| Literature DB >> 32731648 |
Yi-Chuan Cheng1,2, Li-Chi Huang3, Chi-Hsuan Yang4, Hsing-Chi Chang4.
Abstract
This article focuses on the unique needs and concerns of nursing educators and nursing students in the face of the COVID-19 pandemic. During social distancing, interacting with other human beings has been restricted. This would undermine the experiential learning of nursing students. Hence, it is important to develop and evaluate an experiential learning program (ELP) for nursing education. A pre-test and post-test design were used. The study was conducted in a university in Central Taiwan. A total of 103 nursing students participated in the study from February to June 2019. The study intervention was the experiential learning program (ELP), including bodily experiences and nursing activities with babies, pregnant women, and the elderly. After the intervention, the students completed the self-reflection and insight scale (SRIS) and Taiwan Critical Thinking Disposition Inventory (TCTDI) as outcome measures. An independent t-test showed that there was a significant difference between pre-test and post-test in both SRIS and TCTDI (p < 0.01). The Pearson product-moment correlation analysis showed that SRIS and TCTDI were significantly positively correlated (p < 0.01). ELP has a significant impact on the self-reflection and critical thinking of first-year nursing students, which can be used as a reference for the education of nursing students. During these turbulent times, it is especially vital for faculties to provide experiential learning instead of the traditional teaching concept.Entities:
Keywords: critical thinking; experiential learning program; nurse education; self-reflection
Mesh:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32731648 PMCID: PMC7432080 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph17155442
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health ISSN: 1660-4601 Impact factor: 3.390
Comparison of scores of SRIS before and after ELP (n = 103).
| Domains of SRIS | Mean | t |
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pre-Test | Post-Test | |||
| I. Behavior | 20.59 | 21.25 | −1.98 | 0.04 * |
| II. Thoughts | 21.39 | 22.04 | −1.60 | 0.11 |
| III. Feelings | 28.35 | 29.65 | −2.53 | 0.00 ** |
| Total | 70.33 | 72.94 | −2.69 | 0.01 ** |
* p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001.
Comparison of scores of TCTDI before and after ELP (n = 103).
| Domains of TCTDI | Mean | t |
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pre-Test | Post-Test | |||
| I. | 38.62 | 42.74 | 4.42 | 0.00 *** |
| II. Open-mindedness | 17.01 | 18.87 | 4.43 | 0.00 *** |
| III. Inquisitiveness | 13.20 | 14.50 | −3.95 | 0.00 *** |
| IV. Reflective thinking | 17.42 | 19.29 | −4.30 | 0.00 *** |
| Total | 86.25 | 95.41 | −4.62 | 0.00 *** |
* p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001.
Correlation between reflection and critical thinking (n = 103).
| Variables | SRIS | TCTDI |
|---|---|---|
| SRIS | 1.00 | 0.30 * |
| TCTDI | 0.30 * | 1.00 |
* p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001.