.

Authors:  Rita Carrotta; Maria Rosalia Mangione; Fabio Librizzi; Oscar Moran
Journal:  Biology (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-25

9.  Effects of subchronic dietary exposure to the engineered nanomaterials SiO2 and CeO2 in C57BL/6J and 5xFAD Alzheimer model mice.

Authors:  Adriana Sofranko; Tina Wahle; Julia Kolling; Harm J Heusinkveld; Burkhard Stahlmecke; Martin Rosenbruch; Catrin Albrecht; Roel P F Schins
Journal:  Part Fibre Toxicol       Date:  2022-03-25       Impact factor: 9.400

10.  Nanomechanical Stability of Aβ Tetramers and Fibril-like Structures: Molecular Dynamics Simulations.

Authors:  Adolfo B Poma; Tran Thi Minh Thu; Lam Tang Minh Tri; Hoang Linh Nguyen; Mai Suan Li
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2021-07-12       Impact factor: 2.991

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.