| Literature DB >> 32731625 |
Abhishek Anand1, Delphine Chinchilla1, Christopher Tan1, Laurent Mène-Saffrané1, Floriane L'Haridon1, Laure Weisskopf1.
Abstract
Plants face many biotic and abiotic challenges in nature; one of them is attack by disease-causing microbes. Phytophthora infestans, the causal agent of late blight is one of the most prominent pathogens of the potato responsible for multi-billion-dollar losses every year. We have previously reported that potato-associated Pseudomonas strains inhibited P. infestans at various developmental stages. A comparative genomics approach identified several factors putatively involved in this anti-oomycete activity, among which was the production of hydrogen cyanide (HCN). Here, we report the relative contribution of HCN emission to the overall anti-Phytophthora activity of two cyanogenic Pseudomonas strains, P. putida R32 and P. chlororaphis R47. To quantify this contribution, we generated HCN-negative mutants (Δhcn) and compared their activities to those of their respective wild types in different experiments assessing P. infestans mycelial growth, zoospore germination, and infection of potato leaf disks. Using in vitro experiments allowing only volatile-mediated interactions, we observed that HCN accounted for most of the mycelial growth inhibition (57% in R47 and 80% in R32). However, when allowing both volatile and diffusible compound-mediated interactions, HCN only accounted for 1% (R47) and 18% (R32) of mycelial growth inhibition. Likewise, both mutants inhibited zoospore germination in a similar way as their respective wild types. More importantly, leaf disk experiments showed that both wild-type and Δhcn strains of R47 and R32 were able to limit P. infestans infection to a similar extent. Our results suggest that while HCN is a major contributor to the in vitro volatile-mediated restriction of P. infestans mycelial growth, it does not play a major role in the inhibition of other disease-related features such as zoospore germination or infection of plant tissues.Entities:
Keywords: biocontrol; hydrogen cyanide; potato late blight; pseudomonads
Year: 2020 PMID: 32731625 PMCID: PMC7464445 DOI: 10.3390/microorganisms8081144
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Microorganisms ISSN: 2076-2607
Figure 1Effect of R47 (wt and ∆hcn) and R32 (wt and ∆hcn) strains on Phytophthora infestans mycelium growth. (a,b) Volatile compound-mediated dual assay; (c,d) diffusible compound-mediated dual assay. Left panels: quantification of mycelium growth of P. infestans represented as inhibition percentages. The bars show averages (n = 3 independent assays with 3–4 technical replicates) with error bars indicating standard error of the mean. Letters indicate significant differences between treatments as per ANOVA followed by Tukey’s honestly significant difference (HSD) (threshold p < 0.05); Right panels: representative images of dual assays corresponding to the graphs on the left.
Figure 2Effect of R47 (wt and ∆hcn) and R32 (wt and ∆hcn) strains on zoospore germination. (a) Graph representing the inhibition percentages of germinated zoospores when exposed to different strains and control (unexposed to bacterial strains). The bars show averages (n = 3 independent assays with 3–4 technical replicates) with error bars indicating standard error of the mean. Letters indicate significant differences between treatments as per ANOVA followed by Tukey’s HSD (threshold p < 0.05). (b) Representative images of zoospores after 3 h incubation with or without bacterial strains at room temperature. Scale bar = 100 μm.
Figure 3Pseudomonas strains (R32 and R47) restrict the infection by P. infestans on leaf disks. (a) Left panel: representative images of leaf disks co-inoculated with Pseudomonas strains and P. infestans zoospores. Pictures were taken 6 days post-inoculation. Right panel: zoomed images of leaf disks showing P. infestans infection (white hyphal mat). (b) Quantification of infection by measuring P. infestans-specific fatty acid (EPA; C20:5) content in leaf tissues. The bars show averages (n = 3) with error bars indicating standard error of the mean. Letters indicate significant differences between treatments as per ANOVA followed by Tukey’s HSD (threshold p < 0.05).